scholarly journals Cross-Cultural Differences and Sexual Risk Behavior of Emerging Adults

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tami L. Thomas ◽  
Hossein N. Yarandi ◽  
Safiya George Dalmida ◽  
Andrew Frados ◽  
Kathleen Klienert
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1834-1858
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Grossman ◽  
Anne C. Black ◽  
Amanda M. Richer

Effective parenting processes during offspring’s adolescence can reduce sexual risk behavior for those offspring in emerging adulthood. Few studies consider how mothers’ and fathers’ parenting processes cluster together and predict emerging adults’ risky sexual behavior. In this study, we used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify patterns of teens’ perceptions of their residential mothers’ and fathers’ closeness, disapproval of teen sex, monitoring/presence at home, and communication. Using data from waves one and three of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), we identified four parenting classes: high disapproval/high closeness (54%), high disapproval/low closeness (7%), low disapproval/high closeness (15%), and moderate disapproval/high closeness (24%). Emerging adults within the high disapproval/high closeness class had lower rates of sexual risk behavior than other classes. These findings show benefits of authoritative parenting styles and suggest parenting processes should be considered in combination, rather than as independent predictors of risk outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hunter A. Hahn ◽  
Dokyoung S. You ◽  
Michale Sferra ◽  
Meagan Hubbard ◽  
Sneha Thamotharan ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-472
Author(s):  
Mark D. C. Guimarães ◽  
Katherine S. Elkington ◽  
Ana Luiza F. M. Gomes ◽  
Carolina Veloso ◽  
Karen McKinnon

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice

Abstract The argument against innatism at the heart of Cognitive Gadgets is provocative but premature, and is vitiated by dichotomous thinking, interpretive double standards, and evidence cherry-picking. I illustrate my criticism by addressing the heritability of imitation and mindreading, the relevance of twin studies, and the meaning of cross-cultural differences in theory of mind development. Reaching an integrative understanding of genetic inheritance, plasticity, and learning is a formidable task that demands a more nuanced evolutionary approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document