Determining On-/Off-track Lesions in Glenohumeral Dislocation Using Multiplanar Reconstruction Computed Tomography Is Easier and More Reproducible Than Using 3-dimensional Computed Tomography

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-145
Author(s):  
Laura Irène C. Mulleneers ◽  
Hannah Van Rompaey ◽  
Baïdir Haloui ◽  
Nicole Pouliart
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Multiplanar Reconstruction ◽  
Source Image ◽  
Bony Defect ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Bony Bankart ◽  
Glenoid Track

Background: The glenoid track is a useful tool to predict engagement and therefore the risk of recurrence of dislocation in the presence of Hill-Sachs and/or bony Bankart lesions. To assess the glenoid track preoperatively, only methods using 3-dimensional reconstruction (3DR) have been described, but these lack a standardized, reliable, and easy description. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to evaluate a new method for determining the glenoid track using computed tomography (CT) scan with multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) in comparison with using 3DR images. Our hypothesis was that the MPR method would be easier to standardize and more reproducible. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 52 patients whose arthro-CT scan revealed a Hill-Sachs lesion, whether in combination with a bony Bankart lesion or not, were included. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data from the 52 CT scans were all analyzed using open source image analysis software. Glenoid width, with or without associated bony defect, and the Hill-Sachs interval (HSI) were measured on MPR as well as on 3DR images. All measurements obtained using both methods were directly compared and evaluated for intra- and interobserver reliability. Results: In absolute values, only small differences were seen between the MPR and 3DR methods, amounting to a maximal difference of 0.07 cm for the HSI and 0.04 cm for the glenoid width. For glenoid measurements, both methods were similar. For humeral measurements, the MPR method demonstrated higher inter- and intraobserver reliability than did the 3DR method. Conclusion: The newly described MPR method for the assessment of the glenoid track and HSI is at least as accurate as the published 3DR method, with better intra- and interobserver reliability. Because MPRs are also easier to obtain, this method could be recommended in daily practice.

scholarly journals Importance of Computed Tomography in Determining Displacement in Scaphoid Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 038-042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Gilley ◽  
Sameer Puri ◽  
Krystle Hearns ◽  
Andrew Weiland ◽  
Michelle Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Scaphoid Fracture ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Angular Deformity ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Scaphoid Fractures ◽  
The Mean

Background Displaced scaphoid fractures have a relatively high rate of nonunion. Detection of displacement is vital in limiting the risk of nonunion when treating scaphoid fractures. Questions/Purpose We evaluated the ability to diagnose displacement on radiographs and computed tomography (CT), hypothesizing that displacement is underestimated in assessing scaphoid fracture by radiograph compared with CT. Materials and Methods Thirty-five preoperative radiographs and CT scans of acute scaphoid fractures were evaluated by two blinded observers. Displacement and angular deformity were measured, and the fracture was judged as displaced or nondisplaced. Scapholunate, radiolunate, and intrascaphoid angles were measured. Radiograph and CT measurements between nondisplaced and displaced fractures were compared. Intraobserver reliability was measured. Results  Reader 1 identified 12 fractures as nondisplaced on radiograph, but displaced on CT (34%). Reader 2 identified 9 fractures as nondisplaced on radiograph, but displaced on CT (26%). For displaced fractures, the mean intrascaphoid angle was over three times greater when measured on CT than on radiograph (56 vs. 16 degrees). Scapholunate angle >65 degrees and radiolunate angle >16 degrees were significantly associated with displacement on CT. Interobserver reliability for diagnosing displacement was perfect on CT but less reliable on radiograph. Conclusion Scaphoid fracture displacement on CT was identified in 26 to 34% of fractures that were nondisplaced on radiograph, confirming that radiographic evaluation alone underestimates displacement. These results underscore the importance of CT scan in determining displacement and angular deformity when evaluating scaphoid fractures, as it may alter the decision on treatment and surgical approach to the fracture. We recommend considering CT scan to evaluate all scaphoid fractures. Level of Evidence Level III.

3D Biometrics for Hindfoot Alignment Using Weightbearing Computed Tomography

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 720-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Zhong Zhang ◽  
François Lintz ◽  
Alessio Bernasconi ◽  
Shu Zhang ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Hindfoot Alignment ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study

Background: Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) is a useful tool for the assessment of hindfoot alignment (HA). Foot ankle offset (FAO) is a recently introduced parameter, determined from WBCT images using semiautomatic software. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical relevance and reproducibility of FAO for the evaluation of HA. Methods: A prospective comparative study was performed on consecutive patients requiring bilateral WBCT between September 2017 and April 2018. Based on the clinical assessment of HA, patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) normal alignment group (G1), (2) valgus (G2), and (3) varus (G3). FAO and long axial view (HACT) were measured on WBCT images, and the groups were compared. The reproducibility of FAO and HACT was determined through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Regression analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between the 2 methods. Overall, 249 feet (126 patients) were included (G1 = 115, G2 = 78, and G3 = 56 feet). Results: The mean values for FAO and HACT were 1.2% ± 2.8% and 3.9 ± 3.1, respectively, in G1; 8.1% ± 3.7% and 9.7 ± 4.9 in G2; and −6.6% ± 4.8% and −8.2 ± 6.6 in G3. Intra- and interobserver reliability was 0.987 and 0.988 for FAO and 0.949 and 0.949 for HACT, respectively. There was a good linear correlation between HACT and FAO ( R2 = 0.744), with a regression slope of 1.064. Conclusions: WBCT was a useful method for the characterization of HA. FAO was reproducible and correlated well with physical examination. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

scholarly journals Quantification of Acetabular Coverage on 3-Dimensional Reconstructed Computed Tomography Scan Bone Models in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Descriptive Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 232596712110494
Author(s):  
Steven F. DeFroda ◽  
Thomas D. Alter ◽  
Floor Lambers ◽  
Philip Malloy ◽  
Ian M. Clapp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Femoral Head ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Acetabular Coverage ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Average Percentage ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Inferior Aspect ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Background: Accurate assessment of osseous morphology is imperative in the evaluation of patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and hip dysplasia. Through use of computed tomography (CT), 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructed hip models may provide a more precise measurement for overcoverage and undercoverage and aid in the interpretation of 2-dimensional radiographs obtained in the clinical setting. Purpose: To describe new measures of acetabular coverage based on 3D-reconstructed CT scan bone models. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Preoperative CT scans were acquired on the bilateral hips and pelvises of 30 patients before arthroscopic surgical intervention for FAIS. Custom software was used for semiautomated segmentation to generate 3D osseous models of the femur and acetabulum that were aligned to a standard coordinate system. This software calculated percentage of total acetabular coverage, which was defined as the surface area projected onto the superior aspect of the femoral head. The percentage of coverage was also quantified regionally in the anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial, and posterolateral quadrants of the femoral head. The acetabular clockface was established by defining 6 o’clock as the inferior aspect of the acetabular notch. Radial coverage was then calculated along the clockface from the 9-o’clock to 5-o’clock positions. Results: The study included 20 female and 10 male patients with a mean age of 33.6 ± 11.7 years and mean body mass index of 27.8 ± 6.3. The average percentage of total acetabular coverage for the sample was 57% ± 6%. Acetabular coverages by region were as follows: anteromedial, 78% ± 7%; anterolateral, 18% ± 7%, posterolateral, 33% ± 13%, and posteromedial, 99% ± 1%. The acetabular coverage ranged from 23% to 69% along the radial clockface from 9 to 5 o’clock. Conclusion: This study demonstrated new 3D measurements to characterize acetabular coverage in patients with FAIS and elucidated the distribution of acetabular coverage according to these measurements.

Comparison of Computed Tomography, Traction, and Inverted Grayscale Radiographs for Understanding Pilon Fracture Morphology

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110492
Author(s):  
Gokay Eken ◽  
Abdulhamit Misir
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Fracture Morphology ◽  
Correct Identification ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Fracture Fragment ◽  
Plain Radiographs ◽  
Pilon Fractures

Background: There have been no studies evaluating the usefulness of grayscale radiographs in extremity fractures. We aimed to compare the ability and reliability of traction radiographs vs traction grayscale inversion radiographs to detect fracture fragment and comminution zones in comminuted tibia pilon fractures. Methods: Plain radiographs and grayscale inversion images of 60 patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association/AO Foundation type C3 fracture were evaluated by 20 observers (15 orthopedic surgeons and 5 radiologists) after traction had been applied. The anterolateral, posterolateral, and medial malleolar fragments, as well as the lateral, central, and medial column comminution zones, were identified by all physicians. Computed tomography scan images were used as the “gold standard” against which plain radiographs and grayscale inversion image interpretation were measured. Intra- and interobserver reliability and correct identification of fracture fragments and comminution zones were evaluated. Results: The interobserver reliability for 3 of the fracture fragments and comminution zones on the traction plain radiographs was moderate, whereas it was substantial on traction grayscale inversion radiographs. The lateral comminution zones ( P = .001) and presence or absence of posterolateral fragments ( P < .001) were significantly better identified in grayscale inversion radiographs compared to standard radiographs. Conclusion: After traction was applied, we found grayscale inversion radiographs are superior to plain radiographs in the identification of posterolateral fragment and lateral zone of comminution in comminuted intraarticular pilon fractures. Level of Evidence: III, Retrospective Case Series.

scholarly journals Indication for Computed Tomography Scan in Shoulder Instability: Sensitivity and Specificity of Standard Radiographs to Predict Bone Defects After Traumatic Anterior Glenohumeral Instability

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596711773366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Delage Royle ◽  
Frédéric Balg ◽  
Martin J. Bouliane ◽  
Fanny Canet-Silvestri ◽  
Laurianne Garant-Saine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Quantifying glenohumeral bone loss is key in preoperative surgical planning for a successful Bankart repair. Hypothesis: Simple radiographs can accurately measure bone defects in cases of recurrent shoulder instability. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A true anteroposterior (AP) view, alone and in combination with an axillary view, was used to evaluate the diagnostic properties of radiographs compared with computed tomography (CT) scan, the current gold standard, to predict significant bone defects in 70 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated and compared. Results: Detection of glenoid bone loss on plain film radiographs, with and without axillary view, had a sensitivity of 86% for both views and a specificity of 73% and 64% with and without the axillary view, respectively. For detection of humeral bone loss, the sensitivity was 8% and 17% and the specificity was 98% and 91% with and without the axillary view, respectively. Regular radiographs would have missed 1 instance of significant bone loss on the glenoid side and 20 on the humeral side. Interobserver reliabilities were moderate for glenoid detection (κ = 0.473-0.503) and poor for the humeral side (κ = 0.278-0.336). Conclusion: Regular radiographs showed suboptimal sensitivity, specificity, and reliability. Therefore, CT scan should be considered in the treatment algorithm for accurate quantification of bone loss to prevent high rates of recurrent instability.

scholarly journals Comparison of Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Fluoroscopy With Standard Computed Tomography for Stereotactic Frame Registration

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrance Peng ◽  
Daniel R Kramer ◽  
Morgan B Lee ◽  
Michael F Barbaro ◽  
Li Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Ct Scanner ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Lead Placement ◽  
Stereotactic Frame ◽  
Mri Scans ◽  
Marginal Means ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri

Abstract BACKGROUND Three-dimensional fluoroscopy via the O-arm (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) has been validated for intraoperative confirmation of successful lead placement in stereotactic electrode implantation. However, its role in registration and targeting has not yet been studied. After frame placement, many stereotactic neurosurgeons obtain a computed tomography (CT) scan and merge it with a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan to generate planning coordinates; potential disadvantages of this practice include increased procedure time and limited scanner availability. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the second-generation O-arm (O2) can be used in lieu of a traditional CT scan to obtain accurate frame-registration scans. METHODS In 7 patients, a postframe placement CT scan was merged with preoperative MRI and used to generate lead implantation coordinates. After implantation, the fiducial box was again placed on the patient to obtain an O2 confirmation scan. Vector, scalar, and Euclidean differences between analogous X, Y, and Z coordinates from fused O2/MRI and CT/MRI scans were calculated for 33 electrode target coordinates across 7 patients. RESULTS Marginal means of difference for vector (X = −0.079 ± 0.099 mm; Y = −0.076 ± 0.134 mm; Z = −0.267 ± 0.318 mm), scalar (X = −0.146 ± 0.160 mm; Y = −0.306 ± 0.106 mm; Z = 0.339 ± 0.407 mm), and Euclidean differences (0.886 ± 0.190 mm) remained within the predefined equivalence margin differences of −2 mm and 2 mm. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that O2 may emerge as a viable alternative to the traditional CT scanner for generating planning coordinates. Adopting the O2 as a perioperative tool may offer reduced transport risks, decreased anesthesia time, and greater surgical efficiency.

Effect of Intraoperative Multidimensional Fluoroscopy Versus Conventional Fluoroscopy on Syndesmotic Reduction

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072095902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryce A. Cunningham ◽  
Stephen Warner ◽  
Marschall Berkes ◽  
Timothy Achor ◽  
Andrew Choo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Ankle Fractures ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
Fluoroscopic Imaging ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study

Background: Despite multiple techniques to improve syndesmotic reduction accuracy, syndesmotic malreduction in unstable ankle fractures remains prevalent. We performed a prospective, observational study to assess the ability of intraoperative multidimensional fluoroscopy to lead a surgeon to change the syndesmotic reduction obtained by conventional fluoroscopic techniques with the goal of achieving an accurate reduction. Methods: Thirty patients with unilateral malleolar ankle fractures and syndesmotic instability were enrolled. Following fixation of the malleollar fractures, the syndesmosis was provisionally reduced. Once the surgeon believed acceptable reduction was obtained by comparison with the contralateral, uninjured ankle mortise and lateral fluoroscopic images, provisional fixation was used to maintain reduction. Intraoperative, multidimensional fluoroscopy was used to generate cross-sectional images to assess the reduction. The surgeon then decided if a change in the reduction was needed, and fixation proceeded per surgeon preference. Postoperative bilateral computed tomography (CT) scans of the ankles were used to assess the reduction. Results: The main outcome recorded was syndesmotic reduction change by the attending surgeon following 3-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopic imaging. The secondary outcome was syndesmotic reduction accuracy on postoperative CT scan. Fourteen of 30 patients had intraoperative reduction change following 3D fluoroscopic imaging. Three of 30 patients had residual malreduction compared with the contralateral ankle on bilateral postoperative CT scan. Conclusion: Intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy frequently led the surgeon to change the syndesmotic reduction obtained by conventional techniques and provided additional information not available with 2-dimensional fluoroscopy. A 10% syndesmotic malreduction rate was obtained with this technique. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic level II, prospective comparative study.

Location of the Glenoid Defect in Shoulders with Recurrent Anterior Dislocation

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 889-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidetomo Saito ◽  
Eiji Itoi ◽  
Hiroyuki Sugaya ◽  
Hiroshi Minagawa ◽  
Nobuyuki Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Dislocation ◽  
Bony Defect ◽  
Precise Location ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Glenoid Defect ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Prevalence Level ◽  
Symptom Prevalence ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Recurrent Anterior Dislocation

Background In patients with recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder, it is well known that the glenoid rim is often deficient (8%-95%). However, little is known regarding the precise location of the bony defect of the glenoid. Hypothesis The bony defect is anterior rather than anteroinferior to the glenoid Study Design Cohort study (symptom prevalence); Level of evidence, 2. Methods The authors studied 3-dimensional images of the glenoid reconstructed from computed tomography to determine the location of the glenoid defect in 123 shoulders of 123 patients with recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder. They measured the location, extent, and orientation of the defect based on the clock face of the glenoid. Results The defects were located between 12:08 and 6:32, with the range between 2:30 and 4:20 being the most frequent. The extent of the glenoid defect was 106.7°± 27.1° (mean ± standard deviation). The mean orientation of the defect was pointing toward 3:01 on the clock face of the glenoid, at a mean angle of 90.5°± 10.4° from the 12-o'clock direction. Conclusion The glenoid defect is located almost anterior to the glenoid.

The Role of Weightbearing Computed Tomography Scan in Hallux Valgus

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072096239
Author(s):  
Karim Mahmoud ◽  
Sreenivasulu Metikala ◽  
Samir D. Mehta ◽  
George W. Fryhofer ◽  
Daniel C. Farber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Linear Relationship ◽  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Musculoskeletal Radiology ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Computed Tomography Images

Background: Hyperpronation of the first metatarsal in hallux valgus (HV) is poorly understood by conventional weightbearing radiography. We aimed to evaluate this parameter using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and to understand its association with other standard measurements. Methods: Retrospective evaluation of WBCT and weightbearing radiographs (WBXRs) was performed for 20 patients with HV feet and 20 controls with no such deformity. Axial computed tomography images of both groups were compared for the first metatarsal pronation angle (alpha angle) and tibial sesamoid subluxation (TSS) grades. The HV angle (HVA), first-second intermetatarsal angle (IMA), first metatarsal-medial cuneiform angle (MMCA), Meary’s angle, and calcaneal pitch (CP) angle of the study and control groups were compared on both WBXR and the corresponding 2-dimensional images of WBCT. All measurements were independently performed by 1 musculoskeletal radiology fellow and 1 foot and ankle surgical fellow. Measurements were averaged and interobserver reliability was calculated. Results: The HV group demonstrated significantly higher values for TSS grade ( P < .001) but not for alpha angle ( P = .121) compared with controls. Likewise, significantly elevated HVA and IMA were noted in the HV group on both imaging modalities, while no such differences were observed for the CP angle. Higher MMCA and Meary’s angle in the HV group were evident only on WBXR (MMCA, P = .039; Meary’s, P = .009) but not on WBCT (MMCA, P = .183; Meary’s, P = .171). Among all, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated the greatest area under the curve (AUC) for HVA, followed by IMA. The alpha angle performed only just outside the range of chance (AUC, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.69). The Pearson’s correlations of the alpha angle, in the HV group, revealed a significant linear relationship with TSS grade and with HVA on WBXR, and only trended toward a weak linear relationship with IMA and with HVA on WBCT. Conclusion: The alpha angle, a measure of abnormal hyperpronation of the first metatarsal, was an independent factor that may coexist with other parameters in HV, but in isolation had limited diagnostic utility. “Abnormal” alpha angles were even observed in individuals without HV. Increases in IMA and MMCA were not necessarily associated with similar increases in alpha angle, despite moderate correlations with TSS grade and HVA on WBXR. Nevertheless, the WBCT was a useful method for assessing hyperpronation and guiding surgical management in individual cases. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Evaluation of Syndesmosis Reduction on CT Scan

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1087-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Elghazy Abdelaziz ◽  
Noortje Hagemeijer ◽  
Daniel Guss ◽  
Ahmed El-Hawary ◽  
Hani El-Mowafi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Intraobserver Reliability ◽  
Area Measurement ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Radiological Measurement ◽  
Tibial Plafond

Background: Computed tomography (CT) imaging has traditionally been considered the gold standard for evaluation of syndesmostic reduction, but there is no uniformly accepted method to assess reduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra- and interobserver reliability of published measurement techniques for evaluation of syndesmotic reduction on weightbearing CT scan (WBCT) in hopes of determining which method is best. Methods: Medical records were reviewed to identify patients who underwent operative stabilization of unilateral syndesmotic injuries. Exclusion criteria included patients younger than 18 years, ipsilateral fractures extending to the tibial plafond, any contralateral ankle fracture or syndesmotic injury, and body mass index greater than 40 kg/m2. Twenty eligible patients underwent WBCT evaluation of both ankles at an average of 3 years after syndesmotic fixation. The anatomic accuracy of syndesmotic reduction was evaluated by 2 observers using axial CT images at a level 1 cm proximal to the tibial plafond using 9 previously published radiological measurement techniques. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were assessed for each evaluation method. Results: The syndesmotic area calculation showed the highest interobserver reliability (0.96), the highest intraobserver reliability for observer 2 (0.97), and the second highest intraobserver reliability for observer 1 (0.92). Fibular rotation had the second highest interobserver reliability in our results (0.84), with intraobserver reliability of 0.91 and 0.8 for first and second observers, respectively. The intraobserver reliability of the side-by-side method was 0.49 and 0.24 for the first and second observers, respectively, and the interobserver reliability was 0.26. Conclusion: Qualitatively assessing syndesmotic reduction via side-by-side comparison with the uninjured ankle had the least intra- and interobserver reliability and should not be relied on to determine syndesmotic reduction quality. In contradistinction, syndesmotic area calculation demonstrated the highest reliability when evaluating syndesmotic reduction, followed by fibular rotation. Given that syndesmotic area measurement techniques are not readily available on standard image viewers, technologically updating image viewers to allow such calculation would make this approach more accessible in clinical practice. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document