Scrutinising the argument for reducing penalty rates

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 652-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph McIvor ◽  
Raymond Markey

The issue of weekend penalty rates has been an important area of contention in Australian industrial relations in recent times, with employers seeking reductions in penalty rates or their elimination altogether. In its recent review of Modern Awards, the Fair Work Commission decided to reduce Sunday penalty rates in a number of awards. The decision was in part informed by a recent review by the Productivity Commission, which had gone so far as to recommend that penalty rates on Sundays be made equivalent to Saturdays. In this article, we examine two of the main justifications for reductions in Sunday penalty rates. We begin by examining the question of whether Sundays are still ‘special’ in a sense likely to warrant penalty rates additional to those on a Saturday. We find that Sundays remain the least preferred day to work, are most valued by employees, and occupy a particular role in time shared with family. We also examine the key claim by the Productivity Commission – accepted by the Fair Work Commission – that a reduction in penalty rates would necessarily result in increased employment in the industries considered. We find that there is little direct empirical evidence for this, and that minimum wage studies have been largely unable to find a net employment effect. The relationship among wages, policy and unemployment is complex in a way that defies simple predictions. There is a need for more direct evidence of the effects of penalty rates on employment.

NOTARIUS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Harin Nadindra Kirti

AbstractRemuneration is the most vulnerable and the most important in the relationship between labor and employers also have differences and even frequent conflicts, especially if it is associated with the perception or interpretation that is not the same on the interests of each party that basically does have differences, so that study of the legal protection of the labor mendapatk paid below the regional minimum wage needs to be analyzed properly in order to achieve the welfare of workers. Issues examined in this research is how the legal protection for workers who are not in wages in accordance with the provisions of the minimum wage cities / districts in the city, as well as how the dispute resolution to resume the work force of less than 10 people, who do not earn the minimum wage. The method used in this research is the empirical juridical approach. The results of this study finally provides an answer that the legal protection for workers who are not in wages in accordance with the provisions of the minimum wage city / county in the city of Semarang is to make a complaint to the All Indonesian Workers Union (SPSI) Semarang to be pursued advocacy and admonition to the employer the conflict in order to realize the protection and welfare of workers, related to the settlement of disputes to the CV workforce of less than 10 people who do not get the minimum wage is that it can be done by utilizing a system of Pancasila Industrial Relations with the aim to advise the order to resolve the issue amicably and consensus by Entrepreneur with workers so that outcomes could satisfy both sides.   AbstrakPengupahan merupakan bagian yang paling rawan dan paling penting di dalam hubungan antara tenaga kerja dan pengusaha yang sering kali menimbulkan konflik. Hal ini membuat kajian tentang perlindungan hukum terhadap tenaga kerja yang  dibayar dibawah ketentuan upah minimum regional perlu dianalisis dengan baik, demi terwujudnya kesejahteraan bagi tenaga kerja. Masalah dalam  penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah perlindungan hukum terhadap tenaga kerja yang tidak di upah sesuai dengan ketentuan upah minimum kota/kabupaten di Kota Semarang, serta bagaimana penyelesaian sengketa terhadap CV yang tenaga kerjanya kurang dari 10 orang, yang tidak mendapatkan upah sesuai UMR. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap tenaga kerja yang dibayar di bawah ketentuan upah minimum kota/kabupaten di Kota Semarang adalah dengan melakukan pengaduan kepada Serikat Pekerja Seluruh Indonesia (SPSI) Kota Semarang untuk diupayakan advokasi hingga peneguran kepada pihak pengusaha yang terlibat konflik, terkait penyelesaian sengketa terhadap CV yang tenaga kerjanya kurang dari 10 orang yang tidak mendapatkan upah sesuai UMR adalah dengan memanfaatkan Sistem Hubungan Industrial Pancasila dengan tujuan untuk menyarankan kepada para pihak, baik pengusaha maupun tenaga kerja, agar menyelesaikan persoalan secara musyawarah dan mufakat sehingga hasil yang dicapai dapat memuaskan kedua belah pihak.   


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Agus Pramono

<p>This article discusses the settlement of industrial relations disputes and termination of employment according to the applicable laws. Industrial relations disputes can be divided into two types: disputes over rights and disputes over interests. The relationship between workers and employers is a relationship that needs each other; workers need wages, employers benefit. However, in practice there are problems, so employers give Warning Letters I and II which are followed by Termination of Employment (PHK). The process of resolving this problem can be carried out through Bipartite, Mediation, or to the Industrial Relations Court. This paper is written with a normative juridical approach. The results show that the labor-employer problem is getting more complicated since the existence of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation, one of which contains the elimination of the city / district minimum wage (UMK) and replaced with the provincial minimum wage (UMP). The elimination of MSEs results in lower wages for workers. In fact, in the Manpower Act Number 13 of 2003, no worker may receive a wage below the minimum wage, because the determination of wages is based on the calculation of Living Needs.</p><p align="center">[]</p><p><em>Artikel ini membahas mengenai penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial dan pemutusan hubungan kerja menurut perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Perselisihan hubungan industrial menurut jenisnya dapat dibagi menjadi dua: perselisihan hak dan perselisihan kepentingan. Hubungan pekerja dan pengusaha merupakan hubungan yang saling membutuhkan; buruh memerlukan upah, pengusaha mendapatkan keuntungan. Namun, dalam prakteknya terjadi permasalahan, sehingga pengusaha memberikan Surat Peringatan I dan II yang diikuti dengan Pemutusan Hubugan Kerja (PHK). Proses penyelesaian persoalan ini dapat dilakukan melalui Bipartit, Mediasi, atau ke Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. Tulisan ini ditulis dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa permasalahan buruh-pengusaha semakin pelik seja hadirnya Undang-Undang Omnibus Law Cipta Lapangan Kerja yang salah satu isinya penghapusan upah minimum kota/kabupaten (UMK) dan diganti dengan upah minimum provinsi (UMP). Penghapusan UMK membuat upah pekerja lebih rendah. Padahal, dalam Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tak boleh ada pekerja yang mendapat upah di bawah upah minimum, karena penetapan upah didasarkan atas perhitungan Kebutuhan Layak Hidup.</em></p>


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xunbing Shen

Microexpressions do exist, and they are regarded as valid cues to deception by many researchers, furthermore, there is a lot of empirical evidence which substantiates this claim. However, some researchers don’t think the microexpression can be a way to catch a liar. The author elucidates the theories predicting that looking for microexpressions can be a way to catch a liar, and notes that some data can support for the utilization of microexpressions as a good way to detect deception. In addition, the author thinks that the mixed results in the area of investigating microexpressions and deception detection may be moderated by the stake. More empirical studies which employ high-stake lies to explore the relationship between microexpressions and deception detection are needed.


Author(s):  
Armin Schnider

This chapter summarizes current interpretations of all forms of confabulations discussed in the book and reviews the relationship between the four forms of memory-related confabulations. Experimental investigation has confirmed the dissociation between various types of false memories and considerably advanced the understanding of the mechanisms of some forms of confabulation, in particular behaviourally spontaneous confabulation and false statements in anosognosia. Overall, experimental evidence is scarce; many models have no controlled experimental basis or extend their proposed range of application well beyond the empirical evidence. The chapter concludes with a call for heightened respect of basic scientific standards in the research on confabulation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1211-1226
Author(s):  
Phan Tran Minh Hung ◽  
Tran Thi Trang Dai ◽  
Phan Nguyen Bao Quynh ◽  
Le Duc Toan ◽  
Vo Hoang Diem Trinh

1980 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 406-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
James DeNardo

A heavy turnout is commonly believed to favor the Democrats. This study presents theoretical reasoning and empirical evidence that challenge the conventional view. Reasonable assumptions about the behavior of core and peripheral voters lead to the conclusion that the majority party is most likely to suffer when turnout increases, common sense notwithstanding. It also appears that the recent decay of partisan loyalties among voters has eroded the relationship between turnout and the vote.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document