Level and Trend of Writing Sequences: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Writing Interventions for Students With Disabilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-192
Author(s):  
Shawn M. Datchuk ◽  
Kyle Wagner ◽  
Bridget O. Hier
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Strategy Development ◽  
Writing Difficulties ◽  
Gradual Improvement ◽  
Information Theoretic ◽  
Writing Interventions ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Competing Models

We examined effects of intervention on the level and trend of text-writing sequences of students with disabilities and writing difficulties, in addition to potential moderating effects related to student demographics (i.e., disability status, age, gender, and race) and writing task (i.e., sentence, essay, and narrative). We reviewed 18 single-case experimental design studies with a total of 96 students and subsequently meta-analyzed 15 of these studies with a total of 79 students using mixed-effects linear regression and an information-theoretic ranking of competing models. Results indicate that writing interventions, including direct instruction and self-regulated strategy development, produced gradual improvement in the trend of correct writing sequences per minute. Older students produced higher levels of writing sequences, but younger students showed steeper trends during intervention. Furthermore, students had higher levels of writing fluency on sentence-writing tasks than on discourse-writing tasks (narratives and essays).

Effects of Writing Interventions on the Level and Trend of Total Words Written: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 001440292110275
Author(s):  
Shawn M. Datchuk ◽  
Derek B. Rodgers ◽  
Kyle Wagner ◽  
Bridget O. Hier ◽  
Christopher T. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Performance Feedback ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Strategy Development ◽  
Older Students ◽  
Information Theoretic ◽  
Writing Interventions ◽  
Fluency Intervention ◽  
Competing Models ◽  
Total Words Written

We estimated effects of writing interventions on the level and trend of writing fluency—rate of total words written over time—by students with and without disabilities. Using mixed-effects regression and an information-theoretic ranking of competing models, we synthesized results of 42 single-case experimental design studies with a total of 205 students. A variety of acquisition and fluency interventions were used across studies, such as self-regulated strategy development and timed practice with performance feedback. We found acquisition and fluency interventions produced an increase in level and a gradual increase in trend of total words written per minute. Students receiving fluency intervention tended to have higher levels of performance across experimental phases (i.e., baseline, intervention, and postintervention), but students receiving acquisition had steeper upward trends. In addition, we found higher levels of total words written per minute on writing tasks with brief time limits (i.e., ≤10 min) and in the writing of older students.

Three-Level Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Data Regarding the Effects of Peer Tutoring on Academic and Social-Behavioral Outcomes for At-Risk Students and Students With Disabilities

2019 ◽  
pp. 074193251985507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariola Moeyaert ◽  
David A. Klingbeil ◽  
Emily Rodabaugh ◽  
Merve Turan
Keyword(s):  
Social Behavior ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Peer Tutoring ◽  
Academic Outcomes ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Behavior Outcomes ◽  
Study Heterogeneity

Meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs may further knowledge about evidence-based practices for students needing remedial or special education. To contribute to evidence-based practice, a multivariate multilevel meta-analysis was used to synthesize the effectiveness of peer tutoring interventions on both academic and social-behavior outcomes. In total, 46 single-case studies met all inclusion criteria. Peer tutoring had a statistically significant effect on both academic and social-behavior outcomes, with a slightly larger effect on academic outcomes. Peer tutoring also had a significant effect on the trend in academic outcomes during the treatment phase (indicating that the intervention becomes more effective over time), but the effect on trends was slightly less than for social outcomes. Including moderators such as gender, age, disability type, and study quality reduced the amount of between-case and between-study heterogeneity. Limitations and implications of these findings are discussed.

Function-Based Intervention in Inclusive School Settings: A Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia L. Walker ◽  
Yun-Ching Chung ◽  
Lauren K. Bonnet
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Challenging Behavior ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Functional Behavior Assessment ◽  
Appropriate Behavior ◽  
School Settings ◽  
Inclusive School ◽  
Study Characteristics ◽  
Function Based Intervention

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to summarize single-case intervention research studies in which students with disabilities received function-based intervention (FBI) within inclusive school settings to address challenging behavior. A total of 27 studies were identified and systematically reviewed to determine the overall effect of FBI on challenging and appropriate behavior and whether study characteristics moderated intervention outcomes. In addition, we summarized the following: (a) characteristics of study participants and settings, (b) characteristics of FBI applied within the studies, and (c) quality of the studies. Overall, FBI led to improved behavior in a variety of inclusive school settings. Interventions delivered after a teacher-administered functional behavior assessment and within the context of a whole group instructional arrangement resulted in significant reductions in challenging behavior and improvements in appropriate behavior, respectively. Implications for practice, future directions for research, and limitations are described.

A Meta-Analysis of Paraprofessional-Delivered Interventions to Address Challenging Behavior Among Students With Disabilities

2020 ◽  
pp. 109830072091114
Author(s):  
Virginia L. Walker ◽  
Megan E. Carpenter ◽  
Kristin J. Lyon ◽  
Lindsey Button
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Challenging Behavior ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Challenging Behaviors ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Future Research ◽  
School Environments ◽  
Wide Range

Paraprofessionals report spending a substantial amount of time addressing challenging behavior in a range of school environments, yet identify behavioral intervention as a high-priority training area. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to systematically review and summarize single-case intervention studies involving paraprofessional-delivered behavioral interventions for students with disabilities. Descriptive findings suggest that, among the reviewed studies, paraprofessionals primarily provided behavioral support to students with autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and multiple disabilities who engage in a wide range of challenging behaviors in both inclusive and noninclusive school environments. Overall, training largely was delivered by researchers and resulted in positive paraprofessional implementation outcomes. Likewise, paraprofessional-implemented behavioral interventions contributed to desirable changes in student challenging and appropriate behavior, with effect size estimates significantly higher for interventions delivered to early childhood–age students and within inclusive school settings. Implications for practice, limitations, and future research directions are described.

A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Group Contingency Interventions for Students With Challenging Behavior: An Update

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 353-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Maggin ◽  
James E. Pustejovsky ◽  
Austin H. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Challenging Behavior ◽  
Student Behavior ◽  
Visual Analysis ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Group Contingency ◽  
Group Contingencies

Group contingencies are recognized as a potent intervention for addressing challenging student behavior in the classroom, with research reviews supporting the use of this intervention platform going back more than four decades. Over this time period, the field of education has increasingly emphasized the role of research evidence for informing practice, as reflected in the increased use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In the current article, we continue this trend by applying recently developed between-case effect size measures and transparent visual analysis procedures to synthesize an up-to-date set of group contingency studies that used single-case designs. Results corroborated recent systematic reviews by indicating that group contingencies are generally effective—particularly for addressing challenging behavior in general education classrooms. However, our review highlights the need for more research on students with disabilities and the need to collect and report information about participants’ functional level.

A Meta-Analysis of Educator Training to Improve Implementation of Interventions for Students With Disabilities

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew E. Brock ◽  
Erik W. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Performance Feedback ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Implementation Fidelity ◽  
Single Case Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Educator Training ◽  
Effective Training ◽  
Case Design

Teachers and paraprofessionals need effective training to improve their implementation of interventions for students with disabilities. Reviews of the single-case design literature have identified some features associated with effective training for these educators, but the group-design literature has received little attention. This meta-analysis systematically reviews group-design studies testing the efficacy of training to improve implementation of interventions for students with disabilities. The mean effect size of educator training on implementation fidelity was g = 1.08, and results from meta-regression analysis suggest training that involves a combination of two specific training strategies (i.e., modeling and performance feedback) was associated with improved implementation fidelity. Increased duration of training was not associated with larger effects. Considered alongside findings from the single-case design literature, these results suggest that how educators are trained is a more important consideration than the number of hours they spend in training.

A Meta-Analysis of Schema Instruction Implemented in Single-Case Experimental Designs

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey J. Peltier ◽  
Kimberly J. Vannest ◽  
Josh J. Marbach
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Experimental Designs ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
Meta Analyses

Identifying mathematical interventions that practitioners can implement to improve the mathematical problem solving (PS) of students is a need for the field. Literature on the PS performance of students with disabilities has grown; recently, schema instruction (SI) has been suggested as an evidence-based practice. The purpose of this study was to meta-analyze single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) that implemented SI with students identified with disabilities. A total of 16 studies, with 61 students identified with disabilities met the inclusion criteria. Tau U was used to report intervention effects; this decision was made because it is more robust than other nonoverlap methods and is frequently reported in published meta-analyses of SCEDs. Moderator analyses included grade of participants, use of technology, disability category, and the type of problems taught. The weighted aggregated Tau U was 88.29% (90% confidence interval [CI] = [80.5%, 96.1%]). Moderator analysis and implications for practice are discussed.

scholarly journals An Evidence-Based Analysis of Self-Regulated Strategy Development Writing Interventions for Students with Specific Learning Disabilities

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Areej Alharbi ◽  
Brittany L. Hott ◽  
Beth A. Jones ◽  
Harvetta R. Henry
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Single Case ◽  
The United States ◽  
Specific Learning Disabilities ◽  
Strategy Development ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Writing Interventions ◽  
School Aged Children ◽  
Overlapping Data ◽  
Specific Learning

AbstractBackground: Approximately 5% of school-aged children in the United States receive special education services under the specific learning disabilities category. Additionally, 20% of all students experience difficulty with writing, spelling, and handwriting.Goal: This literature review provides a synthesis of single case studies evaluating the use of self-regulated strategy development SRSD) for students with specific learning disabilities.Method: Percentage of non-overlapping data PND) and Percentage of Data Exceeding the Median (PEM) were used as a common metric to evaluate studies meeting inclusion criteria.Results: Fifteen articles evaluating seven SRSD writing intervention strategies met study inclusion criteria. Both mean PND (89.69%, Range = 38% - 100%) and mean PEM (0.98, Range = 0.91 - 1.00) suggest that SRSD writing interventions are effective to highly effective.Conclusions: Althoudh additional research is needed, the results suggest that self-regulated writing strategies are an effective intervention to support students with specific learning disabilities experiencing difficulty with writing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document