Otopolyposis With Middle Ear Allergic Mucin in a Patient With Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (10) ◽  
pp. 862-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manvinder S. Kumar ◽  
Nicholas J. Panella ◽  
Kelly R. Magliocca ◽  
Esther X. Vivas
Keyword(s):  
Middle Ear ◽  
Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Mucin

A Concomitant Allergic Fungal Otomastoiditis with an Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Vandersteen Clair ◽  
Vandersteen Clair ◽  
Johanna Pradelli ◽  
Grégoire D’andrea ◽  
Elisabeth Lanteri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Middle Ear ◽  
Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis ◽  
Purulent Discharge ◽  
Nasal Discharge ◽  
Middle Meatus ◽  
Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
The Face

Background: Allergic fungal otomastoiditis is a rare ear condition characterized by the presence of a specific middle ear mucus usually found in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Methods: We report a case of concomitant allergic fungal otomastoiditis and rhinosinusitis in an immunocompetent 27-year-old man complaining of right otorrhea and nasal discharge for 6 months resistant to any medical treatment. Examination revealed a sticky mucus arising from a polypoid middle ear associated with a right middle meatus purulent discharge. Surgical treatment revealed no cholesteatoma but thick yellowish mucus and a fungal ball, as targeted by imaging, both of which containing Aspergillus species. Result: The patient received short postoperative systemic corticotherapy and showed no recurrence 6 months after. Discussion: Allergic fungal otomastoidis should be considered in the face of a sticky mucus arising from perforated chronic otitis, especially when associated with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Complete surgical debridement is essential.

scholarly journals Low Incidence of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis in Japanese Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117955061987075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiichiro Makihara ◽  
Shin Kariya ◽  
Tomoyuki Naito ◽  
Junya Matsumoto ◽  
Mitsuhiro Okano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steroid Therapy ◽  
Bone Erosion ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Treatment ◽  
High Recurrence Rate ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Peripheral Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Mucin

Background: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a noninvasive fungal disease of the sinuses with a very high recurrence rate. A very small number of Japanese cases have been reported. Material and methods: The subjects were 6 patients with AFRS out of 429 patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery at Kagawa Rosai Hospital between December 2011 and November 2017. We retrospectively examined the clinical features and outcomes of these 6 patients. Results: The incidence of AFRS was 1.4% (6/429). Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis was unilateral in 5 cases and bilateral in 1. Computed tomography revealed hyperdense areas representing allergic mucin, but no patient exhibited bone erosion. Magnetic resonance imaging showed hypointense or no signal regions at the locations of allergic mucin. Postoperatively, 1 patient developed recurrence. Because the recurrent patient had no significant symptoms, he refused further surgery and received drug therapy. Preoperative eosinophil counts and total IgE levels were elevated in all patients; postoperatively, both remained high in the patient who developed recurrence. Postoperative treatments included steroid therapy and nasal irrigation. Conclusions: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis is less prevalent in Japan than in Western nations. Peripheral blood eosinophil and serum IgE values may be used as the biomarkers. Significance: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis is prone to recurrence. Postoperative treatment including steroid therapy is important in the management of AFRS.

Radiographic Nuances in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas R. Rowan ◽  
Tyler A. Janz ◽  
Rodney J. Schlosser ◽  
Zachary M. Soler
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Nasal Polyposis ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Concha Bullosa ◽  
Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Unilateral Disease ◽  
Allergic Mucin

Background Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is characterized by higher revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) rates and unique radiographic features when compared to chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) or chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP). Objective We hypothesized that an increased frequency of concha bullosa in AFRS or other radiographic nuances might allow for accumulation of allergic mucin and contribute to increased ESS revision rates. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patient diagnosis (AFRS, CRSwNP, and CRSsNP), basic demographics, and prior ESS rates were collected. Results A total of 210 consecutive patients were included (AFRS = 70, CRSwNP = 70, and CRSsNP = 70). Pediatric AFRS patients had more unilateral disease (38.1% vs 4.4%; P = .007) and anterior ethmoid skull base erosion (23.8% vs 6.7%; P = .047) than adult AFRS patients. AFRS patients were more likely to be younger (24.9 ± 10.1 years vs 45.6 ± 14.4 years vs 48.7 ± 18.2 years; P < .001), African American (70% vs 14.3% vs 11.4%; P < .001), and have undergone prior ESS (54.3% vs 45.7% vs 31.4%; P = .02) than CRSwNP or CRSsNP patients. Concha bullosa were more prevalent in AFRS patients than CRSwNP or CRSsNP patients across the population (42.9%, 18.6%, and 14.3%; P < .001) and in the setting of no previous surgery (53.1%, 31.6%, and 16.7%; P < .001). Conclusion In this cohort, pediatric AFRS patients had more unilateral disease and anterior ethmoid skull base erosion. Concha bullosa prevalence was significantly higher in AFRS as compared to those with CRSwNP or CRSsNP, despite prior ESS. Surgeons should consider concha bullosa as a potential anatomical subsite to harbor recurrent or residual disease.

Fungal Sinusitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean P McKee ◽  
Jeffrey Paul Radabaugh ◽  
Martin J Citardi ◽  
William C Yao
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Paranasal Sinuses ◽  
Fungal Disease ◽  
Fungal Sinusitis ◽  
Invasive Fungal Sinusitis ◽  
Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Mucin

Fungal sinusitis encompasses a spectrum of fungal disease processes affecting the paranasal sinuses, ranging from asymptomatic colonization to rapidly progressive and fatal infections. This review contains 10 figures, 3 tables, and 30 references.  Key Words: fungal sinusitis, mycetoma, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, invasive fungal sinusitis, mucormycosis, allergic mucin

scholarly journals Allergen Immunotherapy in an HIV+ Patient with Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian A. Myles ◽  
Satyen Gada
Keyword(s):  
Allergen Immunotherapy ◽  
Severe Infection ◽  
Invasive Fungal Disease ◽  
Fungal Disease ◽  
Fungal Sinusitis ◽  
Opportunistic Pathogens ◽  
Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Chronic Invasive

Patients with HIV/AIDS can present with multiple types of fungal rhinosinusitis, fungal balls, granulomatous invasive fungal rhinosinusitis, acute or chronic invasive fungal rhinosinusitis, or allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). Given the variable spectrum of immune status and susceptibility to severe infection from opportunistic pathogens it is extremely important that clinicians distinguish aggressive fungal invasive fungal disease from the much milder forms such as AFRS. Here we describe a patient with HIV and AFRS to both remind providers of the importance of ruling out invasive fungal disease and outline the other unique features of fungal sinusitis treatment in the HIV-positive population. Additionally we discuss the evidence for and against use of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for fungal disease in general, as well as the evidence for AIT in the HIV population.

Sinonasal Surfactant Protein A1, A2, and D Gene Expression in Cystic Fibrosis: A Preliminary Report

2007 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradford A. Woodworth ◽  
Rachel Wood ◽  
John E. Baatz ◽  
Rodney J. Schlosser
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cystic Fibrosis ◽  
Nasal Polyposis ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Surfactant Protein ◽  
Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Novel Treatment ◽  
Polymerase Chain

OBJECTIVE: To measure alterations in SPA1, A2, and D gene expression in various forms of inflammatory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Sinus mucosal biopsies were performed in patients with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFS), CRS with nasal polyposis, cystic fibrosis (CF), and controls. SP mRNA was measured with quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Patients with CF (n = 4) showed significantly increased SPA1 (82-fold), SPA2 (100-fold), and SPD (47-fold) mRNA ( P < 0.05) when compared with controls (n = 5). Patients with CRS with nasal polyposis (n = 5) also demonstrated elevated SPA1 (27-fold), SPA2 (13-fold), and SPD (13-fold). Patients with AFS (n = 7) had increased SPA1 (5-fold), SPA2 (9-fold), and SPD (17-fold), but were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: SPA1, A2, and D are upregulated in various forms of CRS, but are significantly elevated in cystic fibrosis CRS. SIGNIFICANCE: Understanding the role of SPs in CRS will help develop novel treatment approaches for sinonasal pathoses.

scholarly journals Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: an overview on pathogenesis, early diagnosis and management

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Suri ◽  
Bhavya B. M.
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Histological Evaluation ◽  
Nasal Discharge ◽  
Fungal Sinusitis ◽  
Surgical Specimen ◽  
Specimen Handling ◽  
Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of the study was<strong> </strong>to evaluate the criteria for diagnosing allergic fungal rhinosinusitis and to maintain permanent drainage and ventilation, while preserving the integrity of the mucosa.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This is a prospective study of 50 patients with allergic fungal sinusitis with or without polyposis all of whom were treated with endoscopic debridement. Mucous sample collection, nasal secretion culture, surgical specimen handling, and histological evaluation of surgical specimens are described. All patients treated with endoscopic sinus surgery, debridement, post-operative use of steroids and antifungal therapy.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Fungal mucin was found in all 50 cases, histology and fungal cultures confirmed the diagnosis. Out of 50 patients, 29 were females and 21 were males, with a mean age of 32 years. The most common symptom was nasal discharge 41 (82%) cases, nasal obstruction in 38 (76%) cases, headache and facial pain in 32 (72%) cases, 7 (14%) patients had bronchial asthma. Symptoms of nasal obstruction and nasal discharge were improved in 46 (92%) cases. All preoperative versus postoperative changes in AFRS associated complaints reached statistical significance of p value &lt;0.001 except in patients with asthma.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Comprehensive management with endoscopic sinus surgery, oral steroids and antifungals reduces the recurrence or need for revision surgery. Long term follow up is very important.</p>

Evaluation of the Role of Immunotherapy in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-117
Author(s):  
Ghada A. Mokhtar ◽  
Sylvia W. Roman ◽  
Aya M. Elgendy ◽  
Marian A. Gerges ◽  
Alsayed Abdulmageed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Examination ◽  
Type I ◽  
Fungal Culture ◽  
Total Ige ◽  
Prick Test ◽  
Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Fungal Allergens ◽  
Type I Hypersensitivity

Background: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a distinct form of chronic rhinosinusitis. Type I hypersensitivity to inhaled fungal allergens has been implicated as key pathogenesis. Immunotherapy as one of the therapeutic options is still controversial. Objective: to evaluate the role of immunotherapy in the management of AFRS patients not responding to medical treatment 3 months following endoscopic surgery. Methodology: A total of 35 patients diagnosed as resistant AFRS were included in this prospective study. Patients were diagnosed following clinical, radiological, and endoscopic examination of nose and paranasal sinuses. Specimens were collected during endoscopy and subjected to microscopic examination and fungal culture. Skin prick test and assessment of total IgE level were performed for all patients. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) was initiated for all patients for 6 months. Clinical efficacy of SLIT was assessed using the 20-item sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-20) score. Results: Aspergillus spp. was the most frequent fungus isolated (74.3%) from patients. All patients were sensitized to mixed fungi. Elevated total IgE (> 100 IU/mL) was found in all patients with 40% of them had peripheral eosinophilia. A significant improvement (p < 0.001) was recorded in the SNOT-20 score of examined patients recording a mean of 1.2 ± 0.3, 6 months after SLIT compared to 1.93 ± 0.44 before immunotherapy initiation. Conclusion: Immunotherapy appears to be a good adjunctive therapy for the management of resistant cases of AFRS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document