Tonic and phasic influences on perceived size: Effects of visual field, stimulus eccentricity, and smooth pursuit eye movements

1. Neural pathology which impairs foveal smooth pursuit eye movements typically also degrades optokinetic pursuit of large textures, suggesting that the two kinds of pursuit share a common circuit. This study reports an exception. After sequential bilateral ablation of the pursuit area in the frontal lobe three monkeys displayed degraded pursuit of a small foveal target but performed normally on identical measures of optokinetic pursuit. 2. A related experiment in one subject demonstrated a pursuit deficit when the foveal target moved relative to the background, but not when background and target moved together. The frontal pursuit area may specifically control pursuit of relative motion, and do so by receiving signals primarily from motion detectors in the macular part of the visual field.

Download Full-text

Interference between smooth pursuit and color working memory

Journal of Eye Movement Research ◽

10.16910/jemr.10.3.6 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 10 (3) ◽

Author(s):

Shulin Yue ◽

Zhenlan Jin ◽

Chenggui Fan ◽

Qian Zhang ◽

Ling Li

Keyword(s):

Working Memory ◽

Eye Movements ◽

Visual Field ◽

Spatial Attention ◽

Smooth Pursuit ◽

Spatial Working Memory ◽

Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽

Match To Sample ◽

Pursuit Eye Movements ◽

The Relationship

Spatial working memory (WM) and spatial attention are closely related, but the relationship between non-spatial WM and spatial attention still remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the interaction between color WM and smooth pursuit eye movements. A modified delayed-match-to-sample paradigm (DMS) was applied with 2 or 4 items presented in each visual field. Subjects memorized the colors of items in the cued visual field and smoothly moved eyes towards or away from memorized items during retention interval despite that the colored items were no longer visible. The WM performance decreased with higher load in general. More importantly, the WM performance was better when subjects pursued towards rather than away from the cued visual field. Meanwhile, the pursuit gain decreased with higher load and demonstrated a higher result when pursuing away from the cued visual field. These results indicated that spatial attention, guiding attention to the memorized items, benefits color WM. Therefore, we propose that a competition for attention resources exists between color WM and smooth pursuit eye movements.

Download Full-text

The Smooth Pursuit System

Eye Movement Disorders ◽

10.1093/oso/9780195324266.003.0011 ◽

2008 ◽

Author(s):

Agnes Wong

Keyword(s):

Eye Movements ◽

Visual Field ◽

Smooth Pursuit ◽

Moving Object ◽

Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽

En Bloc ◽

Pursuit Eye Movements ◽

Ocular Reflex ◽

Suitable Target ◽

Stationary Background

Smooth pursuit consists of conjugate eye movements that allow both eyes to smoothly track a slowly moving object so that its image is kept on the foveae. For example, smooth pursuit eye movements are used when you track a child on a swing. Only animals with foveae make smooth pursuit eye movements. Rabbits, for instance, do not have foveae, and their eyes cannot track a small moving target. However, if a rabbit is placed inside a rotating drum painted on the inside with stripes so that the rabbit sees the entire visual field rotating en bloc, it will track the stripes optokinetically. Humans have both smooth pursuit and optokinetic eye movements, but pursuit predominates. When you track a small, moving object against a detailed stationary background, such as a bird flying against a background of leaves, the optokinetic system will try to hold your gaze on the stationary background, but it is overridden by pursuit. Pursuit works well at speeds up to about 70°/sec, but top athletes may generate pursuit as fast as 130°/sec. Pursuit responds slowly to unexpected changes—it takes about 100 msec to track a target that starts to move suddenly, and this is why we need the faster acting vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) to stabilize our eyes when our heads move. However, pursuit can detect patterns of motion and respond to predictable target motion in much less than 100 msec. Pursuit cannot be generated voluntarily without a suitable target. If you try to pursue an imaginary target moving across your visual field, you will make a series of saccades instead of pursuit. However, the target that evokes pursuit does not have to be visual; it may be auditory (e.g., a moving, beeping pager), proprioceptive (e.g., tracking your outstretched finger in the dark), tactile (e.g., an ant crawling on your arm in the dark), or cognitive (e.g., tracking a stroboscopic motion in which a series of light flashes in sequence, even though no actual motion occurs.

Download Full-text

Visual Tracking Neurons in Primate Area MST Are Activated by Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements of an “Imaginary” Target

Journal of Neurophysiology ◽

10.1152/jn.00272.2003 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 90 (3) ◽

pp. 1489-1502 ◽

Cited By ~ 64

Author(s):

Uwe J. Ilg ◽

Peter Thier

Keyword(s):

Eye Movements ◽

Visual Field ◽

Eye Movement ◽

Visual Tracking ◽

Smooth Pursuit ◽

Rhesus Monkeys ◽

Image Motion ◽

Eye Position ◽

Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽

Pursuit Eye Movements

Because smooth-pursuit eye movements (SPEM) can be executed only in the presence of a moving target, it has been difficult to attribute the neuronal activity observed during the execution of these eye movements to either sensory processing or to motor preparation or execution. Previously, we showed that rhesus monkeys can be trained to perform SPEM directed toward an “imaginary” target defined by visual cues confined to the periphery of the visual field. The pursuit of an “imaginary” target provides the opportunity to elicit SPEM without stimulating visual receptive fields confined to the center of the visual field. Here, we report that a subset of neurons [85 “ imaginary” visual tracking (iVT)-neurons] in area MST of 3 rhesus monkeys were identically activated during pursuit of a conventional, foveal dot target and the “imaginary” target. Because iVT-neurons did not respond to the presentation of a moving “imaginary” target during fixation of a stationary dot, we are able to exclude that responses to pursuit of the “imaginary” target were artifacts of stimulation of the visual field periphery. Neurons recorded from the representation of the central parts of the visual field in neighboring area MT, usually vigorously discharging during pursuit of foveal targets, in no case responded to pursuit of the “imaginary” target. This dissociation between MT and MST neurons supports the view that pursuit responses of MT neurons are the result of target image motion, whereas those of iVT-neurons in area MST reflect an eye movement–related signal that is nonretinal in origin. iVT-neurons fell into two groups, depending on the properties of the eye movement–related signal. Whereas most of them (71%) encoded eye velocity, a minority showed responses determined by eye position, irrespective of whether eye position was changed by smooth pursuit or by saccades. Only the former group exhibited responses that led the eye movement, which is a prerequisite for a causal role in the generation of SPEM.

Download Full-text