Standard early rehabilitation and lower limb transcutaneous nerve or neuromuscular electrical stimulation in acute stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1344-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsiao-Ching Yen ◽  
Wen-Shiang Chen ◽  
Jiann-Shing Jeng ◽  
Jer-Junn Luh ◽  
Ya-Yun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Early Rehabilitation ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Stroke Center

Objective:We investigated adding lower limb transcutaneous nerve stimulation or neuromuscular electrical stimulation to standard early rehabilitation in acute stroke patients.Design:An assessor-blinded, randomized controlled pilot study.Setting:A medical stroke center.Subjects:First-stroke patients aged 20–80 years admitted to the stroke center within 24 hours post stroke.Interventions:A total of 42 participants were randomly assigned to groups: transcutaneous nerve stimulation + standard early rehabilitation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation + standard early rehabilitation, or standard early rehabilitation-only. Transcutaneous nerve or neuromuscular electrical stimulation was delivered to the affected tibialis anterior and quadriceps muscles for 30 minutes a day, five days per week for two weeks.Main measures:The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients, the Functional Independence Measure, and three mobility milestones, namely, sitting for >five minutes, standing for >one minute, and walking ⩾50 m, were evaluated, respectively, at baseline, at the two-week post-intervention, and at two-week follow-up.Results:Significant differences existed in the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients scores between the transcutaneous nerve stimulation and standard early rehabilitation-only groups measured at two-weeks post-intervention (mean (SD) = 31.38 (5.39) and 18.00 (8.65), respectively) and at the two-week follow-up (34.08 (2.69) and 26.14 (7.77), respectively). A higher proportion of participants could walk ⩾50 m independently in the transcutaneous nerve stimulation group than in the standard early rehabilitation-only group at the two-week post-intervention ( P = 0.013) and two-week follow-up ( P = 0.01) marks.Conclusion:Two weeks of transcutaneous nerve stimulation added to standard early rehabilitation improved postural stability and walking in acute stroke patients.

scholarly journals Sensorimotor vs. Motor Upper Limb Therapy for Patients With Motor and Somatosensory Deficits: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Early Rehabilitation Phase After Stroke

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nele De Bruyn ◽  
Leen Saenen ◽  
Liselot Thijs ◽  
Annick Van Gils ◽  
Eva Ceulemans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Limb ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Motor Impairment ◽  
Early Rehabilitation ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Additional Therapy ◽  
Somatosensory Function

Background: Somatosensory function plays an important role in motor learning. More than half of the stroke patients have somatosensory impairments in the upper limb, which could hamper recovery.Question: Is sensorimotor upper limb (UL) therapy of more benefit for motor and somatosensory outcome than motor therapy?Design: Randomized assessor- blinded multicenter controlled trial with block randomization stratified for neglect, severity of motor impairment, and type of stroke.Participants: 40 first-ever stroke patients with UL sensorimotor impairments admitted to the rehabilitation center.Intervention: Both groups received 16 h of additional therapy over 4 weeks consisting of sensorimotor (N = 22) or motor (N = 18) UL therapy.Outcome measures: Action Research Arm test (ARAT) as primary outcome, and other motor and somatosensory measures were assessed at baseline, post-intervention and after 4 weeks follow-up.Results: No significant between-group differences were found for change scores in ARAT or any somatosensory measure between the three time points. For UL impairment (Fugl-Meyer assessment), a significant greater improvement was found for the motor group compared to the sensorimotor group from baseline to post-intervention [mean (SD) improvement 14.65 (2.19) vs. 5.99 (2.06); p = 0.01] and from baseline to follow-up [17.38 (2.37) vs. 6.75 (2.29); p = 0.003].Conclusion: UL motor therapy may improve motor impairment more than UL sensorimotor therapy in patients with sensorimotor impairments in the early rehabilitation phase post stroke. For these patients, integrated sensorimotor therapy may not improve somatosensory function and may be less effective for motor recovery.Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03236376.

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF FUNCTIONAL NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION (FNMES) IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF HAND FUNCTIONS IN ACUTE STROKE SURVIVALS

2012 ◽  
Vol 02 (04) ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Mohamed Faisal C. K. ◽  
Priyabandani Neha Om Prakash ◽  
Ajith S.
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Hand Functions ◽  
Conventional Physiotherapy ◽  
Block Test ◽  
Experimental Group

AbstractStroke is a worldwide health problem. Hand function is one of the important factors which are affected in stroke. Stroke patients are usually given a conventional physiotherapy but if an additional FNMES is given it might show better improvement. By keeping these facts in view, the present study aims at evaluating and comparing the efficacy of conventional physiotherapy and adding FNMES will make any better outcome in the acute stroke survivals. The subjects were randomly assigned to any of the two groups; control group consisted of 15 subjects who received only conventional therapy for 4 weeks and experimental group consisting of 15 subjects who received an additional FNMES along with conventional physiotherapy for 4 weeks. The hand function was assessed on day 1 and to know the recovery, at the end of four weeks of intervention with the help of action research arm test (ARAT) and box and block test (BBT). At the end of 4 weeks of intervention both the groups showed significant improvements. On ARAT, control group showed a mean of 10.2000 whereas, experimental group showed mean of 20.8000 with p = 0.001 (p ≤ 0.05) and on BBT, the control group showed a mean of 21.666 and experimental group showed 30.933 with p = 0.41 (p ≤ S 0.05). Therefore the study concludes that, though there was improvement in both the groups, the experimental group who received an additional FNMES along with conventional physiotherapy showed better improvement in hand functions in the acute stroke survivals.

Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Swallowing Process in Stroke Patient with Neurogenic Dysphagia

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-53
Author(s):  
Ruth Ariyani ◽  
Widjajalaksmi ◽  
Luh K Wahyuni ◽  
Susyana Tamin ◽  
Saptawati Bardosono
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Voice Quality ◽  
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Neurogenic Dysphagia ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Cough Reflex ◽  
Voluntary Cough ◽  
Pharyngeal Phase ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Objective: The aim of this study to determine the therapeutic effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on pharyngeal phase of swallowing for stroke patients with neurogenic dysphagia,and to see the effect of NMES in reducing the incidence of standing secretion, residue, penetration and aspiration.Methods: It is a quasi-­experimental study design. 10 stroke patients with neurogenic dysphagia in Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital, Jakarta, 40-­80 years old with hemodynamically stable, cooperative and will be get NMES therapy for 4 weeks. Pre and Post treatment assessment caompared using a modified MASA test (The Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability) and FEES examination (Flexible Endoscophic Evaluation of Swallowing). Analysis of change scores using Wilcoxon test.Results:The obtain average age of patients 59.80+9.705 years. Significant difference seen in the pharyngeal phase of swallowing increased score of gag reflex, velum elevation, cough reflex, voluntary cough, voice quality, pharynx response, pharyngeal constrictor contraction and vocal cord adduction (p<0.005).Also seen significant reduction in the incidence of standing secretion, residue and penetration (p<0.005), but not significantly in the incidence of aspiration (p=0083).Conclusions: NMES increased the pharyngeal phase of swallowing, reduced the incidence of standing secretion, residue and penetration of stroke patients with neurogenic dysphagia, but have not able to reduced aspiration.Keywords :Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NEMS), neurogenic dysphagia, MASA test (The Mann Assessment of Swallow ing Ability), FEES examination (Flexible Endoscophic Evaluation of Swallowing), swallowing process.

scholarly journals In-Hospital Intravenous Thrombolysis Offers No Benefit in Mechanical Thrombectomy in Optimized Tertiary Stroke Center Setting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juha-Pekka Pienimäki ◽  
Jyrki Ollikainen ◽  
Niko Sillanpää ◽  
Sara Protto
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Stroke Center

Abstract Purpose Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the first-line treatment in acute stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to MT is being contested. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MT without IVT in patients with no contraindications to IVT presenting directly to a tertiary stroke center with acute anterior circulation LVO. Materials and Methods We collected the data of 106 acute stroke patients who underwent MT in a single high-volume stroke center. Patients with anterior circulation LVO eligible for IVT and directly admitted to our institution who subsequently underwent MT were included. We recorded baseline clinical, laboratory, procedural, and imaging variables and technical, imaging, and clinical outcomes. The effect of intravenous thrombolysis on 3-month clinical outcome (mRS) was analyzed with univariate tests and binary and ordinal logistic regression analysis. Results Fifty-eight out of the 106 patients received IVT + MT. These patients had 2.6-fold higher odds of poorer clinical outcome in mRS shift analysis (p = 0.01) compared to MT-only patients who had excellent 3-month clinical outcome (mRS 0–1) three times more often (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences between the groups in process times, mTICI, or number of hemorrhagic complications. A trend of less distal embolization and higher number of device passes was observed among the MT-only patients. Conclusions MT without prior IVT was associated with an improved overall three-month clinical outcome in acute anterior circulation LVO patients.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Manual Therapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Cervical Mobility and Endurance in Subacute and Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3245
Author(s):  
Belén Díaz-Pulido ◽  
Yolanda Pérez-Martín ◽  
Daniel Pecos-Martín ◽  
Isabel Rodríguez-Costa ◽  
Milagros Pérez-Muñoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Chronic Neck Pain ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Neck pain is a frequent health problem. Manual therapy (MT) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) are recommended techniques for treatment of mechanical neck disorders (MND) in Spanish Public Primary Care Physiotherapy Services. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of MT versus TENS in active mobility and endurance in cervical subacute or chronic neck pain. Ninety patients with MND were randomly allocated to receive ten 30-min sessions of either MT or TENS, in a multi-centered study through 12 Primary Care Physiotherapy Units in the Madrid community. Active cervical range of motion (CD-ROM) and endurance (Palmer and Epler test) were evaluated pre- and post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up. A generalized linear model of repeated measures was constructed for the analysis of differences. Post-intervention MT yielded a significant improvement in active mobility and endurance in patients with subacute or chronic MND, and at 6-month follow-up the differences were only significant in endurance and in sagittal plane active mobility. In the TENS group, no significant improvement was detected. With regard to other variables, MT improved mobility and endurance more effectively than TENS at post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up in the sagittal plane. Only MT generated significant improvements in cervical mobility and endurance in the three movement planes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document