scholarly journals Analysis on Clinical pharmacy services provided by pharmacists for promoting elderly patients care

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL4) ◽  
pp. 745-750
Author(s):  
Bushan Kumar GG ◽  
Jyothi Singamsetty ◽  
Rajasekhar K V ◽  
Sahitya Meda

Clinical pharmacy services are the services provided by the pharmacists to promote patient care, optimizes medication therapy, promote health and disease prevention. This prospective cross sectional study was conducted in tertiary care hospital over a period of 6 months. This collected data is checked for their appropriateness of any prescription related errors and DRPs were identified. Results obtained were assessed to determine the influence of Clinical pharmacist services. Majority of the prescriptions were with 5-9(62.5%) drugs. The majority of co-morbidities among 125 enrolled patients in age group of 60-70, 55 patients were with 3-4 co-morbidities. Among 125 prescriptions around 12 prescriptions were identified with 622 drug interactions. Among 125 patients 2 (0.277) adverse drug reactions were observed and according to Naranjo's probability assessment scale these adverse drug reactions were mild and 15(2.08%) dispensing errors, 10(1.386%) prescription errors where majority of prescription errors are due to missed written frequencies in the prescriptions. 5(0.693%) administration errors, 5 (0.693%)untreated indications were observed. Presence of clinical pharmacist in hospital settings can reduce drug related problems and they can assist other staff in improving patient care.

2020 ◽  
pp. 0000-0000
Author(s):  
Alexandria May ◽  
Olivia Morgan ◽  
Kristi Quairoli

Abstract Background: Clinical pharmacists are uniquely positioned to assist with the complexities of medication management for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study is to describe clinical pharmacy services provided as well as provider satisfaction and perceived impact of incorporating a clinical pharmacist in MS patient care. Methods: This study was conducted in two parts: a retrospective chart review and provider survey conducted in an outpatient neurology clinic at an academic medical center. Between April 2017 and June 2018, electronic medical records (EMRs) of patients with documented interventions by a pharmacist were reviewed to describe clinical pharmacy services provided to MS patients. A voluntary, anonymous survey was distributed to neurology providers to evaluate provider satisfaction and perceived impact of clinical pharmacist involvement in MS patient care. Results: There were 64 patients identified during the study period with 378 documented interventions made by clinical pharmacists. Pharmacist interventions were most commonly related to facilitating medication access (N=208), pre-treatment screening (N=57), patient counseling (N=51), and providing drug information (N=43). All providers surveyed (n=9) indicated that facilitating medication access, patient counseling, and drug interaction management were moderately or very important clinical pharmacy services. Furthermore, all providers surveyed strongly agreed that pharmacist involvement decreased time to therapy initiation for patients and decreased provider time spent on medication management. Conclusions: Clinical pharmacists play an integral role in MS patient care, particularly with facilitating medication access. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the contribution of clinical pharmacists in the care of MS patients.


2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 927-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurumurthy Parthasarathi ◽  
Madhan Ramesh ◽  
Karin Nyfort-Hansen ◽  
Bahubali Gundappa Nagavi

OBJECTIVE: To describe how clinical pharmacy is helping to improve medication use at a South Indian teaching hospital by addressing medication use problems, which are commonly encountered in India. SUMMARY: Clinical pharmacy is practiced in many countries and makes a significant contribution to improved drug therapy and patient care. India is a country with significant problems with medication use, but until recently Indian pharmacists have not been educated for a patient-care role. Postgraduate pharmacy practice programs have been established at 2 pharmacy colleges in South India as a result of a joint Indo-Australian program of cooperation. At a teaching hospital associated with the colleges, clinical pharmacy services such as drug information, medication counseling, drug therapy review, adverse drug reaction reporting, and the preparation of antibiotic guidelines are assisting clinicians to improve drug therapy and patient care. Seven hundred twenty-seven requests for drug information were received from July 1997 to February 2001, and 543 suspected adverse drug reactions were evaluated from November 1997 to February 2001. The most common drug classes causing adverse drug reactions were antibiotics, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and antitubercular agents. Physician opinion and service utilization have also been surveyed: 82% of respondents had sought drug information from the Clinical Pharmacy Department and 71% of respondents had sought advice on individual patient management. The success of this program is raising awareness of clinical pharmacy among pharmacy educators elsewhere in India and has led to the introduction of clinical pharmacy services at other Indian hospitals.


1979 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 266-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Massoud ◽  
Gedy Gudauskas

This article summarizes the results of a study designed to evaluate clinical pharmacy services as a means of reducing drug usage in a 170-bed community hospital. A total of 591 medication orders for 93 hospitalized patients were evaluated. A pharmacy resident made recommendations regarding the appropriateness of the medication order to the attending physicians. A team of reviewing physicians later evaluated these recommendations. The resident's suggestions were also monitored by a university-affiliated and experienced clinical pharmacist. The number of medications ordered which the pharmacy resident would have prescribed during consultation with physicians was 312 (53 percent), while the overseeing clinical pharmacist would have prescribed 352 (60 percent). Two hundred and fifteen therapeutic recommendations were provided by the pharmacy resident, of which 38 (17.6 percent) were carried out by the attending physician. The reviewing physicians did not agree with 37 of these recommendations. Twenty-two drug interactions were detected, of which eleven were thought to be of definite clinical significance by the pharmacy resident. The study demonstrated that a 40 percent reduction in medication utilization could result in a community hospital, while the same level of therapeutic effectiveness was maintained, by using the services of a properly trained clinical pharmacist. The patient care appraisal committee which was appointed to evaluate the study reviewed the results and agreed that, based on the cost factor and improvement of patient care, clinical pharmacy services would be beneficial.


2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslınur Albayrak ◽  
Bilgen Başgut ◽  
Gülbin Aygencel Bıkmaz ◽  
Bensu Karahalil

Abstract Background Critically ill patients treated in the intensive care units (ICUs) often suffer from side effects and drug-related problems (DRPs) that can be life-threatening. A way to prevent DRPs and improve drug safety and efficacy is to include clinical pharmacists in the clinical team. This study aims to evaluate the classification of drug-related problems and the implementation of clinical pharmacy services by a clinical pharmacist in the ICU of a university hospital in Turkey. Methods This study was carried out prospectively between December 2020 and July 2021 in Gazi University Medical Faculty Hospital Internal Diseases ICU. All patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit for more than 24 h were included in the study. During the study, the clinical pharmacist's interventions and other clinical services for patients were recorded. DRPs were classed according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe V.8.02. Results A total of 151 patients were included during the study period corresponding to 2264 patient-days. Patients with DRPs had a longer hospital stay and a higher mortality rate (p < 0.05). 108 patients had at least one DRP and the total number of DRPs was 206. There was an average of 1.36 DRPs per patient, 71.5% of patients experienced DRP and 89.22 DRPs per 1000 patient-days. A total of 35 ADEs were observed in 32 patients. ADE incidence was per 1000 patient-days 15.45. ADEs were caused by nephrotoxicity (48.57%), electrolyte disorders (17.14%), drug-induced thrombocytopenia (17.14%), liver enzyme increase (8.57%) and other causes (8.57%). Drug selection (40.29%) and dose selection (54.36%) constituted most of the causes of DRPs. Dose change was the highest percentage of planned interventions with a rate of 56.79%. Intervention was accepted at a rate of 90.8% and it was fully implemented. Conclusion In this study, the importance of the clinical pharmacist in the determination and analysis of DRPs was emphasized. Clinical pharmacy services like the one described should be implemented widely to increase patient safety.


Author(s):  
Kavitha Samy P ◽  
Athira Jith ◽  
Chaithanya T Kumar ◽  
Joffey Sara Joy ◽  
Sambath Kumar R

ABSTRACTObjective: Our study attempts to get an insight into the drug–drug interactions (DDIs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among stroke patients fromthe Neurology Department in a private hospital.Methods: In a prospective study spanning 6 months (May to October 2015), we have analyzed the prescription data of 221 patients with bothischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Gender, age, social habits, length of stay, drug utilization pattern, DDIs reported from the database and clinicallyobserved, and ADRs of individual drugs were observed among the patients. Of 221 cases, 208 (94.11%) were ischemic, 12 (5.43%) were hemorrhagic,and 1 (0.45%) was transient ischemic attack.Results: A number of 140 patients were males and 80 were females. The mean age of the patients was between 41 and 70 years. In ischemic patients,357 major, 282 moderate, and 38 mild DDIs were reported using a specific database, while in hemorrhagic patients, 10 major, 7 moderate, and 1 mildinteraction were reported using a specific database. 18 DDIs were observed clinically and confirmed with evidence. 8 DDI-induced ADRs and 10 ADRscaused by individual drugs were observed in our study population. 18 DDIs were observed clinically and confirmed with evidence. 8 DDI-inducedADRs and 10 ADRs caused by individual drugs were observed in our study population.Conclusion: Drugs if wrongly prescribed may cause negative outcomes and pose significant challenge to health-care providers and may contribute tomorbidity and mortality. Clinical pharmacist can play an important role in identifying and resolving drug-related problems through pharmaceuticalcare practices.Keywords: Stroke, Drug–drug interactions, Adverse drug reactions, Clinical pharmacist.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 650-657
Author(s):  
Maria Marchese ◽  
Angela Heintzman ◽  
Mark Pasetka ◽  
Flay Charbonneau ◽  
Carlo DeAngelis ◽  
...  

Virtual methods have been innovatively utilized to provide clinical and supportive care to patients with cancer. Oncology pharmacists have been actively involved in this movement, in order to minimize patient contact and decrease the risk of viral transmission for this high-risk group. In response to COVID-19 restrictions, the Odette Cancer Centre pharmacy modified the delivery of clinical pharmacy services (CPS), including medication histories and patient education/counseling, to a remote telephone-based model. Process maps were created to visualize workflow before and after the pandemic. Process metrics were tracked over a 6-week period. From March 25th to May 1st, 2020, 202 best-possible medication histories and baseline assessments were completed; 149 of these (74%) were completed remotely. For medication therapy counsels, 72 of 199 were completed remotely (36%). Despite workflow disruptions caused by the pandemic, these results demonstrate that clinical pharmacy service levels could be maintained by incorporating remote delivery approaches without significant investment in resources. Challenges included acceptance by patients and lack of technology to support system-level processes. Further research to develop, refine, and individualize virtual clinical pharmacy care models will help to consolidate the role of these approaches in the post-COVID-19 era.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 1250-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Strnad ◽  
Bethany R. Shoulders ◽  
Pamela L. Smithburger ◽  
Sandra L. Kane-Gill

Objective: To assess the impact of telepharmacy services in the acute care setting. Data Sources: EMBase, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS database searches were performed through April 2018. Study Selection and Data Extraction: PRISMA guidelines were applied for this systematic review. All English-language studies meeting the criteria of the following population, intervention, comparison, and outcome question were included: What impact does the provision of inpatient clinical pharmacy services delivered via telemedicine have on patient outcomes compared with standard of care? Data Synthesis: A total of 11 studies were identified for the acute care setting, including 3 for critically ill patients. All studies demonstrated a positive impact on patient outcomes, nursing satisfaction, and disease management. Varying modes of telepharmacy technology were used, such as remote access to electronic medical records, faxing or scanning documents, pictures or webcams. For communication purposes, telepharmacists used email or electronic communication, facsimile, video review, or telephone to speak directly with hospital personnel and patients. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Inpatient telepharmacy is feasible and should be leveraged to further enhance patient care by complementing existing service models. Conclusions: Telepharmacy services enhanced patient outcomes, improved nursing satisfaction, and expanded services within inpatient settings. Similar technologies were leveraged in non–intensive care units (ICUs) and ICUs, but the goals of telepharmacy appeared to differ. ICUs focused on an expansion of services in the ICU and non-ICUs addressed improved patient outreach in rural areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document