Diabetes Mellitus and Cerebrovascular Disease as Independent Determinants for Increased Hospital Costs and Length of Stay in Open Appendectomy in Comparison with Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Chieh Yeh ◽  
Chi-Hsun Hsieh ◽  
Chien-Chang Liao ◽  
Li-Ting Su ◽  
Yu-Chun Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Open Approach

Comorbidity has been proven to increase hospital costs and length of hospital stays in patients receiving appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis. However, the specific comorbidities that independently influence discrepancy of hospital costs and length of stay between open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy still need to be elucidated. Using multi-variate linear analysis, administrative claims data were obtained from Taiwan's National Health Institute Research Database to compare differences of hospitalization costs and length of stay between open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy categorized by various comorbidities defined in Charlson comorbidity score. Of 103,653 patients, 81,479 open appendectomies and 22,174 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed for the treatment of acute appendicitis in Taiwan between 2004 and 2008. In multilinear regression models, the adjusted costs and length of stay for open appendectomy in patients with cerebrovascular diseases or diabetes mellitus were significantly higher than that for laparoscopic appendectomy. To reduce costs and length of stay, patients with cerebrovascular diseases or diabetes mellitus should be particularly recommended to receive laparoscopic approach rather than an open approach for the treatment of acute appendicitis.

scholarly journals Comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in pregnant women

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1623
Author(s):  
Subba Rao Dova ◽  
Sankara Rao Pagoti ◽  
Manoj Kumar Mannem
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Fetal Loss ◽  
P Value ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Open Procedure ◽  
Gestational Age At Delivery ◽  
Group 2

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for surgical emergency in normal patients and also in pregnant women. The objective of this study was to study the clinical significance of a laparoscopic over an open approach to appendicectomy pregnant population.Methods: Total 46 cases patients with acute appendicitis confirmed the diagnosis by clinical examination and ultrasonography. The patients were divided into two groups laparoscopic appendectomy (group 1) n=21 and Open appendectomy (group 2) n=25. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records to compare the 2 groups.Results: All the demographic details are not significant when compared with each other. Laparoscopic appendectomy is significantly i.e. <p-value <0.05 less time for operation, length of stay in hospital and complication when compared with open procedure. Time to first flatus, leucocyte and neutrophil ratio are not significantly when compared laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy. Preterm delivery, birth weight, APGAR score, gestational age at delivery, delivery type, fetal loss and maternal death were not significant when compared laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy.Conclusions: Laparoscopic procedure is safe and effective technique for the treatment of appendicitis during pregnancy with nearly similar rates of complications compared to open procedure. Laparoscopic appendectomy associated with shorter hospital stay, faster return to daily activities and shorter time to first flatus.

LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY BECOMES THE METHOD OF CHOICE IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS

2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-146
Author(s):  
Samir Delibegovic ◽  
Ervin Matovic
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Usual Method ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Frequent Complication ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Duration Of Operation ◽  
Methods Of Treatment

Introduction: Laparoscopic appendectomy becomes a usual method in the treatment of acute appendicitis, although its advantage over open appendectomy has been proven. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, a few medical centers are introducing laparoscopic appendectomy as a method of treatment of acute appendicitis. In this study we want to compare different methods of treatment of acute appendicitis. Patients and Methods: During 20 months we have analyzed 498 patients operated due to acute appendicitis. We followed the duration of operation, total hospitalization stay, complications of surgical procedure and reasons of conversion in patients operated by laparoscopic approach. Results: The duration of operation was 96 minutes in the group operated by open approach and 107 minutes in the group operated by laparoscopic approach. Total hospitalization stay was 3.9. days in the group operated by open approach and 2.3. days in the group operated by laparoscopic approach. The most frequent complication in the group operated by open approach was infection of the operative wound (56/452) and ileus (5/452), and in the group operated by laparosocopic approach ileus (1/46) was the most frequent complication. Conclusion: The patients operated by laparoscopic approach have fewer risk of wound infection, and the hospital stay is shorter. With the increase of surgeon’s experience this method of treatment of acute appendicitis will become a method of choice.

scholarly journals A comparative study on surgical site infection in cases of open and laparoscopic appendicectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 3309
Author(s):  
Priyansh Pandey ◽  
Manish M. Swarnkar ◽  
S. C. Jain
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Blood Cell ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
White Blood Cell ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Site Infection

Background: Diagnosis of acute appendicitis is mostly based on clinical features pointing towards appendicitis. Several biochemical parameters, such as the white blood cell (WBC) count, and neutrophil percentage, are currently used to aid clinical diagnosis.  Without immediate surgery, appendicitis may progress to perforation of the appendix. This study was carried out to determine rate of SSI in open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy for acute appendicitis and to identify independent risk factors for SSI.Methods: Appendicitis is a common cause of pain in right iliac fossa worldwide. The present study was carried out in the Department of General Surgery, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi, Wardha, from August 2015 to July 2017. This study was conducted after the due clearance from Institutional Ethical committee. Total 132 patients admitted to the surgery ward with acute lower abdominal pain with clinical features of acute appendicitis on clinical examination, were studied prospectively.Results: In the present study, maximum patients were seen in less than 20 years of age and next commonest age group of presentation was 21-30 years. The male to female sex ratio was 1:1.3 in the laparoscopic appendectomy group while in the open appendectomy group was 1.81:1. The incidence of complicated intra-operative findings and mean white blood cell count was more in the open appendectomy group. The mean operative time, days for use of analgesics, time taken to return to soft diet and length of hospital stay for laparoscopic appendectomy group was less than the open appendectomy group. There were more cases of surgical site infection in the patients operated by open approach than laparoscopic approach.Conclusions: Wound class II versus III and NNIS index were found to be significantly associated with surgical site infection.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Report on 1164 Operations at a Single-Institution, Safety-Net Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 1110-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan P. Dumas ◽  
Madhu Subramanian ◽  
Erica Hodgman ◽  
Michelle Arevalo ◽  
Gabriella Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Complicated Appendicitis ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Safety Net Hospital

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the standard of care for the treatment of acute appendicitis. There is an ongoing debate regarding the optimal management of appendicitis, which led us to study outcomes after an appendectomy at a large safety-net hospital. We hypothesize that despite a high-risk population, LA remains a safe and effective treatment for acute appendicitis. A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent an appendectomy from 2011 to 2013. The primary end point was significant morbidity defined as a score of three or greater on the Clavien-Dindo scale of surgical morbidity. Thousand hundred and sixty-four patients underwent an appendectomy. A total of 1102 (94.7%) patients underwent either an LA or laparoscopic converted to open appendectomy, and 62 (5.3%) patients underwent an open appendectomy (OA). Two hundred and forty six patients (21.1%) had complicated appendicitis. Laparoscopic converted to OA conversion rate was 4.4 per cent and differed between years (P < 0.001). LA had a significantly shorter length of stay, shorter length of postoperative antibiotics, and less postoperative morbidity. When limited to only patients with complicated appendicitis, major morbidity was still greater in the OA group (22.6 vs 52.0%, P = 0.001). Length of stay was significantly longer in the OA group [3.42 (2.01, 5.97) vs 7.04 (5.05, 10.13), P < 0.001]. Odds for complication were 2.6 times greater in the OA group compared with the LA group. In the absence of peritonitis and systemic illness necessitating urgent laparotomy, patients who are laparoscopic surgical candidates should be offered an LA. Our study demonstrates that these patients have better outcomes and shorter hospital stays.

scholarly journals Unligature method of laparoscopic appendectomy in children

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav G. Svarich ◽  
Evgeniy G. Perevozchikov ◽  
Ilya M. Kagantsov
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Inflammatory Infiltration ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
Clinical Hospital ◽  
Digital Assessment

Aim. On the basis of the accumulated clinical material to show the possibility of a ligature-free method of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Materials and methods. From 2000 to 2019, 2044 children with acute appendicitis were treated in the surgical department of the Republican childrens clinical hospital in Syktyvkar. Of these, 651 patients had an open appendectomy with treatment of the stump of the vermiform process by the submersible method, 1363 children had a laparoscopic appendectomy with ligature treatment of the stump of the process, and 32 patients had their first non-ligature laparoscopic appendectomy with the intersection of the vermiform process with the Ligasure device. Results. On average, surgery for ligature-free laparoscopic appendectomy lasted 7 3 minutes less than for laparoscopic appendectomy using the ligature method for treating the stump of the worm-like process. Experimentally, it was found that this method of appendectomy should not be used when the thickness of the worm-like process is more than 1.5 cm, with pronounced inflammatory infiltration of the caecum dome and perforation at the base of the process. With ligature-free appendectomy, the operation time was reduced. In the period from 1 to 6 months, there were no intra-abdominal postoperative complications associated with the new method of surgery. Conclusion. Ligar-free laparoscopic appendectomy in children using modern high-energy platforms with a digital assessment of the degree of tissue coagulation readiness made it possible to avoid intraoperative and postoperative complications, simplify the technique of its implementation, and reduce the time of surgery.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Appendectomy Trends and Outcomes in the United States: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004–2011

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 1074-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Masoomi ◽  
Ninh T. Nguyen ◽  
Matthew O. Dolich ◽  
Steven Mills ◽  
Joseph C. Carmichael ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Nationwide Inpatient Sample ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is becoming the standard procedure of choice for appendicitis. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and trends of LA for acute appendicitis in the United States and to compare outcomes of LA with open appendectomy (OA). Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we examined patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from 2004 to 2011. A total of 2,593,786 patients underwent appendectomy during this period. Overall, the rate of LA was 60.5 per cent (children: 58.1%; adults: 63%; elderly: 48.7%). LA rate significantly increased from 43.3 per cent in 2004 to 75 per cent in 2011. LA use increased 66 per cent in nonperforated appendicitis versus 100 per cent increase in LA use for perforated appendicitis. The LA rate increased in all age groups. The increased LA use was more significant in male patients (84%) compared with female patients (62%). The overall conversion rate of LA to OA was 6.3 per cent. Compared with OA, LA had a significantly lower complication rate, a lower mortality rate, a shorter mean hospital stay, and lower mean total hospital charges in both nonperforated and perforated appendices. LA has become an established procedure for appendectomy in nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in all rates exceeding OA. Conversion rate is relatively low (6.3%).

Changes in Incidence and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Children—A Population-Based Study in the Period 2000–2015

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grith Laerkholm Hansen ◽  
Jakob Kleif ◽  
Christian Jakobsen ◽  
Anders Paerregaard
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Registration System

Abstract Introduction Recent studies suggest that the epidemiology and management of appendicitis have changed during the last decades. The purpose of this population-based study was to examine this in the pediatric population in Denmark. Materials and Methods Data were retrieved from the Danish National Patient Registry, the Danish Civil Registration System, and the Statbank Denmark. Patients aged 0 to 17 years diagnosed with appendicitis and appendectomized during the period 2000 to 2015 were included. The primary outcome was the annual incidences of appendicitis. Secondary outcomes were the annual percent of patients with appendicitis having a laparoscopic appendectomy, delay from admission to surgery, length of postoperative hospital stay, and 30-day postoperative mortality. Results A total of 24,046 pediatric cases of appendicitis were identified. The annual incidence steadily declined until 2008 (–29%, all ages) and then remained stable. The surgical approach of choice changed from being open appendectomy in 2000 (97%) to laparoscopic appendectomy in 2015 (94%). Simultaneously, the duration of postoperative hospital stay declined from 41 hours (median) to 17 hours. Delay from admission until surgery did not change during the period. Only one child died within the 30-day postoperative period. Conclusion In accordance with other recent studies from Western countries, we found significant changes in the incidence of acute appendicitis including a decline in all age groups except those below 5 years of age, a shift toward laparoscopic appendectomy, and decreasing time spent in the hospital during the years 2000 to 2015.

scholarly journals Transumblical Single Incision Two-Port Laparoscopic Assisted Appendectomy: Early Experience in Paediatric Patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-294
Author(s):  
MA Nowshad ◽  
A Mostaque ◽  
SMA Shahid ◽  
HK Emrul
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Safe Technique ◽  
Port System ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted ◽  
Additional Port

Laparoscopic appendectomy considered as superior alternative to open appendectomy. Usual laparoscopic appendectomy is performed with the three port system. In this study, we performed a unique single transumblical incision two-port laparoscopic assisted appendectomy with the aim to reduce postoperative port site complication as well as improving cosmesis and patients satisfaction. From January 2010, 32 patients were admitted with clinically diagnosed acute appendicitis and were randomly assigned to single transumblical incision two-port laparoscopic assisted appendectomy. Transumblical single incision two-port laparoscopic assisted appendectomy was attempted in all patients (9 males and 23 females) with an average age of 9.2 years. Transumblical single incision two-port laparoscopic assisted appendectomy was successfully completed in 31 patients. In one patient, another additional port required due to severe adhesion of the appendix. Mean operation time was 25.2 minutes (range, 17-38), and mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.Sdays (range 1-2). Postoperative complications (local pericaecal abscess) occurred in one case that was treated conservatively. Transumblical single incision two-port laparoscopic assisted appendectomy appears to be a feasible and safe technique for the treatment of acute appendicitis in the paediatric setting. It allows nearly scar less abdominal surgery. The true benefit of the technique should be assessed by randomized controlled trials.TAJ 2009; 22(1): 289-294

scholarly journals A retrospective study on laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1144
Author(s):  
P. Senthil Kumar ◽  
S. Edwin Kin’s Raj ◽  
Saranya Nagalingam
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Early Return

Background: Appendectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in emergency surgery. Open appendectomy is the “gold standard” for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy though widely practiced has not gained universal approval. Our aim is to compare the safety and benefits of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in a retrospective study.Methods: The study was done as a retrospective study among 387 patients diagnosed with appendicitis for a period of 18 months in the Dept of General Surgery. All patients included were 16 years and above and followed up for 3 weeks. In this study, 130 patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis - underwent open appendectomy and 257 patients diagnosed as sub-acute cases of appendicitis - underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. These two groups (open & laparoscopic) were compared for operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, complication rate, early return to normal activity.Results: Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (around 4.5 days), with a less need for analgesia and with an early return to daily activities (around 11.5 days). Operative time was significantly shorter in the open group (35 mins), when compared with laparoscopic group (around 59 mins). Total number of complications was less in the Laparoscopic group with a significantly lower incidence of post-op pain and complications.Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach is a safe and efficient operative procedure and it provides clinically beneficial advantages over open appendectomy (including shorter hospital stay, an early return to daily activities and less post-op complications).

scholarly journals Acute Appendicitis in Pregnant Women: Our Clinical Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Türkan ◽  
Metin Yalaza ◽  
Mehmet Tolga Kafadar ◽  
Gürka Değirmencioğlu
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Fetal Loss ◽  
University Research ◽  
Lower Quadrant ◽  
Right Lower Quadrant

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse 13 patients who were treated in our clinic due to acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Methods: Records of the patients who received appendectomy with appendicitis diagnosis in our Turgut Özal University Research and Application Hospital between January 2007 and December 2015 have been analyzed retrospectively. Results: Appendectomies were performed on 13 pregnant patients with an acute appendicitis diagnosis. Average age of the patients was 27.69 years (between 22-37 years). Most frequent complaint of the patients was abdominal pain and most frequent examination finding was tenderness at right lower quadrant. Ultrasonography was used in all cases for diagnosis. Surgery was decided with clinical diagnosis for five cases (38.5%) where appendix had not been identified with ultrasonography. While laparoscopic appendectomy was applied in one case (7.7%) and open appendectomy was applied using a McBurney incision in 12 cases (92.3%). Average hospitalization duration was 1.69 days. All patients were tracked together through the Gynaecology Department for two weeks after they had been discharged from the hospital. Preterm delivery, maternal and fetal loss did not occur. Conclusion: It is considered appropriate to apply ultrasonography routinely to all pregnant patients in whom acute appendicitis is suspected. Concern for maternal or fetal complication that may occur in consequence of an unnecessary surgery should not be at a level that will delay surgical treatment needed by the patient.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document