scholarly journals Lay and professional stakeholder involvement in scoping palliative care issues: Methods used in seven European countries

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Brereton ◽  
Christine Ingleton ◽  
Clare Gardiner ◽  
Elizabeth Goyder ◽  
Kati Mozygemba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Key Issues

Background: Stakeholders are people with an interest in a topic. Internationally, stakeholder involvement in palliative care research and health technology assessment requires development. Stakeholder involvement adds value throughout research (from prioritising topics to disseminating findings). Philosophies and understandings about the best ways to involve stakeholders in research differ internationally. Stakeholder involvement took place in seven countries (England, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway and Poland). Findings informed a project that developed concepts and methods for health technology assessment and applied these to evaluate models of palliative care service delivery. Aims: To report on stakeholder involvement in the INTEGRATE-HTA project and how issues identified informed project development. Design: Using stakeholder consultation or a qualitative research design, as appropriate locally, stakeholders in seven countries acted as ‘advisors’ to aid researchers’ decision making. Thematic analysis was used to identify key issues across countries. Setting/participants: A total of 132 stakeholders (82 professionals and 50 ‘lay’ people) aged ⩾18 participated in individual face-to-face or telephone interviews, consultation meetings or focus groups. Results: Different stakeholder involvement methods were used successfully to identify key issues in palliative care. A total of 23 issues common to three or more countries informed decisions about the intervention and comparator of interest, sub questions and specific assessments within the health technology assessment. Conclusion: Stakeholders, including patients and families undergoing palliative care, can inform project decision making using various involvement methods according to the local context. Researchers should consider local understandings about stakeholder involvement as views of appropriate and feasible methods vary. Methods for stakeholder involvement, especially consultation, need further development.

scholarly journals STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT THROUGHOUT HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: AN EXAMPLE FROM PALLIATIVE CARE

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Brereton ◽  
Philip Wahlster ◽  
Kati Mozygemba ◽  
Kristin Bakke Lysdahl ◽  
Jake Burns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Implementation Barriers ◽  
Stakeholder Consultation

Objectives: Internationally, funders require stakeholder involvement throughout health technology assessment (HTA). We report successes, challenges, and lessons learned from extensive stakeholder involvement throughout a palliative care case study that demonstrates new concepts and methods for HTA.Methods: A 5-step “INTEGRATE-HTA Model” developed within the INTEGRATE-HTA project guided the case study. Using convenience or purposive sampling or directly / indirectly identifying and approaching individuals / groups, stakeholders participated in qualitative research or consultation meetings. During scoping, 132 stakeholders, aged ≥ 18 years in seven countries (England, Italy, Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, Lithuania, and Poland), highlighted key issues in palliative care that assisted identification of the intervention and comparator. Subsequently stakeholders in four countries participated in face–face, telephone and / or video Skype meetings to inform evidence collection and / or review assessment results. An applicability assessment to identify contextual and implementation barriers and enablers for the case study findings involved twelve professionals in the three countries. Finally, thirteen stakeholders participated in a mock decision-making meeting in England.Results: Views about the best methods of stakeholder involvement vary internationally. Stakeholders make valuable contributions in all stages of HTA; assisting decision making about interventions, comparators, research questions; providing evidence and insights into findings, gap analyses and applicability assessments. Key challenges exist regarding inclusivity, time, and resource use.Conclusion: Stakeholder involvement is feasible and worthwhile throughout HTA, sometimes providing unique insights. Various methods can be used to include stakeholders, although challenges exist. Recognition of stakeholder expertise and further guidance about stakeholder consultation methods is needed.

STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT IN THE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN LATIN AMERICA

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Pichon-Riviere ◽  
Natalie Soto ◽  
Federico Augustovski ◽  
Laura Sampietro-Colom
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Key Issues

Objectives:Latin American countries are taking important steps to expand and strengthen universal health coverage, and health technology assessment (HTA) has an increasingly prominent role in this process. Participation of all relevant stakeholders has become a priority in this effort. Key issues in this area were discussed during the 2017 Latin American Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) Policy Forum.Methods:The Forum included forty-one participants from Latin American HTA agencies; public, social security, and private insurance sectors; and the pharmaceutical and medical device industry. A background paper and presentations by invited experts and Forum members supported discussions. This study presents a summary of these discussions.Results:Stakeholder involvement in HTA remains inconsistently implemented in the region and few countries have established formal processes. Participants agreed that stakeholder involvement is key to improve the HTA process, but the form and timing of such improvements must be adapted to local contexts. The legitimization of both HTA and decision-making processes was identified as one of the main reasons to promote stakeholder involvement; but to be successful, the entire system of assessment and decision making must be properly staffed and organized, and certain basic conditions must be met, including transparency in the HTA process and a clear link between HTA and decision making.Conclusions:Participants suggested a need for establishing clear rules of participation in HTA that would protect HTA producers and decision makers from potentially distorting external influences. Such rules and mechanisms could help foster trust and credibility among stakeholders, supporting actual involvement in HTA processes.

OP18 A Case Study Of Local Context-Dependent Decision-Making In Health Technology Assessment

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Renée Drolet ◽  
Genevieve Asselin ◽  
Alice Nourissat ◽  
Martin Coulombe ◽  
Marc Rhainds
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Context Analysis ◽  
Medical Indications

IntroductionAntibiotics impregnated calcium sulfate (AI-CaSO4) is an innovative practice to ensure local diffusion of antibiotics especially in the treatment of prosthesis or medical implants infections. A recent introduction of AI-CaSO4 at CHU de Québec-Université Laval (CHU de Québec) was followed by a rapid increase in use and costs. A hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA) was then requested to assess the clinical relevance of AI-CaSO4 in surgical site infection (SSI) management.MethodsA systematic review of the effectiveness and adverse effects of AI-CaSO4 was performed in indexed databases and grey literature. The local context analysis included different methodologies: 1) interviews with pharmacists, surgeons and operating room managers, 2) data extraction from electronic patient records (EPR), 3) procurement database on CaSO4, and 4) interdisciplinary working group including orthopedic and vascular surgeons, pharmacists, infectiologists, and hospital managers.ResultsAvailable evidence suggest that AI-CaSO4 could contribute in the treatment of osteomyelitis whereas no conclusion can be drawn for other medical indications in both treatment and prevention of SSI. A review of 113 surgical procedures showed that AI-CaSO4 was rapidly adopted after only one year and used for various medical indications in neuromodulation, orthopedic and vascular surgery. Osteomyelitis treatment accounted for less than 3% of cases. AI-CaSO4 was mainly used in prevention of SSI (65%) and surgical revisions (74%). Furthermore, local safety issues were raised by a lack of standardization for the preparation and under recording of antibiotics use with AI-CaSO4.ConclusionsThe current state of knowledge does not support the widespread use AI-CaSO4 at CHU de Québec. This study highlights the importance of adapting HTA approach to the local context to influence decision-making especially in the context of innovating practice in order to insure the relevance, safety and sustainability of care.

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN POLICY AND PRACTICE

2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Henshall ◽  
Pedro Koch ◽  
Georg Carl von Below ◽  
Albert Boer ◽  
José L. Conde-Olasagasti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Group 6 ◽  
Types Of Information

According to the HTA-Europe report, health technology assessment (HTA) has the potential to influence health policy in the fields of research and development, regulation of pharmaceuticals, devices, and services, quality assurance, reimbursement, education and training of healthcare providers, and consumer education (1). To identify and bridge the gaps between HTA production and implementation, the goal of Working Group 6 was to approach the use of HTA in policy and practice on the aggregate policy level as well as in the local context, such as in hospitals. Members of Working Group 6 included both users (e.g., members of decision-making bodies) and producers (e.g., members of HTA agencies) of HTA reports. The aim of the working group was to identify three types of information on HTA implementation and impact. These included identifying successful examples of the implementation of HTA results, examples of structures that require HTA information as part of the decision-making process, and finally, identifying groups and persons who use HTA frequently and are willing to share their experiences with other HTA users and producers.

Reflections on the evolution of health technology assessment in Europe

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinna Sorenson ◽  
Kalipso Chalkidou
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Assessment Requirements ◽  
Development And Evolution ◽  
Over Time

AbstractHealth technology assessment (HTA) has assumed an increasing role in health systems in recent years, with many countries establishing agencies or programmes to evaluate health technology and other interventions to inform policy decisions and clinical practice. This paper reflects upon its development and evolution in Europe over the last decade, with a focus on England, France, Germany and Sweden. In particular, we explore how HTA has evolved over time as well as its impact on policy and practice. While countries share many of the same objectives, there are differences in the way HTA agencies and programmes are organised, operate, and influence decision making. Despite these differences, all systems are faced with opportunities and challenges related to stakeholder involvement and acceptance, the suitability and transparency of assessment requirements and methods, balancing evidence and values in decision making, and demonstrating impact.

scholarly journals Health technology assessment in sub-Saharan Africa: a descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Hollingworth ◽  
Ama Pokuaa Fenny ◽  
Su-Yeon Yu ◽  
Francis Ruiz ◽  
Kalipso Chalkidou
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Technical Assistance ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Main Theme ◽  
Narrative Synthesis ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Sub Saharan

Abstract Background Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are moving towards universal health coverage. The process of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) can support decisions relating to benefit package design and service coverage. HTA involves institutional cooperation with agreed methods and procedural standards. We systematically reviewed the literature on policies and capacity building to support HTA institutionalisation in SSA. Methods We systematically reviewed the literature by searching major databases (PubMed, Embase, etc.) until June 2019 using terms considering three aspects: HTA; health policy, decision making; and SSA. We quantitatively extracted and descriptively analysed content and conducted a narrative synthesis eliciting themes from the selected literature, which varied in study type and apporach. Results Half of the 49 papers identified were primary research studies and mostly qualitative. Five countries were represented in six of ten studies; South Africa, Ghana, Uganda, Cameroon, and Ethiopia. Half of first authors were from SSA. Most informants were policy makers. Five themes emerged: (1) use of HTA; (2) decision-making in HTA; (3) values and criteria for setting priority areas in HTA; (4) involving stakeholders in HTA; and (5) specific examples of progress in HTA in SSA. The first one was the main theme where there was little use of evidence and research in making policy. The awareness of HTA and economic evaluation was low, with inadequate expertise and a lack of local data and tools. Conclusions Despite growing interest in HTA in SSA countries, awareness remains low and HTA-related activities are uncoordinated and often disconnected from policy. Further training and skills development are needed, firmly linked to a strategy focusing on strengthening within-country partnerships, particularly among researchers and policy makers. The international community has an important role here by supporting policy- relevant technical assistance, highlighting that sustainable financing demands evidence-based processes for effective resource allocation, and catalysing knowledge-sharing opportunities among countries facing similar challenges.

scholarly journals Determinants of Managed Entry Agreements in the context of Health Technology Assessment: a comparative analysis of oncology therapies in four countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olina Efthymiadou ◽  
Panos Kanavos
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Best Practice Guidelines ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Decision Making Factors ◽  
Managed Entry Agreements

Abstract Background Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) are increasingly used to address uncertainties arising in the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) process due to immature evidence of new, high-cost medicines on their real-world performance and cost-effectiveness. The literature remains inconclusive on the HTA decision-making factors that influence the utilization of MEAs. We aimed to assess if the uptake of MEAs differs between countries and if so, to understand which HTA decision-making criteria play a role in determining such differences. Methods All oncology medicines approved since 2009 in Australia, England, Scotland, and Sweden were studied. Four categories of variables were collected from publicly available HTA reports of the above drugs: (i) Social Value Judgments (SVJs), (ii) Clinical/Economic evidence submitted, (iii) Interpretation of this evidence, and (iv) Funding decision. Conditional/restricted decisions were coded as Listed With Conditions (LWC) other than an MEA or LWC including an MEA (LWCMEA). Cohen's κ-scores measured the inter-rater agreement of countries on their LWCMEA outcomes and Pearson's chi-squared tests explored the association between HTA variables and LWCMEA outcomes. Results A total of 74 drug-indication pairs were found resulting in n = 296 observations; 8 percent (n = 23) were LWC and 55 percent (n = 163) were LWCMEA. A poor-to-moderate agreement existed between countries (−.29 < κ < .33) on LWCMEA decisions. Cross-country differences within the LWCMEA sample were partly driven by economic uncertainties and largely driven by SVJs considered across agencies. Conclusions A set of HTA-related variables driving the uptake of MEAs across countries was identified. These findings can be useful in future research aimed at informing country-specific, “best-practice” guidelines for successful MEA implementation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document