scholarly journals Mean Flow in the Gulf of Mexico

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 1501-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilton Sturges ◽  
Kern E. Kenyon
Keyword(s):  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Loop Current ◽  
Independent Data ◽  
Ekman Pumping ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
The West ◽  
Net Flux ◽  
Yucatan Channel ◽  
Current Potential

Abstract Several independent data sources suggest that there is a net upper-layer mass flux O(3 Sv) (Sv ≡ 106 m3 s−1) to the west in the central Gulf of Mexico, even though the western gulf is a closed basin. A plausible explanation is that this net flux is pumped downward by the convergent wind-driven Ekman pumping, as is typical of all midlatitude anticlyclonic gyres. The downward flux can follow isopycnals to depths O(500–600 m) and deeper by eddy mixing; a mechanism for forcing deep water to the south through the Yucatan Channel is provided by the intrusion and ring-shedding cycle of the Loop Current. Potential vorticity maps show that a deep flow from the western gulf back to the Yucatan Channel is likely.

scholarly journals Deep Cyclonic Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1801-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. DeHaan ◽  
Wilton Sturges
Keyword(s):  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
Accurate Result ◽  
Sea Water ◽  
Cyclonic Circulation ◽  
Loop Current ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Eastern Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
Geostrophic Shear ◽  
Layer Flow ◽  
Yucatan Channel

Abstract The anticyclonic Loop Current dominates the upper-layer flow in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, with a weaker mean anticyclonic pattern in the western gulf. There are reasons, however, to suspect that the deep mean flow should actually be cyclonic. Topographic wave rectification and vortex stretching contribute to this cyclonic tendency, as will the supply of cold incoming deep water at the edges of the basin. The authors find that the deep mean flow is cyclonic both in the eastern and western gulf, with speeds on the order of 1–2 cm s−1 at 2000 m. Historical current-meter mooring data, as well as profiling autonomous Lagrangian circulation explorer (PALACE) floats (at 900 m), suggest that vertical geostrophic shear relative to 1000 m gives a surprisingly accurate result in the interior of the basin. The temperature around the edges of the basin at 2000 m is coldest near the Yucatan Channel, where Caribbean Sea water is colder by ∼0.1°C. The temperature increases steadily with distance in the counterclockwise direction from the Yucatan, consistent with a deep mean cyclonic boundary flow.

On the Mean Flow in the Western Gulf of Mexico and a Reappraisal of Errors in Ship-Drift Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1983-1988
Author(s):  
Wilton Sturges
Keyword(s):  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
Surface Flow ◽  
Return Flow ◽  
Loop Current ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
The West ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Southern Half ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Layer Flow

AbstractShip-drift data in the Gulf of Mexico have led to a perplexing result, that the near-surface flow in the west has a north–south mean, of the east–west flow, ~5–10 cm s−1 into a closed basin. Ship-drift data have been used in the past hundred years under the assumption that they are reasonably accurate; the present study examines that assumption carefully, finding that the standard deviation of individual observations is typically ~20 cm s−1. In a monthly mean composed of order 400 observations or more, as examined here, the standard error of the mean will be reduced accordingly. In the southern part of the western Gulf of Mexico, the observed upper-layer flow is clearly to the west and is consistent with our expectations. In the northern part, however, the apparent flow as reported by ship drift in deep water is not significantly different from zero. Thus, the puzzling result remains: three different datasets in the southern half of the basin clearly show flow to the west, with speeds of 10 cm s−1 or more, yet there is no clear evidence of a near-surface return flow back to the east. The convergent wind stress forces downwelling of the upper layer; its return flow could be at some intermediate depth. The transport to the west from Loop Current rings is possibly returned in a deep boundary flow driven by the rectification of deep topographic Rossby waves.

scholarly journals Transports through the Straits of Florida

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hamilton ◽  
Jimmy C. Larsen ◽  
Kevin D. Leaman ◽  
Thomas N. Lee ◽  
Evans Waddell
Keyword(s):  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
North Atlantic Ocean ◽  
Florida Current ◽  
Loop Current ◽  
Straits Of Florida ◽  
Key West ◽  
The North ◽  
Side Channels ◽  
Yucatan Channel ◽  
Accurate Indicator

Abstract Transports were calculated for four sections of the Florida Current from Key West to Jupiter, Florida, using a moored current-meter array and voltages from cross-channel telephone cables at the western and northern ends of the Straits of Florida. In addition, moored arrays were used to estimate transport through the Northwest Providence, Santaren, and Old Bahama Channels that connect the Florida Current to the southwestern part of the North Atlantic Ocean. Transport measurements were obtained for an 11-month period from December 1990 to November 1991. Mean transports of ∼25 Sv (1 Sv ≡ 106 m3 s−1) for the flow across the western ends of the straits, which agree quite well with recent estimates of 23.8 ± 1 Sv entering the Gulf of Mexico through the Yucatan Channel, were obtained from both the Key West to Havana cable and the moored array. This estimate is about 5 Sv less than the generally accepted transport through the northern end of the straits at 27°N. This difference was partially accounted for by inflows through the side channels with more transport from the Old Bahama than the Northwest Providence Channel. The variability in the southern part of the straits was larger than at 27°N and included large diversions of the Florida Current south of the Cay Sal Bank and into the Santaren Channel that were caused by large meanders of the flow. The variability of transport in the side channels contributed to the variability of the Florida Current and reduces the correlations of the transports at the ends of the straits. Therefore, the well-measured transport at 27°N is not an accurate indicator of the transport of the Loop Current out of the Gulf of Mexico.

scholarly journals A Puzzling Disagreement between Observations and Numerical Models in the Central Gulf of Mexico

2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 2673-2681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilton Sturges ◽  
Alexandra Bozec
Keyword(s):  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Surface Flow ◽  
Return Flow ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
The West ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Direct Observations ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Two large, independent sets of direct observations in the central Gulf of Mexico show a mean near-surface flow of ~10 cm s−1 to the west, concentrated in the northern and southern Gulf. Numerical models that the authors have examined do not produce this mean westward flow. The observed speeds appear to be almost an order of magnitude larger than the estimated errors; this paper studies the observations to estimate carefully the possible errors involved and compares the observations with model results. The flow to the west in the southern Gulf is presumably wind driven on the shallow parts of the shelf, and, in slightly deeper water at the outer edges of the shelf, is possibly the result of southward Sverdrup interior flow driven by the negative curl of the wind stress. In another possibly related issue, long-term deep current-meter observations in the northern Gulf at ~1000 m and below find flow to the west, whereas some models find flow to the east. The flow proposed here assumes a mean flow to the west above roughly 300 m, with a required return flow in deep water. The difference between the deep observations and the models will produce a slope of pressure surfaces of the opposite sign below 1000 m, reversing the direction of upper-layer geostrophic flow in the models.

Subinertial Slope-Trapped Waves in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1475-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. R. Hallock ◽  
W. J. Teague ◽  
E. Jarosz
Keyword(s):  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
Current Velocity ◽  
Kelvin Waves ◽  
Loop Current ◽  
Mobile Bay ◽  
The West ◽  
Direct Forcing ◽  
Northeastern Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
The Waves ◽  
Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers

Abstract Current velocity from moored arrays of acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) deployed on the outer shelf and slope, south of Mobile Bay in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico, shows evidence of alongslope, generally westward-propagating subinertial baroclinic Kelvin waves with periods of about 16 and 21 days, amplitudes of 5–10 cm s−1, and wavelengths of about 500 km. The observed waves were highly coherent over the slope between about 200 and 500 m and accounted for a significant amount of the current variability below 200 m. The source of the waves could be attributed to effects of the Loop Current on the west Florida slope but is more likely due to direct forcing by Loop Current–generated eddies impacting the experimental area.

scholarly journals Dominant Circulation Patterns of the Deep Gulf of Mexico

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Pérez-Brunius ◽  
Heather Furey ◽  
Amy Bower ◽  
Peter Hamilton ◽  
Julio Candela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Bottom Layer ◽  
Loop Current ◽  
Cyclonic Gyre ◽  
Boundary Current ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Western Basin ◽  
Boundary Flow ◽  
Circulation Patterns

AbstractThe large-scale circulation of the bottom layer of the Gulf of Mexico is analyzed, with special attention to the historically least studied western basin. The analysis is based on 4 years of data collected by 158 subsurface floats parked at 1500 and 2500 m and is complemented with data collected by current meter moorings in the western basin during the same period. Three main circulation patterns stand out: a cyclonic boundary current, a cyclonic gyre in the abyssal plain, and the very high eddy kinetic energy observed in the eastern Gulf. The boundary current and the cyclonic gyre appear as distinct features, which interact in the western tip of the Yucatan shelf. The persistence and continuity of the boundary current is addressed. Although high variability is observed, the boundary flow serves as a pathway for water to travel around the western basin in approximately 2 years. An interesting discovery is the separation of the boundary current over the northwestern slope of the Yucatan shelf. The separation and retroflection of the along-slope current appears to be a persistent feature and is associated with anticyclonic eddies whose genesis mechanism remains to be understood. As the boundary flow separates, it feeds into the westward flow of the deep cyclonic gyre. The location of this gyre—named the Sigsbee Abyssal Gyre—coincides with closed geostrophic contours, so eddy–topography interaction via bottom form stresses may drive this mean flow. The contribution to the cyclonic vorticity of the gyre by modons traveling under Loop Current eddies is discussed.

scholarly journals Is the Loop Current a Chaotic Oscillator?

2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1455-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Lugo-Fernández
Keyword(s):  
Dynamical Systems ◽  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
North Atlantic ◽  
Chaotic Oscillator ◽  
Loop Current ◽  
The North ◽  
Short Memory ◽  
The North Atlantic ◽  
Yucatan Channel ◽  
The North Atlantic Oscillation

Abstract Dynamical systems theory is employed to study the irregular Loop Current in the Gulf of Mexico using a short database of shedding periods and north–south positions of the current. Two independent tests based on these data suggest that the Loop Current is not chaotic but behaves as a nonlinear driven and dampened oscillator with a very short memory. It is suggested that this current varies around a limit-cycle elliptical attractor. It was found that the amplitude and period of the oscillation vary at time scales of 3–5 yr, a time scale that agrees with those of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and/or ENSO; however, it is proposed that NAO provides the link between these systems. The proposed mechanism is the ITCZ changes caused by NAO, which affects the wind strength and the transport across the Yucatan Channel. A forecasting scheme that allows for prediction of the next eddy-shedding period from knowledge of the last shedding event, a condition caused by the short memory of the system, is provided.

scholarly journals The potential vorticity flux through the Yucatan Channel and the Loop Current in the Gulf of Mexico

2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (22) ◽  
pp. 16-1-16-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Candela ◽  
Julio Sheinbaum ◽  
José Ochoa ◽  
Antoine Badan ◽  
Robert Leben
Keyword(s):  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
Potential Vorticity ◽  
Loop Current ◽  
Yucatan Channel ◽  
Vorticity Flux

scholarly journals Hydrography of the Gulf of Mexico Using Autonomous Floats

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 773-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hamilton ◽  
Robert Leben ◽  
Amy Bower ◽  
Heather Furey ◽  
Paula Pérez-Brunius
Keyword(s):  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
Water Masses ◽  
Intermediate Water ◽  
Loop Current ◽  
Western Basin ◽  
Homogeneous Potential ◽  
Comprehensive Survey ◽  
Yucatan Channel ◽  
Subtropical Underwater ◽  
June July

ABSTRACTFourteen autonomous profiling floats, equipped with CTDs, were deployed in the deep eastern and western basins of the Gulf of Mexico over a four-year interval (July 2011–August 2015), producing a total of 706 casts. This is the first time since the early 1970s that there has been a comprehensive survey of water masses in the deep basins of the Gulf, with better vertical resolution than available from older ship-based surveys. Seven floats had 14-day cycles with parking depths of 1500 m, and the other half from the U.S. Argo program had varying cycle times. Maps of characteristic water masses, including Subtropical Underwater, Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW), and North Atlantic Deep Water, showed gradients from east to west, consistent with their sources being within the Loop Current (LC) and the Yucatan Channel waters. Altimeter SSH was used to characterize profiles being in LC or LC eddy water or in cold eddies. The two-layer nature of the deep Gulf shows isotherms being deeper in the warm anticyclonic LC and LC eddies and shallower in the cold cyclones. Mixed layer depths have an average seasonal signal that shows maximum depths (~60 m) in January and a minimum in June–July (~20 m). Basin-mean steric heights from 0–50-m dynamic heights and altimeter SSH show a seasonal range of ~12 cm, with significant interannual variability. The translation of LC eddies across the western basin produces a region of low homogeneous potential vorticity centered over the deepest part of the western basin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document