The Impact of Adolescent Sexual Harassment Experiences in Predicting Sexual Risk-Taking in Young Women

2019 ◽  
pp. 088626051984573
Author(s):  
Candice Norcott ◽  
Kate Keenan ◽  
Kristen Wroblewski ◽  
Alison Hipwell ◽  
Stephanie Stepp
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Vargas Carmona ◽  
Gloria J. Romero ◽  
Tamra Burns Loeb

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shayna Skakoon-Sparling ◽  
Kenneth M. Cramer ◽  
Paul A. Shuper

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mphatso Kamndaya

Abstract Objective: Understanding how context-specific measures of urban disadvantage are associated with sexual risk is critical to the refinement of effective HIV prevention interventions in urban disadvantaged settings in sub-Saharan Africa . This study describes how a mixed methods research design was used to get a more nuanced understanding of young people’s experience of material deprivation and their motivation for sexual risk-taking in urban disadvantaged settings. The study involved secondary analysis of data (n=560) from South Africa, primary qualitative study with 60 young people and household survey (n = 1,071) in Malawi. Legitimation strategies were used to identify inferences from the findings. Material deprivation characteristics that explained the most variance in sexual risk were determined by using logged coefficients multiplied by their standard deviations. Results: In South Africa, financial difficulty (0.16 = (log 2.11)*(0.50)) exerted the strongest effects on sexual risk followed by deprivation (0.10 = (log 1.43)*(0.66)) among young women, while for young men, material deprivation (0.04 = (log 1.20)*(0.50)) showed significant effects on sexual risk-taking. However in Malawi, material deprivation (0.08 = (log 1.37)*(0.58)) and unemployment (0.12 = (log 1.77)*(0.50)) were the most influential indicators of deprivation associated with coercive sex among young women and young men respectively.


2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Strong ◽  
John Bancroft ◽  
Lori A. Carnes ◽  
Leah A. Davis ◽  
John Kennedy

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 492-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynda M. Sagrestano ◽  
Alayne J. Ormerod ◽  
Cirleen DeBlaere

Peer sexual harassment (PSH) occurs frequently and across contexts during adolescence. The current study examined the relations among PSH in school, psychological distress, sexual experimentation, and sexual risk-taking in a sample of African American middle and high school girls. Results indicate that negative body appraisals mediated the relationship between PSH and psychological distress, suggesting that PSH is one way to operationalize interpersonal sexualization and sexual objectification. PSH was directly associated with sexual experimentation, but the association between PSH and sexual experimentation was not mediated by negative body appraisals. Neither PSH nor negative body appraisals were related to sexual risk-taking. This suggests that frequent exposure to high levels of sexualization and sexual objectification, in the form of PSH, is associated with more psychological distress and sexual experimentation, but not with sexual risk-taking, regardless of how girls feel about their bodies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Limmer

Understanding and addressing the sexual risk taking of young men remains a key research, policy, and practice concern in attempts to improve the emotional and physical sexual health of young men and their sexual partners. This article explores one of the ways in which young men attempt to mitigate sexual risk through the assigning of labels to particular young women and using these as a basis for their decisions in relation to sexual activity, contraception, and condom use. The article uses the lens of hegemonic masculinities theory to increase understanding of the role played by the construction and performance of marginalized masculinities and how these in turn are influenced by social exclusionary processes. The article draws on focus group and interview data from 46 young men aged 15 to 17 years living in the northwest of England, purposively selected on the basis of the prevailing policy definitions of social inclusion and exclusion. The article describes a form of marginalized masculinity pertaining to socially excluded young men, which as a result of limited access to other tenets of hegemonic masculinity, is disproportionately reliant on sexual expertise and voracity alongside overt demonstrations of their superiority over women. It is in this context that young women are assigned the labels of “dirty” or “clean” on the basis of a selection of arbitrary judgments relating to dress, demeanor, area of residence, and perceived sexual activities. The motivations of the young men, the impact on young women, and the policy and practice implications are all discussed.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Billig ◽  
Pamela Brouillard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document