Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy under Epidural Anesthesia: A Retrospective Comparison of 100 Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Wei Zhang ◽  
Ya-Jin Chen ◽  
Ming-Hui Cao ◽  
Feng-Tao Ji
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Epidural Anesthesia ◽  
Hospital Cost ◽  
Recovery Room ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Duration Of Stay ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study

There are limited data about laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) under epidural anesthesia. This retrospective comparative study aimed to evaluate on the feasibility and advantages of LC under epidural anesthesia. In this retrospective comparative study, 100 patients (46 men and 54 women) with symptomatic cholelithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using epidural anesthesia (EA) were compared with 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using general anesthesia (GA). Both groups were evaluated with regard to intraoperative mean arterial pressure, heart rate, operation time, duration of stay in the recovery room, and hospital cost. Laparoscopic operation was performed for 200 patients. Mean age of patients was 46.4 ± 6.9 years and 45.3 ± 6.8 years in EA and GA, respectively. Forty-six and 50 per cent of subjects were male in EA and GA, respectively. The mean operation time was 24 minutes and 25.58 minutes for EA and GA, respectively ( P = 0.652). The duration of stay in the recovery room was significantly shorter in EA than that in GA (19.56 ± 2.55 minutes vs 56.27 ± 6.85 minutes, respectively; P = 0.0001). In the EA group, 23 patients (23%) had severe shoulder pain during surgery. After receiving pethidine intravenously, all these patients could subsequently undergo surgery smoothly. There were no complications or mortality in either group. Most of the patients regarded EA as a comfortable procedure. The mean hospital cost for the EA group was only three-fourths that of the GA group. LC under EA is feasible and safe in selected patients.

A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Coblation Adenoidectomy and Regular Curettage Adenoidectomy in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kerala

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (41) ◽  
pp. 3559-3566
Author(s):  
Abdul Salam R. T. ◽  
Shahul Hameed A. ◽  
Meera Rajan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Adenoid Tissue ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tube Function ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Mean

BACKGROUND An ideal surgery to remove hypertrophied adenoid mass should be safe, with less bleeding and operation time along with post-operative improvement in the eustachian tubal ventilation and normal respiration. It should also have low morbidity and mortality. Among the various methods described for its removal, the two commonly used methods are conventional cold curettage method and coblation technique. The purpose of this study was to collate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic coblation adenoidectomy with the conventional curettage adenoidectomy. METHODS A prospective comparative study with fifty patients was studied who underwent adenoidectomy. Twenty five patients underwent endoscopy assisted coblation adenoidectomy and twenty five patients underwent regular adenoidectomy by curettage. RESULTS Patients who underwent coblation adenoidectomy showed better results during follow up in terms of completeness of removal. 80 % of children undergoing regular adenoidectomy by curettage method showed remnant adenoid tissue in the nasopharynx at the end of the procedure. But it was 6 % among the children undergoing endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy. The mean duration of operation was higher for endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy which was significant statistically. The mean blood loss was 30.36 ml in regular curettage adenoidectomy; 10.6 ml with endoscopic coblation adenoidectomy. The grading of pain was significantly lower in endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy. There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of eustachian tube function after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Coblation adenoidectomy has significant advantages over conventional adenoidectomy in terms of completeness of removal, reduced blood loss, and lower post-operative pain grade. KEYWORDS Coblation, Adenoidectomy, Curettage, Haemorrhage and Complications

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Endoscopic versus Microscopic Cartilage Type I Tympanoplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. e80-e85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipesh Shakya ◽  
Arun KC ◽  
Ajit Nepal
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Type I ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Type I Tympanoplasty ◽  
Graft Success ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Endoscopic Tympanoplasty

Abstract Introduction The use of endoscope is rapidly increasing in otological and neuro-otological surgery in the last 2 decades. Middle ear surgeries, including tympanoplasty, have increasingly utilized endoscopes as an adjunct to or as a replacement for the operative microscope. Superior visualization and transcanal access to diseases normally managed with a transmastoid approach are touted as advantages with the endoscope. Objectives The present study aimed to compare the outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic cartilage tympanoplasty (Type I) Methods This was a retrospective comparative study of 70 patients (25 males and 45 females) who underwent type I tympanoplasty between March 2015 and April 2016. The subjects were classified into 2 groups: endoscopic tympanoplasty (ET, n = 35), and microscopic tympanoplasty (MT, n = 35). Tragal cartilage was used as a graft and technique used was cartilage shield tympanoplasty in both groups. Demographic data, perforation size of the tympanic membrane at the preoperative state, operation time, hearing outcome, and graft success rate were evaluated. Results The epidemiological profiles, the preoperative hearing status, and the perforation size were similar in both groups. The mean operation time of the MT group (52.63 ± 8.68 minutes) was longer than that of the ET group (48.20 ± 10.37 minutes), but the difference was not statistically significant. The graft success rates 12 weeks postoperatively were 91.42% both in the ET and MT groups, that is, 32/35; and these values were not statistically significantly different. There was a statistically significant improvement in hearing within the groups, both pre- and postoperatively, but there was no difference between the groups. Conclusion Endoscopic tympanoplasty is a minimally invasive surgery with similar graft success rate, comparable hearing outcomes and shorter operative time period as compared to microscopic use.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Trejo-Ávila ◽  
Danilo Solórzano-Vicuña ◽  
Ricardo García-Corral ◽  
Orlando Bada-Yllán ◽  
Adolfo Cuendis-Velázquez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Endoscopic Treatment ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Synchronous Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Coronary Artery Revascularization

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. E229-E233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dogan Kahraman ◽  
Ihsan Sami Uyar ◽  
Umit Duman ◽  
Ibrahim Sami Karaca ◽  
Dilek Dogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Intubation Time ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Cabg Surgery ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Group I ◽  
The Mean

Background: There are limited data about the results of simultaneous coronary revascularization, either with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and cholecystectomy operations. Here we present clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and coronary revascularization at the same session. Patients and Methods: We included a total of 19 patients who underwent simultaneous LC and CABG or PCI. Thirteen of them had been hospitalized because of acute cholecystitis prior to coronary angiography. Simultaneous CABG and LC were performed in 10 patients (group I). LC was performed immediately after CABG surgery at the same session. PCI (group II) was performed in 9 patients. In the PCI group, LC was performed under general anesthesia 2 or 3 days after PCI. Results: No mortality was seen after the procedures. In the CABG group, the mean number of bypass grafts was 3.4 ± 1.9. The mean extracorporeal circulation and the total operation times were 95 ± 13.5 minutes and 259 ± 18.9 minutes, respectively; the mean intubation duration was 17 ± 4.8 hours. In the PCI group, the mean number of stents per patient was 2.1 ± 0.7; LC was performed 2 or 3 days after the PCI without the cessation of clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid. The mean operation times for LC were 56.5 ± 15.6 minutes and 51.3 ± 17.6 minutes in the CABG and PCI groups, respectively (P = .86). In the CABG group, the mean durations of ICU and hospital stays were 3.1 ± 1.4 and 14.2 ± 3.7 days, respectively. In the PCI group, the mean durations of ICU stay and hospitalization were 1.7 ± 0.4 and 7.4 ± 2.2 days, respectively. Significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of the intubation time, duration of ICU stay, and hospitalization periods (P =.001, P =.0001, and P =.001, respectively). No intra-abdominal complications or bleeding was encountered in any group. Postoperative complications of the abdominal wall or mediastinitis were not seen in the setting of concomitant procedures in the CABG group. Conclusion: Simultaneous CABG or PCI with LC may be performed safely in patients with cholecystitis. The durations of postcholecystectomy ICU stay and the intubation time were significantly lower in the PCI group. According to our results, PCI may be the first choice of revascularization procedure in selected patients requiring cholecystectomy prior to discharge.

scholarly journals A retrospective comparative study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mifepristone with misoprostol over misoprostol alone in induction in labor

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 5140
Author(s):  
Reena Sharma ◽  
B. R. Sharma ◽  
Poojan Dogra
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group B ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Group 1

Background: The aim is to compare the improvement in pre-induction Bishop’s score, proportion of patients going in labor and induction–delivery interval after using the Misoprostol versus Mifepristone and Misoprostol as cervical ripening and labor inducing agent.Methods: It is retrospective comparative study conducted on 110 women. Women were randomized in group A and in group B of 55 patients in each group. Group A received tab Mifepristone 200 mg orally on day 1 followed by Misoprostol 25 ug after 48 hours and continued 6 hourly till maximum four tablets and group B patients received tablet Misoprostol 25ug and continued 25ug 6hrly maximum 4 doses. Women observed for improvement in Bishop‟s score, induction-delivery interval and requirement of subsequent doses of Misoprostol.Results: Present study concluded that tablet Mifepristone is an efficient cervical ripening and inducing agent of labor as pre-induction Bishop’s score was improved. 36.4%patients went into labor only with tablet Mifepristone. The mean induction-delivery interval was,19±12.2hrs in Group 1 as compare to 13.1±13.0 hrs in Group 2. Mean Bishop’s score observed in Group 1 were 2.5±1.78 and 1.67±1.25 in Group 2. It was observed that there was significant improvement in the Bishop’s score after giving Mifepristone to the patients; mean Bishop’s 24hrs after mifepristone were 4.03±1.80. Repeated dose of Misoprostol required in Group 1 was observed to be higher than group 2 as shown in table 8. Mean misoprostol doses required in group 1 was 2.56±1.15 as compared to 1.71±1.58 in group 2.Conclusions: Mifepristone with Misoprostol reduce the induction delivery interval and more potent in combination for induction of labour as compared to Misoprostol alone.

Surgical Stress Response and Clinical Outcomes of Single Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Prospective Nonrandomized Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung Joon Han ◽  
Sae Byeol Choi ◽  
Wan Bae Kim ◽  
Jin-Suk Lee ◽  
Yoon Jung Boo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Stress Response ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Group ◽  
The Mean

The levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) are proportionate to injury; it is the most commonly used quantitative marker in surgical studies. Cytokines and the acute-phase response play an important role in controlling the human immune system. The objective of this study was to compare the systemic acute cytokine response and clinical outcomes of conventional laparoscopic and single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We compared patients who underwent single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (the single port group) with patients who underwent conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (the conventional group) according to the clinical variables, IL-6, leukocyte subpopulations, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. The mean age in the single port group was significantly younger ( P = 0.010) and the mean operation time in the conventional group was significantly shorter ( P = 0.002). Postoperative 4-hour VAS pain score was slightly worse in the single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group, but was not significantly different. We found no difference in clinical outcomes, the level of serum IL-6, C-reactive protein, leukocyte subpopulations, and complications between the two groups. Stress response in single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is equal to conventional surgery. Postoperative 4-hour VAS pain score was slightly worse and the operation time is significantly longer in the single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document