Dietary Adequacy Among Young Children in India: Improvement or Stagnation? An Investigation From the National Family Health Survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 471-487
Author(s):  
Nizamuddin Khan ◽  
Arupendra Mozumdar ◽  
Supreet Kaur

Background: This study assessed the trend of minimum acceptable dietary practices among children aged 6 to 23 months in India in the past decade. Methods: Data collected in the National Family Health Survey during 2005 to 2006 (NFHS-3) and 2015 to 2016 (NFHS-4) were used. The sample size for this study was 11 727 children for NFHS-3 and 61 158 children for NFHS-4. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were done to identify the predictors of feeding practices. We analyzed data of last-born singleton children aged 6 to 23 months who were living with their mother (ever-married women aged 15-49 years). Results: In India, a low proportion (10%) of children aged 6 to 23 months received a minimum acceptable diet, and its estimate remained the same in the past 10 years. Older mothers, educated mothers, antenatal care, high economic status, and place of residence were the most consistent predictors of minimum acceptable dietary intake. Over the past decade, however, the minimum acceptable dietary intake has declined among older children (odds ratio [OR] = 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.70; P < .001), children with overweight mothers (OR = 0.40, 95% CI, 0.31-0·50; P <.001), and children of well-off families (OR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.23-0.37; P < .001). The odds for minimum acceptable dietary intake were significantly higher among children of high (4+) birth order (OR = 1.74, 95% CI, 1.41-2.15; P < .001), rural areas, and children living in the central, eastern, and north-eastern region. Conclusion: Results indicate the need for further investigations of poor dietary intake among children living in well-off families and in the northern region. This study suggests policymakers and program managers to address contextual barriers against minimum acceptable dietary intake among children and to reconsider existing strategies in India.

2021 ◽  
pp. 001946622110153
Author(s):  
Payal Seth

This commentary analyses the recently launched National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) (2019–2020) factsheet to investigate the claim of an open defecation free (ODF) India. The official data from Swachh Bharath Mission (SBM) was used to declare India ODF on 2 October 2019. The SBM statistics reported that India has achieved 100% sanitation coverage, that is, the fraction of households with access to individual household latrines (IHHLs). However, the NFHS-5 data shows that even though India witnessed an improvement in sanitation in the past four to five years, we are far from achieving universal elimination of open defecation. In an attempt to evaluate the differing claims made regarding India’s ODF status by two Government of India’s data sources, I explain the distinction in their objectives. While the SBM captures access to IHHLs, NFHS-5 records the place which the members of the household usually use for defecation. The two datasets jointly suggest that access to toilets does not concurrently translate to its usage. Hence, determining the ODF status of Indian communities on mere access to toilets is an inadequate representation of the sanitation environment. There is substantial merit in moving the sanitation outcomes from access to the adoption of toilets.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Kanougiya ◽  
Muthusamy Sivakami ◽  
Saurabh Rai

Abstract Background The feminist theory posits that spousal coercive control is not random but a purposeful and systematic men’s strategy to control and dominate their female partners. The frequency of coercive control is more than emotional, physical, and sexual intimate partner violence (IPV). Coercive control is usually mistaken with psychological abuse when it is not and has recently gained independent attention within the spectrum of IPV. The role of socioeconomic factors in determining coercive control and associations between coercive control and form of IPV is less researched. Objective We aimed to examine sociodemographic and socioeconomic predictors of spousal coercive control and its association with IPV (past 12-months). Methods We analysed data of 66,013 ever-married women aged 15-49 from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS)-4 (2015-2016). Estimates involved bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models, and marginal effects prediction. Results The prevalence of spousal coercive control is more commonly reported by 48% of women than the prevalence of IPV 25% (emotional 11%, physical 22%, and sexual 5%) in the past 12 months. Adjusted odds ratio indicate that women having three and more children (aOR 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0-1.2), women work status (1.1; 1.1-1.2), husband’s secondary (1.1; 1.1-1.2) or higher education (1.1; 1.1-1.2), and husband alcohol consumption (1.7; 1.6-1.7) increase the odds of coercive control. In the fully adjusted model coercive control independently increased the likelihood of experiencing emotional (aOR 2.8.; 95% CI: 2.6, 3.1), physical (2.2; 2.1, 2.3), and sexual (2.5; 2.3, 2.8) IPV in the past 12 months; and with an increase in each additional indicator of coercive control acts, the likelihood of physical, sexual, and emotional IPV further increases. When women reported six indicators of coercive control, the predicted proportion of women experiencing emotional 53%, physical 45%, and sexual IPV was 25% in the fully adjusted model. Conclusion Coercive control limits women’s social support and contacts contributing to low self-esteem, self-efficacy, and poor mental health. The purpose of this study is to highlight that understudied coercive control is more common than other forms of IPV and is a potential risk factor for physical, sexual, and emotional IPV independently. The inclusion of coercive control in interventions is crucial to prevent form of IPV. Survivals long-term safety and independence can be secured if the current protection law against domestic violence is extended to encompass coercive control.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nivedita Roy ◽  
Vijay Kumar Mishra ◽  
Piyush Kumar Mishra ◽  
Ashish Bandhu ◽  
Rajeev Dhakad

Abstract Objectives: To study the changes in Anemia among women and to study the association between anemia and socio-demographic and economic predictors, also estimating the percentage contribution of selected predictors to Anemia among women belonging to poor and non-poor households.Methods: The State-wise percentages were taken from the extracted factsheets of National Family Health Survey 2015-2016 and 2019-2020. Absolute and relative percent changes to understand the changes in prevalence have been calculated. Multiple logistic regression was done to understand the associated varying predictors of Anemia among women. Percentage contribution of selected varying predictors through multivariate decomposition analysis have also been estimated. Results: Anemia prevalence was found the highest among the women in Goa and least in Lakshwadeep. The relative change in prevalence of Anemia was highest in Assam and lowest in Lakshwadeep. Socio-economic factors like marriage at a young age, lack of education, exposure to media, malnutrition, and poor economic status contribute significantly to the prevalence of Anemia among women of age 15-49 years.Conclusion: It is seen that the socio-demographic and economic burden on Anemia still continues to be higher than other medical predictors. The focus should be made more on education, malnutrition, and economic status to reduce the prevalence of Anemia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e003717
Author(s):  
Phuong Hong Nguyen ◽  
Rasmi Avula ◽  
Lan Mai Tran ◽  
Vani Sethi ◽  
Alok Kumar ◽  
...  

ObjectivesExisting health and community nutrition systems have the potential to deliver many nutrition interventions. However, the coverage of nutrition interventions across the delivery platforms of these systems has not been uniform. We (1) examined the opportunity gaps between delivery platforms and corresponding nutrition interventions through the continuum of care in India between 2006 and 2016 and and (2) assessed inequalities in these opportunity gaps.MethodsWe used two rounds of the National Family Health Survey data from 2005 to 2006 and 2015–2016 (n=36 850 and 190 898 mother–child dyads, respectively). We examine the opportunity gaps over time for seven nutrition interventions and their associated delivery platforms at national and state levels. We assessed equality and changes in equality between 2006 and 2016 for opportunity gaps by education, residence, socioeconomic status (SES), public and private platforms.ResultsCoverage of nutrition interventions was consistently lower than the reach of their associated delivery platforms; opportunity gaps ranging from 9 to 32 percentage points (pp) during the pregnancy, 17 pp during delivery and 9–26 pp during childhood in 2006. Between 2006 and 2016, coverage improved for most indicators, but coverage increases for nutrition interventions was lower than for associated delivery platforms. The opportunity gaps were larger among women with higher education (22–57 pp in 2016), higher SES status and living in urban areas (23–57 pp), despite higher coverage of most interventions and the delivery platforms among these groups. Opportunity gaps vary tremendously by state with the highest gaps observed in Tripura, Andaman and Nicobar islands, and Punjab for different indicators.ConclusionsIndia’s progress in coverage of health and nutrition interventions in the last decade is promising, but both opportunity and equality gaps remained. It is critical to close these gaps by addressing policy and programmatic delivery systems bottlenecks to achieve universal coverage for both health and nutrition within the delivery system.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Balhasan Ali ◽  
Shekhar Chauhan

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarun Shankar Choudhary ◽  
Akanksha Srivastava ◽  
Ranadip Chowdhury ◽  
Sunita Taneja ◽  
Rajiv Bahl ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-340
Author(s):  
Ekta Belwal ◽  
Shalini Pandey ◽  
Supta Sarkar

Anemia is the most prevalent deficiency disease and one among the major nutrition related goals globally. Children and women of reproductive age are the most vulnerable groups for anemia everywhere. While there are various nutritional and non-nutritional factors causing anemia, Iron deficiency is the most prominent of them. In India, more than half population of preschool age children and reproductive age women is suffering from anemia. Indian government had started anemia prophylaxis efforts a half century ago and still continuing to battle with this ever prevalent disease to bring down its occurrence. National Family Health Survey is the large-scale survey conducted in India to provide high-quality data on health and family welfare and related emerging issues. The data provided not only helps in formulation, revision and monitoring of the policies and programs but in situating the development of India globally. Studying the time trend for anemia prevalence and other related parameters reported in NFHS surveys helps how well India has performed until now and how far is from its goal to become Anemia free country. Keywords: Anemia, iron deficiency, health survey, child health, maternal health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document