Pseudomyxoma Peritonei as a First Manifestation of KRAS-Mutated Urachal Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma of the Bladder: A Case Report

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ksenya V. Shelekhova ◽  
Alexander S. Zhuravlev ◽  
Daria D. Krylova ◽  
Alexey S. Konstantinov ◽  
Lidia V. Shtan ◽  
...  

Only 28 cases of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) arising from urachal neoplasms have been reported. We report one example of this extremely rare disease with KRAS mutational status in its spectrum of pathology. A 45-year-old woman presented with urachal frankly invasive mucinous cystadenocarcinoma confined to the dome of the bladder, which clinically manifested as PMP and was not detected at the first surgery. The primary tumour was revealed 6 months later because of its recurrence as PMP. Microscopic investigation revealed tubular adenoma and cystadenocarcinoma communicating with the bladder lumen and transitioning from the urachal urothelium to the mucinous epithelium. A urachal remnant was identified near the neoplasm. On immunohistochemistry, the tumour proved positive for CK7, CK20, CEA, and CDX2. Staining for β-catenin revealed expression in both the cytoplasm and cell membrane. Mismatch repair protein expression was normal. Somatic KRAS-mutation (G12V) was revealed in tubular adenoma, cystadenocarcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma peritonei and may play an oncogenic role in the malignant transformation of urachal mucosa and the development of PMP.

2013 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Gao ◽  
Yong-xi Song ◽  
Ying-ying Xu ◽  
Zhe Sun ◽  
Jing-xu Sun ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (7) ◽  
pp. 1777-1783
Author(s):  
Junya AOYAMA ◽  
Tadayuki SAKURAGAWA ◽  
Shotaro MARUYAMA ◽  
Yusuke UCHI ◽  
Motohide SHIMAZU

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4016-4016
Author(s):  
Beatrice Borelli ◽  
Elisa Fontana ◽  
Mirella Giordano ◽  
Carlotta Antoniotti ◽  
Francesca Bergamo ◽  
...  

4016 Background: The TRIBE2 study (NCT02339116) recently demonstrated the superiority of upfront FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab (bev) when compared to a pre-planned strategy of doublets/bev in molecularly unselected but mostly (74%) RAS/ BRAF mutant mCRC patients. The Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS) and CRCAssigner (CRCA) demonstrated prognostic value in multiple studies, but their predictive role has not been established so far. Given the poor prognosis associated with early stage mesenchymal/stem-like subtypes, we hypothesized that the CMS/CRCA classifiers could predict benefit from the upfront intensified strategy in patients included in the TRIBE2 study. Methods: Untreated formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples were classified into CMS/CRCA subtypes using a custom nCounter assay (NanoString Technologies). The impact of subtypes on progression free survival (PFS), progression free survival 2 (PFS2, defined as the time from randomization until the second evidence of disease progression) or overall survival (OS) was evaluated in the profiled population. Results: 426 and 428 (63%) patients enrolled in the TRIBE2 study were profiled according to CMS and CRCA classifications, respectively. The distribution of CMS/CRCA subtypes differed according to primary tumour site (both p < 0.001 for CMS/CRCA) and RAS/ BRAF mutational status (both p < 0.001 for CMS/CRCA). Significant associations of both CMS/CRCA classifiers with PFS, PFS2 and OS were demonstrated (Table). The effect of treatment intensification was independent of CMS subtypes (p for interaction for PFS/PFS2/OS: ns). Significant interaction effect between CRCA subtypes and treatment arm was reported in terms of PFS (p = 0.017), PFS2 (p = 0.010) and OS (p = 0.008). The benefit from the intensification of the upfront chemotherapy seemed more relevant in the stem-like (PFS, HR = 0.60; p = 0.03) and mixed subtypes (HR = 0.44; p = 0.002). Conclusions: CMS subtypes have a prognostic role in mCRC independently of RAS/ BRAF status. CRCA classification may help identifying subgroups of patients who may derive a more substantial benefit from upfront FOLFOXIRI/bev. [Table: see text]


Pancreas ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Imaoka ◽  
Kenji Yamao ◽  
Ahmed A. S. Salem ◽  
Nobumasa Mizuno ◽  
Kuniyuki Takahashi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-383
Author(s):  
Hideo Miyamoto ◽  
Kouichi Okita ◽  
Ritsu Kusama ◽  
Yoshirou Fujimori ◽  
Kiyofumi Yamagishi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document