patient understanding
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

333
(FIVE YEARS 105)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Perlis ◽  
Antonio Finelli ◽  
Mike Lovas ◽  
Alexis Lund ◽  
Amelia Di Meo ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Standard radiology reports (SRR) are designed to communicate information between doctors. With many patients having instantaneous access to SRRs on patient portals, interpretation without guidance from doctors can cause anxiety and panic. We designed a patient-centred prostate MRI template report (PACERR) to address some of these challenges and tested whether PACERRs improve patient knowledge and experience. Materials and Methods Patients booked for clinical prostate MRI were randomly assigned to SRR or SRR + PACERR. Questionnaires included multiple-choice that targeted 4 domains (understanding, usefulness, next steps, emotional experience) hypothesized to improve with patient-centred reports and short answer questions, testing knowledge regarding MRI results. Clinical encounters were observed and recorded to explore whether adding PACERR improved communication. Likert scaled-responses and short-answer questions were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results Of the 40 participants, the majority were MRI naïve (70%). Patients receiving a PACERR had higher scores in the categories of patient understanding (mean: 4.17 vs. 3.39, p=0.006), usefulness (mean: 4.58 vs. 3.07, p<0.001), and identifying next steps (mean: 1.89 vs. 3.03, p=0.003) but not emotional experience (mean: 4.18 vs. 3.79, p=0.22). PACERR participants found the layout and design more patient friendly (mean: 4.47 vs. 2.61, p<0.001) and easier to understand (mean: 4.37 vs. 2.38, p<0.001). In the knowledge section, overall, the PACERR arm scored better (87% vs. 56%, p=0.004). Conclusion With the addition of Prostate MRI PACERR, participants had better understanding of their results and felt more prepared to involve themselves in discussions with their doctor.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Robins ◽  
Rachel Brody ◽  
Irena Parvanova ◽  
Joseph Finkelstein

This study focuses on feedback from domain experts to assess usability and acceptance of the E-Consent electronic consent platform. Quantitative and qualitative data were captured throughout the usability inspection, which was structured around a cognitive walkthrough with heuristics evaluation. Additional surveys measured biobanking knowledge and attitudes and familiarity with informed consent. A semi-structured qualitative interview captured open-ended feedback. 23 researchers of various ages and job titles were included for analysis. The System Usability Scale (SUS) provided a standardized reference for usability and satisfaction, and the mean result of 86.7 corresponds with an ‘above average’ usability rating in the >90th percentile. Overall, participants believe that electronic consenting using this platform will be faster than previous workflows while enhancing patient understanding, and human rapport is still a key component of the consent process. Expert review has provided valuable insight and actionable information that will be used to further enhance this maturing platform.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Temperley ◽  
Cian Murray ◽  
James Carey ◽  
Jarlath Bolger ◽  
Narayanasamy Ravi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Vitamin B12 deficiency is a well described complication post gastrectomy. It is caused by the loss of parietal cell mass leading to megaloblastic anaemia and possible long term neurological symptoms. Treatment can be with standardised replacement regimens or to monitor B12 levels and replace as required.  This study assesses patient understanding of and compliance with B12 supplementation guidelines post total and subtotal gastrectomy.  Methods 125 patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2010-2020 were available for study (86 total gastrectomies, 39 subtotal gastrectomies).  Patient data was collected by review of the hospital electronic records and individual phone calls. Patients were asked standardised questions to elicit knowledge of the importance of B12 supplementation and compliance with supplementation. Results 92% (79/86) of total gastrectomy patients reported compliance in regular parenteral B12 supplementation.  Compliance was significantly lower for subtotal gastrectomies  for checking and/or replacing their vitamin B12 at 53.8% (21/39) (p &lt; 0.001). 62.6% of patients stated that they knew it was important to supplement B12 post gastrectomy.  37.8% of participants could explain why this was important and 14.8% had any knowledge of the complications of vitamin B12 deficiency. Patients who were compliant with B12 supplementation had an improved understanding of why supplementation was important compared to those who did not. Conclusions Regular monitoring and supplementation of vitamin B12 levels is important post gastrectomy.  This study demonstrates good compliance in those undergoing total gastrectomy.  Patient understanding correlates with compliance, suggesting that patient education and knowledge reinforcement may be key to compliance with vitamin B12 supplementation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Cockcroft ◽  
Mariam Saigar ◽  
Andrew Dawkins ◽  
Catrin S. Rutland

Maths is a crucial part of medicine. All the graphs, equations, statistics, and general maths we learn at school help us to understand important aspects of human and veterinary medicine, biology, and science in general. People always think that biology and chemistry are important for doctors, nurses, midwives, scientists, and all the other people involved in medicine and healthcare-related jobs, but in fact maths is also vital. So, whether you are thinking of becoming a doctor, hoping to invent medical technologies, or just wishing to understand treatments you get as a patient, understanding the maths behind medicine is crucial. This article explores how we check whether someone has a disease such as coronavirus or heart disease, how we predict and measure how many people will be affected by various diseases, and how maths is used to treat patients and prevent the spread of contagious diseases. While people are generally aware that sciences like biology and chemistry are important for jobs in the medical field, many may not realize that maths is also vital for most of these jobs. This article looks at some of the ways we use maths in medicine. If you want to become a doctor, veterinary surgeon, nurse, midwife, medical scientist, or to have any job related to healing people and animals, or even if you just want to be an informed patient, knowledge of maths is quite important!


2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. S46
Author(s):  
Michael L. Horsey ◽  
Aneil L. Srivastava ◽  
Aalap Herur-Raman ◽  
Matthew D. Ng ◽  
Vincent L. Obias

2021 ◽  
pp. 100742
Author(s):  
Hussain Almerdhemah ◽  
Zaheeda Mulla ◽  
Hane Mohammad Muamenah ◽  
Amina Weber ◽  
Tarik Boubakra ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 100163
Author(s):  
Ciléin Kearns ◽  
Alex Alamri ◽  
Gwenllian Evans

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy McKay ◽  
Carlos Pantoja ◽  
Richard Hall ◽  
Sarah Matthews ◽  
Phil Spalding ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Clinical and patient-reported outcomes are positively affected when efforts to increase patient understanding of underlying diseases and foster patient participation are part of care pathways. The prevalence of liver diseases is increasing globally, and successful communication of results from liver diagnostic tests will be important for physicians to ensure patient engagement and encourage adherence to lifestyle changes and therapy. Here, we aimed to explore the impact of non-invasive liver tests on patient experience and patient comprehension of liver disease in chronic liver disease diagnostic pathways typically managed with liver biopsies. Results 101 participants diagnosed with a range of liver disease aetiologies (90 patients, 11 caregivers) underwent a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test. A subset of 33 participants was subjected to transient elastography (TE) with FibroScan® in addition to multiparametric MRI. MRI results were analysed using LiverMultiScan™. Participants received results on their liver-health status followed by a semi-structured interview to assess the scan procedure experience, comprehension of the results, and experiences of liver disease. A subset of participants (N = 5) was also engaged in the design, execution, and thematic analysis of the interview transcripts of the study. Analysis of semi-structured interviews revealed: (1) Presentation and discussion of the LiverMultiScan visual report by a physician was an effective contributor to better patient experience and increased comprehension of liver disease. (2) Patients demonstrated preference for non-invasive tests over biopsy for management of liver disease. (3) Patients reported positive experiences with the MRI test during the path for liver disease management. Conclusions Patients presented with visual reports of liver test results developed increased understanding of liver disease care which may have contributed to an overall more positive experience. Patients reported that clinical information obtained through non-invasive methods and transmitted through visual reports contributed to clarity, understanding and overall increased satisfaction. We conclude that a shift toward non-invasive testing and visual reporting of clinical information (e.g. picture of liver with visual scale) when possible are likely to contribute to improved physician engagement with patients and lead to better outcomes in the management of chronic liver diseases. Plain English summary Evidence suggests that patient experience and understanding can affect several aspects of clinical care and patient well-being. In this study, 101 patients and patient caregivers affected by liver diseases were recruited to determine how patient experiences of liver disease were affected with the introduction of non-invasive evaluation of the liver with an MRI or ultrasound-based elastography. All 101 participants received an MRI followed by a LiverMultiScan report. 33 participants received an additional FibroScan and report. Following the reports, participants were interviewed and asked to reflect on factors which affected their experience of the procedure and the understanding of their results. We focused on factors related to the layout of the standardised report and the delivery of its results. The interviews were transcribed and analysed for common themes and patterns. Patients and patient advocacy groups were involved in the design and conduct of the study, and analysis of the interview transcripts. Here, we report the perception of patients and patient caregivers on the quality of care and diagnostic experience. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier—NCT02877602.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e001419
Author(s):  
Charisma DeSai ◽  
Keri Janowiak ◽  
Beatrice Secheli ◽  
Eleanor Phelps ◽  
Sam McDonald ◽  
...  

Patients who do not have enough information about their discharge plans have decreased treatment compliance, decreased patient safety, increased emergency department (ED) recidivism, and poor satisfaction. This project aimed to develop and implement a method to assess and improve patient understanding of treatment and discharge plan in the ED. The authors developed a questionnaire to assess patient knowledge using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Joint Commission recommendations, areas of communication deficits reported in other manuscripts, and ED staff and provider input. Responses from patient interviews were then scored against the medical record. Three trained scorers graded all responses, and inter-rater reliability was calculated using the kappa statistic.Baseline observations found that written discharge instructions were long and tedious, and important information was difficult to find. Based on initial patient scores, stakeholder interviews, and fishbone diagrams, the team developed a one-page simplified information page (SIP) targeted to inform patients their most relevant discharge instructions. Next, the SIP was tested on 118 patients to measure its effect on patient understanding. At the baseline study, no patients had complete understanding of their discharge instructions. The areas of lowest scores were medication instructions and indications to return to the ED. Implementation of the SIP resulted in statistically significant changes in score distribution across all questions assessed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Interrater reliability between scorers was high (kappa=0.84). We incorporated the concept of the SIP to the cover page of our standard discharge instructions.Healthcare providers often spend valuable time educating their patients, and it is important to assess the effectiveness of this teaching to identify areas in which we may improve health literacy and patient understanding. This project has shown that a simple, easy-to-read, concise page developed with patient input significantly improved ED discharge instruction knowledge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document