Iatrogenic Urological Lesions in Vascular Surgery: Uretero-Arterial Fistula after Positioning of “double J” for Ureteral Stenosis after Aorto-Phemoral Bypass

1992 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
G. Contemori ◽  
S. Omacini ◽  
A. Bolgan ◽  
U. Santucci Delli Ponti ◽  
S. Petracco

The Authors report the case of a patient with double iatrogenic complications: 1) ureteral obstruction secondary to vascular bypass surgery; 2) uretero-arterial fistula after positioning of an indwelling double J ureteral stent. The increasing frequency of these complications stresses the need for utmost care regarding urinary tract integrity after vascular surgery and the choice, positioning and functioning of ureteral stents.

Urolithiasis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Arkusz ◽  
Kamila Pasik ◽  
Andrzej Halinski ◽  
Adam Halinski

Abstract The aim of this work was to determine which part of a double-J ureteral stent (DJ stents) showed the highest tendency to crystal, calculi, and biofilm deposition after ureterorenoscopic-lithotripsy procedure (URS-L) to treat calcium oxalate stones. Additionally, the mechanical strength and the stiffness of DJ stents were evaluated before and after exposure to urine. Obtained results indicated that the proximal (renal pelvis) and distal (urinary bladder) part is the most susceptible for post-URS-L fragments and urea salt deposition. Both, the outer and inner surfaces of the DJ ureteral stents were completely covered even after 7 days of implantation. Encrustation of DJ stents during a 31-day period results in reducing the Young’s modulus by 27–30%, which confirms the loss of DJ stent elasticity and increased probability of cracks or interruption. Performed analysis pointed to the need to use an antibacterial coating in the above-mentioned part of the ureteral stent to prolong its usage time and to prevent urinary tract infection.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saya Kurata ◽  
Shohei Tobu ◽  
Kazuma Udo ◽  
Mitsuru Noguchi

Objective: We examined the outcomes of patients undergoing ureteral stent placement for hydronephrosis that occurred during treatment for gynecological malignancies. Materials and Methods: From January 2004 to December 2009, we enrolled 33 patients with 45 ureters undergoing ureteral stent placement for hydronephrosis which occurred during treatment for gynecological malignancies. We examined the outcomes of the patients after stent placement. Results: The causes of hydronephrosis were obstruction of the urinary tract by a tumor (n = 22), obstruction due to lymph node swelling (n = 6), ureteral stenosis after radiation therapy (n = 4), and others (n = 1). The ureteral stent was inserted into both ureters in 12 cases, and into one ureter in 21 cases. Ureteral stents were replaced 1-26 times during the observation period (median 3 times). Eighteen (40%) ureteral stents were removed. The reasons for ureteral stent removal were hydronephrosis improvement (11 ureters, 24.4%), a change to nephrostomy (cystectomy: 1 ureter, progression of ureteral stenosis: 2 ureters), renal atrophy (3 ureters), and ureteral dilatation (1 ureter). All of the cases in which ureteral stent withdrawal due to hydronephrosis improvement were cases in which the ureter was compressed by a tumor and were lower ureteral obstructions. Twenty-one patients (64%) died due to cancer after stent placement. The periods from the first stent placement to death ranged from 1 to 58 months (median 18 months). Conclusion: Ureteral stent placement was associated with a poor prognosis in patients with gynecological malignancies. There were a few cases in which stent withdrawal became possible due to the improvement of hydronephrosis. In such cases, the withdrawal rate varied according to the cause and obstructive level.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 114-118
Author(s):  
Rana Ata ur Rehman ◽  
Muhammad Muzammil Tahir ◽  
Muhammad Seerwan

Introduction: Cystoscopic intraluminal placement of ureteral stents has become a routine practice in urology. Ureteral stents preserve urine flow from the kidney to the bladder in cases of ureteral obstruction (intrinsic or extrincis). In patients with obvious ureteral obstruction, the placement of a ureteral stent will restart urine transport and protect the kidney from possible risks. Ureteral stents are troublesome in some patients and causes LUTS. Study Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Setting: Urology Department, Sheikh Zayed Hospital Lahore. Period: Six month started from August 2015 to December 2015. Material and Methods: 100 patients who were randomly divided into two equal groups. The patients were between 18 to 50 years of age of both gender undergo retrograde double-J ureteral stent placement. Before the double-J stent will be applied, all patients completed an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire for evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms.Patients were divided in two groups on the basis of lottery method tamsolusin group (1) and placebo group (2). Tamsulosin group patients was given tamsulosin post operatively and placebo group was given a placebo postoperatively. Results: There were total 100 patients who were enrolled in this study with a mean age of 42.63±6.24. There were 75(75%) were male while 25(25%) were female. The mean IPSS sore at presentation was 2.47±1.43 and post treatment was 5.20±1.65. There was significant difference in IPSS score in control group with mean 5.28±1.69 versus study as mean 2.22±1.05 group, p-value= 0.010. Conclusion: There is difference in lowering of IPSS score in the patients who are given tamsolusin versus those who were retained on placebo.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Aljuhayman ◽  
Faisal Balaraj ◽  
Yahya Ghazwani ◽  
Saeed Bin Hamri

Abstract Double-J (DJ) ureteral stent is a standard procedure in daily urological practice performed to relive ureteral obstruction or as a part of other endourological procedures. Although it is a common procedure, the widespread use of ureteral stents has corresponded to the increase in possible complication. We report a unique complication for a patient who presented with a renal subcapsular complete misplacement of DJ stent postureteroscopy for a distal ureteric stone. This challenging complication of ureteral stents is rare and organ threatening.


BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Soria ◽  
Julia E. de La Cruz ◽  
Juan Pablo Caballero-Romeu ◽  
Manuel Pamplona ◽  
Daniel Pérez-Fentes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Double J ureteral stents are widely used on urological patients to provide drainage of the upper urinary tract. Unfourtunately, ureteral stents are not free from complications, as bacterial colonization and require a second procedure for removal. The purpose of the current comparative experimental study is to evaluate a new heparin-coated biodegradable antireflux ureteral stent (BraidStent®-H) to prevent urinary bacterial colonization. Methods A total of 24 female pigs were underwent determination of bacteriuria and nephrosonographic, endoscopic and contrast fluoroscopy assessment of the urinary tract. Afterward, were randomly assigned animals to Group-I, in which a 5Fr double-pigtail ureteral stent was placed for 6 weeks, or Group-II, in which a BraidStent®-H was placed. Follow-up assessments were performed at 1, 3, 6, 8, 12 weeks. The final follow-up includes the above methods and an exhaustive pathological study of the urinary tract was accomplished after 20 weeks. Results Bacteriuria findings in the first 48 h were significant between groups at 6 h and 12 h. Asymptomatic bacteriuria does not reach 100% of the animals in Group-II until 48 h versus Group-I where it appears at 6 h. The weekly bacteriuria mean rate was 27.7% and 44.4% in Group I and II respectively, without statistical significance. In Group II there were no animals with vesicoureteral reflux, with statistical significance at 3 and 6 weeks with Group-I. The 91.2% of stents in Group-II were degraded between 3 and 6 weeks, without obstructive fragments. Distal ureteral peristalsis was maintained in 66.6–75% in Group-II at 1–6 weeks. Conclusions The heparin coating of BraidStent® allows an early decrease of bacterial colonization, but its effectiveness is low at the long term. Heparin coating did not affect scheduled degradation rate or size of stents fragments. BraidStent®-H avoids the side effects associated with current ureteral stents, thus should cause less discomfort to patients.


Urology ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 278-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E. Kaufman ◽  
C. Lowell Parsons ◽  
Barbara B. Gosink ◽  
Joseph D. Schmidt

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Carolina Nery Wittmaack ◽  
Guilherme Sembenelli ◽  
Paola Castro Moraes ◽  
Luís Gustavo Gosuen Gonçalves Dias ◽  
Paloma Espirito Santo Silva ◽  
...  

Background: Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) usually affects the trigone region of the bladder and proximal portion of the urethra. TCC in dogs is often complicated by local tumor invasion and obstruction of the urethra, ureters, or both. Urinary obstruction is the cause of death in approximately 60% of dogs with TCC. Radical surgeries are associated with morbidity and mortality rates. Stents have recently been evaluated for use in dogs with ureteral obstruction resulting from a variety of urinary tract tumors. This report aims to describe bilateral ureteral stent placement for treatment of malignant ureteral obstruction and long-term follow-up in a dog.Case: An 11‐year‐old female spayed Maltese with ureteral obstruction secondary to transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) in the bladder trigone. After palliative debulking procedure and diagnostic of TCC in bladder and NSAIDs treatment, recurrence has occurred causing ureteral obstruction and TCC had invaded the abdominal wall. Abdominal wall local tumor resection, trigone mass debulking and bilateral ureteral stent placement was made. A double-pigtail ureteral stent of appropriate length was advanced to bypass the ureteral obstruction. Stent sizes were 3.5 Fr in diameter and from 8 to 32 cm in length. The patient underwent surgical resection of the transitional cell carcinoma in the abdominal wall. The correct location of the bilateral ureteral pigtail stent was certified by abdominal radiography. Recovery was uneventful and the dog was discharged 2 days after surgery. Eleven months after stent placement, the dog developed lumbar vertebrae metastasis, without evidence of recurrent ureteral obstruction. The owners elected euthanasia 517 days after original presentation and 337 days after ureteral stent placement. Euthanasia was unrelated to the local tumor obstruction but was related to the bone metastasis.Discussion: Ureteral stent placement is feasible techniques for treatment of bladder TCC in dogs, with the objective of delaying the evolution of the disease and preventing ureteral obstruction. According to previous studies, although distant metastatic disease is worrisome, in the majority of dogs with bladder TCC, the primary location of the tumor is the most common cause of death. In patients with ureteral obstruction, early intervention preserves functional renal tissue. Thus, relief of obstruction should be recommended as soon as possible before irreversible renal damage occurs. The authors encourage aggressive and timely intervention, particularly when ureteral obstruction is bilateral. In the present report, 90 days postoperatively local recurrence causing ureteral obstruction was not evidenced on bladder ultrasound images and laboratory test follow-up. After this period, until 180 days after debulking surgery, tumor recurrence occurred, causing clinical signs and compromising renal function. Complications associated with stent placement included stent migration, recurrent ureteral obstruction, stranguria/pollakiuria, presumably due to irritation of the trigonal region from the distal stent; imperfect stent location; ureteral trauma during stent placement; and urinary tract infection. In the present report, the ureteral stents were placed for palliative treatment for malignant ureteral obstructions. Although urinary tract infection was recurrent, other complications associated with bilateral ureteral stent did not occur, such as accidental dislocation or stent obstruction by the tumor. The results obtained were satisfactory for urinary tract obstruction, allowing survival of 517 days. These findings may support long-term ureteral stenting in veterinary patients.


Urology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 911-915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Hafron ◽  
Michael C. Ost ◽  
Beng Jit Tan ◽  
James D. Fogarty ◽  
David M. Hoenig ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document