Algorithm for Flat First-Year Ice Draft Using AMSR2 Data in the Arctic Ocean

AbstractFirst-year ice has replaced multiyear ice in the Northern Sea Route area since 2008. In this area, sea ice survival during summer substantially depends on first-year ice thickness at melt onset, and thus monitoring of first-year ice thickness in the freezing period is a key to forecasting sea ice distributions in the following summer. In this paper we introduce a new algorithm to estimate flat first-year ice draft using brightness temperature data measured by the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-2 (AMSR2). The algorithm uses a gradient ratio (GR) of 18- and 36-GHz vertically polarized brightness temperatures based on decreases in sea ice emissivity in higher AMSR2 frequency channels with thermodynamic growth associated with an increase in volume scattering. Such spectral characteristics of the emissivity are examined by comparing GR values with flat first-year ice draft extracted by mode values of in situ draft data measured by a moored ice profiling sonar. The accuracy of the daily draft estimated from GR values after applying proper noise filters is about 10 cm for a draft range of 0.4–1.2 m.

Download Full-text

Tensile fracture of a single crack in first-year sea ice

Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences ◽

10.1098/rsta.2017.0346 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 376 (2129) ◽

pp. 20170346 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

J. P. Dempsey ◽

D. M. Cole ◽

S. Wang

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Field Trips ◽

Cohesive Crack ◽

The Arctic ◽

Tensile Fracture ◽

First Year ◽

Crack Model ◽

Separation Curve ◽

Ice Phenomena

The break-up of sea ice in the Arctic and Antarctic has been studied during three field trips in the spring of 1993 at Resolute, NWT, and the fall of 2001 and 2004 on McMurdo Sound via in situ cyclic loading and fracture experiments. In this paper, the back-calculated fracture information necessary to the specification of an accurate viscoelastic fictitious (cohesive) crack model is presented. In particular, the changing shape of the stress separation curve with varying conditions and loading scenarios is revealed. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Modelling of sea-ice phenomena’.

Download Full-text

Modeling the seasonal evolution of the Arctic sea ice floe size distribution

Elem Sci Anth ◽

10.12952/journal.elementa.000126 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 4 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Jinlun Zhang ◽

Harry Stern ◽

Byongjun Hwang ◽

Axel Schweiger ◽

Michael Steele ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Size Distribution ◽

Power Law ◽

Annual Cycle ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

First Year ◽

Seasonal Evolution ◽

Marginal Ice Zone

Abstract To better simulate the seasonal evolution of sea ice in the Arctic, with particular attention to the marginal ice zone, a sea ice model of the distribution of ice thickness, floe size, and enthalpy was implemented into the Pan-arctic Ice–Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS). Theories on floe size distribution (FSD) and ice thickness distribution (ITD) were coupled in order to explicitly simulate multicategory FSD and ITD distributions simultaneously. The expanded PIOMAS was then used to estimate the seasonal evolution of the Arctic FSD in 2014 when FSD observations are available for model calibration and validation. Results indicate that the simulated FSD, commonly described equivalently as cumulative floe number distribution (CFND), generally follows a power law across space and time and agrees with the CFND observations derived from TerraSAR-X satellite images. The simulated power-law exponents also correlate with those derived using MODIS images, with a low mean bias of –2%. In the marginal ice zone, the modeled CFND shows a large number of small floes in winter because of stronger winds acting on thin, weak first-year ice in the ice edge region. In mid-spring and summer, the CFND resembles an upper truncated power law, with the largest floes mostly broken into smaller ones; however, the number of small floes is lower than in winter because floes of small sizes or first-year ice are easily melted away. In the ice pack interior there are fewer floes in late fall and winter than in summer because many of the floes are “welded” together into larger floes in freezing conditions, leading to a relatively flat CFND with low power-law exponents. The simulated mean floe size averaged over all ice-covered areas shows a clear annual cycle, large in winter and smaller in summer. However, there is no obvious annual cycle of mean floe size averaged over the marginal ice zone. The incorporation of FSD into PIOMAS results in reduced ice thickness, mainly in the marginal ice zone, which improves the simulation of ice extent and yields an earlier ice retreat.

Download Full-text

North Atlantic warming and declining volume of arctic sea ice

The Cryosphere Discussions ◽

10.5194/tcd-7-245-2013 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. 245-265 ◽

Cited By ~ 28

Author(s):

V. A. Alexeev ◽

V. V. Ivanov ◽

R. Kwok ◽

L. H. Smedsrud

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Large Scale ◽

Atlantic Water ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

First Year ◽

Pacific Water ◽

Svalbard Archipelago ◽

Arctic Sea

Abstract. Long-term thinning of arctic sea ice over the last few decades has resulted in significant declines in the coverage of thick multi-year ice accompanied by a proportional increase in thinner first-year ice. This change is often attributed to changes in the arctic atmosphere, both in composition and large-scale circulation, and greater inflow of warmer Pacific water through the Bering Strait. The Atlantic Water (AW) entering the Arctic through Fram Strait has often been considered less important because of strong stratification in the Arctic Ocean and the deeper location of AW compared to Pacific water. In our combined examination of oceanographic measurements and satellite observations of ice concentration and thickness, we find evidence that AW has a direct impact on the thinning of arctic sea ice downstream of Svalbard Archipelago. The affected area extends as far as Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago. The imprints of AW appear as local minima in sea ice thickness; ice thickness is significantly less than that expected of first-year ice. Our lower-end conservative estimates indicate that the recent AW warming episode could have contributed up to 150–200 km3 of sea ice melt per year, which would constitute about 20% of the total 900 km3yr−1 negative trend in sea ice volume since 2004.

Download Full-text

The melt pond fraction and spectral sea ice albedo retrieval from MERIS data: validation and trends of sea ice albedo and melt pond fraction in the Arctic for years 2002–2011

The Cryosphere Discussions ◽

10.5194/tcd-8-5227-2014 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 8 (5) ◽

pp. 5227-5292 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

L. Istomina ◽

G. Heygster ◽

M. Huntemann ◽

P. Schwarz ◽

G. Birnbaum ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Imaging Spectrometer ◽

Melt Pond ◽

Result Show ◽

Area North ◽

Ice Floes ◽

Multiyear Ice

Abstract. The presence of melt ponds on the Arctic sea ice strongly affects the energy balance of the Arctic Ocean in summer. It affects albedo as well as transmittance through the sea ice, which has consequences on the heat balance and mass balance of sea ice. An algorithm to retrieve melt pond fraction and sea ice albedo (Zege et al., 2014) from the MEdium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS) data is validated against aerial, ship borne and in situ campaign data. The result show the best correlation for landfast and multiyear ice of high ice concentrations (albedo: R = 0.92, RMS = 0.068, melt pond fraction: R = 0.6, RMS = 0.065). The correlation for lower ice concentrations, subpixel ice floes, blue ice and wet ice is lower due to complicated surface conditions and ice drift. Combining all aerial observations gives a mean albedo RMS equal to 0.089 and a mean melt pond fraction RMS equal to 0.22. The in situ melt pond fraction correlation is R = 0.72 with an RMS = 0.14. Ship cruise data might be affected by documentation of varying accuracy within the ASPeCT protocol, which is the reason for discrepancy between the satellite value and observed value: mean R = 0.21, mean RMS = 0.16. An additional dynamic spatial cloud filter for MERIS over snow and ice has been developed to assist with the validation on swath data. The case studies and trend analysis for the whole MERIS period (2002–2011) show pronounced and reasonable spatial features of melt pond fractions and sea ice albedo. The most prominent feature is the melt onset shifting towards spring (starting already in weeks 3 and 4 of June) within the multiyear ice area, north to the Queen Elizabeth Islands and North Greenland.

Download Full-text

Regional melt-pond fraction and albedo of thin Arctic first-year drift ice in late summer

The Cryosphere ◽

10.5194/tc-9-255-2015 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 255-268 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

D. V. Divine ◽

M. A. Granskog ◽

S. R. Hudson ◽

C. A. Pedersen ◽

T. I. Karlsen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Open Water ◽

Ice Cover ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

First Year ◽

Surface Type ◽

Melt Pond ◽

Melt Ponds

Abstract. The paper presents a case study of the regional (≈150 km) morphological and optical properties of a relatively thin, 70–90 cm modal thickness, first-year Arctic sea ice pack in an advanced stage of melt. The study combines in situ broadband albedo measurements representative of the four main surface types (bare ice, dark melt ponds, bright melt ponds and open water) and images acquired by a helicopter-borne camera system during ice-survey flights. The data were collected during the 8-day ICE12 drift experiment carried out by the Norwegian Polar Institute in the Arctic, north of Svalbard at 82.3° N, from 26 July to 3 August 2012. A set of > 10 000 classified images covering about 28 km2 revealed a homogeneous melt across the study area with melt-pond coverage of ≈ 0.29 and open-water fraction of ≈ 0.11. A decrease in pond fractions observed in the 30 km marginal ice zone (MIZ) occurred in parallel with an increase in open-water coverage. The moving block bootstrap technique applied to sequences of classified sea-ice images and albedo of the four surface types yielded a regional albedo estimate of 0.37 (0.35; 0.40) and regional sea-ice albedo of 0.44 (0.42; 0.46). Random sampling from the set of classified images allowed assessment of the aggregate scale of at least 0.7 km2 for the study area. For the current setup configuration it implies a minimum set of 300 images to process in order to gain adequate statistics on the state of the ice cover. Variance analysis also emphasized the importance of longer series of in situ albedo measurements conducted for each surface type when performing regional upscaling. The uncertainty in the mean estimates of surface type albedo from in situ measurements contributed up to 95% of the variance of the estimated regional albedo, with the remaining variance resulting from the spatial inhomogeneity of sea-ice cover.

Download Full-text

Remote sensing of sea ice: advances during the DAMOCLES project

The Cryosphere ◽

10.5194/tc-6-1411-2012 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 6 (6) ◽

pp. 1411-1434 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

G. Heygster ◽

V. Alexandrov ◽

G. Dybkjær ◽

W. von Hoyningen-Huene ◽

F. Girard-Ardhuin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Remote Sensing ◽

Sea Ice ◽

Estimation Method ◽

Satellite Observations ◽

Microwave Emission ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

In Situ Observation ◽

Microwave Emissivity

Abstract. In the Arctic, global warming is particularly pronounced so that we need to monitor its development continuously. On the other hand, the vast and hostile conditions make in situ observation difficult, so that available satellite observations should be exploited in the best possible way to extract geophysical information. Here, we give a résumé of the sea ice remote sensing efforts of the European Union's (EU) project DAMOCLES (Developing Arctic Modeling and Observing Capabilities for Long-term Environmental Studies). In order to better understand the seasonal variation of the microwave emission of sea ice observed from space, the monthly variations of the microwave emissivity of first-year and multi-year sea ice have been derived for the frequencies of the microwave imagers like AMSR-E (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on EOS) and sounding frequencies of AMSU (Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit), and have been used to develop an optimal estimation method to retrieve sea ice and atmospheric parameters simultaneously. In addition, a sea ice microwave emissivity model has been used together with a thermodynamic model to establish relations between the emissivities from 6 GHz to 50 GHz. At the latter frequency, the emissivity is needed for assimilation into atmospheric circulation models, but is more difficult to observe directly. The size of the snow grains on top of the sea ice influences both its albedo and the microwave emission. A method to determine the effective size of the snow grains from observations in the visible range (MODIS) is developed and demonstrated in an application on the Ross ice shelf. The bidirectional reflectivity distribution function (BRDF) of snow, which is an essential input parameter to the retrieval, has been measured in situ on Svalbard during the DAMOCLES campaign, and a BRDF model assuming aspherical particles is developed. Sea ice drift and deformation is derived from satellite observations with the scatterometer ASCAT (62.5 km grid spacing), with visible AVHRR observations (20 km), with the synthetic aperture radar sensor ASAR (10 km), and a multi-sensor product (62.5 km) with improved angular resolution (Continuous Maximum Cross Correlation, CMCC method) is presented. CMCC is also used to derive the sea ice deformation, important for formation of sea ice leads (diverging deformation) and pressure ridges (converging). The indirect determination of sea ice thickness from altimeter freeboard data requires knowledge of the ice density and snow load on sea ice. The relation between freeboard and ice thickness is investigated based on the airborne Sever expeditions conducted between 1928 and 1993.

Download Full-text

Using CloudSat snowfall rate observations to constrain and characterize the uncertainties of Arctic snow-on-sea-ice

10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11436 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Alex Cabaj ◽

Paul Kushner ◽

Alek Petty ◽

Stephen Howell ◽

Christopher Fletcher

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Arctic Ocean ◽

Snow Depth ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

The Arctic Ocean ◽

Ice Model

Snow on Arctic sea ice plays multiple&#8212;and sometimes contrasting&#8212;roles in several feedbacks between sea ice and the global climate system. For example, the presence of snow on sea ice may mitigate sea ice melt by increasing the sea ice albedo and enhancing the ice-albedo feedback. Conversely, snow can inhibit sea ice growth by insulating the ice from the atmosphere during the sea ice growth season. In addition to its contribution to sea ice feedbacks, snow on sea ice also poses a challenge for sea ice observations. In particular, snow contributes to uncertainties in retrievals of sea ice thickness from satellite altimetry measurements, such as those from ICESat-2. Snow-on-sea-ice models can produce basin-wide snow depth estimates, but these models require snowfall input from reanalysis products. In-situ snowfall measurements are absent over most of the Arctic Ocean, so it can be difficult to determine which reanalysis snowfall product is best suited to be used as input for a snow-on-sea-ice model.In the absence of in-situ snowfall rate measurements, measurements from satellite instruments can be used to quantify snowfall over the Arctic Ocean. The CloudSat satellite, which is equipped with a 94 GHz Cloud Profiling Radar instrument, measures vertical radar reflectivity profiles from which snowfall rates can be retrieved. This instrument provides the most extensive high-latitude snowfall rate observation dataset currently available. CloudSat&#8217;s near-polar orbit enables it to make measurements at latitudes up to 82&#176;N, with a 16-day repeat cycle, over the time period from 2006-2016.We present a calibration of reanalysis snowfall to CloudSat observations over the Arctic Ocean, which we then apply to reanalysis snowfall input for the NASA Eulerian Snow On Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM). This calibration reduces the spread in snow depths produced by NESOSIM when different reanalysis inputs are used. In light of this calibration, we revise the NESOSIM parametrizations of wind-driven snow processes, and we characterize the uncertainties in NESOSIM-generated snow depths resulting from uncertainties in snowfall input. We then extend this analysis further to estimate the resulting uncertainties in sea ice thickness retrieved from ICESat-2 when snow depth estimates from NESOSIM are used as input for the retrieval.

Download Full-text

Sea ice representation in CMIP6 simulations with EC-Earth3-Veg

10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-20372 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Torben Koenigk ◽

Evelien Dekker

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Emission Scenario ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

First Year ◽

Data Sets ◽

Sea Ice Extent ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

Arctic Sea

In this study, we compare the sea ice in ensembles of historical and future simulations with EC-Earth3-Veg to the sea ice of the NSIDC and OSA-SAF satellite data sets. The EC-Earth3-Veg Arctic sea ice extent generally matches well to the observational data sets, and the trend over 1980-2014 is captured correctly. Interestingly, the summer Arctic sea ice area minimum occurs already in August in the model. Mainly east of Greenland, sea ice area is overestimated. In summer, Arctic sea ice is too thick compared to PIOMAS. In March, sea ice thickness is slightly overestimated in the Central Arctic but in the Bering and Kara Seas, the ice thickness is lower than in PIOMAS.While the general picture of Arctic sea ice looks good, EC-Earth suffers from a warm bias in the Southern Ocean. This is also reflected by a substantial underestimation of sea ice area in the Antarctic.Different ensemble members of the future scenario projections of sea ice show a large range of the date of first year with a minimum ice area below 1 million square kilometers in the Arctic. The year varies between 2024 and 2056. Interestingly, this range does not differ very much with the emission scenario and even under the low emission scenario SSP1-1.9 summer Arctic sea ice almost totally disappears.

Download Full-text

On retrieving sea ice freeboard from ICESat laser altimeter

The Cryosphere ◽

10.5194/tc-10-2329-2016 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 10 (5) ◽

pp. 2329-2346 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Kirill Khvorostovsky ◽

Pierre Rampal

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Snow Depth ◽

Sea Surface ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Laser Altimeter ◽

Data Set ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

Along Track ◽

Multiyear Ice

Abstract. Sea ice freeboard derived from satellite altimetry is the basis for the estimation of sea ice thickness using the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium. High accuracy of altimeter measurements and freeboard retrieval procedure are, therefore, required. As of today, two approaches for estimating the freeboard using laser altimeter measurements from Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat), referred to as tie points (TP) and lowest-level elevation (LLE) methods, have been developed and applied in different studies. We reproduced these methods for the ICESat observation periods (2003–2008) in order to assess and analyse the sources of differences found in the retrieved freeboard and corresponding thickness estimates of the Arctic sea ice as produced by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). Three main factors are found to affect the freeboard differences when applying these methods: (a) the approach used for calculation of the local sea surface references in leads (TP or LLE methods), (b) the along-track averaging scales used for this calculation, and (c) the corrections for lead width relative to the ICESat footprint and for snow depth accumulated in refrozen leads. The LLE method with 100 km averaging scale, as used to produce the GSFC data set, and the LLE method with a shorter averaging scale of 25 km both give larger freeboard estimates comparing to those derived by applying the TP method with 25 km averaging scale as used for the JPL product. Two factors, (a) and (b), contribute to the freeboard differences in approximately equal proportions, and their combined effect is, on average, about 6–7 cm. The effect of using different methods varies spatially: the LLE method tends to give lower freeboards (by up to 15 cm) over the thick multiyear ice and higher freeboards (by up to 10 cm) over first-year ice and the thin part of multiyear ice; the higher freeboards dominate. We show that the freeboard underestimation over most of these thinner parts of sea ice can be reduced to less than 2 cm when using the improved TP method proposed in this paper. The corrections for snow depth in leads and lead width, (c), are applied only for the JPL product and increase the freeboard estimates by about 7 cm on average. Thus, different approaches to calculating sea surface references and different along-track averaging scales from one side and the freeboard corrections as applied when producing the JPL data set from the other side roughly compensate each other with respect to freeboard estimation. Therefore, one may conclude that the difference in the mean sea ice thickness between the JPL and GSFC data sets reported in previous studies should be attributed mostly to different parameters used in the freeboard-to-thickness conversion.

Download Full-text

Inorganic carbon dynamics of melt pond-covered first year sea ice in the Canadian Arctic

Biogeosciences Discussions ◽

10.5194/bgd-11-7485-2014 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 11 (5) ◽

pp. 7485-7519 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

N.-X. Geilfus ◽

R. J. Galley ◽

O. Crabeck ◽

T. Papakyriakou ◽

J. Landy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

First Year ◽

Ice Melt ◽

Melt Pond ◽

Melt Ponds ◽

Arctic Sea ◽

Melt Water

Abstract. Melt pond formation is a common feature of the spring and summer Arctic sea ice. However, the role of the melt ponds formation and the impact of the sea ice melt on both the direction and size of CO2 flux between air and sea is still unknown. Here we describe the CO2-carbonate chemistry of melting sea ice, melt ponds and the underlying seawater associated with measurement of CO2 fluxes across first year landfast sea ice in the Resolute Passage, Nunavut, in June 2012. Early in the melt season, the increase of the ice temperature and the subsequent decrease of the bulk ice salinity promote a strong decrease of the total alkalinity (TA), total dissolved inorganic carbon (TCO2) and partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) within the bulk sea ice and the brine. Later on, melt pond formation affects both the bulk sea ice and the brine system. As melt ponds are formed from melted snow the in situ melt pond pCO2 is low (36 μatm). The percolation of this low pCO2 melt water into the sea ice matrix dilutes the brine resulting in a strong decrease of the in situ brine pCO2 (to 20 μatm). As melt ponds reach equilibrium with the atmosphere, their in situ pCO2 increase (up to 380 μatm) and the percolation of this high concentration pCO2 melt water increase the in situ brine pCO2 within the sea ice matrix. The low in situ pCO2 observed in brine and melt ponds results in CO2 fluxes of −0.04 to −5.4 mmol m–2 d–1. As melt ponds reach equilibrium with the atmosphere, the uptake becomes less significant. However, since melt ponds are continuously supplied by melt water their in situ pCO2 still remains low, promoting a continuous but moderate uptake of CO2 (~ −1mmol m–2 d–1). The potential uptake of atmospheric CO2 by melting sea ice during the Arctic summer has been estimated from 7 to 16 Tg of C ignoring the role of melt ponds. This additional uptake of CO2 associated to Arctic sea ice needs to be further explored and considered in the estimation of the Arctic Ocean's overall CO2 budget.

Download Full-text