Cost Justification of Clinical Pharmacy Services on a General Surgery Team: Focus on Diagnosis-Related Group Cases

1988 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 906-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E. Bertch ◽  
Hind T. Hatoum ◽  
Michael S. Willett ◽  
Kenneth W. Witte

We used a novel approach to cost-justify clinical pharmacy services on a general surgery team in nine diagnosis-related group cases. The clinical pharmacist monitored nine patients longitudinally on a general surgery team from admission to discharge and intervened in their therapeutic management. Each recommendation was analyzed for rationale, acceptance, perceived impact on quality and/or cost of patient care, whether self-initiated or solicited, and impact on patient outcome. Types of recommendations and outcomes were categorized by process and outcome measurement criteria. Total cost avoidance per patient was calculated using costs of drug therapy, laboratory tests, and length of stay. Accounting for cost of clinical pharmacy services, net cost avoidance per patient was calculated. The clinical pharmacist made 101 recommendations on nine patients. Physicians accepted 82 percent of the recommendations; 77 percent of the recommendations were self-initiated and 23 percent were solicited. Recommendations had a perceived impact on cost, quality, or both at 13, 31, and 56 percent, respectively. Most recommendations (79 percent) brought patient therapy to a level of conformance with current standards of practice as documented in the medical literature. Recommendations that potentially preserved a major organ function by preventing drug-induced toxicity or the exacerbation of existing problems constituted 16 percent of the total. None of the accepted recommendations adversely affected patient outcome and 23 percent directly resulted in a measurable positive outcome in patient care. A total of four hospital days was potentially saved for two cases. Based on objective outcome criteria, a 1.9-day increase in therapeutic control was documented per patient. Total cost avoidance was $465.12 per patient and the cost of clinical pharmacy services was $23.66 per patient; net cost avoidance was therefore $441.46 per patient. For the duration of the study, the clinical pharmacist documented that similar input was required and actually provided to 40 percent of the patients admitted to the service. Based on an annual census of 1000 patients, the projected annual net cost avoidance was $176 584.

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL4) ◽  
pp. 745-750
Author(s):  
Bushan Kumar GG ◽  
Jyothi Singamsetty ◽  
Rajasekhar K V ◽  
Sahitya Meda

Clinical pharmacy services are the services provided by the pharmacists to promote patient care, optimizes medication therapy, promote health and disease prevention. This prospective cross sectional study was conducted in tertiary care hospital over a period of 6 months. This collected data is checked for their appropriateness of any prescription related errors and DRPs were identified. Results obtained were assessed to determine the influence of Clinical pharmacist services. Majority of the prescriptions were with 5-9(62.5%) drugs. The majority of co-morbidities among 125 enrolled patients in age group of 60-70, 55 patients were with 3-4 co-morbidities. Among 125 prescriptions around 12 prescriptions were identified with 622 drug interactions. Among 125 patients 2 (0.277) adverse drug reactions were observed and according to Naranjo's probability assessment scale these adverse drug reactions were mild and 15(2.08%) dispensing errors, 10(1.386%) prescription errors where majority of prescription errors are due to missed written frequencies in the prescriptions. 5(0.693%) administration errors, 5 (0.693%)untreated indications were observed. Presence of clinical pharmacist in hospital settings can reduce drug related problems and they can assist other staff in improving patient care.


2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslınur Albayrak ◽  
Bilgen Başgut ◽  
Gülbin Aygencel Bıkmaz ◽  
Bensu Karahalil

Abstract Background Critically ill patients treated in the intensive care units (ICUs) often suffer from side effects and drug-related problems (DRPs) that can be life-threatening. A way to prevent DRPs and improve drug safety and efficacy is to include clinical pharmacists in the clinical team. This study aims to evaluate the classification of drug-related problems and the implementation of clinical pharmacy services by a clinical pharmacist in the ICU of a university hospital in Turkey. Methods This study was carried out prospectively between December 2020 and July 2021 in Gazi University Medical Faculty Hospital Internal Diseases ICU. All patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit for more than 24 h were included in the study. During the study, the clinical pharmacist's interventions and other clinical services for patients were recorded. DRPs were classed according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe V.8.02. Results A total of 151 patients were included during the study period corresponding to 2264 patient-days. Patients with DRPs had a longer hospital stay and a higher mortality rate (p < 0.05). 108 patients had at least one DRP and the total number of DRPs was 206. There was an average of 1.36 DRPs per patient, 71.5% of patients experienced DRP and 89.22 DRPs per 1000 patient-days. A total of 35 ADEs were observed in 32 patients. ADE incidence was per 1000 patient-days 15.45. ADEs were caused by nephrotoxicity (48.57%), electrolyte disorders (17.14%), drug-induced thrombocytopenia (17.14%), liver enzyme increase (8.57%) and other causes (8.57%). Drug selection (40.29%) and dose selection (54.36%) constituted most of the causes of DRPs. Dose change was the highest percentage of planned interventions with a rate of 56.79%. Intervention was accepted at a rate of 90.8% and it was fully implemented. Conclusion In this study, the importance of the clinical pharmacist in the determination and analysis of DRPs was emphasized. Clinical pharmacy services like the one described should be implemented widely to increase patient safety.


2020 ◽  
pp. 0000-0000
Author(s):  
Alexandria May ◽  
Olivia Morgan ◽  
Kristi Quairoli

Abstract Background: Clinical pharmacists are uniquely positioned to assist with the complexities of medication management for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study is to describe clinical pharmacy services provided as well as provider satisfaction and perceived impact of incorporating a clinical pharmacist in MS patient care. Methods: This study was conducted in two parts: a retrospective chart review and provider survey conducted in an outpatient neurology clinic at an academic medical center. Between April 2017 and June 2018, electronic medical records (EMRs) of patients with documented interventions by a pharmacist were reviewed to describe clinical pharmacy services provided to MS patients. A voluntary, anonymous survey was distributed to neurology providers to evaluate provider satisfaction and perceived impact of clinical pharmacist involvement in MS patient care. Results: There were 64 patients identified during the study period with 378 documented interventions made by clinical pharmacists. Pharmacist interventions were most commonly related to facilitating medication access (N=208), pre-treatment screening (N=57), patient counseling (N=51), and providing drug information (N=43). All providers surveyed (n=9) indicated that facilitating medication access, patient counseling, and drug interaction management were moderately or very important clinical pharmacy services. Furthermore, all providers surveyed strongly agreed that pharmacist involvement decreased time to therapy initiation for patients and decreased provider time spent on medication management. Conclusions: Clinical pharmacists play an integral role in MS patient care, particularly with facilitating medication access. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the contribution of clinical pharmacists in the care of MS patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Crespo ◽  
Malgorzata Tyszka

Purpose To evaluate the patient-perceived impact of delivery of clinical pharmacy services, including a proactive follow-up program, on patient understanding, satisfaction, and toxicity management. Methods Patients who had received clinical pharmacy services at their initial chemotherapy treatment were identified and asked to complete a 20-point survey at the second or subsequent treatment. The services that the survey evaluated consist of face-to-face education during the first treatment and proactive telephone follow-up 3 to 7 days later. Results A total of 107 of the 112 respondents (95.5%) indicated that the time with the pharmacist at the first treatment was worthwhile and 92.6% of respondents reported that the interaction with the pharmacist increased their understanding of the medication regimen. Of the 113 respondents, the majority was either “Very Satisfied” or “Satisfied” with the time the pharmacist spent with them (94.7%), and the pharmacist’s ability to answer their questions (92.9%). In addition, survey results indicate that the clinical pharmacy input provided in the pharmacist call-back program is valuable, with 92.6% of the 82 respondents indicating that this service is worthwhile, and 91.4% of 93 respondents stating that the pharmacist input helped them to manage side-effects at home. Conclusions Survey results indicate that patients value clinical pharmacy services in the ambulatory oncology chemotherapy setting. These services contribute to improve patient understanding of the medication regimen, a high level of patient satisfaction, and self-management of treatment-related toxicities. These results support the provision of clinical pharmacy services and proactive follow-up programs in ambulatory chemotherapy units.


DICP ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Chrischilles ◽  
Dennis K. Helling ◽  
Carl R. Aschoff

This study assessed the impact of physician exposure to clinical pharmacy services on the appropriateness of physician prescribing and on medication costs. Two study sites were used: FPC (primary resident training office without clinical pharmacist) and PMC (satellite office with clinical pharmacist). The same physicians provided care at both study sites. Exposed patient encounters were selected from encounters during each resident's rotation at the PMC satellite. Unexposed patient encounters were selected from encounters at the FPC immediately prior to each resident's exposure to clinical pharmacy services. A blind review panel evaluated case abstracts of the patient encounters for appropriateness of drug choice, daily dosage, dosing interval, duration of treatment, clarity of instructions, and monitoring data; potential severity of the patient problem; and difficulty of the clinical decision. After adjusting for covariables (potential severity, difficulty, patient age, sex, Medicaid status, therapeutic category, and type of medical problem), physician-patient encounters in which family practice residents were exposed to clinical pharmacy services were rated significantly more appropriate for choice of drug prescribed, daily dosage chosen, dosing interval selected, clarity of prescription instructions, and monitoring data. Costs of acute medications, as measured by average wholesale price per day, per dose, and per treatment course, were also significantly lower for clinical pharmacy-exposed physician-patient encounters.


1979 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 266-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Massoud ◽  
Gedy Gudauskas

This article summarizes the results of a study designed to evaluate clinical pharmacy services as a means of reducing drug usage in a 170-bed community hospital. A total of 591 medication orders for 93 hospitalized patients were evaluated. A pharmacy resident made recommendations regarding the appropriateness of the medication order to the attending physicians. A team of reviewing physicians later evaluated these recommendations. The resident's suggestions were also monitored by a university-affiliated and experienced clinical pharmacist. The number of medications ordered which the pharmacy resident would have prescribed during consultation with physicians was 312 (53 percent), while the overseeing clinical pharmacist would have prescribed 352 (60 percent). Two hundred and fifteen therapeutic recommendations were provided by the pharmacy resident, of which 38 (17.6 percent) were carried out by the attending physician. The reviewing physicians did not agree with 37 of these recommendations. Twenty-two drug interactions were detected, of which eleven were thought to be of definite clinical significance by the pharmacy resident. The study demonstrated that a 40 percent reduction in medication utilization could result in a community hospital, while the same level of therapeutic effectiveness was maintained, by using the services of a properly trained clinical pharmacist. The patient care appraisal committee which was appointed to evaluate the study reviewed the results and agreed that, based on the cost factor and improvement of patient care, clinical pharmacy services would be beneficial.


1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1526-1531 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Daniel Robinson ◽  
Stephen C. Piscitelli ◽  
Donna J. Occhipinti ◽  
Larry H. Danziger ◽  
Carlotta Hill ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To describe the role of the clinical pharmacist in a Hansen's disease (HD, leprosy) clinic and to describe the development, validation, and operation of a dapsone compliance monitoring program. RATIONALE: HD remains a major, worldwide healthcare problem. Dapsone is the drug of choice for treatment of HD; however, high rates of noncompliance with this agent have been reported by many treatment centers. The assessment of compliance in HD patients is important to help distinguish between treatment failure secondary to noncompliance or to the development of resistance. SETTING: In the US, the Chicago Regional Hansen's Disease Center at the University of Illinois at Chicago is one of ten centers that provide comprehensive care to patients diagnosed with this condition. This article reviews the clinical pharmacy services and dapsone compliance program in the clinic encompassing the years 1983–93. RESULTS: The clinical pharmacist provides a variety of clinical services in the clinic as well as coordinating the clinical research program. A pharmacist-generated dapsone compliance program led to improvement in compliance rates and clinical outcome. This improvement in compliance has been sustained over an extended period of time. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical pharmacy services performed in the HD clinic provide a model for pharmacy involvement in other chronic disease states. The dapsone compliance program has been successful in improving patient care and obtaining reimbursement for clinical pharmacy services.


1986 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 493-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis K. Helling ◽  
Patrick W. Thies ◽  
Robert E. Rakel

A nationwide study investigated the attitudes of family practice residents toward: (1) interdisciplinary health care teams in family practice; (2) the clinical pharmacist as a member of the health care team; and (3) the utility of clinical pharmacist involvement in private family practice offices. A random sample of 174 family practice residency programs was selected for study. First-year residents comprised the sample population. Based on the response of the directors, programs were assigned to experimental (programs offering clinical pharmacy services) or control (no clinical pharmacy services) groups. Completed attitudinal instruments were received from 158 resident respondents in the experimental group and 153 resident respondents from the control group. The reliability coefficient of the returned questionnaires was 0.901 by the split-halves method. Residents in the experimental group had significantly more favorable attitudes than those residents in the control group on several scales. These scales included the clinical pharmacist's participation on the health care team, utility of a clinical pharmacist in a private practice setting, desirability of hiring a clinical pharmacist, and the desirability of practicing with a multidisciplinary health care team. These results support the hypothesis that exposure to clinical pharmacy services can significantly affect physician resident's attitudes toward clinical pharmacy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document