The Instructional Decisions of Preservice Teachers during a Reading Practicum

1987 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Shefelbine ◽  
Sandra Hollingsworth
2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elson Szeto ◽  
Annie Yan Ni Cheng

This case study examines preservice teachers’ integration of technology in teaching various subject domains. It aims to gain in-depth understandings of preservice teachers’ pedagogical patterns for teaching through the theoretical lens of technological pedagogical and content knowledge. Multiple data sources were collected in a teacher education institution in Hong Kong. The teachers’ pedagogical patterns vary depending on their instructional decisions affected by individual preferences, various subject cultures, and individual school settings. The patterns reflected various forms of technological pedagogical and content knowledge development in teaching different subjects. Implications for preparation of preservice teachers’ pedagogy, teacher preparation, and development are also discussed.


Author(s):  
Meredith J. C. Swallow ◽  
Kathryn Will-Dubyak

Two professors in a teacher preparation program purposefully examined their courses for ways in which the learning opportunities in each separate course could be connected to facilitate development of preservice teachers' understandings of purposeful integration of technology within literacy instruction for elementary student learners. Preservice teachers in the courses used their knowledge of children's literature and best practices to create rich learning opportunities before examining them through the lens of the TPACK framework and SAMR model. This process enhanced and transformed preservice teachers' instructional decisions to illuminate educational technology as part of literacy instruction.


2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 572-576
Author(s):  
Thomas Fox

In my mathematics methods course for preservice teachers, I ask my students to assess a group of elementary school students concerning their level of geometric reasoning. To do so, they use tasks that focus on assessing and extending students' geometric understandings. These open-ended tasks, along with a framework developed from research findings involving children's geometric reasoning, are described in this article. An important aspect of these tasks is that they focus on how students communicate their reasoning so that my preservice teachers can make more informed instructional decisions when planning a follow-up geometry lesson. Research on geometric reasoning has shown that a match between students' reasoning level and instructional tasks is crucial if meaningful learning is to occur (Crowley 1987).


Author(s):  
Sarah Watt ◽  
Sarah Conoyer ◽  
Jeremy W. Ford ◽  
Anne Foegen ◽  
Georgia Luckey

Thirty-seven preservice teachers engaged in a self-regulated learning experience proposed to increase their algebra content knowledge and to examine their use of data to make instructional decisions. Using weekly algebra curriculum-based measures, preservice special education teachers set learning goals and objectives, individually selected and adjusted weekly learning activities, and self-monitored and graphed their progress. A mixed-methods approach identified that all participants significantly increased in their algebra content knowledge, but the decision-making approaches among students varied greatly.


2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-123
Author(s):  
Ana C. Stephens ◽  
Crystal L. Lamers

Increased calls for student, teacher, and school “accountability” have placed a greater emphasis on the need to assess what students know. While the focus of the calls for accountability is often on high-stakes testing, there are other important forms and purposes of assessment that deserve attention. In Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) asserts, “Assessment should be more than merely a test at the end of instruction to see how students perform under special conditions; rather, it should be an integral part of instruction that informs and guides teachers as they make instructional decisions. Assessment should not merely be done to students; rather, it should also be done for students, to guide and enhance their learning” (p. 22).


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Pfitzner-Eden ◽  
Felicitas Thiel ◽  
Jenny Horsley

Teacher self-efficacy (TSE) is an important construct in the prediction of positive student and teacher outcomes. However, problems with its measurement have persisted, often through confounding TSE with other constructs. This research introduces an adapted TSE instrument for preservice teachers, which is closely aligned with self-efficacy experts' recommendations for measuring self-efficacy, and based on a widely used measure of TSE. We provide first evidence of construct validity for this instrument. Participants were 851 preservice teachers in three samples from Germany and New Zealand. Results of the multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses showed a uniform 3-factor solution for all samples, metric measurement invariance, and a consistent and moderate correlation between TSE and a measure of general self-efficacy across all samples. Despite limitations to this study, there is some first evidence that this measure allows for a valid 3-dimensional assessment of TSE in preservice teachers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document