scholarly journals A retrospective study on laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1144
Author(s):  
P. Senthil Kumar ◽  
S. Edwin Kin’s Raj ◽  
Saranya Nagalingam
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Early Return

Background: Appendectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in emergency surgery. Open appendectomy is the “gold standard” for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy though widely practiced has not gained universal approval. Our aim is to compare the safety and benefits of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in a retrospective study.Methods: The study was done as a retrospective study among 387 patients diagnosed with appendicitis for a period of 18 months in the Dept of General Surgery. All patients included were 16 years and above and followed up for 3 weeks. In this study, 130 patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis - underwent open appendectomy and 257 patients diagnosed as sub-acute cases of appendicitis - underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. These two groups (open & laparoscopic) were compared for operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, complication rate, early return to normal activity.Results: Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (around 4.5 days), with a less need for analgesia and with an early return to daily activities (around 11.5 days). Operative time was significantly shorter in the open group (35 mins), when compared with laparoscopic group (around 59 mins). Total number of complications was less in the Laparoscopic group with a significantly lower incidence of post-op pain and complications.Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach is a safe and efficient operative procedure and it provides clinically beneficial advantages over open appendectomy (including shorter hospital stay, an early return to daily activities and less post-op complications).

scholarly journals A comparative study of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  
Reina Khadilkar ◽  
Ashwini Anil Panditrao ◽  
Ramteja Inturi
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Total Leukocyte Count ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background: Obstruction of appendiceal lumen resulting in acute appendicitis is diagnosed by clinical examination, supported by raised neutrophil count, computed tomography and/or ultrasonography.Appendectomy one of the most commonly done surgeries is the standard line of management for acute appendicitis. Trend is towards greater utilization of laparoscopic appendectomy despite lack of consensus on superiority of laparoscopic procedure, hence imperative to prove scientifically the effectiveness of the two methods. The aim of the present study was a comparative study of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy.Methods: A prospective cohort study of 100 cases of acute appendicitis above 16 years of age with no co morbidities was carried out in Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre from July 2017 to September 2019.Results: Mean age was 28.82 years, 64 (64%) males and 36 (36%) females, pain in abdomen (100%) being most common complaint followed by fever (77%) with positive correlation with severity of appendicitis (Alvarado score) and with total leukocyte count. Mean duration of surgery and hospital stay in laparoscopic appendectomy was lesser than open and difference was statistically highly significant (p=0.000). No difference in pain score observed. Retrocaecal (58%) was the most common position, slightly higher rate of complications in open appendectomy, no conversion of laparoscopic to open. Subjective level of satisfaction score (0-10) in laparoscopic appendectomy was higher than in open and difference was statistically highly significant (p=0.000).Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy had advantages like better cosmesis, shorter duration of procedure and hospital stay, fewer post-operative complications and early return to work with disadvantage of steep learning curve, while open appendectomy, does not require special instruments, and is performed under direct three-dimensional vision.

scholarly journals Comparative study of single incision versus conventional three port laparoscopic appendectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 3852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Rometra ◽  
Rahil Rometra ◽  
Neeraj Koul ◽  
R. K. Chrungoo
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Abdominal Incision ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Appendicitis is primarily a disease of adolescents and young adults with a peak incidence in the second and third decades of life. Appendectomy for appendicitis is the most commonly performed emergency operation in the world.For more than a century, open appendectomy remained the gold standard for the treatment of acute appendicitis.  Laparoscopic surgery has become popular universally during the last couple of decades.   Efforts are still being made to decrease abdominal incision and visible scars after laparoscopy.  Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new innovation allowing minimal access surgery to be performed through a single umbilical incision.Methods: It was a prospective study carried out on 50 patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis. They were divided into two groups of 25 each. One group underwent Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy (CLA) and other group underwent Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS).  Results were compared with regard to mean operative time,   complications, post-operative pain and discomfort (vas score at 12 hours), post-operative morbidity, duration of hospital stay and condition at discharge and cosmesis.Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to the parameters like postoperative pain, hospital stay and complication profile. However, operative time for SILS appendectomy were found to be significantly higher compared to conventional group.Conclusions: Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments is safe and effective, feasible surgery with better cosmetic results.

scholarly journals A prospective randomized comparison of primary outcome between laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 3397
Author(s):  
Shivakumar T ◽  
Ved Prakash Ranjan ◽  
Yamuna V. S. ◽  
Karthik P.
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Emergency Operation ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Early Return

Background: Open appendectomy is one of the most common surgeries done in an emergency operation theatre even after three decades of introduction of laparoscopic surgeries. The previous studies done on laparoscopic appendectomy produced conflicting recommendations, and the adequacy of sample sizes is generally unknown. We compared primary outcomes after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a sample of predetermined statistical power.Methods: A pre-study power analysis suggested that 200 randomized patients would yield 80% power to show a mean decrease of 1.3 days hospitalization. One hundred ninety-eight patients with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis were randomized prospectively to laparoscopic or open appendectomy. The primary outcomes measured were duration of operative time, postoperative pain and analgesia, length of hospital stay and cosmetic advantages.Results: It was found that mean operation time was 33±5.8 minute and 37± 7.5 minute in OA and LA respectively. Duration of post-operative hospital stay was 1.2 days shorter in Laparoscopic group. LA required 1.1 shots of less analgesic than OA. Oral feeding was resumed 21 hours earlier following LA compared to OA. Laparoscpic appendectomy was safely performed in paediatric patient without any adverse effect. We also found that, in female patient, concurrent ovarian cysts, tubal pregnancy and endometriosis can be diagnosed and managed laparoscopically in the same sitting.Conclusions: Present study found that laparoscopic appendectomy is an effective and safe procedure irrespective of age and sex of the patient. LA has added advantage of early return of bowel movement, less post-op hospital stays and less requirement of narcotic analgesic.

Changes in Incidence and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Children—A Population-Based Study in the Period 2000–2015

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grith Laerkholm Hansen ◽  
Jakob Kleif ◽  
Christian Jakobsen ◽  
Anders Paerregaard
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Registration System

Abstract Introduction Recent studies suggest that the epidemiology and management of appendicitis have changed during the last decades. The purpose of this population-based study was to examine this in the pediatric population in Denmark. Materials and Methods Data were retrieved from the Danish National Patient Registry, the Danish Civil Registration System, and the Statbank Denmark. Patients aged 0 to 17 years diagnosed with appendicitis and appendectomized during the period 2000 to 2015 were included. The primary outcome was the annual incidences of appendicitis. Secondary outcomes were the annual percent of patients with appendicitis having a laparoscopic appendectomy, delay from admission to surgery, length of postoperative hospital stay, and 30-day postoperative mortality. Results A total of 24,046 pediatric cases of appendicitis were identified. The annual incidence steadily declined until 2008 (–29%, all ages) and then remained stable. The surgical approach of choice changed from being open appendectomy in 2000 (97%) to laparoscopic appendectomy in 2015 (94%). Simultaneously, the duration of postoperative hospital stay declined from 41 hours (median) to 17 hours. Delay from admission until surgery did not change during the period. Only one child died within the 30-day postoperative period. Conclusion In accordance with other recent studies from Western countries, we found significant changes in the incidence of acute appendicitis including a decline in all age groups except those below 5 years of age, a shift toward laparoscopic appendectomy, and decreasing time spent in the hospital during the years 2000 to 2015.

scholarly journals Clinical outcome of appendectomy: laparoscopic vs open technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Jan M. Rather ◽  
Sobia Manzoor ◽  
Mubashir Shah
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Open Technique ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common abdominal surgical emergency. Appendectomy has been proven to be the standard care for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Objective of the study was to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of clinical outcome and complication rates.Methods: This was a single centric, retrospective study conducted at SKIMS, Soura from May 2018 to April 2021. Open and laparoscopic appendectomy patients were compared in terms of operative times, conversion rate, complication rates and duration of hospital stay.Results: Total 120 patients were included in this study with 40 in laparoscopic group while 80 patients in the open group. Increased operative time in laparoscopic group (p=0.033) and longer duration of hospital stay (p=0.021) with open group while as comparable complication rate in both procedures were observed. Higher rates of intra-abdominal collection in laparoscopic group as compared to open groupConclusions: Both laparoscopic and open appendectomy procedures can be performed routinely for acute appendicitis without the additional risks of complications.

scholarly journals Study of laparoscopic appendectomy: advantages, disadvantages and reasons for conversion of laparoscopic to open appendectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 993
Author(s):  
Sujan Narayan Agrawal ◽  
Sunita Meshram ◽  
Kamlesh Dhruv
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background:Good outcome has been reported with the laparoscopic approach in uncomplicated appendicitis, but a higher incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses has been reported after laparoscopic appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Objective was to study the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy.Methods: A Hospital based cross sectional study was carried out among of 302 patients. The study duration was from June 2004 to December 2006. Institutional Ethics Committee permission was obtained. Informed individual consent was taken. Out of 302 subjects, 236 underwent open appendectomy and 66 underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.Results:It was observed that in both the groups majority patients had retrocecal position of the appendix. The amount of blood loss, adjacent organ injury and duration of surgery were similar in both the groups. The difference in the incidence of wound infection in both groups was not found to be statistically significant. But the antibiotic use was significantly less in the LA group compared to OA group. It was found that time to resumptions of oral fees, duration of hospital stay and time to return to normal duties were significantly lesser in LA group compared to OA group. (p < 0.001). As per the cosmetic end result, majorities were satisfied in LA group and rated the surgery as excellent as compared to patients in OA group.Conclusions:Laparoscopic appendectomy was better than open appendectomy with respect to wound infection, tackling co-existing pathology, duration of hospital stay, earlier return to normal activity, excellent cosmetic end result, lesser use of antibiotics and earlier resumption of oral feeds.

LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY BECOMES THE METHOD OF CHOICE IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS

2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-146
Author(s):  
Samir Delibegovic ◽  
Ervin Matovic
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Usual Method ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Frequent Complication ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Duration Of Operation ◽  
Methods Of Treatment

Introduction: Laparoscopic appendectomy becomes a usual method in the treatment of acute appendicitis, although its advantage over open appendectomy has been proven. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, a few medical centers are introducing laparoscopic appendectomy as a method of treatment of acute appendicitis. In this study we want to compare different methods of treatment of acute appendicitis. Patients and Methods: During 20 months we have analyzed 498 patients operated due to acute appendicitis. We followed the duration of operation, total hospitalization stay, complications of surgical procedure and reasons of conversion in patients operated by laparoscopic approach. Results: The duration of operation was 96 minutes in the group operated by open approach and 107 minutes in the group operated by laparoscopic approach. Total hospitalization stay was 3.9. days in the group operated by open approach and 2.3. days in the group operated by laparoscopic approach. The most frequent complication in the group operated by open approach was infection of the operative wound (56/452) and ileus (5/452), and in the group operated by laparosocopic approach ileus (1/46) was the most frequent complication. Conclusion: The patients operated by laparoscopic approach have fewer risk of wound infection, and the hospital stay is shorter. With the increase of surgeon’s experience this method of treatment of acute appendicitis will become a method of choice.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Versusopen Appendectomy - Which One Is Better?

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Md Atiar Rahman ◽  
Md Shahadot Hossain Sheikh ◽  
Md Ibrahim Siddique ◽  
Md Shahidul Islam ◽  
AKM Ahsan Ullah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Laparoscopic Technique ◽  
Analgesia Requirement ◽  
Initial Procedure

Objective: Appendectomy, being the most common surgical procedure performed in general surgery, is still being performed by both open and laparoscopic methods due to a lack of consensus as to which is the most appropriate method. Because further trials are necessary and few such studies have been performed in developing countries, we decided to evaluate the outcomes of the 2 procedures to share our experience with others. Methods: Prospectively collected data from 618 consecutive patients with appendicitis were studied. These comprised of 340 patients who underwent conventional open appendectomy and 260 patients treated laparoscoplcally&18 were excluded because of protocol violations. The two groups were compared with respect to operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, return to normal work, complication rate and cost. Results: There were no statistical differences regarding patient characteristics between the two groups. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 5 patients (1.88%). Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (1.5 d vs 2.5 d), lower incidence of wound infection (3.07% vs 8.29%,) &less analgesia requirement. The operative time was more (45.6 vs 24.5 min) and the cost of treatment was higher in the laparoscopic group. Conclusion: The laparoscopic technique is a safe and clinically beneficial operative procedure. It provides certain advantages over open appendectomy, ·including short hospital stay, decreased requirement .of postoperative analgesia, early food tolerance, and earlier return to normal activities, Where feasible, laparoscopy should be undertaken as the initial procedure of choice for most cases of appendicitis. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2013) Vol. 17 (1) : 7-13

scholarly journals Is the laparoscopic approach a safe choice for the management of acute appendicitis in pregnant women? A meta-analysis of observational studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Frountzas ◽  
C Nikolaou ◽  
K Stergios ◽  
K Kontzoglou ◽  
K Toutouzas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Fetal Loss ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Increased Risk

IntroductionAcute appendicitis is a common and serious situation during pregnancy, because of the increased risk of fetal loss and perforation in the third trimester, as well as a diagnostic difficulty. During recent years laparoscopic approach has been introduced to clinical practice with encouraging results. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the surgical and obstetrical outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy during pregnancy.Materials and methodsMEDLINE, SCOPUS, Clinicaltrials.gov, CENTRAL and Google Scholar were searched for studies reporting on postoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy during pregnancy. The random effects model (DerSimonian–Laird) was used to calculate pooled effect estimates when high heterogeneity was encountered, otherwise the fixed-effects (Mantel–Haenszel) model was implemented.ResultsTwenty-one studies that enrolled 6276 pregnant women are included in the present meta-analysis. Of these women, 1963 underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 4313 underwent an open appendectomy. Women who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy demonstrated an increase in fetal loss risk, while neonates of women that underwent open appendectomy presented decreased Apgar score at five minutes after birth. All the rest outcomes were similar between the two groups. The time that each study took place seemed to affect the comparison of birth weight and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups.ConclusionLaparoscopic appendectomy seems to be a relatively safe therapeutic option in pregnancy when it is indicated. Thus, it should be implemented in clinical practice, always considering the experience of the surgeon in such procedures. Nevertheless, the need of new studies to enhance this statement remains crucial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document