The language we use – the effect of writing mental health care plans in the first person

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 496-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Wyder ◽  
Steve Kisely ◽  
Carla Meurk ◽  
Josie Dietrich ◽  
Teresa Fawcett ◽  
...  

Objective: This study describes the impact of Motivational Aftercare Planning (MAP) – an intervention to increase consumer/clinician collaboration on the content of mental health recovery plans. The intervention focussed on enhancing existing discharge processes in psychiatric inpatient wards and supporting nursing staff in using motivational interviewing techniques to facilitate the completion of these plans. Methods: We conducted a qualitative thematic content analysis of the recovery plans completed throughout the study ( n = 110). Chi-squared tests were then used to compare the occurrence of themes and content identified in recovery plans pre and post the intervention ( n = 55). Results: The thematic content of the recovery plans shifted in focus following the intervention, with a change from third to first person language. Those completed prior to the intervention generally mentioned: decreasing symptoms of mental illness; acceptance of the illness; achieving clinical stability; risk management and treatment compliance. The recovery plans completed after the intervention focussed on: general wellness; participate in meaningful activities; community life; social roles and connections with others. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a simple time-limited, facilitated intervention resulted in a change of thematic content in recovery plans. The use of these plans and its effect on care planning will need further evaluation.

Author(s):  
Sophie Collingwood ◽  
Laura McKenzie-Smith

Background: Uniform has traditionally been worn in psychiatric inpatient and other mental health settings, but there has been a move to non-uniform in recent years. Some services have made the change back to uniform, raising questionsabout the potential impact on patients and staff.Aim: To review the impact of uniform within a psychiatric inpatient or mental health setting.Method: Databases were searched for articles exploring the impact of uniform use using specified search terms. Articles were assessed for suitability with inclusion and exclusion criteria, critically appraised, then analysed for themes using thematic analysis.Results: 17 papers were included in the review. Thematic analysis identified five main themes and 29 subthemes. Main themes were Attitudes and interactions, A freer environment, Are you both nurses?, The ‘ideal self’ and There are more important things. A critical appraisal of the articles suggested issues with validityand reliability, which are discussed.Discussion: Studies identified that wearing non-uniform facilitated positive changes in both patients and staff. This raises the potential negative impact of uniform on both patients and staff, and the role of power imbalance in these settings is discussed. Further themes around identification of staff out of uniform were considered.Implications for practice: The use of uniform in mental health and psychiatric inpatient settings should be considered carefully, due to the potential negative impact, whilst also recognising the importance of staff identification and supporting professional identity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Payne-Gill ◽  
Corin Whitfield ◽  
Alison Beck

AbstractAimsInpatient life in UK mental health hospitals was profoundly altered during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analysed whether these changes impacted the rate of violent and aggressive incidents across acute adult wards and psychiatric intensive care units in a South London NHS Mental Health Trust during the first UK lockdown.MethodsWe used an interrupted time series analysis to assess whether the rate of violent and aggressive incidents changed during the lockdown period from 23rd March 2020 to 15th June 2020. We used a quasi-poisson general additive model to model the weekly rate of violent incidents as a function of a seasonal trend, time trend, and impact of lockdown, using data from 1st January 2017 to 27th September 2020.ResultsThere was a 35% increase in the rate of incidents of violence and aggression [IR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.15 – 1.58, p < 0.001] between March 23rd 2020 and June 15th 2020. In addition, there was strong evidence of temporal (p < 0.001) and seasonal trends (p < 0.001).ConclusionsOur results suggest that restrictions to life increased the rate of violent incidents on the mental health wards studied here.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanne Harper ◽  
Mick McKeown

Purpose Whilst there is growing evidence to suggest that the recovery college (RC) environment supports students towards their mental health recovery (Meddings et al., 2015b), students’ initial motivations for engagement, alongside factors that may hinder or support attendance, have yet to be exclusively explored. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach All new RC students were invited to take part in a semi-structured interview three months following their enrolment. Four participants completed an interview which were later analysed using thematic analysis. Findings Four themes emerged within analysis: making the effort; being “too unwell”; friendly environment; and glad I came. These are discussed alongside the literature, and it is proposed that whilst there is a substantial struggle involved in engagement with a RC, likely related to mental health and social factors, the RC environment, peer support and support of the tutors helps students to overcome the impact of this. Research limitations/implications Due to the small sample size and exploratory stance of this study, additional research into the complexities around engagement with RCs is strongly recommended. Only students who had attended at least one RC course chose to participate in this study, therefore an under-researched population of non-attendees may provide a valuable contribution to further understanding. Originality/value This is one of the first studies to qualitatively explore factors which may support, or hinder, initial and ongoing engagement with a RC. It is proposed that a greater understanding of these important issues could be used to increase RC accessibility and inclusion.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-122
Author(s):  
Nikki Scheiner ◽  
Sarah Cohen ◽  
Ruth Davis ◽  
Tim Gale ◽  
Amanda Agyare

Aims and methodThe Frequent Attenders Programme is a joint initiative between Hertfordshire Rapid Assessment, Interface and Discharge service and the Emergency Department of the West Hertfordshire NHS Trust, which aims to divert frequent attenders from the emergency department by addressing their unmet needs. This paper describes the range of interventions put in place from the time that the service was set up in 2014 until the introduction of the new national Commissioning for Quality and Innovation 2017–2019, which tasked National Health Service trusts to improve services for people with mental health needs who present to Accident and Emergency. The terms emergency department and Accident and Emergency are used interchangeably, reflecting the practice in policy documents. A subsequent article will report on the impact of the Commissioning for Quality and Innovation in Hertfordshire.ResultsAnalysis of the interventions indicated a highly significant (P < 0.0001) mean reduction in attendances. Lower gains were made in patients whose primary presentations were alcohol-related. A failure to effect change in two patients led to a significant revision of their respective care plans, resulting in a subsequent reduction in their attendances.Clinical implicationsAn integrated approach to patients with complex presentations was associated with high levels of both patient and referrer satisfaction. It is hypothesised that dismantling the barriers between physical and mental health may lead to similar successes in frequent attenders in other in-patient and community medical and psychiatric services.Declaration of interestNone.


Author(s):  
Dimitar Karadzhov

Despite its seeming breadth and diversity, the bulk of the personal (mental health) recovery literature has remained strangely ‘silent’ about the impact of various socio-structural inequalities on the recovery process. Such an inadequacy of the empirical literature is not without consequences since the systematic omission or downplaying, at best, of the socio-structural conditions of living for persons with lived experience of mental health difficulties may inadvertently reinforce a reductionist view of recovery as an atomised, individualised phenomenon. Motivated by those limitations in extant scholarship, a critical literature review was conducted to identify and critique relevant research to problematise the notion of personal recovery in the context of socio-structural disadvantage such as poverty, homelessness, discrimination and inequalities. The review illuminates the scarcity of empirical research and the paucity of sociologically-informed theorisation regarding how recovery is shaped by the socio-structural conditions of living. Those inadequacies are especially pertinent to homelessness research, whereby empirical investigations of personal recovery have remained few and undertheorised. The gaps in the research and theorising about the relational, contextual and socio-structural embeddedness of recovery are distilled. The critical review concludes that personal recovery has remained underresearched, underproblematised and undertheorised, especially in the context of homelessness and other forms of socio-structural disadvantage. Understanding how exclusionary social arrangements affect individuals’ recovery, and the coping strategies that they deploy to negotiate those, is likely to inform anti-oppressive interventions that could eventually remove the structural constraints to human emancipation and flourishing.


Author(s):  
Peter Kinderman

From an academic clinical psychological perspective, mental health problems are seen as existing on a number of continua with normal functioning, rather than being explicable in terms of categorical diagnoses. Clinical Psychologists use clinical case formulations in their professional practice and are critical of the validity and utility of diagnosis. Psychologists also see mental health problems as stemming from disturbances in psychological processes. In turn, these processes may be disrupted by a variety of causes – biological, social and psychological. Nevertheless, we see disturbance or impairment of such psychological processes as the central issue in mental ill health.<br /><br />Mental health legislation should therefore reflect these perspectives in terms of the criteria for compulsory treatment and in terms of the procedures and practices governing care.<br /><br />To an extent this is welcome in the Government’s current proposals for mental health legislative reform. A basis of compulsion based on criteria rather than diagnosis is proposed, as are care plans rather than diagnosis and treatment. Clinical psychology, however, would go further. Since there seem to be differences between ‘well’ and ‘ill’ in terms only of the degree and nature of the disturbance of psychological process and the impact on functioning, this speaks to the nature of<br />‘unsoundness of mind’. Clinical psychologists contend that it follows that mental health legislation is appropriate and necessary only if people are impaired in their judgement to the extent of being unable to make valid decisions for themselves.<br />It has been proposed that Clinical Psychologists could act as ‘clinical supervisors’ (the term which is to replace ‘responsible medical officers’). If, indeed, mental ill health is the disturbance of complex, inter-related psychological processes, it makes perfect sense to employ psychologists to coordinate care and decision-making. Clinical psychologists are ready to take their place as partners with lawyers and psychiatrists.


2020 ◽  
pp. 103985622093614
Author(s):  
Luke Viglione ◽  
Brooke L Short

Objective: To assess rates of metabolic monitoring in patients prescribed antipsychotic medications in the psychiatric inpatient setting and the impact education can have regarding monitoring compliance. Method: Two identical audits were undertaken at a NSW mental health inpatient service before and after a campaign designed to educate mental health workers about the importance of metabolic monitoring. Results from both audits were compared for statistically significant improvements in monitoring rates. Results: Rates of monitoring plasma lipids increased from 21.7% to 78.8% ( p < 0.01) and rates for plasma glucose increased from 20.8% to 73.7% ( p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant changes in rates of monitoring body mass index (83.0% and 77.1%, respectively), waist circumference (36.8% and 43.2%, respectively) and blood pressure (99.1% and 100%, respectively). Conclusion: This study has shown that rates of metabolic monitoring in the inpatient setting can be improved with a relatively low-cost education intervention. While absolute rates remain low, outcomes suggest that it may be worthwhile trialling further modes of education and repeating this education in cycles.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S184-S185
Author(s):  
Martta Kerkelä ◽  
Mika Gissler ◽  
David Gyllenberg ◽  
Andre Sourander ◽  
Juha Veijola

Abstract Background Finnish mental health policy has aimed to reduce psychiatric inpatient beds and the average duration of psychiatric inpatient treatment period has been reduced noticeably since 1980s. At the same time, the aim has been to increase outpatient services for people with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Along with this policy, there is some evidence that increasing number of people with psychosis have never been admitted to hospital. The purpose of this study was to harmonize health care data in five large Finnish birth cohorts and evaluate evidence on whether the cumulative incidence of adolescent and adulthood hospitalization due to schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders has changed over the decades. Methods We used data from five different Finnish birth cohorts: Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (NFBC 1966), 1987 Finnish Birth Cohort (FBC 1987), Finnish 1981 Birth Cohort Study (FBCS 1981), Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986 (NFBC 1968) and 1997 Finnish Birth Cohorts (FBC 1997). NFBC 1966 includes the people born in the two northern most provinces of Finland with the expected date in the year 1966, comprising of 12,231 children and the NFBC 1986 between July 1st, 1985 and June 30th, 1986 including 9,479 children. FBCS 1981 consist of a sample including 10% of the Finnish children born in 1981. The sample is based on the school sampling, comprising of 5,417 children. FBC studies follows all children survived perinatal period born in Finland in 1987 and in 1997. FBC 1987 comprises of 59,476 children and FBC 1997 of 58,802 children. The main outcome in this study was hospitalization due to schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. The data of mental disorders were obtained from the Care Register for Health Care (CRHC). Data covers the years from 1969 to 2017. The CRHC data was harmonized in each cohort using the same program. The harmonization included personal identification number and dates (entry date, date of discharge) revisions. The diagnoses were confirmed to be on the right format. Final dataset included total N = 145,405 subjects. The follow-up for the study subjects was from age 0 to 18 years in all five birth cohorts and from age 0 to 28 years in all other cohorts except FBC 1997. Cumulative incidence of hospital treated schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders in each cohort was calculated. Test of equal proportions was used to calculate the Pearson’s chi-squared statistic. The linear association was also tested using chi-squared test for trend in proportions. Results At ages of 0 to 28 years the cumulative incidences of hospital treated psychosis were in NFBC 1966 1.0% (N=124), FBCS 1981 1.5% (N=81), NFBC 1986 1.2% (N=109) and FBC 1987 1.6% (N=947) (χ²: 30.6, p&lt;.001; χ²trend: 23.5, p&lt;.001). Respective numbers at age of 0 to 18 years were in NFBC 1966 0.1% (N=14), FBCS 1981 0.3% (N=15), NFBC 1986 0.3% (N=33), FBC 1987 0.4% (N=256) and FBC 1997 0.3% (N=195) (χ²: 31.6, p&lt;.001; χ²trend: 9.9, 0.001). Hospital treated schizophrenia between ages of 0 to 18 years was too rare to analyze (NFBC 1966 N=5, FBCS 1981 N=4, NFBC 1986 N=4, FBC 1987 N=41 and FBC 1997 N=15). At ages of 0 to 29 years the cumulative incidences were NFBC 1966 0.4% (N=59), FBCS 1981 0.6% (N=34), NFBC 1986 0.3% (N=27) and FBC 1987 0.5% (N=297) (χ²: 10.5 p=0.015; χ²trend: 0.01, p = 0.912). Discussion The main finding of the study was that the cumulative incidence of first-admission inpatient treated psychosis has increased over the decades in Finland. This is somewhat opposite to the Finnish mental health policy plan aiming to treat people with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders mainly in outpatient services.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document