Detection of Bovine Torovirus and other Enteric Pathogens in Feces from Diarrhea Cases in Cattle

The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of bovine torovirus (BoTV) in bovine fecal samples from diarrhea cases submitted to the Ohio Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (ADDL) and to assess if a relationship exists between BoTV and the other enteric pathogens detected. From November 1999 to May 2001, 259 specimens from 53 calves (≤6 months old), 27 young adults (≤2 years), 125 adults (≥2 years), and 54 animals of unknown age were examined by an antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay developed to detect BoTV Testing for other enteric pathogens was performed by ADDL, and the results were analyzed with the BoTV data. The BoTV was detected using ELISA or RT-PCR in 9.7% (25/259) of the clinical samples, 56% (14/25) of which were from calves ( P < 0.001) representing 26.4% (14/53) of the calves tested. Of the BoTV-positive calves, 71% (10/14) were less than 3 weeks of age. In 11/25 positive specimens, BoTV was the only pathogen detected among those examined. Other enteric organisms detected alone or in combination with BoTV in calf samples were rotavirus, coronavirus, Salmonella spp., Cryptosporidium spp., and Giardia spp.; but no consistent association between BoTV and these organisms was observed. In summary, BoTV was detected in fecal samples from cattle with diarrhea, principally in young calves less than 3 weeks of age. Future studies of infectious diarrhea in cattle should also include assays for this etiologic agent.

Download Full-text

Monitoring Current-Season Spread of Potato virus Y in Potato Fields Using ELISA and Real-Time RT-PCR

Plant Disease ◽

10.1094/pdis-03-12-0283-re ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 97 (5) ◽

pp. 641-644 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

Manphool S. Fageria ◽

Mathuresh Singh ◽

Upeksha Nanayakkara ◽

Yvan Pelletier ◽

Xianzhou Nie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Real Time ◽

Potato Virus ◽

Potato Virus Y ◽

Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Pcr Assay ◽

Current Season ◽

Seed Market ◽

Polymerase Chain ◽

Time Of Harvest

The current-season spread of Potato virus Y (PVY) was investigated in New Brunswick, Canada, in 11 potato fields planted with six different cultivars in 2009 and 2010. In all, 100 plants selected from each field were monitored for current-season PVY infections using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Average PVY incidence in fields increased from 0.6% in 2009 and 2% in 2010 in the leaves to 20.3% in 2009 and 21.9% in 2010 in the tubers at the time of harvest. In individual fields, PVY incidence in tubers reached as high as 37% in 2009 and 39% in 2010 at the time of harvest. Real-time RT-PCR assay detected more samples with PVY from leaves than did ELISA. A higher number of positive samples was also detected with real-time RT-PCR from growing tubers compared with the leaves collected from the same plant at the same sampling time. PVY incidence determined from the growing tubers showed a significant positive correlation with the PVY incidence of tubers after harvest. Preharvest testing provides another option to growers to either top-kill the crop immediately to secure the seed market when the PVY incidence is low or leave the tubers to develop further for table or processing purposes when incidence of PVY is high.

Download Full-text

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction assay for the detection of COVID-19 from clinical samples in low-and middle-income countries: Protocol

10.21203/rs.3.rs-960246/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Emmanuel Oladipo Babafemi

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽

Real Time ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Clinical Samples ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Chain Reaction ◽

Pcr Assay ◽

Middle Income ◽

Polymerase Chain

Abstract Background: COVID-19 has spread globally since its discovery in Hubei province, China in December 2019 and became pandemic in 2020. COVID-19 is a new betacoronavirus and a variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARA- CoV-2). Rapid, accurate and reliable diagnosis of COVID-19 will prevent the spread and allow for appropriate management. The main objective of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and summarise the published evidence on the diagnostic performance and effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the diagnosis of current or previous COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We will search MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, BIOSIS, LILACS, Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialised Register (CIDG SR), Global Health, and CINAHL for published studies for the diagnosis of COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction assay in LMICs There will be no restriction regarding the language, date of publication, and publication status. We will include retrospective, cross-sectional and cohort observational studies will be included in the review. Selection of studies, data extraction and management, assessment of risk of bias, and quality of evidence will be performed by two independent reviewers (EB and BC). A third researcher (GM) will be consulted in case of discrepancies. Depending on the availability and quality of the data, a meta-analysis will be performed. Otherwise, findings will be qualitatively reported. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the uptake of RT-PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection from clinical samples in human in LMICs. This review will make available evidence on the uptake, accuracy, approach, and interpretation of results of this assay in the context of COVID-19 diagnosis which will meet an urgent need, considering the diagnostic challenges of RT-PCR assay for COVID-19 diagnosis in humans. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021271894

Download Full-text

DETECTION OF RESPIRATORY SYNCITIAL VIRUS (RSV) IN LOWER ACUTE RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS BY NESTED REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION- POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION

Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy ◽

10.34071/jmp.2011.3.2 ◽

2011 ◽

pp. 11-15

Author(s):

Keyword(s):

Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽

Reverse Transcription ◽

Respiratory Infections ◽

Clinical Samples ◽

Acute Respiratory Infections ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Minimal Level ◽

Chain Reaction ◽

Pcr Assay ◽

Polymerase Chain

Objective: To develop and apply a nested reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction (nested RT-PCR) for detection of RSV in lower acute respiratory infections. Materials and methods: A nested reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify a sequence of the F gene in the RSV genomic RNA, optimized and compared the sensitivity and specificity of this assay with the control samples and then applied this procedure for diagnosing RSV from clinical samples. Results: This nested RT-PCR assay amplified the specific target fragment of RSV RNA and did not amplify any sequence of genomes of the tested common viruses and bacteria causing respiratory infections. The minimal level of detection of this procedure was 102 copies/ml. Results for detection of RSV on 109 samples of throat swabs or nasopharyngeal swabs from children with lower respiratory infections showed that twenty seven patients were positive with RSV ( 24.8%), among which six out of 30 (20%) were with bronchitis, seven out of 26 ( 27%) were with bronchiolitis and fourteen out of 53 (26.4%) were with pneumonia. Conclusion: This nested RT-PCR was found to be useful and reliable for detection of RSV in respiratory infections.

Download Full-text

Investigation of Rotavirus infection in sheep usingserological and molecular techniques

Indian Journal of Animal Research ◽

10.18805/ijar.11463 ◽

2016 ◽

Author(s):

Volkan Yilmaz. ◽

M.Ozkan Timurkan ◽

Nuvit Coskun ◽

Yakup Yildirim

Keyword(s):

Molecular Detection ◽

Molecular Techniques ◽

Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽

Small Scale ◽

Family Farms ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Fecal Samples ◽

Rotavirus Infection ◽

Scale Family ◽

Polymerase Chain

In this study, serological and molecular research was conducted on the Rotavirus infection in domestic breeds of sheep at 2–3 years of age. The sheep included in the study were raised on small scale family units of less than 20 sheep per unit, in central Kars province and its districts (Susuz, Arpaçay, Kagizman and Selim) in the Northeast Anatolia region of Turkey. The blood and fecal samples were collected randomly from 450 sheep. They were analyzed for the presence of Rotavirus and the antibody against the virus using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The highest seropositive ratio (73.46%) was found in central Kars province. The seroprevalence of Rotavirus in sheep raised in the Kars region was determined to be 55.33%. Rotavirus was not detected in fecal samples with ELISA. Molecular detection of Rotavirus from fecal samples was done by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique using specific generic primers for VP6 protein. Rotavirus could not be detected in RT-PCR. The data that were obtained showed that the infection spreads on small scale family farms. Based on this information, recommendations were made for controlling Rotavirus infection.

Download Full-text

PCR Detection of Group A Bovine Rotaviruses in Feces

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation ◽

10.1177/104063879300500403 ◽

1993 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 516-521 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Jarasvech Chinsangaram ◽

Geoffrey Y. Akita ◽

Anthony E. Castro ◽

Bennie I. Osburn

Keyword(s):

Ethidium Bromide ◽

Clinical Samples ◽

Pcr Analysis ◽

Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽

Pcr Assay ◽

Fecal Samples ◽

Bovine Rotavirus ◽

Viral Particles ◽

Pcr Inhibitor ◽

Group A

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol has been developed for identification of bovine group A rotavirus infection in feces. Primers (20mers) complementary to 3′ ends of double-stranded RNA genome segment 6 of bovine rotavirus NCDV strain were synthesized and used in PCR. Bovine rotavirus RNA from infected cell culture was employed to optimize the PCR protocol. Rotavirus-negative fecal samples were spiked with known quantities of bovine rotavirus, and the sensitivity of the PCR assay was determined. Fecal samples were extracted with phenol and treated to eliminate unidentified PCR inhibitor(s) in feces, and PCR was performed. PCR products were either visualized on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels or detected by chemiluminescent hybridization. The sensitivity of the assay was 6 × 104 viral particles/ml of feces with ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel visualization or 6 × 102 viral particles/ml of feces with chemiluminescent hybridization. The PCR assay was applied to 18 fecal specimens from clinical cases. All 16 clinical samples that were positive for rotavirus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or by ELISA and electron microscopy (EM) were positive by PCR. The 2 samples that were rotavirus negative by ELISA or by ELISA and EM were also negative on PCR analysis.

Download Full-text

Polymerase chain reaction amplification and typing of rotavirus in environmental samples

Water Science & Technology ◽

10.2166/wst.1995.0643 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 31 (5-6) ◽

pp. 371-374 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

R. Gajardo ◽

R. M. Pintó ◽

A. Bosch

Keyword(s):

Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽

Environmental Samples ◽

Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Chain Reaction ◽

Pcr Assay ◽

Group A ◽

Reaction Amplification ◽

Stool Specimens ◽

Polymerase Chain

A reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay is described that has been developed for the detection and serotyping of group A rotavirus in stool specimens and concentrated and non-concentrated sewage specimens.

Download Full-text

Is it enough for COVID-19 screening test? Limitation of swab test and general characteristics of mild symptom patients

Science Progress ◽

10.1177/00368504211026152 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 104 (2) ◽

pp. 003685042110261

Author(s):

Sungwoo Choi ◽

Hyo Jeong Choi ◽

Ho Jung Kim

Keyword(s):

Screening Test ◽

Community Treatment ◽

Upper Respiratory Tract ◽

Test Results ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Pcr Assay ◽

Positive Rate ◽

Upper Respiratory ◽

Polymerase Chain ◽

Discharge Criteria

The most common method for SARS-CoV-2 testing is throat or nasal swabbing by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. In South Korea, drive-through swab test is used for screening system and community treatment centers (CTCs), which admit and treat confirmed COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms, are being used. This retrospective study was conducted on patients admitted to a CTC on March 6, 2020. A total of 313 patients were admitted. The nasal and throat swabs were collected from the upper respiratory tract, and a sputum test was performed to obtain lower respiratory samples. The positive rate of the first set of test, sputum test was higher than that of the swab test ( p = 0.011). In the second set of test, 1 week after the first ones, the rate of positive swab tests was relatively high ( p = 0.026). In the first set of test, 66 of 152 (43.4%) patients showed 24-h consecutive negative swab test results, when the sputum test results were considered together, that number fell to 29 patients (19.1%) ( p < 0.001). Also, in the second set of test, 63 of 164 (38.4%) patients met the discharge criteria only when the swab test was considered; that number fell to 30 (18.3%) when the sputum test results were also considered ( p < 0.001). Using the swab test alone is insufficient for screening test and discharge decision. Patients who may have positive result in the sputum test can be missed.

Download Full-text

Analysis and validation of a highly sensitive one-step nested quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for specific detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Virology Journal ◽

10.1186/s12985-020-01467-y ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 17 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Yang Zhang ◽

Chunyang Dai ◽

Huiyan Wang ◽

Yong Gao ◽

Tuantuan Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽

Real Time ◽

Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽

Clinical Samples ◽

Chain Reaction ◽

Pcr Assay ◽

Qrt Pcr ◽

Highly Sensitive ◽

One Step ◽

Polymerase Chain

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, is posing a serious threat to global public health. Reverse transcriptase real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) is widely used as the gold standard for clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2. Due to technical limitations, the reported positive rates of qRT-PCR assay of throat swab samples vary from 30 to 60%. Therefore, the evaluation of alternative strategies to overcome the limitations of qRT-PCR is required. A previous study reported that one-step nested (OSN)-qRT-PCR revealed better suitability for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, information on the analytical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR is insufficient. Method In this study, we aimed to analyze OSN-qRT-PCR by comparing it with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and qRT-PCR by using a dilution series of SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviral RNA and a quality assessment panel. The clinical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR was also validated and compared with ddPCR and qRT-PCR using specimens from COVID-19 patients. Result The limit of detection (copies/ml) of qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and OSN-qRT-PCR were 520.1 (95% CI: 363.23–1145.69) for ORF1ab and 528.1 (95% CI: 347.7–1248.7) for N, 401.8 (95% CI: 284.8–938.3) for ORF1ab and 336.8 (95% CI: 244.6–792.5) for N, and 194.74 (95% CI: 139.7–430.9) for ORF1ab and 189.1 (95% CI: 130.9–433.9) for N, respectively. Of the 34 clinical samples from COVID-19 patients, the positive rates of OSN-qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and qRT-PCR were 82.35% (28/34), 67.65% (23/34), and 58.82% (20/34), respectively. Conclusion In conclusion, the highly sensitive and specific OSN-qRT-PCR assay is superior to ddPCR and qRT-PCR assays, showing great potential as a technique for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with low viral loads.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease

Intervirology ◽

10.1159/000517003 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-6

Author(s):

Salman Khan ◽

Syed Asad Ali Shah ◽

Syed Muhammad Jamal

Keyword(s):

Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽

Viral Genome ◽

Foot And Mouth Disease ◽

Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Chain Reaction ◽

Kappa Value ◽

Polymerase Chain ◽

Pcr Assays ◽

Level Of Agreement

Background: Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an infectious and highly contagious disease of cloven-hoofed domestic and wild animals, causing heavy economic losses to the livestock industry. Rapid and reliable diagnosis of the disease is essential for the implementation of effective control measures. This study compared sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (S-ELISA) and conventional reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the diagnosis of FMD. Methods: A total of 60 epithelial samples from suspected cases of FMD were tested using both S-ELISA and RT-PCR assays. The level of agreement between the assays was assessed by calculating the Kappa value. Results: S-ELISA detected 38 (63%) samples positive for FMD virus (FMDV). Being predominant, serotype O was detected in 22 (57.9%) of the total samples tested positive, whereas 9 (23.7%) and 7 (18.4%) samples were found positive for serotypes A and Asia-1, respectively. RT-PCR detected viral genome in 51 (85%) of the samples using pan-FMDV primers set, 1F/1R. Thirty-six samples were found positive and 7 negative by both the tests. The level of agreement between the tests was assessed by calculating the Kappa value, which was found to be fair (Kappa value = 0.303 and 95% CI = 0.089; 0.517) and significant (p = 0.009). However, 2 samples, which were found positive on S-ELISA tested negative on RT-PCR. This may be attributed to the presence of nucleotide mismatch(es) in the primer-binding sites that may have resulted in failure of amplification of the viral genome. The serotype-specific RT-PCR assays not only confirmed serotyping results of S-ELISA but were also able to establish serotype in 9 S-ELISA-negative but pan-FMDV RT-PCR-positive samples. Conclusions: The RT-PCR assay contributes significantly to establishing a quick, sensitive, and definitive diagnosis of FMD in resource-constrained countries. Samples giving negative results in S-ELISA should be tested in RT-PCR for the disease detection and virus typing.

Download Full-text