A letter from the States General of the United Provinces of the Low Countries to the king of Great Britain, dated the 9/19 decemb. 1673

Author(s):  
Caleb Karges

The War of the Spanish Succession was a large military conflict that encompassed most of western and central Europe spawning additional fighting in the Americas and the world’s oceans. Hostilities began with the invasion of Lombardy by imperial forces in 1701 and were concluded be the treaties of Utrecht (1713), Rastatt, and Baden (1714). The trigger for the war was the long-anticipated death of the childless King Charles II of Spain in 1700 and his will, which ignored several partition treaties signed by other powers and passed the entirety of the Spanish monarchy to Louis XIV of France’s grandson, Philip, Duke of Anjou (Philip V of Spain). The Austrian Habsburgs under Emperor Leopold I contested the will on the behalf of his second son the Archduke Charles (Charles VI of the Holy Roman Empire). With the European balance of power jeopardized by the prospect of a Bourbon succession in Spain, the Kingdom of England (Great Britain after 1707) and the United Provinces joined the Holy Roman Emperor in forming the Grand Alliance in 1702. The Grand Alliance, heretofore referred to as the Allies, expanded to consist ultimately of the emperor of and the states of the Holy Roman Empire (with a few notable exceptions), Great Britain, the United Provinces, Portugal, and the Duchy of Savoy-Piedmont. The pro-Bourbon alliance opposing the Grand Alliance consisted of France, Spain, the Electorate of Bavaria, and the Archbishopric of Cologne. The main military operations largely occurred along the frontiers of France and in the Spanish possessions in Europe such as the Spanish Netherlands, Italy, and the Iberian Peninsula. Of notable exception were the Bavarian campaigns in 1703 and 1704. Throughout the war, each side tried to exploit real and potential revolts/insurgencies in the other’s territory. The Allies maintained a large military presence in Catalonia and set up a rival court in Barcelona under the Archduke Charles as “Charles III of Spain.” The land war in Europe was characterized by the military victories of the Allied commanders, the Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene of Savoy in Flanders, Germany, and Italy. However, the Bourbons maintained their supremacy in Spain itself. As the war protracted, financial and political exhaustion beset all sides. Despite sustained losses bringing France to the brink of collapse, Louis XIV continued to resist until Allied resolve softened with the events of 1710 and 1711 (the Tory victory in the British elections, the battle of Brihuega, and the death of Emperor Joseph I). The war ended with the signing of the treaties of Utrecht, Rastatt, and Baden (collectively known as the Peace of Utrecht) in 1713 and 1714. The British gained significant colonial possessions and concessions from the Bourbon powers as well as the territories of Gibraltar and Minorca. The Dutch received a reinforced barrier in the Low Countries. The Austrians received Spain’s possessions in Italy and the Low Countries. Philip V retained Spain and its colonial possessions.


1992 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 350-371
Author(s):  
H.T. Dickinson

Henry St. John, Viscount Bolingbroke, was one of the Secretaries of State in Queen Anne's Tory administration of 1710–14 which sought to bring an end to the increasingly burdensome War of the Spanish Succession. Employing somewhat dubious means, he and his ministerial colleagues eventually made peace with France by the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713; a treaty which paid more attention to the interests of Great Britain than to those of her allies, the Dutch and Austrians. In seeking peace at almost any price Bolingbroke and his colleagues faced a particular problem with the former Spanish territory of the Southern Netherlands (or Flanders). The Dutch were particularly interested in this territory because they hoped to secure possession of strong fortresses there which would provide them with a secure barrier against a sudden attack by the French. The Austrians, for their part, hoped to gain this territory as part of the Emperor's inheritance of former Spanish possessions. Britain herself was concerned to serve her allies in this territory at least. She also had commercial interests in Flanders and had long sought an effective barrier to French efforts to expand into the Low Countries. These concerns were reflected in Bolingbroke's correspondence with Charles, Earl of Orrery, one of his Tory friends, who was appointed in 1711 as the Queen's envoy-extraordinary to the States General in The Hague and to the Council of Flanders in Brussels. Orrery served in this capacity for most of 1711. In late 1712 he returned to these duties and served there for a further year


Author(s):  
Theodore M. Porter

This chapter focuses on Adolphe Quetelet, who was among the few nineteenth-century statisticians who pursued a numerical social science of laws, not just of facts. Quetelet's contribution to statistical thought and to the mathematics of statistical analysis was a characteristic if not unsurprising product of his syncretic approach. Social physics was an elaborate metaphor that integrated his genuine concern for the advancement of scientific knowledge with his desire to turn science to the promotion of sound government and social improvement. Quetelet's fascination with the possibility of subjecting ostensibly uncontrolled social phenomena to scientific order was at the heart of his dedication to the concept of statistical laws. Characteristically, he gave this idea its fullest development in reference to such events as crime and suicide, the immoral materials for that “moral statistics” which was central to the early statistical movements in Britain and France as well as the Low Countries. The notion of statistical law achieved its fullest expression in Great Britain during the 1850s, the decade when laissez-faire liberalism reached its intellectual apogee.


1978 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-531
Author(s):  
Shirley B. Whitaker

At the expiration of the Twelve Years’ Truce in 1621, the renewal of hostilities between Spain and the United Provinces opened another phase in the long struggle for mastery of the Low Countries. From the Spanish viewpoint, one of the most heartening events in the years immediately following was the capitulation of the city of Breda, of great strategic importance by reason of its location on the main route to Utrecht and Amsterdam. The Dutch resistance was vigorous, for it was only after a siege lasting many months that the city yielded to Ambrosio Spinola, military commander of the Spanish Netherlands, on June 5, 1625. Ten days later the news reached Madrid.


2021 ◽  
pp. 219-244
Author(s):  
Martin Wight

In this essay Wight clarified the importance of dynastic legitimacy—that is, hereditary monarchy—in European history. In the Middle Ages and subsequent centuries, rulers were mainly princes who inherited their crowns. The principal exceptions were the leaders of republics, including Venice, Ragusa, Genoa, and Lucca in Italy; the Swiss confederation; and the United Provinces of the Low Countries. Dynastic principles included the theory that the ruler was chosen by God through hereditary succession, and that the monarch represented his or her subjects, notably with regard to the official religious denomination of the country. Such principles made dynastic marriages valuable means to provide heirs to the crown, to clarify succession to the throne, to consolidate alliances, to gain influence and wealth, and to legitimize territorial gains. Despite imprudent and egocentric behaviour by some royal leaders, monarchs were increasingly expected to pursue national rather than personal dynastic interests. After the Napoleonic Wars, the Congress of Vienna reaffirmed dynastic principles of legitimacy, including in Venice and the Netherlands; the Swiss confederation was a conspicuous exception. Dynastic rulers have, however, tended to become symbols and instruments of national unity and self-determination. Popular support for dynastic houses has in many cases led to popular legitimacy for constitutional monarchies.


1942 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Barltrop

Although the possibilities of linen flax cultivation in New Zealand were first explored in 1936, it was the German invasion of France and the Low Countries—the flax-producing areas of Western Europe—which caused the British Government in June 1940 to make an urgent request for New Zealand to grow up to 15,000 acres of flax and to arrange for its processing. At that time there was not, in the whole of New Zealand, more seed than would suffice for sowing 2,000 acres; and some 500 tons of seed had to be imported from Great Britain. The paper describes how the difficulties of starting a new industry at such short notice were successfully overcome. The New Zealand Government secured the co-operation of the farmers in preparing the ground, and of the railway workshops in constructing the machinery. Essential materials were in exceedingly short supply, and the author recounts the way in which those responsible for the engineering side of the industry grappled with, and overcame, the difficulties which confronted them, and shows with what measure of success their efforts in conducting the new venture were rewarded. The paper gives an account of the various processes in the production of linen flax for export, with descriptions of the machinery used, and concludes with a brief outline of the New Zealand Government's programme for 1941–2. Further statistical data relating to the industry are included in Appendixes I–IV, pp. 168–9.


Author(s):  
Bram De Ridder

The Act of Cession of 1598 is generally considered as a Habsburg failure, for it did notsucceed in the pacification and reunification of the Low Countries. By looking into thenegotiations surrounding the cession, and more specifically the arguments used to acceptor denounce the change of power from the Spanish King to the Archdukes, this articletries to uncover the reasons for its lack of success. Whilst the loyal provinces benefittedfrom extended cooperation with the dynasty, the United Provinces were not prepared torejoin Habsburg rule. This divide followed out of the growing state formation in bothparts of the Low Countries, which entailed uncomplimentary concepts of statehood.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document