scholarly journals Impact of Soil Moisture–Atmosphere Interactions on Surface Temperature Distribution

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (21) ◽  
pp. 7976-7993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Berg ◽  
Benjamin R. Lintner ◽  
Kirsten L. Findell ◽  
Sergey Malyshev ◽  
Paul C. Loikith ◽  
...  

Abstract Understanding how different physical processes can shape the probability distribution function (PDF) of surface temperature, in particular the tails of the distribution, is essential for the attribution and projection of future extreme temperature events. In this study, the contribution of soil moisture–atmosphere interactions to surface temperature PDFs is investigated. Soil moisture represents a key variable in the coupling of the land and atmosphere, since it controls the partitioning of available energy between sensible and latent heat flux at the surface. Consequently, soil moisture variability driven by the atmosphere may feed back onto the near-surface climate—in particular, temperature. In this study, two simulations of the current-generation Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) Earth System Model, with and without interactive soil moisture, are analyzed in order to assess how soil moisture dynamics impact the simulated climate. Comparison of these simulations shows that soil moisture dynamics enhance both temperature mean and variance over regional “hotspots” of land–atmosphere coupling. Moreover, higher-order distribution moments, such as skewness and kurtosis, are also significantly impacted, suggesting an asymmetric impact on the positive and negative extremes of the temperature PDF. Such changes are interpreted in the context of altered distributions of the surface turbulent and radiative fluxes. That the moments of the temperature distribution may respond differentially to soil moisture dynamics underscores the importance of analyzing moments beyond the mean and variance to characterize fully the interplay of soil moisture and near-surface temperature. In addition, it is shown that soil moisture dynamics impacts daily temperature variability at different time scales over different regions in the model.

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maoya Bassiouni ◽  
Chad W. Higgins ◽  
Christopher J. Still ◽  
Stephen P. Good

Abstract. Ecohydrological parameters that describe vegetation controls on soil moisture dynamics are not easy to measure at hydrologically meaningful scales and site-specific values are rarely available. We hypothesize that sufficient information required to determine these ecohydrological parameters is encoded in empirical probability density functions (pdfs) of soil saturation, and that this information can be extracted through inverse modeling of the commonly used stochastic soil water balance. We developed a generalizable Bayesian inference approach to estimate soil saturation thresholds at which plants control soil water losses, based only on soil texture, rainfall and soil moisture data at point, footprint, and satellite scales. The optimal analytical soil saturation pdfs were statistically consistent with empirical pdfs and parameter uncertainties were on average under 10 %. Parameter estimates were most constrained for scales and locations at which soil water dynamics are more sensitive to the fitted ecohydrological parameters of interest. The algorithm convergence was most successful and the best goodness-of-fit statistics were obtained at the satellite scale. Robust and accurate results were obtained with as little as 75 daily observations randomly sampled from the full records, demonstrating the advantage of analyzing soil saturation pdfs instead of time series. A sensitivity analysis showed that estimates of soil saturation thresholds at which plants control soil water losses were not sensitive to soil depth and near-surface observations are valuable to characterize ecohydrological factors driving soil water dynamics at ecosystem scales. This work combined modeling and empirical approaches in ecohydrology and provided a simple framework to obtain analytical descriptions of soil moisture dynamics at a range of spatial scales that are consistent with soil moisture observations.


2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng WANG ◽  
Shu-Qi WANG ◽  
Xiao-Zeng HAN ◽  
Feng-Xian WANG ◽  
Ke-Qiang ZHANG

2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ajmal ◽  
Muhammad Waseem ◽  
Waqas Ahmad ◽  
Tae-Woong Kim

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 3229-3243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maoya Bassiouni ◽  
Chad W. Higgins ◽  
Christopher J. Still ◽  
Stephen P. Good

Abstract. Vegetation controls on soil moisture dynamics are challenging to measure and translate into scale- and site-specific ecohydrological parameters for simple soil water balance models. We hypothesize that empirical probability density functions (pdfs) of relative soil moisture or soil saturation encode sufficient information to determine these ecohydrological parameters. Further, these parameters can be estimated through inverse modeling of the analytical equation for soil saturation pdfs, derived from the commonly used stochastic soil water balance framework. We developed a generalizable Bayesian inference framework to estimate ecohydrological parameters consistent with empirical soil saturation pdfs derived from observations at point, footprint, and satellite scales. We applied the inference method to four sites with different land cover and climate assuming (i) an annual rainfall pattern and (ii) a wet season rainfall pattern with a dry season of negligible rainfall. The Nash–Sutcliffe efficiencies of the analytical model's fit to soil observations ranged from 0.89 to 0.99. The coefficient of variation of posterior parameter distributions ranged from < 1 to 15 %. The parameter identifiability was not significantly improved in the more complex seasonal model; however, small differences in parameter values indicate that the annual model may have absorbed dry season dynamics. Parameter estimates were most constrained for scales and locations at which soil water dynamics are more sensitive to the fitted ecohydrological parameters of interest. In these cases, model inversion converged more slowly but ultimately provided better goodness of fit and lower uncertainty. Results were robust using as few as 100 daily observations randomly sampled from the full records, demonstrating the advantage of analyzing soil saturation pdfs instead of time series to estimate ecohydrological parameters from sparse records. Our work combines modeling and empirical approaches in ecohydrology and provides a simple framework to obtain scale- and site-specific analytical descriptions of soil moisture dynamics consistent with soil moisture observations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document