scholarly journals Restricted Variance Interaction Effects: What They Are and Why They Are Your Friends

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 2779-2806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose M. Cortina ◽  
Tine Koehler ◽  
Kathleen R. Keeler ◽  
Bo Bernhard Nielsen

Although interaction hypotheses are increasingly common in our field, many recent articles point out that authors often have difficulty justifying them. The purpose of this article is to describe a particular type of interaction: the restricted variance (RV) interaction. The essence of the RV interaction is that, as the value of one variable in a system changes, certain values of another variable in the system become less plausible, thus restricting its variance. This, in turn, influences relationships between that variable and other variables. These types of interactions are quite common, even if they are not recognized as RV interactions, and they exist at every level of analysis. The advantage of the RV interaction is that, as compared with other interaction types, it is relatively simple to justify. The different forms of RV interaction do, however, contain complexities of which a researcher must be aware. This article explains and illustrates the forms that RV interactions can take and their often counterintuitive implications. It also describes how one should go about testing them. Our intention is to help researchers strengthen and focus their interaction arguments.

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 610-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard G. Gardner ◽  
T. Brad Harris ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Bradley L. Kirkman ◽  
John E. Mathieu

The study of interaction effects is critical for creating, extending, and bounding theory in organizational research. Integrating and extending prior work, we present a taxonomy of two-way interaction effects that can guide organizational scholars toward clearer, more precise ways of developing theory, advancing hypotheses, and interpreting results. Specifically, we identify three primary interaction types, including strengthening, weakening, and reversing effects. In addition, we explore subcategories within these interaction types. Our review of articles published in leading management and applied psychology journals from 2009 to 2013 supports the generalizability of this framework. We offer specific recommendations for using this taxonomy to deliver more precise development, testing, and interpretation of interaction hypotheses.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Mohammed ◽  
Lori A. Ferzandi ◽  
Michelle M. Harrison ◽  
Jodi L. Buffington

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D. R. Bennett ◽  
A. Nicole Burnett ◽  
Paul D. Siakaluk ◽  
Penny M. Pexman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document