scholarly journals On the Use of a Water Balance to Evaluate Interannual Terrestrial ET Variability

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1102-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunjin Han ◽  
Wade T. Crow ◽  
Christopher R. Hain ◽  
Martha C. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Water Balance ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Past Research ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing ◽  
Cast Doubt ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Balance Analysis

Abstract Accurately measuring interannual variability in terrestrial evapotranspiration ET is a major challenge for efforts to detect trends in the terrestrial hydrologic cycle. Based on comparisons with annual values of terrestrial evapotranspiration derived from a terrestrial water balance analysis, past research has cast doubt on the ability of existing products to accurately capture variability. Using a variety of estimates, this analysis reexamines this conclusion and finds that estimates of variations obtained from a land surface model are more strongly correlated with independently acquired from thermal infrared remote sensing than derived from water balance considerations. This tendency is attributed to significant interannual variations in terrestrial water storage neglected by the water balance approach. Overall, results demonstrate the need to reassess perceptions concerning the skill of estimates derived from land surface models and show the value of accurate remotely sensed ET products for the validation of interannual ET.

scholarly journals Multisource Estimation of Long-Term Terrestrial Water Budget for Major Global River Basins

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 3191-3206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Pan ◽  
Alok K. Sahoo ◽  
Tara J. Troy ◽  
Raghuveer K. Vinukollu ◽  
Justin Sheffield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Balance ◽  
Error Analysis ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Budget ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Terrestrial Water

A systematic method is proposed to optimally combine estimates of the terrestrial water budget from different data sources and to enforce the water balance constraint using data assimilation techniques. The method is applied to create global long-term records of the terrestrial water budget by merging a number of global datasets including in situ observations, remote sensing retrievals, land surface model simulations, and global reanalyses. The estimation process has three steps. First, a conventional analysis on the errors and biases in different data sources is conducted based on existing validation/error studies and other information such as sensor network density, model physics, and calibration procedures. Then, the data merging process combines different estimates so that biases and errors from different data sources can be compensated to the greatest extent and the merged estimates have the best possible confidence. Finally, water balance errors are resolved using the constrained Kalman filter technique. The procedure is applied to 32 globally distributed major basins for 1984–2006. The authors believe that the resulting global water budget estimates can be used as a baseline dataset for large-scale diagnostic studies, for example, integrated assessment of basin water resources, trend analysis and attribution, and climate change studies. The global scale of the analysis presents significant challenges in carrying out the error analysis for each water budget variable. For some variables (e.g., evapotranspiration) the assumptions underpinning the error analysis lack supporting quantitative analysis and, thus, may not hold for specific locations. Nevertheless, the merging and water balance constraining technique can be applied to many problems.

scholarly journals Diagnosing hydrological limitations of a land surface model: application of JULES to a deep-groundwater chalk basin

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Le Vine ◽  
A. Butler ◽  
N. McIntyre ◽  
C. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Expert Knowledge ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Deep Groundwater ◽  
Resolution Model ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Water Redistribution ◽  
Types Of Information

Abstract. Land surface models (LSMs) are prospective starting points to develop a global hyper-resolution model of the terrestrial water, energy, and biogeochemical cycles. However, there are some fundamental limitations of LSMs related to how meaningfully hydrological fluxes and stores are represented. A diagnostic approach to model evaluation and improvement is taken here that exploits hydrological expert knowledge to detect LSM inadequacies through consideration of the major behavioural functions of a hydrological system: overall water balance, vertical water redistribution in the unsaturated zone, temporal water redistribution, and spatial water redistribution over the catchment's groundwater and surface-water systems. Three types of information are utilized to improve the model's hydrology: (a) observations, (b) information about expected response from regionalized data, and (c) information from an independent physics-based model. The study considers the JULES (Joint UK Land Environmental Simulator) LSM applied to a deep-groundwater chalk catchment in the UK. The diagnosed hydrological limitations and the proposed ways to address them are indicative of the challenges faced while transitioning to a global high resolution model of the water cycle.

scholarly journals Water balance versus land surface model in the simulation of Rhine river discharges

2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. W. L. Hurkmans ◽  
H. de Moel ◽  
J. C. J. H. Aerts ◽  
P. A. Troch
Keyword(s):  
Water Balance ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Rhine River

scholarly journals Diagnosing hydrological limitations of a Land Surface Model: application of JULES to a deep-groundwater chalk basin

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 7541-7582
Author(s):  
N. Le Vine ◽  
A. Butler ◽  
N. McIntyre ◽  
C. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Expert Knowledge ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Deep Groundwater ◽  
Resolution Model ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Water Redistribution ◽  
Types Of Information

Abstract. Land Surface Models (LSMs) are prospective starting points to develop a global hyper-resolution model of the terrestrial water, energy and biogeochemical cycles. However, there are some fundamental limitations of LSMs related to how meaningfully hydrological fluxes and stores are represented. A diagnostic approach to model evaluation is taken here that exploits hydrological expert knowledge to detect LSM inadequacies through consideration of the major behavioural functions of a hydrological system: overall water balance, vertical water redistribution in the unsaturated zone, temporal water redistribution and spatial water redistribution over the catchment's groundwater and surface water systems. Three types of information are utilised to improve the model's hydrology: (a) observations, (b) information about expected response from regionalised data, and (c) information from an independent physics-based model. The study considers the JULES (Joint UK Land Environmental Simulator) LSM applied to a deep-groundwater chalk catchment in the UK. The diagnosed hydrological limitations and the proposed ways to address them are indicative of the challenges faced while transitioning to a global high resolution model of the water cycle.

scholarly journals Development and evaluation of 0.05° terrestrial water storage estimates using CABLE land surface model and GRACE data assimilation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natthachet Tangdamrongsub ◽  
Michael F. Jasinski ◽  
Peter Shellito
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Grace Data ◽  
Terrestrial Water

Abstract. Accurate estimation of terrestrial water storage (TWS) at a meaningful spatiotemporal resolution is important for reliable assessments of regional water resources and climate variability. Individual components of TWS include soil moisture, snow, groundwater, and canopy storage and can be estimated from the Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange (CABLE) land surface model. The spatial resolution of CABLE is currently limited to 0.5° by the resolution of soil and vegetation datasets that underlie model parameterizations, posing a challenge to using CABLE for hydrological applications at a local scale. This study aims to improve the spatial detail (from 0.5° to 0.05°) and timespan (1981–2012) of CABLE TWS estimates using rederived model parameters and high-resolution meteorological forcing. In addition, TWS observations derived from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission are assimilated into CABLE to improve TWS accuracy. The success of the approach is demonstrated in Australia, where multiple ground observation networks are available for validation. The evaluation process is conducted using four different case studies that employ different model spatial resolutions and include or omit GRACE data assimilation (DA). We find that the CABLE 0.05° developed here improves TWS estimates in terms of accuracy, spatial resolution, and long-term water resource assessment reliability. The inclusion of GRACE DA increases the accuracy of groundwater storage (GWS) estimates and has little impact on surface soil moisture or evapotranspiration. The use of improved model parameters and improved state estimations (via GRACE DA) together is recommended to achieve the best GWS accuracy. The workflow elaborated in this paper relies only on publicly accessible global datasets, allowing reproduction of the 0.05° TWS estimates in any study region.

Water Cycle Extremes in the GRACE and GRACE-FO Data Record

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Rodell ◽  
Bailing Li
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Mass ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Drought Event ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Data Record ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Hydrological Droughts

<p>A unique aspect of satellite gravimetry is its ability to quantify changes in all water stored at all depths on and beneath the land surface.  Hence, GRACE and GRACE-FO are well suited for quantifying both hydrological droughts, when terrestrial water storage (TWS) is low, and pluvial events, when TWS is high.  In this study we use GRACE and GRACE-FO data assimilation within a land surface model to fill the 1-year gap between the two missions and to replace other missing data.  We apply a cluster analysis approach to identify the locations and extents of TWS extreme events in resulting data record.  We then rank these events based on their intensity, i.e., the integral of the non-seasonal water mass anomaly over the period of the event.  In this presentation we report on the largest wet and dry events over each continent.  During the period of study, Africa, North America, and Australia each had a wet event with an intensity that exceeded 10,000 km<sup>3</sup> * month, although the 2010-2012 event in Australia can largely be attributed to a depressed baseline TWS during the period caused by the millennial drought.  With 30 more years of data it is probable that the intensity of that drought would have been greater than the recovery and wet event during 2010-2012.  As it stands, the biggest drought event was determined to be one occurred in South America during 2015-2016, with an intensity of over 10,000 km<sup>3</sup> * month.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document