The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R): A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Parkinson’s Disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 089198872110600
Author(s):  
Danilo Carrozzino ◽  
Kaj Sparle Christensen ◽  
Chiara Patierno ◽  
Chiara Siri ◽  
Anna Zecchinelli ◽  
...  

Objective: This is the first study applying Clinimetric Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (CLIPROM) criteria to evaluate the construct validity, sensitivity, and clinical utility of the SCL-90-R in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: A Rasch analysis was conducted using a sample of 488 PD outpatients. Results: Testing for dimensionality revealed that less than 5% of t-tests were significant, indicating that the SCL-90-R subscales entailed the property of construct validity. As to the total score, a Person Separation Reliability Index of .96 was found. Conclusions: The SCL-90-R total score is a sensitive screening measure that can be used not only to differentiate healthy stress reactions from symptoms of psychological distress but also to detect PD patients with an increased risk for psychiatric complications. As to the subscales, the brief versions that did not include misfitting items should be used to assess the severity of specific symptoms of psychological distress affecting PD patients.

Author(s):  
Rebecca McKeown ◽  
David R. Ellard ◽  
Abdul-Rasheed Rabiu ◽  
Eleni Karasouli ◽  
Rebecca S. Kearney

Abstract Background Ankle fractures are painful and debilitating injuries that pose a significant burden to society and healthcare systems. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used outcome measures in clinical trials of interventions for ankle fracture but there is little evidence on their validity and reliability. This systematic review aims to identify and appraise evidence for the measurement properties of ankle specific PROMs used in adults with an ankle fracture using Consensus Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) methodology. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL online databases for evidence of measurement properties of ankle specific PROMs. Articles were included if they assessed or described the development of the PROM in adults with ankle fracture. Articles were ineligible if they used the PROM to assess the measurement properties of another instrument. Abstracts without full articles and conference proceedings were ineligible, as were articles that adapted the PROM under evaluation without any formal justification of the changes as part of a cross-cultural validation or translation process. Two reviewers completed the screening. To assess methodological quality we used COSMIN risk of bias checklist and summarised evidence using COSMIN quality criteria and a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality and extracted the data for a sample of articles. Results The searches returned a total of 377 articles. From these, six articles were included after application of eligibility criteria. These articles evaluated three PROMs: A-FORM, OMAS and AAOS. The A-FORM had evidence of a robust development process within the patient population, however lacks post-formulation testing. The OMAS showed sufficient levels of reliability, internal consistency and construct validity. The AAOS showed low quality evidence of sufficient construct validity. Conclusions There is insufficient evidence to support the recommendation of a particular PROM for use in adult ankle fracture research based on COSMIN methodology. Further validation of these outcome measures is required in order to ensure PROMs used in this area are sufficiently valid and reliable to assess treatment effects. This would enable high quality, evidenced-based management of adults with ankle fracture.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ayse Kuspinar ◽  
Kedar K. V. Mate ◽  
Anne-Louise Lafontaine ◽  
Nancy Mayo

Introduction. Parkinson’s disease (PD) affects all aspects of an individual’s life and is heterogeneous across people and time. The Patient Generated Index (PGI) is an individualized measure of quality of life (QOL) that allows patients to identify the areas of life that are important to them. Although the PGI has immense potential for use in clinical and research settings, its validity has not been assessed in PD. The purpose of this study is to estimate how well areas of QOL that patients with PD nominate on the PGI agree with ratings obtained from standard outcome measures. Methods. Patients with PD completed the PGI and various standard patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. The PGI and standard PRO measures were compared at the total score, domain, and item levels. Pearson’s correlations and independent t-tests were used, as well as positive and negative predictive values. Results. The sample (n = 76) had a mean age of 69 (standard deviation 9) and were predominantly men (59%). The PGI was moderately correlated (r = −0.35) with the standardized disease-specific QOL measure Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8). Within one severity rating, agreement between the PGI and different standard outcome measures ranged from 85 to 100% for walking, 69 to 100% for fatigue, 38 to 75% for depression, and 20 to 80% for memory/concentration. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that nominated areas of QOL on the PGI provide comparable results to standard PRO measures, and provides evidence in support of the validity of this individualized measure in PD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18294-e18294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Licht ◽  
Alain Nickels ◽  
David Riedl ◽  
Gerhard Rumpold ◽  
Bernhard Holzner

e18294 Background: Many cancer survivors suffer from psychological distress and poor QoL. Cancer rehabilitation is aimed at improving their condition but the benefit remains controversial, we have thus investigated the outcome. Methods: ePROM were routinely integrated into the inpatient program of a cancer rehabilitation center in Austria. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to assess distress, and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire for analysis of cancer-related symptoms and functions. Patients answered questions via internet prior to admission (T0). This allowed for allocation of physical therapies and 4-8 psychological counseling sessions according to their needs. Following informed consent, the outcome was investigated likewise by the time of discharge after 3 weeks (T1). Data were analyzed with SPSS software using ANOVA repeated measures. Results: 4198 patients (age 59.2±11.7 yr; range 18-91 years; 61.5% female) participated between January 2015, and August 2018. HADS identified a marked reduction of anxiety and depression, with distress levels similar to the normal population by T1. QLQ-C30 revealed significant increases for global QoL; physical, social, emotional and role functions. All recorded symptoms were improved, in particular fatigue, pain and insomnia. Moreover, subgroup analyses confirmed improvement for 11 investigated entities. Of notice, decrease of anxiety was most prominent in survivors of breast, head/neck and lung cancer patients (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between a subgroup of 1122 elderly ( > 70 yr), and younger patients except for the physical function, which improved significantly in older patients (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Our study shows that inclusion of ePROM into inpatient cancer rehabilitation helps allocate therapies according to individual needs. This large series demonstrates significant reduction of psychological distress and improvement of all parameters of QoL. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document