When migraine mimics stroke: A systematic review

Cephalalgia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (14) ◽  
pp. 2068-2078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Terrin ◽  
Giulia Toldo ◽  
Mario Ermani ◽  
Federico Mainardi ◽  
Ferdinando Maggioni
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Migraine With Aura ◽  
Thrombolytic Treatment ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Mimics ◽  
The Third ◽  
Stroke Mimic

Background Migraine with aura may mimic an acute ischemic stroke, so that an improper administration of thrombolytic treatment can expose migrainous patients to severe adverse effects. Methods This systematic review quantifies the relevance of migraine with aura among stroke mimics, checking for thrombolysis’ safety in these patients. We reviewed the literature after 1995, distinguishing from studies dealing with stroke mimics treated with systemic thrombolysis and those who were not treated with systemic thrombolysis. Results Migraine with aura is responsible for 1.79% (CI 95% 0.82–3.79%) of all the emergency Stroke Unit evaluations and it represents 12.24% (CI 95% 6.34–22.31%) of stroke mimics in the group not treated with systemic thrombolysis. 6.65% (CI 95% 4.32–9.78%) of systemic thrombolysis administrations are performed in patients without an acute ischemic stroke. Migraine with aura is responsible for 17.91% of these (CI 95% 13.29–23.71%). The reported rate of adverse events seems extremely low (0.01%). Conclusion Migraine with aura is the third most common stroke mimic, following seizures and psychiatric disorders; it is responsible for about 18% of all improper thrombolytic treatments. Despite the absence of strong supporting data, thrombolysis in migraine with aura seems to be a procedure with an extremely low risk of adverse events.

scholarly journals External Validation of Stroke Mimic Prediction Scales in the Emergency Department

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Ming Tu ◽  
Guan Zhong Tan ◽  
Seyed Ehsan Saffari ◽  
Chee Keong Wee ◽  
David Jeremiah Ming Siang Chee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Stroke Mimics ◽  
Prediction Tools ◽  
Stroke Mimic

Abstract Background Acute ischemic stroke is a time-sensitive emergency where accurate diagnosis is required promptly. Due to time pressures, stroke mimics, whom present with similar signs and symptoms as acute ischemic stroke, pose a diagnostic challenge to the emergency physician. With limited access to investigative tools, clinical prediction tools, based only on clinical features, may be useful to identify stroke mimics. We aim to externally validate the performance of 4 stroke mimic prediction scales and aim to derive a novel decision tree, to improve identification of stroke mimics. Methods We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study at a primary stroke centre, served by a telestroke hub. We included consecutive patients whom were administered intravenous thrombolysis for suspected acute ischemic stroke from January 2015 to October 2017. Four stroke mimic prediction tools (FABS, simplified FABS, Telestroke Mimic Score and Khan Score) were rated simultaneously, using only clinical information prior to administration of thrombolysis. The final diagnosis was ascertained by an independent stroke neurologist. Area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) analysis was performed. A classification tree analysis was also conducted using variables which were found to be significant in the univariate analysis. Results Telestroke Mimic Score had the highest discrimination for stroke mimics among the 4 scores tested (AUROC = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.63–0.87), although it was not statistically significantly better. Telestroke Mimic Score had the highest sensitivity (91.3%), while Khan score had the highest specificity (88.2%). All 4 scores had high positive predictive value (88.1–97.5%) and low negative predictive values (4.7–32.3%). A novel decision tree, using only age, presence of migraine and psychiatric history, had a higher prediction performance (AUROC = 0.80). Conclusion Four tested stroke mimic prediction scales performed similarly well to identify stroke mimics in the emergency setting. A novel decision tree may improve the identification of stroke mimics.

Mechanical thrombectomy in pediatric stroke: systematic review, individual patient data meta-analysis, and case series

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 558-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kartik Bhatia ◽  
Hans Kortman ◽  
Christopher Blair ◽  
Geoffrey Parker ◽  
David Brunacci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Neurological Outcomes

OBJECTIVEThe role of mechanical thrombectomy in pediatric acute ischemic stroke is uncertain, despite extensive evidence of benefit in adults. The existing literature consists of several recent small single-arm cohort studies, as well as multiple prior small case series and case reports. Published reports of pediatric cases have increased markedly since 2015, after the publication of the positive trials in adults. The recent AHA/ASA Scientific Statement on this issue was informed predominantly by pre-2015 case reports and identified several knowledge gaps, including how young a child may undergo thrombectomy. A repeat systematic review and meta-analysis is warranted to help guide therapeutic decisions and address gaps in knowledge.METHODSUsing PRISMA-IPD guidelines, the authors performed a systematic review of the literature from 1999 to April 2019 and individual patient data meta-analysis, with 2 independent reviewers. An additional series of 3 cases in adolescent males from one of the authors’ centers was also included. The primary outcomes were the rate of good long-term (mRS score 0–2 at final follow-up) and short-term (reduction in NIHSS score by ≥ 8 points or NIHSS score 0–1 at up to 24 hours post-thrombectomy) neurological outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in patients < 18 years of age. The secondary outcome was the rate of successful angiographic recanalization (mTICI score 2b/3).RESULTSThe authors’ review yielded 113 cases of mechanical thrombectomy in 110 pediatric patients. Although complete follow-up data are not available for all patients, 87 of 96 (90.6%) had good long-term neurological outcomes (mRS score 0–2), 55 of 79 (69.6%) had good short-term neurological outcomes, and 86 of 98 (87.8%) had successful angiographic recanalization (mTICI score 2b/3). Death occurred in 2 patients and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in 1 patient. Sixteen published thrombectomy cases were identified in children < 5 years of age.CONCLUSIONSMechanical thrombectomy may be considered for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (ICA terminus, M1, basilar artery) in patients aged 1–18 years (Level C evidence; Class IIb recommendation). The existing evidence base is likely affected by selection and publication bias. A prospective multinational registry is recommended as the next investigative step.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document