scholarly journals Performance of CMIP3 and CMIP5 GCMs to Simulate Observed Rainfall Characteristics over the Western Himalayan Region

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. 7777-7799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jitendra Kumar Meher ◽  
Lalu Das ◽  
Javed Akhter ◽  
Rasmus E. Benestad ◽  
Abdelkader Mezghani
Keyword(s):  
Interannual Variability ◽  
Annual Cycle ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
India Meteorological Department ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Himalayan Region ◽  
Western Himalayan Region ◽  
Cmip5 Gcms

Abstract The western Himalayan region (WHR) was subject to a significant negative trend in the annual and monsoon rainfall during 1902–2005. Annual and seasonal rainfall change over the WHR of India was estimated using 22 rain gauge station rainfall data from the India Meteorological Department. The performance of 13 global climate models (GCMs) from phase 3 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3) and 42 GCMs from CMIP5 was evaluated through multiple analysis: the evaluation of the mean annual cycle, annual cycles of interannual variability, spatial patterns, trends, and signal-to-noise ratio. In general, CMIP5 GCMs were more skillful in terms of simulating the annual cycle of interannual variability compared to CMIP3 GCMs. The CMIP3 GCMs failed to reproduce the observed trend, whereas approximately 50% of the CMIP5 GCMs reproduced the statistical distribution of short-term (30 yr) trend estimates than for the longer-term (99 yr) trends from CMIP5 GCMs. GCMs from both CMIP3 and CMIP5 were able to simulate the spatial distribution of observed rainfall in premonsoon and winter months. Based on performance, each model of CMIP3 and CMIP5 was given an overall rank, which puts the high-resolution version of the MIROC3.2 model [MIROC3.2 (hires)] and MIROC5 at the top in CMIP3 and CMIP5, respectively. Robustness of the ranking was judged through a sensitivity analysis, which indicated that ranks were independent during the process of adding or removing any individual method. It also revealed that trend analysis was not a robust method of judging performances of the models as compared to other methods.

IMPROVING THE NORTH AMERICAN MULTI-MODEL ENSEMBLE (NMME) PRECIPITATION FORECASTS AT SEASONAL SCALE OVER THE HIMALAYAN REGION USING MACHINE LEARNING

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
SOURABH SHRIVASTAVA ◽  
RAM AVTAR ◽  
PRASANTA KUMAR BAL
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
North American ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Summer Monsoon Rainfall ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Himalayan Region ◽  
Model Ensemble ◽  
The North

The coarse horizontal resolution global climate models (GCMs) have limitations in producing large biases over the mountainous region. Also, single model output or simple multi-model ensemble (SMME) outputs are associated with large biases. While predicting the rainfall extreme events, this study attempts to use an alternative modeling approach by using five different machine learning (ML) algorithms to improve the skill of North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) GCMs during Indian summer monsoon rainfall from 1982 to 2009 by reducing the model biases. Random forest (RF), AdaBoost (Ada), gradient (Grad) boosting, bagging (Bag) and extra (Extra) trees regression models are used and the results from each models are compared against the observations. In simple MME (SMME), a wet bias of 20[Formula: see text]mm/day and an RMSE up to 15[Formula: see text]mm/day are found over the Himalayan region. However, all the ML models can bring down the mean bias up to [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]mm/day and RMSE up to 2[Formula: see text]mm/day. The interannual variability in ML outputs is closer to observation than the SMME. Also, a high correlation from 0.5 to 0.8 is found between in all ML models and then in SMME. Moreover, representation of RF and Grad is found to be best out of all five ML models that represent a high correlation over the Himalayan region. In conclusion, by taking full advantage of different models, the proposed ML-based multi-model ensemble method is shown to be accurate and effective.

scholarly journals Improvement of ENSO Simulation Based on Intermodel Diversity

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 998-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoo-Geun Ham ◽  
Jong-Seong Kug
Keyword(s):  
Interannual Variability ◽  
El Niño ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
El Nino ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Climate Simulation ◽  
Central Pacific

Abstract In this study, a new methodology is developed to improve the climate simulation of state-of-the-art coupled global climate models (GCMs), by a postprocessing based on the intermodel diversity. Based on the close connection between the interannual variability and climatological states, the distinctive relation between the intermodel diversity of the interannual variability and that of the basic state is found. Based on this relation, the simulated interannual variabilities can be improved, by correcting their climatological bias. To test this methodology, the dominant intermodel difference in precipitation responses during El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is investigated, and its relationship with climatological state. It is found that the dominant intermodel diversity of the ENSO precipitation in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) is associated with the zonal shift of the positive precipitation center during El Niño. This dominant intermodel difference is significantly correlated with the basic states. The models with wetter (dryer) climatology than the climatology of the multimodel ensemble (MME) over the central Pacific tend to shift positive ENSO precipitation anomalies to the east (west). Based on the model’s systematic errors in atmospheric ENSO response and bias, the models with better climatological state tend to simulate more realistic atmospheric ENSO responses. Therefore, the statistical method to correct the ENSO response mostly improves the ENSO response. After the statistical correction, simulating quality of the MME ENSO precipitation is distinctively improved. These results provide a possibility that the present methodology can be also applied to improving climate projection and seasonal climate prediction.

scholarly journals Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 Model Performance in Simulating Historical Precipitation and Temperature in Bangladesh: A Preliminary Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Kamruzzaman ◽  
Shamsuddin Shahid ◽  
ARM Towfiqul Islam ◽  
Syewoon Hwang ◽  
Jaepil Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Skill Score ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Lower Performance ◽  
Mean Square Errors ◽  
Cmip5 Gcms

Abstract The relative performance of global climate models (GCMs) of phases 5 and 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5 and CMIP6, respectively) was assessed in this study based on their ability to simulate annual and seasonal mean rainfall and temperature over Bangladesh for the period 1977–2005. The multiple statistical metrics were used to measure the performance of the GCMs at 30 meteorological observation stations. Two robust multi-criteria decision analysis methods were used to integrate the results obtained using different metrics for an unbiased ranking of the GCMs. The results revealed MIROC5 as the most skilful among CMIP5 GCMs and ACCESS-CM2 among CMIP6 GCMs. Overall, a significant improvement in CMIP6 MME compared to CMIP5 MME was noticed in simulating rainfall over Bangladesh at annual and seasonal scales. CMIP6 MME also showed significant reduction in maximum and minimum temperature biases over Bangladesh. However, systematic wet and cold biases still exist in CMIP6 models for Bangladesh. CMIP6 GCMs showed higher spatial correlation with observed data compared to CMIP5 GCMs, but higher difference in terms of standard deviations and centered root mean square errors, indicating better performance in simulating geographical distribution but lower performance in simulating spatial variability of most of the climate variables for different timescales. In terms of Taylor skill score, the CMIP6 MME showed higher performance in simulating rainfall but lower performance in simulating temperature compared to CMIP5 MME for most of the timeframes. The findings of this study suggest that the added value of rainfall and temperature simulations in CMIP6 models is incompatible with the climate models used in this research.

scholarly journals GCMs Derived Projection of Precipitation and Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Variation over N-W Himalayan Region

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Dharmaveer Singh ◽  
R.D. Gupta ◽  
Sanjay K. Jain
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Himalayan Region ◽  
Mean Annual Precipitation ◽  
Hadcm3 Model

The ensembles of two Global Climate Models (GCMs) namely, third generation Canadian Coupled Global Climate Model (CGCM3) and Hadley Center Coupled Model, version 3 (HadCM3) are used to project future precipitation in a part of North-Western (N-W) Himalayan region, India. Statistical downscaling method is used to downscale and generate future scenarios of precipitation at station scale from large scale climate variables obtained from GCMs. The observed historical precipitation data has been collected for three metrological stations, namely, Rampur, Sunni and Kasol falling in the basin for further analysis. The future trends and patterns in precipitation under scenarios A2 and A1B for CGCM3 model, and A2 and B2 for HadCM3 model are analyzed for these stations under three different time periods: 2020’s, 2050’s and 2080’s. An overall rise in mean annual precipitation under scenarios A2 and A1B for CGCM3 model have been noticed for future periods: 2020’s, 2050’s and 2080’s. Decrease, in precipitation has been found under A2 and B2 scenarios of HadCM3 model for 2050’s and slight increase for 2080’s periods. Based on the analysis of results, CGCM3 model has been found better for simulation of precipitation in comparison to HadCM3 model.Journal of Hydrology and Meteorology, Vol. 9(1) 2015, p.1-14

scholarly journals Net irrigation requirement under different climate scenarios using AquaCrop over Europe

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Busschaert ◽  
Shannon de Roos ◽  
Wim Thiery ◽  
Dirk Raes ◽  
Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Interannual Variability ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Crop Productivity ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Irrigation Requirement ◽  
Aquacrop Model ◽  
Far Future

Abstract. Global soil water availability is challenged by the effects of climate change and a growing population. On average 70 % of freshwater extraction is attributed to agriculture, and the demand is increasing. In this study, the effects of climate change on the evolution of the irrigation water requirement to sustain current crop productivity are assessed by using the FAO crop growth model AquaCrop version 6.1. The model is run at 0.5° lat × 0.5° lon resolution over the European mainland, assuming a general C3-type of crop, and forced by climate input data from the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase three (ISIMIP3). First, the performance of AquaCrop surface soil moisture (SSM) simulations using historical meteorological input from two ISIMIP3 forcing datasets is evaluated with satellite-based SSM estimates. When driven by ISIMIP3a reanalysis meteorology for the years 2011–2016, daily simulated SSM values have an unbiased root-mean-square difference of 0.08 and 0.06 m3m−3 with SSM retrievals from the Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) missions, respectively. When forced with ISIMIP3b meteorology from five Global Climate Models (GCM) for the years 2011–2020, the historical simulated SSM climatology closely agrees with the climatology of the reanalysis-driven AquaCrop SSM climatology as well as the satellite-based SSM climatologies. Second, the evaluated AquaCrop model is run to quantify the future irrigation requirement, for an ensemble of five GCMs and three different emission scenarios. The simulated net irrigation requirement (Inet) of the three summer months for a near and far future climate period (2031–2060 and 2071–2100) is compared to the baseline period of 1985–2014, to assess changes in the mean and interannual variability of the irrigation demand. Averaged over the continent and the model ensemble, the far future Inet is expected to increase by 67 mm year–1 (+30 %) under a high emission scenario Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) 3-7.0. Central and southern Europe are the most impacted with larger Inet increases. The interannual variability of Inet is likely to increase in northern and central Europe, whereas the variability is expected to decrease in southern regions. Under a high mitigation scenario (SSP1-2.6), the increase in Inet will stabilize around 40 mm year–1 towards the end of the century and interannual variability will still increase but to a smaller extent. The results emphasize a large uncertainty in the Inet projected by various GCMs.

scholarly journals Increased Interannual Precipitation Extremes over California under Climate Change

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (16) ◽  
pp. 6324-6334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Berg ◽  
Alex Hall
Keyword(s):  
Interannual Variability ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
First Century ◽  
Precipitation Extremes ◽  
Wet Season ◽  
Precipitation Total ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Projected Changes

Abstract Changes to mean and extreme wet season precipitation over California on interannual time scales are analyzed using twenty-first-century precipitation data from 34 global climate models. Models disagree on the sign of projected changes in mean precipitation, although in most models the change is very small compared to historical and simulated levels of interannual variability. For the 2020/21–2059/60 period, there is no projected increase in the frequency of extremely dry wet seasons in the ensemble mean. Wet extremes are found to increase to around 2 times the historical frequency, which is statistically significant at the 95% level. Stronger signals emerge in the 2060/61–2099/2100 period. Across all models, extremely dry wet seasons are roughly 1.5 to 2 times more common, and wet extremes generally triple in their historical frequency (statistically significant). Large increases in precipitation variability in most models account for the modest increases to dry extremes. Increases in the frequency of wet extremes can be ascribed to equal contributions from increased variability and increases to the mean. These increases in the frequency of interannual precipitation extremes will create severe water management problems in a region where coping with large interannual variability in precipitation is already a challenge. Evidence from models and observations is examined to understand the causes of the low precipitation associated with the 2013/14 drought in California. These lines of evidence all strongly indicate that the low 2013/14 wet season precipitation total can be very likely attributed to natural variability, in spite of the projected future changes in extremes.

scholarly journals Interannual variability of rainfall over the Arabian Peninsula using the IPCC AR4 Global Climate Models

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 2328-2340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansour Almazroui ◽  
M. Adnan Abid ◽  
H. Athar ◽  
M. Nazrul Islam ◽  
M. Azhar Ehsan
Keyword(s):  
Interannual Variability ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Arabian Peninsula ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Ipcc Ar4
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document