Rest ventilator management in children on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

2021 ◽  
pp. 039139882199938
Author(s):  
Matthew L Friedman ◽  
Samer Abu-Sultaneh ◽  
James E Slaven ◽  
Christopher W Mastropietro
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Arterial Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Peak Inspiratory Pressure ◽  
Conventional Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Arterial Oxygen ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Ventilator Management

Background: We aimed to use the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry to describe the current practice of rest mechanical ventilation setting in children receiving veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) and to determine if relationships exist between ventilator settings and mortality. Methods: Data for patients 14 days to 18 years old who received V-V ECMO from 2012-2016 were reviewed. Mechanical ventilation data available includes mode and settings at 24 h after ECMO cannulation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine if rest settings were associated with mortality. Results: We reviewed 1161 subjects, of which 1022 (88%) received conventional mechanical ventilation on ECMO. Rest settings, expressed as medians (25th%, 75th%), are as follows: rate 12 breaths/minute (10, 17); peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) 22 cmH2O (20,27); positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 10 cmH2O (8, 10); and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) 0.4 (0.37, 0.60). Survival to discharge was 68%. Higher ventilator FiO2 (odds ratio:1.13 per 0.1 increase, 95% confidence interval:1.04, 1.23), independent of arterial oxygen saturation, was associated with mortality. Conclusions: Current rest ventilator management for children receiving V-V ECMO primarily relies on conventional mechanical ventilation with moderate amounts of PIP, PEEP, and FiO2. Further study on the relationship between FiO2 and mortality should be pursued.

The physiology of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: The Fick principle

Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912110559
Author(s):  
Hoong Lim
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Arterial Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Arterial Oxygen ◽  
Fick Principle ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Lung Failure ◽  
Va Ecmo ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Vv Ecmo

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be delivered in veno-arterial (VA) and veno-venous (VV) configurations based on the cannulation strategy. VA and VV ECMO are delivered primarily for haemodynamic and respiratory support in patients with severe heart and lung failure, respectively. The Fick principle describes the relationship between blood flow and oxygen consumption – key parameters in the physiological management of extracorporeal support. This review will discuss the application of the Fick principle in: (i) recirculation in VV ECMO; (ii) the quantification of oxygen delivery (DO2) in VV ECMO and (iii) the quantification of transpulmonary blood flow and systemic arterial oxygen saturation in VA ECMO.

scholarly journals Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 induced hypoxia: Single-center study

Perfusion ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 026765912096388
Author(s):  
Muhtadi Alnababteh ◽  
Muhammad D Hashmi ◽  
Karthik Vedantam ◽  
Rajus Chopra ◽  
Akshay Kohli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Conventional Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Washington Dc ◽  
Clinical Prognosis ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Scientific Challenge ◽  
D Dimer

Introduction: The pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associated pneumonia represent a clinical and scientific challenge. The role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in such a crisis remains unclear. Methods: We examined COVID-19 patients who were supported for acute respiratory failure by both conventional mechanical ventilation (MV) and ECMO at a tertiary care institution in Washington DC. The study period extended from March 23 to April 29. We identified 59 patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation. Of those, 13 patients required ECMO. Results: Nine out of 13 ECMO (69.2%) patients were decannulated from ECMO. All-cause ICU mortality was comparable between both ECMO and MV groups (6 patients [46.15%] vs. 22 patients [47.82 %], p = 0.92). ECMO non-survivors vs survivors had elevated D-dimer (9.740 mcg/ml [4.84-20.00] vs. 3.800 mcg/ml [2.19-9.11], p = 0.05), LDH (1158 ± 344.5 units/L vs. 575.9 ± 124.0 units/L, p = 0.001), and troponin (0.4315 ± 0.465 ng/ml vs. 0.034 ± 0.043 ng/ml, p = 0.04). Time on MV as expected was significantly longer in ECMO groups (563.3 hours [422.1-613.9] vs. 247.9 hours [101.8-479] in MV group, p = 0.0009) as well as ICU length of stay 576.2 hours [457.5-652.8] in ECMO group vs. 322.2 hours [120.6-569.3] in MV group, p = 0.012). Conclusion: ECMO is a supportive intervention for COVID-19 associated pneumonia that could be considered if the optimum mechanical ventilation is deemed ineffective. Biomarkers such as D-dimer, LDH, and troponin could help with discerning the clinical prognosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

scholarly journals Mechanical Ventilation during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Acute Severe Respiratory Failure

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongheng Zhang ◽  
Wan-Jie Gu ◽  
Kun Chen ◽  
Hongying Ni
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Conventional Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Protective Ventilation ◽  
Severe Respiratory Failure ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Protective Ventilation Strategy

Conventionally, a substantial number of patients with acute respiratory failure require mechanical ventilation (MV) to avert catastrophe of hypoxemia and hypercapnia. However, mechanical ventilation per se can cause lung injury, accelerating the disease progression. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides an alternative to rescue patients with severe respiratory failure that conventional mechanical ventilation fails to maintain adequate gas exchange. The physiology behind ECMO and its interaction with MV were reviewed. Next, we discussed the timing of ECMO initiation based on the risks and benefits of ECMO. During the running of ECMO, the protective ventilation strategy can be employed without worrying about catastrophic hypoxemia and carbon dioxide retention. There is a large body of evidence showing that protective ventilation with low tidal volume, high positive end-expiratory pressure, and prone positioning can provide benefits on mortality outcome. More recently, there is an increasing popularity on the use of awake and spontaneous breathing for patients undergoing ECMO, which is thought to be beneficial in terms of rehabilitation.

Application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe ARDS secondary to pneumonia: a case report

Open Medicine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 658-661
Author(s):  
Xi-Hong Zhang ◽  
Rui-Xia Xiu ◽  
Tie-Jun Wu ◽  
Xiu-Li Zou ◽  
Long-Le Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Conventional Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation

AbstractThis report describes a 24-year-old patient with marked and continuous hypoxemia resulting from severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to pneumonia, which in turn was refractory to mechanical ventilation and other conventional adjunctive therapies. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was applied for 14 days and resulted in significant improvement in the hypoxemia. We conclude that ECMO presents a therapeutic option for ARDS patients who fail to respond to conventional mechanical ventilation.

scholarly journals A Case of Leptospirosis-Associated Severe Pulmonary Hemorrhagic Syndrome Successfully Treated with Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nao Umei ◽  
Shingo Ichiba
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Serum Antibody ◽  
Arterial Oxygen ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
History Of ◽  
Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Fraction Of Inspired Oxygen ◽  
Paired Serum ◽  
Oxygen Ratio

Background. In patients with leptospirosis-associated severe pulmonary hemorrhagic syndrome (SPHS), hypoxemia is the most common cause of death despite maximal mechanical ventilation. Case. A 50-year-old male sushi chef who had never traveled outside Japan presented with a 2-day history of fever and muscle pain. On admission, the patient had thrombocytopenia, renal insufficiency, and jaundice. His condition continued to deteriorate, with decreasing platelet count, worsening renal function, hyperbilirubinemia, hypotension, and respiratory distress. On day 5 after onset of symptoms, he required intubation and mechanical ventilation. Bronchoscopy showed diffuse endobronchial bleeding. His respiratory status worsened rapidly with a partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio of 70, necessitating venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) and treatment with an inotrope, renal replacement therapy, and broad-spectrum antibiotics including benzylpenicillin. Anticoagulation was maintained at the minimum level. His condition improved, and he was weaned off ECMO on day 15 and discharged on day 19 after onset of symptoms. The leptospirosis diagnosis was confirmed by leptospiral DNA detection in urine samples by polymerase chain reaction and the results of paired serum antibody titer testing. Conclusions. V-V ECMO may prevent mortality in patients with leptospirosis-induced SPHS that does not respond to conventional therapy.

scholarly journals The Evolution of the Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Respiratory Failure

Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 491
Author(s):  
Danielle Feldhaus ◽  
Daniel Brodie ◽  
Philippe Lemaitre ◽  
Joshua Sonett ◽  
Cara Agerstrand
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Rapid Expansion ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Influenza A H1n1 ◽  
Large Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Ventilator Management ◽  
Large Randomized Trial

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used with increasing frequency to support patients with acute respiratory failure, most commonly, and severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The marked increase in the global use of ECMO followed the publication of a large randomized trial in 2009 and the experience garnered during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, and has been further supported by the release of a large, randomized clinical trial in 2018, confirming a benefit from using ECMO in patients with severe ARDS. Despite a rapid expansion of ECMO-related publications, optimal management of patients receiving ECMO, in terms of patient selection, ventilator management, anticoagulation, and transfusion strategies, is evolving. Most recently, ECMO is being utilized for an expanding variety of conditions, including for cases of severe pulmonary or cardiac failure from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This review evaluates modern evidence for ECMO for respiratory failure and the current challenges in the field.

Evaluation of a Multimodal Heparin Laboratory Monitoring Protocol in Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110212
Author(s):  
Kalynn A. Northam ◽  
Bobbie Nguyen ◽  
Sheh-Li Chen ◽  
Edward Sredzienski ◽  
Anthony Charles
Keyword(s):  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Infusion Rate ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Extracorporeal Life Support ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Multimodal Approach ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Monitoring Protocol

Background: Anticoagulation monitoring practices vary during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization describes that a multimodal approach is needed to overcome assay limitations and minimize complications. Objective: Compare activated clotting time (ACT) versus multimodal approach (activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)/anti-factor Xa) for unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring in adult ECMO patients. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective pre- (ACT) versus post-implementation (multimodal approach) study. The incidence of major bleeding and thrombosis, blood product and antithrombin III (ATIII) administration, and UFH infusion rates were compared. Results: Incidence of major bleeding (69.2% versus 62.2%, p = 0.345) and thrombosis (23% versus 14.9%, p = 0.369) was similar between groups. Median number of ATIII doses was reduced in the multimodal group (1.0 [IQR 0.0-2.0] versus 0.0 [0.0 -1.0], p = 0.007). The median UFH infusion rate was higher in the ACT group, but not significant (16.9 [IQR 9.6-22.4] versus 13 [IQR 9.6-15.4] units/kg/hr, p = 0.063). Fewer UFH infusion rate changes occurred prior to steady state in the multimodal group (0.9 [IQR 0.3 -1.7] versus 0.1 [IQR 0.0-0.2], p < 0.001). Conclusion: The incidence of major bleeding and thrombosis was similar between groups. Our multimodal monitoring protocol standardized UFH infusion administration and reduced ATIII administration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document