scholarly journals Embracing a New Vision for Diabetes Education and Diabetes Educators

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-332
Author(s):  
James A. Fain
2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 775-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Fitzner

The purpose of this article is to provide a brief review of reliability and validity testing. These concepts are important to researchers who are choosing techniques and/or developing tools that will be applied and evaluated in diabetes education practice. Several types of reliability and validity testing are defined, and an easy-to-use check sheet is provided for research purposes. Following testing for the basic aspects of reliability and validity such as face and construct validity, a tool may be appropriate for use in practice settings. Those conducting comprehensive outcomes evaluations, however, may desire additional validation such as testing for external validity. Diabetes educators can and should incorporate rigorous testing for these important aspects when conducting assessments of techniques and tools relating to diabetes self-management training.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enza Gucciardi ◽  
Sherry Espin ◽  
Antonia Morganti ◽  
Linda Dorado

Background Specialised diabetes teams, specifically certified nurse and dietitian diabetes educator teams, are being integrated part-time into primary care to provide better care and support for Canadians living with diabetes. This practice model is being implemented throughout Canada in an effort to increase patient access to diabetes education, self-management training, and support. Interprofessional collaboration can have positive effects on both health processes and patient health outcomes, but few studies have explored how health professionals are introduced to and transition into this kind of interprofessional work. Method Data from 18 interviews with diabetes educators, 16 primary care physicians, 23 educators’ reflective journals, and 10 quarterly debriefing sessions were coded and analysed using a directed content analysis approach, facilitated by NVIVO software. Results Four major themes emerged related to challenges faced, strategies adopted, and benefits observed during this transition into interprofessional collaboration between diabetes educators and primary care physicians: (a) negotiating space, place, and role; (b) fostering working relationships; (c) performing collectively; and (d) enhancing knowledge exchange. Conclusions Our findings provide insight into how healthcare professionals who have not traditionally worked together in primary care are collaborating to integrate health services essential for diabetes management. Based on the experiences and personal reflections of participants, establishing new ways of working requires negotiating space and place to practice, role clarification, and frequent and effective modes of formal and informal communication to nurture the development of trust and mutual respect, which are vital to success.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talal Alharbi ◽  
Gayle McLelland ◽  
Nikos Thomacos

Background: Diabetes education provided by qualified and competent diabetes educators (DEs) is effective in reducing risks of diabetes complications. Globally, the DE workforce comprises a mixture of professions, with the majority being nurses. It is necessary to regularly assess DEs’ competence and knowledge to ensure that quality diabetes education is being delivered. Objective: This study explored the self-perceived competence and the diabetes knowledge of DEs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: This study explored the self-perceived competence and the diabetes knowledge of DEs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), using a quantitative, cross-sectional survey, administered at 20 diabetes centres. A total of 368 DEs were invited to participate in the study. Results: Surveys were completed by 324 DEs (response rate = 88%), 84% (n=271) were nurses. From a possible overall range between 63-252, the mean (M) was 168.59 and standard deviation (SD) was (35.6) hence perceived competence of the DEs was low, Of a maximum possible score of 45 for the diabetes knowledge test, response scores ranged from 9 to 40, with M = 26.2 (6.0). Perceived competence and diabetes knowledge varied depending on age, nationality, educational qualification, primary profession, and whether or not the DE held a specialised diabetes qualification. Conclusion: DEs in the KSA need to develop and enhance their competence and knowledge in order to provide quality diabetes care and education. The low perceived competence and scores in the knowledge test show that intervention measures are needed to regularly assess and improve the core competencies of DEs. Further research is required to identify DEs’ barriers to having sufficient competencies and knowledge.


2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Anderson ◽  
Martha M. Funnell ◽  
Cheri Ann Hernandez

Diabetes educators use theories all the time, even if they are not aware of it. To teach, one must have some assumptions about how people learn and what constitutes effective teaching. The purpose of this article is to help diabetes educators interested in research and evaluation choose appropriate theories. The article will review the 4 purposes of theories, that is, description, explanation, prediction, and control, as well as the degree to which a theory has been articulated and elaborated. The importance of a theory’s personal resonance, its explanatory power, and its utility will also be examined. The article will also review how to use 1 or more theories at each stage of a research or evaluation project.


2008 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Daniel J Blackman

In this day and age of evidence-based practice, we seek to provide interventions that we know will make a significant difference in the lives of our patients. For those of us who specialize in the care of people with diabetes, e.g. endocrinologists and diabetes educators, diabetes self-management education/training (DSME/T) has long been considered an essential intervention, a cornerstone of diabetes care. The government’s Healthy People 2010 objective that 60% of persons with diabetes should receive formal diabetes education supports this logic.1However, for many healthcare professionals outside of the specialty, this belief in the efficacy of DSME/T appears to be less solid, as evidenced by the poor referral rates for education. This disconnect is illustrated by the following findings. Although Medicare covers DSME/T as a benefit for patients with diabetes, only 1% of Medicare beneficiaries received this service in 2004 and 2005.2The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) d ta indicate that only 54.3% of people who responded to a survey had ever attended some type of diabetes self-management class.3A 2007 Roper US Diabetes Patient Market Study found that only 26% of nearly 17 million diagnosed diabetes patients in the US had visited a diabetes educator within the past year.4Anecdotal reports from diabetes educators support the notion that with the current type 2 diabetes epidemic facing the US, education programs should be over-run with referrals for DSME/T. This, however, is far from the case for most programs. Most diabetes educators are sorely underutilized, and the rate of recognized diabetes education program closures is staggering, at three per week in the US.5


1993 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Ruby ◽  
Carol A. Blainey ◽  
Linda B. Haas ◽  
Maxine Patrick

This study identified the knowledge base and practices of Registered Nurse,. Certified Diabetes Educators (RN, CDEs) regarding their exercise teaching programs for elderly clients who have non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The random sample of 197 AADE members surveyed by questionnaire was a highly educated and experienced group. RN, CDEs who worked 30 or more hours per week in diabetes education or attended four or more continuing education (CE) programs per year had significantly more comprehensive exercise teaching program designs and instructional techniques to enhance elderly NIDDM clients' learning (P<.05). However; many CDEs do not teach their elderly clients about exercise due to lack of resources, lack of specific knowledge to prescribe exercise, and negative stereotypes of elderly clients' ability to exercise. Greater availability of educational programs for CDEs to explore curriculum development, program planning, evaluation, and exercise prescription for elderly clients with multisystem disease is recommended.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Chin-Fun Chu ◽  
Chengdong Li ◽  
Laura Hayes ◽  
Linda Siminerio

BACKGROUND Diabetes educators are integral to a clinical team in providing diabetes self-management education and support; however, current mobile and Web-based self-management tools are not integrated into clinical diabetes care to support diabetes educators’ education efforts. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to seek diabetes educators’ insights regarding the development of an interface within the Chronicle Diabetes system, a nationally used electronic health record (EHR) system for diabetes education documentation with behavioral goal-setting functions, to transfer mobile phone- and wearable tracker-collected self-monitoring information from patients to diabetes educators to facilitate behavioral goal monitoring. METHODS A descriptive qualitative study was conducted to seek educators’ perspectives on usability and interface development preferences in developing a connected system. Educators can use the Chronicle Diabetes system to set behavioral goals with their patients. Individual and group interviews were used to seek educators’ preferences for viewing mobile phone- and wearable tracker-collected information on diet, physical activity, and sleep in the Chronicle Diabetes system using open-ended questions. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed for common themes. RESULTS Five common themes emerged from the discussion. First, educators expressed enthusiasm for and concerns about viewing diet and physical activity data in Chronicle Diabetes system. Second, educators valued viewing detailed dietary macronutrients and activity data; however, they preferred different kinds of details depending on patients’ needs, conditions, and behavioral goals and educators’ training background. Third, all educators liked the integration of mobile phone-collected data into Chronicle Diabetes system and preferably with current EHR systems. Fourth, a need for a health care team and a central EHR system to be formed was realized for educators to share summaries of self-monitoring data with other providers. Fifth, educators desired advanced features for the mobile app and the connected interface that can show self-monitoring data. CONCLUSIONS Flexibility is needed for educators to track the details of mobile phone- and wearable tracker-collected diet and activity information, and the integration of such data into Chronicle Diabetes and EHR systems is valuable for educators to track patients’ behavioral goals, provide diabetes self-management education and support, and share data with other health care team members to faciliate team-based care in clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document