Rectal Gonorrhoea in Homosexual Men: Source of Infection

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 284-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
A McMillan ◽  
H Young ◽  
A Moyes
Keyword(s):  
Independent Risk Factor ◽  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Receptive Anal Intercourse ◽  
Homosexual Men ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Source Of Infection ◽  
Unprotected Receptive Anal Intercourse ◽  
History Of ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
Index Cases

The objective of this retrospective study was to determine the possible source of infection in homosexual men with rectal gonorrhoea: the probable source of rectal gonorrhoea was identified in 46/155 cases. Although the urethra was the site of infection in 33 (72%) of these contacts, only pharyngeal gonorrhoea was identified in 9 (20%) men. In 25/26 cases, there was concordance in the auxo/serotypes of Neisseria gonorrhoeae between contacts with urethral gonorrhoea and the index men with rectal gonorrhoea. Eleven out of 12 pharyngeal isolates were of the same auxo/serotype as the index cases. This study supports the hypothesis that rectal gonorrhoea in homosexual men can be acquired from the oropharynx. Because infection at this site is an independent risk factor for acquisition of HIV, screening for rectal and pharyngeal gonorrhoea should be offered to men who have sex with men, even when there is no history of unprotected receptive anal intercourse.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for HIV/Syphilis Infection and Male Circumcision Practices and Preferences among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Zeng ◽  
Linglin Zhang ◽  
Tian Li ◽  
Wenhong Lai ◽  
Yujiang Jia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hiv Prevention ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Male Circumcision ◽  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Receptive Anal Intercourse ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Syphilis Infection ◽  
Unprotected Receptive Anal Intercourse ◽  
Male Sex ◽  
Sex With Men

Objective. To investigate factors associated with HIV infection and the frequency and willingness of male circumcision among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Chengdu city, China.Methods. A cross-sectional survey provided information on participants' demographics, risk behaviors, circumcision, and uptake of HIV prevention services.Results. Of 570 participants, 13.3% were infected with HIV and 15.9% with syphilis. An estimated 43.0% of respondents reported having unprotected receptive anal intercourse, and 58.9% reported having ≥2 male sexual partners in the past 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that syphilis, more male sex partners, predominantly receptive anal intercourse, and exclusively receptive male sex were associated with HIV infection. Higher level of education and peer education service were inversely associated with HIV infection. Nearly a fifth (18.0%) of participants were circumcised. More than half of uncircumcised participants expressed willingness to be circumcised.Conclusion. This study reveals a high prevalence of HIV and syphilis among MSM in Chengdu province of China. The frequency of unprotected receptive anal intercourse and multiple male sexual partnerships highlight the urgency for an effective comprehensive HIV prevention strategy. Although the willingness to accept male circumcision (MC) is high, further research is needed to assess the protective effective of MC among MSM.

scholarly journals Unprotected Receptive Anal Intercourse Among Men Who have Sex with Men in Brazil

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1288-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Machado Rocha ◽  
Lígia Regina Franco Sansigolo Kerr ◽  
Ana Maria de Brito ◽  
Ines Dourado ◽  
Mark Drew Crosland Guimarães
Keyword(s):  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Receptive Anal Intercourse ◽  
Unprotected Receptive Anal Intercourse ◽  
Sex With Men

scholarly journals Patterns of Extragenital Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in Women and Men Who Have Sex With Men Reporting a History of Receptive Anal Intercourse

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire S. Danby ◽  
Lisa A. Cosentino ◽  
Lorna K. Rabe ◽  
Carol L. Priest ◽  
Khrystine C. Damare ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Receptive Anal Intercourse ◽  
History Of ◽  
Sex With Men

How condom use, number of receptive anal intercourse partners and history of external genital warts predict risk for external anal warts

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
D J Wiley ◽  
Diane M Harper ◽  
David Elashoff ◽  
Michael J Silverberg ◽  
Christine Kaestle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Condom Use ◽  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Consistent Condom ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Receptive Anal Intercourse ◽  
Protective Effects ◽  
Lifetime Number ◽  
History Of ◽  
Anal Warts ◽  
External Genital Warts

Few analytic opportunities have allowed us to evaluate the role that specific sexual acts and male latex condoms play in the acquisition of external anal warts (EAW) using longitudinal data. The acquisition of EAWs occurs from epithelial contact with other HPV-infected surfaces, and hence is dependent upon sexual behaviour. Our objectives were to classify the relative importance of condom use, receptive anal intercourse (RAI) and prior history of EGWs on acquisition of EAWs. The observational Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study followed 2925 men over nine semiannual study visits for behavioural and physical examinations with laboratory testing. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of examiner-diagnosed EAWs in a homosexual population. EAWs were diagnosed among 10% of men studied across 22,157 visits reviewed for this study. Men with history of EGWs were more likely than those previously unaffected to have developed EAWs (cOR = 2.4 (2.0, 2.9)), as were men who reported multiple anoreceptive intercourse partners (e.g., compared with men who reported no RAI partners, men with 1, 2–5, ≥6 RAI partners had crude risk ratios 1.0 (0.8, 1.3), 1.6 (1.2, 2.1), 3.9 (2.7, 5.8), respectively). These relations persisted after other demographic and sexual risk factors were controlled for in the analyses. Consistent condom usage showed no protective effect for EAWs in our crude or adjusted analyses. Patient education messages should be tailored to reflect our uncertainty about the protective nature of condoms for the development of anal warts, but to continue to assert the protective effects of a limited lifetime number of sexual partners and the heightened risk for wart recurrence once infected.

Getting to the Bottom of It: Sexual Positioning and Stage of Syphilis at Diagnosis, and Implications for Syphilis Screening

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-322
Author(s):  
Vincent J Cornelisse ◽  
Eric P F Chow ◽  
Rosie L Latimer ◽  
Janet Towns ◽  
Marcus Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Centre ◽  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Status ◽  
Secondary Syphilis ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Receptive Anal Intercourse ◽  
Primary Stage ◽  
Primary Syphilis ◽  
Sex With Men

Abstract Background Syphilis control among men who have sex with men (MSM) would be improved if we could increase the proportion of cases who present for treatment at the primary stage rather than at a later stage, as this would reduce their duration of infectivity. We hypothesized that MSM who practiced receptive anal intercourse were more likely to present with secondary syphilis, compared to MSM who did not practice receptive anal intercourse. Methods In this retrospective analysis of MSM diagnosed with primary or secondary syphilis at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between 2008 and 2017, we analyzed associations between the stage of syphilis (primary vs secondary) and behavioral data collected by computer-assisted self-interviews. Results There were 559 MSM diagnosed with primary (n = 338) or secondary (n = 221) syphilis. Of these, 134 (24%) men reported not practicing receptive anal sex. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, MSM were more likely to present with secondary rather than primary syphilis if they reported practicing receptive anal intercourse (adjusted odds ratio 3.90; P < .001) after adjusting for age, human immunodeficiency virus status, and condom use. MSM with primary syphilis who did not practice receptive anal intercourse almost always (92%) had their primary syphilis lesion on their penis. Conclusions The finding that MSM who practiced receptive anal intercourse more commonly presented with secondary syphilis—and hence, had undetected syphilis during the primary stage—implies that anorectal syphilis chancres are less noticeable than penile chancres. These men may need additional strategies to improve early detection of anorectal chancres, to reduce their duration of infectivity and, hence, reduce onward transmission. Men who practiced receptive anal intercourse (AI) were more likely to present with secondary syphilis, compared to men who exclusively practiced insertive AI. Hence, men who practice receptive AI may need additional strategies to detect anal chancres, to reduce transmission.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document