A rat model of nerve stimulator-guided brachial plexus blockade

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-168
Author(s):  
Yanzi Zhang ◽  
Bo Cui ◽  
Chunyu Gong ◽  
Yidan Tang ◽  
Jianxiong Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Rat Model ◽  
Local Anesthetics ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Nerve Stimulator ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Brachial Plexus Blockade ◽  
Plexus Block

It is important to develop a feasible animal model of regional anesthesia other than sciatic nerve blockade for pharmacokinetic investigations of new local anesthetics or analgesia in upper extremity surgery. Herein, we explored a nerve stimulator (NS)-guided brachial plexus block (BPB) in a rat model. The anatomy of the brachial plexus in rats was delineated in cadavers, and various BPBs were examined. The puncture point was located 0.5–1.0 cm below the lateral one-third of the clavicle. The efficacy and safety of the NS-guided BPB were evaluated using an injection of 2% lidocaine or 0.5% bupivacaine in 16 live animals; saline injection was used as a control. Both sides of the brachial plexus were located successfully using the NS-guided technique. Sensory blockade (nociception assessment) and motor blockade (grasping and straightening tests) appeared after application of the two classical local anesthetics, but not normal saline. The motor and sensory blockade induced by bupivacaine exhibited a longer duration than that induced by lidocaine ( p < 0.05). All rats recovered uneventfully from general anesthesia and BPB. No abnormal results were found in pathological studies or behavioral observations. Thus, a rat model of NS-guided BPB was established, and BPB induced an overall reversible sensory and motor blockade in the thoracic limbs. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety demonstrated that this rat BPB model was feasible, reproducible, and safe.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Addition of Midazolam to Lignocaine—Bupivacaine vs only Lignocaine— Bupivacaine in Brachial Plexus Block

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
Naina P Dalvi ◽  
Harshali Salunkhay ◽  
Shubha N Mohite
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Stimulator ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

ABSTRACT Introduction This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared the onset and duration of sensory blockade, motor blockade, and analgesia with lignocaine, bupivacaine, and midazolam combination vs only lignocaine, bupivacaine in brachial plexus block. Materials and methods Patients of either sex, aged 18–60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I/II, posted for upper limb surgeries to be performed under supraclavicular brachial plexus block with the help of peripheral nerve stimulator were administered either 10 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with 50 μg/kg midazolam (preservative free) + 20 ml 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200,000) in Group lignocaine– bupivacaine–midazolam (LBM) or 10 ml 0.5% bupivacaine + 20 ml 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200,000) in Group lignocaine–bupivacaine (LB). Onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade were monitored. Postoperative analgesia was graded with visual analog scale. Sedation was monitored with Ramsey sedation score. Results A total of 60 patients were randomized to the group LBM (n = 30) and group LB (n = 30). The analgesia was significantly prolonged in the study group, with a mean of 11.72 ± 1.924 hours as compared with a mean of 6.383 ± 1.031 hours in the control group. Sedation scores were higher in the study group, that is, group LBM compared to group LB postoperatively. Conclusion In conclusion, midazolam when added to bupivacaine and adrenalized lignocaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block hastens the onset of sensory and motor blockade. This combination improves analgesia, as manifested by lower pain scores and prolonged duration of analgesia. How to cite this article Dalvi NP, Salunkhay H, Mohite SN. A Comparative Study of Addition of Midazolam to Lignocaine–Bupivacaine vs only Lignocaine–Bupivacaine in Brachial Plexus Block. Res Inno in Anaesth 2016;1(1):5-9.

scholarly journals Comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and costoclavicular brachial plexus block using a modified double-injection technique: a randomized non-inferiority trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quehua Luo ◽  
Weifeng Yao ◽  
Yunfei Chai ◽  
Lu Chang ◽  
Hui Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Injection Technique ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Double Injection ◽  
Plexus Block

Abstract Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block (CC-approach) is a recently described brachial plexus block (BPB) and an alternative approach to the supraclavicular approach (SC-approach). The relevant sonoanatomy is analogous in terms of the brachial plexus and its adjacent artery for both approaches. In the present study, we hypothesized that the two approaches will result in similar block dynamics when used the modified double-injection (MDI) technique. One hundred and twelve patients were randomly allocated to receive either a SC- or CC-approach with MDI technique. In the CC group, half the volume was injected adjacent to the medial cord of the brachial plexus, the procedure was guided by ultrasound and verified by nerve stimulator, subsequently the second half was injected close to the lateral cord. In the SC group, the MDI technique was carried out as described in our previous study. Sensory and motor blockade of all four terminal nerves were assessed with a 3-point scale. The primary outcome was the proportion of complete sensory blockade at 15 min with a predefined non-inferiority margin of −13%. The proportion of subjects at 15 min was comparable between the SC group and the CC group (91 vs 87%, absolute difference: −3%). No significant differences were found for complete motor blockade and onset times of the individual nerves within 30 min, and block-related serious adverse events (all P&gt;0.05). We conclude that the MDI technique applied to a costoclavicular and supraclavicular block resulted in similar block dynamics. In addition, it may provide a promising alternative technique when considering the use of multipoint injection.

scholarly journals A comparison of ultrasound versus paresthesia technique for supraclavicular brachial plexus block

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Bidyut Borah ◽  
Smita R. Engineer ◽  
Kiran B. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Ultrasound Technique ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Ultrasonography is a newer tool for identification of nerves in the practice of regional anaesthesia. Visualization of target structures and spread of drugs under direct vision and thus avoiding complications like pneumothorax, accidental intravascular injections are potential benefit of ultrasonography technique. Aim of the study was to examine the usefulness of ultrasound guided brachial plexus block and compare it with paresthesia technique with the believe that ultrasound guidance can shorten the onset as well as increase the duration of blockade..Methods: Eighty patients of either sex, 18-60 years, posted for upper limb surgery were divided into 2 groups according to the technique used to give block, group US (ultrasound technique) and group PA (paresthesia technique).  Both the groups received 0.5 % bupivacaine 20 ml with 8 mg of dexamethasone.Results: There was notable difference between the patient groups with regard to initiation of motor blockade (10 min group US vs 11.1 min group PA, p <0.0156) and sensory blockade (5.16 min group US vs 6.96 min group PA, p <0.0001) also duration of motor blockade (1272.88 min in group US vs 899.25 min in group PA, p <0.0001) and sensory blockade (1343.88 min in group US vs 996.75 min in group PA, p<0.0001).Conclusions: Ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks result in a higher success rate with respect to onset and duration of blockade with less incidence of complications compared to paresthesia technique.

scholarly journals Comparative Study for Anaesthetic Quality with the Addition of Clonidine, Fentanyl or Dexmedetomidine to 0.5℅ Ropivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block at a Tertiary Hospital

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Naveen P
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Plexus Block ◽  
Group D

Background: Supraclavicular Brachial plexus block also described as the “spinal of arm”, provides a rapid onset, complete, predictable, and dense anesthesia for the mid humerus, forearm and hand surgery. Brachial plexus block also causes sympathetic block with resultant improvement in blood flow, reduction in vasospasm, and edema which is more favorable for an acute hand injury and reconstructive plastic surgery. In the present study, we compared the anesthetic quality with the addition of either clonidine, fentanyl, or dexmedetomidine to 0.5℅ ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block in regard to the onset and duration of sensory/motor block and duration of analgesia at a tertiary hospital. Material and Methods: Present study was the prospective, interventional and comparative study carried out in the department of anaesthesiology, in patients 18-60 years, ASA grade1/2, Mallampati grades 1 and 2, posted for elective upper limb surgeries. 60 patients were randomly divided into three groups, each group includes 20 patients, (Group D- Dexmedetomidine, C- Clonidine, F- Fentanyl). Results: 60 patients scheduled to undergo elective upper limb surgeries were randomly divided into three groups (Group D, C, F), each group includes 20 patients. Age, gender, ASA status, weight, height and mean duration of surgery were comparable in three groups and the difference was statistically insignificant. The difference between the onset of sensory blockade, mean time of onset of complete sensory blockade, duration of complete sensory blockade was found to be statistically significant. Intergroup analysis in groups D, C and F for the onset of sensory blockade, onset of complete sensory blockade and duration of complete sensory blockade in three different groups noted a statistically significant difference. The difference for the onset of motor blockade, the onset of complete motor blockade and duration of motor blockade was found to be statistically significant as (p<0.05), there is a difference noted between Group D, C, and F. Intergroup statistical analysis of the onset of motor blockade, the onset of complete motor blockade and duration of motor blockade between group D vs C and group D vs F were statistically significant, whereas between group C vs F it was insignificant. The duration of analgesia was prolonged in Group D, C, F and was found to be statistically significant. Intergroup analysis of duration of analgesia between three different groups. The difference between group D vs C, between group D vs F, and between-group C vs F was statistically significant. The time of 1st rescue analgesia was prolonged in Group D, C, F and was statistically significant (p<0.05). Intergroup analysis of the time of 1st rescue analgesia between three different groups. The difference between group D vs C, between group D vs F, and between group C vs F were statistically significant. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine, clonidine added to ropivacaine shortens the onset of sensory and motor blockade, prolongs the duration of the sensory blockade as compared to fentanyl. Dexmedetomidine shortens the onset of sensory and motor blockade much more than clonidine.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Bupivacaine 0.5 % and Ropivacaine 0.75 % for Supra-Clavicular Brachial Plexus Block Using Nerve Locator for Elective Upper Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 1825-1829
Author(s):  
Amol Singam ◽  
Punith M. Sirige
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
General Nature ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

BACKGROUND Regional anaesthesia has multiple advantages as compared to general anaesthesia for upper limb surgeries. Here in this study, we wanted to compare bupivacaine 0.5 %, commonly used anaesthetic with ropivacaine 0.75 % which has fewer side effects like cardiotoxicity for supraclavicular brachial plexus block. METHODS A study was performed on 60 ASA I & II patients aged between 18 and 75 years, undergoing upper limb elective surgeries under brachial plexus block using nerve locator. Beginning of sensory and motor block, general nature of block, and terms of sensory and motor blocks were assessed in the C5 to T1 dermatomes. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in the onset of sensory and motor blockade between ropivacaine 0.75 % and bupivacaine 0.5 %. Ropivacaine 0.75 % produced similar quality of motor and sensory blockade compared to 0.5 % bupivacaine. The time taken for maximum motor blockade with ropivacaine was comparable with that of bupivacaine 0.5 %. There was no statistically significant difference regarding the duration of analgesia with ropivacaine 0.75 % compared to bupivacaine 0.5 %. Duration of motor blockade with 0.75 % ropivacaine was comparable to that of 0.5 % bupivacaine. CONCLUSIONS Ropivacaine 0.75 % 0.4 ml / kg or 0.5 % bupivacaine 0.4 ml / kg for supraclavicular brachial plexus block produces satisfactory and comparable sensory and motor blockade. It is suggested that lower cardiovascular toxicity of ropivacaine with equal efficacy as bupivacaine in such circumstances may help in reducing the risks to the patient. KEY WORDS Bupivacaine 0.5 %, Ropivacaine 0.75 %, Brachial Plexus Block, Upper Limb Orthopaedic Surgeries

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF EFFICACY OF DEXAMETHASONE USED AS ADJUVANT TO LEVOBUPIVACAINE ADMINISTERED FOR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK BY SUPRACLAVICULAR APPROACH FOR UPPER LIMB SURGERY

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
Avishek Naha ◽  
Sagar Rai ◽  
Amrita Roy ◽  
Gautam Piplai
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Plexus Block ◽  
Group D

Many studies have been done on the adjuvants used along with local anaesthetics for Brachial Plexus block. The drug Levobupivacaine has wider margin of safety and has been used in our study along with Dexamethasone as adjuvant. Method: We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled, single blinded study on a total of 70 patients who were randomly allocated into two groups namely Group N (Normal Saline) and Group D (Dexamethasone). Both groups received 28 ml 0.5% Levobupivacaine. Group D received 2 ml (8 mg) Dexamethasone as adjuvant while Group N received 2 ml Normal Saline. Onset of Sensory blockade and motor blockade were measured, respectively, by time taken to loss of pin prick sensation and loss of muscle movement, after administration of drug. Duration of sensory block was measured by time till patient rst reported pain after sensory blockade. Result:The onset time of sensory block was 10.2 ± 1.67 minutes in Group D compared to 12.3 ± 1.88 minutes in Group N (p value <0.0001). The onset time of motor block in Group D was 14.4 ± 1.73 minutes and in Group N 16.3 ± 1.97 min (p value = 0.0002). The duration of sensory block was 944.1± 64.79 minutes in Group D versus 654.7 ± 71.61 min in Group N (p value < 0.0001). Conclusion: It was observed that Group D had signicantly faster onset of sensory and motor blockade while also experiencing longer duration of analgesia.

“A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED TECHNIQUE VERSUS PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATOR GUIDED TECHNIQUE IN INFRA-CLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK FOR UPPER LIMB SURGERIES.”

2021 ◽  
pp. 68-71
Author(s):  
Sonali M Khobragade ◽  
Roopa R
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Execution Time ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Extensive use of ultrasonography for block execution has increased the success of procedure due to direct visualization of anatomical structures. Infra-clavicular brachial plexus block can be an attractive alternative to supraclavicular nerve block for upper limb surgeries. The objective of our study was to assess and compare the efcacy and success rate of USG guided technique versus PNS technique in Infra-clavicular brachial plexus block. Material And Methods: 70 adult patients with age in the range of 18-60 years, weight 50-80 Kg, ASA Grade I & II posted for elective upper limb surgeries of hand, wrist, forearm and distal arm under infra-clavicular brachial plexus block. Group P (PNS)– Nerve stimulator guided Infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Group U (USG)– Ultrasound guided Infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Block execution time, sensory blockade, motor blockade and success rate were assessed. Assessment of sensory blockade was done by Hollmen scale whereas motor block assessment was done by Bromage Scale. Results: There was statistically signicant difference between the groups for block execution time, onset of sensory and motor blockade, time for complete sensory and motor block and success rate(p<0.05). Conclusion: We conclude that, Ultrasound guided infraclavicular nerve block has shorter block execution time, faster sensory and motor block onset, signicantly earlier complete sensory and motor blockade, higher success rate with lesser pricks and minimal complications and should be preferred over PNS technique.

INTERSCALENE BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK WITH A NERVE STIMULATOR FOR CLAVICULAR FRACTURE SURGERY

2014 ◽  
pp. 20-24
Author(s):  
Van Minh Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Clavicle Fracture ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Clavicular Fracture ◽  
Nerve Stimulator ◽  
Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block ◽  
Fracture Surgery

Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness and side effects, complications of interscalene brachial plexus block with a nerve stimulator for clavicular fracture surgery. Materials and Methods:In a prospective descriptive study, fifty patients received interscalene brachial plexus block for fixation of clavicle fracture. The dose was 7 mg/kg of 1% lidocaine mixed with 1 : 200000 adrenaline. Results:The success rate was 94%, including 4% of patients needed sedation and small amount of narcotic, failure rate was 6%. The minimal stimulating current of the nerve location was 0.46 ±0.08 mA, the onset time of sensory block was 8.86 ±2.65min. There were 3 complications with one Horner’s syndrome and two hoarsenesses. Conclusion:We found that in patients undergoing fixation of clavicle fracture the interscalene block with a nerve stimulator was an effective anesthetic with a low rate of side effects and complications. Key words:Interscalene block, nerve stimulator, clavicular fracture surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document