scholarly journals The Role of Pets in Supporting Cognitive-Behavioral Chronic Pain Self-Management: Perspectives of Older Adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1088-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary R. Janevic ◽  
Varick Shute ◽  
Cathleen M Connell ◽  
John D. Piette ◽  
Jenna Goesling ◽  
...  

Cognitive-behavioral self-management strategies are recommended for older adults with chronic pain. The goal of this study was to explore how pet ownership promotes use of these strategies in everyday life. We conducted four focus groups ( N = 25) with dog and cat owners aged ≥70 years with persistent pain. Participants described how their pets affect their daily routines and health, including pain and its management. We analyzed transcripts for salient themes, categorizing them according to their alignment with recommended pain self-management strategies: Mood Management (e.g., increases positive affect), Relaxation/Distraction (e.g., soothing presence), Physical Activity (e.g., dog-walking), Behavioral Activation (e.g., motivates activity even when pain present), Social Activation (e.g., facilitates socializing), and Sleep (e.g., encourages routine). Some participants described negative impacts of pet ownership. Having pets can facilitate behaviors and thoughts that may enhance coping with pain. Testing formal ways of leveraging pets’ role may expand nonpharmacological options for chronic pain management.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Ledermann

BACKGROUND Chronic pain is a complex problem for many older adults that affects both physical functioning and psychological well-being. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have shown promise in supporting older persons in managing chronic conditions. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is recommended for older people with chronic pain. However, online treatment programs for chronic pain are not aimed at the needs of older people and offer standard therapies without providing tailored treatment for this population. OBJECTIVE To address this problem, we will develop a psychological internet-based intervention based on ecological monitoring of daily life experiences with chronic pain, called EMMA to support self-management of chronic pain in older adults. METHODS The key clinical and engagement features of the intervention were established through the integration of evidence-based material from cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of chronic pain in older adults. The development process uses a CoDesign approach and actively involves the end-users in the design process by incorporating feedback from focus groups with older adults in order to inform a user centered intervention design. For the CoDesign process, we will include 10 older adults without chronic pain that will discuss the requirements in workshops in order to ensure suitability for older adults. In order to test the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, we will include a sample of 30 older adults with chronic pain that will test all features of the intervention for a period of eight consecutive weeks. After the trial period, validated instruments to assess usability and acceptability, as well as influence on pain levels and associated physical and psychological symptoms will be filled out by the participants. Participants will be invited to take part in a semi-structured telephone interview after the trial period to explore their experiences using the app. Required changes to assure usability and acceptability will afterwards directly implemented in the application. RESULTS EMMA brings together a strong body of evidence using cognitive behavioral and self-management theory with contemporary mHealth principles, allowing for a cost-effective intervention irrespective of place and time to target chronic pain in older adults. CONCLUSIONS Given the ubiquity of mHealth interventions for chronic conditions, the results of this study may serve to inform the development of tailored pain self-management interventions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion K. Slack ◽  
Ramon Chavez ◽  
Daniel Trinh ◽  
Daniel Vergel de Dios ◽  
Jeannie Lee

AbstractBackground and aimsAcute pain is differentiated from chronic pain by its sudden onset and short duration; in contrast, chronic pain is characterized by a duration of at least several months, typically considered longer than normal healing time. Despite differences in definition, there is little information on how types of self-management strategies or outcomes differ when pain is chronic rather than acute. Additionally, age and gender are thought to be related to types of strategies used and outcomes. However, strategies used and outcomes can be influenced by level of education, socioeconomic status, occupation, and access to the health care system, which can confound associations to type of pain, age or gender. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of strategies used for pain self-management and outcomes with type of pain, acute or chronic, age, or gender in a socioeconomically homogenous population, pharmacists.MethodsPharmacists with acute or chronic pain and a valid email completed an on-line questionnaire on demographic characteristics, pain characteristics, pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for managing pain, and outcomes (e.g. pain intensity). Univariate analysis was conducted by stratifying on type of pain (acute or chronic), then stratifying on gender (men vs. women) and age (younger vs. older). Thea priorialpha level was 0.05.ResultsA total of 366 pharmacists completed the questionnaire, 212 with acute pain (average age=44±12.1; 36% men) and 154 with chronic pain (average age=53±14.0; 48% men). The chronic pain group reported substantially higher levels of pain before treatment, level of post-treatment pain, level of pain at which sleep was possible, and goal pain levels (effect sizes [ES’s]=0.37–0.61). The chronic pain group were substantially more likely to use prescription non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDS), opioids, and non-prescription pain relievers (ES’s=0.29–0.80), and non-medical strategies (ES’s=0.56–0.77). Participants with chronic pain also were less confident (ES=0.54) and less satisfied (ES=0.52). In contrast, there were no differences within either the acute or chronic pain groups related to gender and outcomes. In the acute pain group, there also were no gender differences related to management strategies. However, younger age in the acute pain group was associated with use of herbal remedies and use of rest. Within the chronic pain group, men were more likely to use NSAIDS and women more likely to use hot/cold packs or massage while older participants were more likely to use massage. Variability in post-treatment level of pain and percent relief was high in all groups (coefficient of variation=25%–100%).ConclusionsThe differences between acute and chronic pain were substantial and included differences in demographic characteristics, pain characteristics, management strategies used, and outcomes. In contrast, few associations between age and gender with either management strategies or outcomes were identified, although the variability was high.ImplicationsWhen managing or researching pain management, acute pain should be differentiated from chronic pain. Because of the substantial variability within the gender and age groups, an individual approach to pain management irrespective of age and gender may be most useful.


Geriatrics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Fang Liu ◽  
Min Tong

Background and objective: Worldwide, 26 million older adults die from chronic disease, and chronic pain is typically a part of the experience of chronic disease. This study explores the perception of chronic pain for home-dwelling Chinese older adults and its influence on (1) self-management ability and (2) management and reduction of chronic pain. Methods: Adopting a qualitative study design, we conducted in-depth interviews with 10 Chinese community-dwelling older adults who experience chronic pain. Half of our informants perceive chronic pain, whereas the other half, diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, do not report that they perceive chronic pain. Data were analyzed with inductive thematic analysis. Results: Chronic pain perception plays important roles in (1) defining the challenge of self-management, (2) connecting previous caretaking experience, (3) adjusting the identity of self-management, (4) acquiring support from important others and (5) re-planning self-management arrangements. Conclusion: Pain perception helps to motivate Chinese older adults to face health challenges and regain self-management capacity through adjustments in self-identity and care experience with the support of important others. Pain perception can consolidate the situation of independent living of older adults. It helps to motivate Chinese older adults to face health challenges and regain self-management capacity.


2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian E. Saelens ◽  
Christine A. Gehrman ◽  
James F. Sallis ◽  
Karen J. Calfas ◽  
Julie A. Sarkin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S70-S70
Author(s):  
Staja Booker ◽  
Keesha Roach

Abstract Racial/ethnic minority older adults experience a disproportionate burden of functionally-disabling chronic pain. However, minimal research in pain and aging has fully explicated the unique and endemic psychosocial and cultural factors that strongly influence appraisal, communication, and management/coping of pain. Yet, to fully engage with and care for diverse racial/ethnic older adults, intentional responsiveness to these factors is necessary. This symposium features under-represented racial/ethnic older adult populations and multiple methodologies, including advanced imaging techniques, to understand various psychosocial and cultural factors associated with chronic pain. Our first presenter, Dr. Lor, uses qualitative inquiry to examine pain-associated language and expression of pain in Hmong older adults, which is often laden with stress and misunderstanding. Following is Dr. Taylor who will discuss the mediating effect of stress and coping on bodily pain in inner-city Black older adults. Dr. Terry will present novel findings on the association between catastrophizing (i.e., negative cognitive and emotional response to actual or anticipated pain resulting in feelings of helplessness) and brain structure in non-Hispanic Black and White adults with or at high-risk for knee osteoarthritis pain. This presentation will segway into culturally-relevant pain self-management practices and the role of social support specifically for Blacks from urban Detroit, as presented by Dr. Janevic. We will conclude with Dr. Booker presenting mixed-level data on the lack of familial and social networks and provider support for osteoarthritis pain self-management in Southern-dwelling older Blacks. This symposium extends the knowledge on the nuanced complexity of biopsychosocial and cultural dynamics underlying the pain experience.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce S. Mannon, B.S. ◽  
Marianne S. Matthias, Ph.D.

Background: ECLIPSE (Evaluation of a Peer Coach-Led Intervention to Improve Pain Symptoms) is a randomized controlled trial testing peer-supported chronic pain self-management. Veterans are paired with a peer coach (also with chronic pain) for 6 months. Peer coaches (PCs) and veterans meet or talk by phone 2x/month about pain self-management strategies, and veterans receive motivation and encouragement from their PC. To determine if the intervention was delivered as intended, fidelity was assessed at the end of the intervention period. Fidelity assessment is vital to help understand reasons for an intervention’s success or failure.   Methods: Intervention veterans were asked about the intervention’s delivery during their 6-month assessment, after intervention completion. Presence or absence of four “essential elements” of the intervention were evaluated, as well as meeting frequency.    Results: Scoring of veteran assessments revealed 74% of PC’s discussed self-management strategies and 69% of veterans felt motivated by their PC. Only 52% discussed how to adjust strategies and 34% discussed goal-setting. PC-veteran meeting frequency varied: 16% met weekly, 21% met twice a month, 16% met once a month, and 46% met less than once a month. 47% of PC’s had greater than 75% fidelity (i.e., the presence of at least 3 of 4 elements described above).   Conclusion and Potential Impact: About half of PC’s delivered the intervention with at least 75% fidelity. Fidelity was greater for discussing self-management strategies and motivating veterans. Results suggest that peer-supported self-management can be delivered with fidelity but PCs may need additional training to do so consistently.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S70-S70
Author(s):  
Mary R Janevic ◽  
Mary Janevic ◽  
Sheria Robinson-Lane ◽  
Susan Murphy ◽  
John Piette

Abstract African American older adults experience disproportionate burden from disabling chronic pain. Pain self-management interventions for this group are most effective when they integrate culturally-relevant preferences into intervention design. In the STEPS pilot trial, we collected focus group (n=23) and survey (n=57) data from African Americans age 60+ years about pain-management practices. Participants were recruited from the community and reported pain for 3+ months, with intensity >4 (0 to 10 scale). The most frequently-used pain-management strategies were exercise (75%) and prayer/Bible reading (74%). Also commonly used were healthy eating (61%), OTC medications (65%), and herbal supplements (51%). Focus group themes provided more nuanced information, including reasons for avoiding prescription pain medications, positive experiences with topical treatments, the value of movement, and the role of social support. Findings reveal strong engagement in pain self-care in this population. Interventions can build on existing practices by incorporating spirituality and appealing options for physical activity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Axon ◽  
Mira J. Patel ◽  
Jennifer R. Martin ◽  
Marion K. Slack

AbstractBackground and aimsMultidomain strategies (i.e. two or more strategies) for managing chronic pain are recommended to avoid excessive use of opioids while producing the best outcomes possible. The aims of this systematic review were to: 1) determine if patient-reported pain management is consistent with the use of multidomain strategies; and 2) identify the role of opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patient-reported pain management.MethodsBibliographic databases, websites, and reference lists of included studies were searched to identify published articles reporting community-based surveys of pain self-management from January 1989 to June 2017 using controlled vocabulary (and synonyms): pain; self-care; self-management; self-treatment; and adult. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data on subject demographics, pain characteristics, pain self-management strategies, and pain outcomes. Pain self-management strategies were organized according to our conceptual model. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias. Differences between the researchers were resolved by consensus.ResultsFrom the 3,235 unique records identified, 18 studies published between 2002 and 2017 from 10 countries were included. Twenty-two types of pharmacological strategies were identified (16 prescription, six non-prescription). NSAIDs (15 studies, range of use 10–72%) and opioids (12 studies, range of use 5–72%) were the most commonly reported prescription pharmacological strategies. Other prescription pharmacological strategies included analgesics, acetaminophen, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, anxiolytics, salicylates, β-blockers and calcium channel blockers, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and steroids, muscle relaxants, topical products, triptans, and others. Twenty-two types of non-pharmacological strategies were identified: four medical strategies (10 studies), 10 physical strategies (15 studies), four psychological strategies (12 studies), and four self-initiated strategies (15 studies). Medical strategies included consulting a medical practitioner, chiropractic, and surgery. Physical strategies included exercise, massage, hot and cold modalities, acupuncture, physical therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, activity modification or restriction, assistive devices, and altering body position/posture. Psychological strategies included relaxation, prayer or meditation, therapy, and rest/sleep. Self-initiated strategies included dietary or herbal supplements, dietary modifications, and complementary and alternative medicine. Overall, the number of strategies reported among the studies ranged from five to 28 (out of 44 identified strategies). Limited data on pain outcomes was reported in 15 studies, and included satisfaction with pain management strategies, pain interference on daily activities, adverse events, lost work or restricted activity days, emergency department visits, and disabilities.ConclusionsA wide variety and large number of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to manage chronic pain were reported, consistent with the use of multidomain strategies. High levels of use of both NSAIDs and opioids also were reported.ImplicationsComprehensive review and consultation with patients about their pain management strategies is likely needed for optimal outcomes. Additional research is needed to determine: how many, when, and why multidomain strategies are used; the relationship between opioid use, multidomain management strategies, and level of pain; how multidomain strategies relate to outcomes; and if adding strategies to a pain management plan increases the risk of adverse events or interactions, and increases an individuals pain management burden.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document