scholarly journals Entanglement of Top-Down and Bottom-Up: Sociotechnical Innovation Pathways of Geothermal Energy in Switzerland

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Ejderyan ◽  
Franziska Ruef ◽  
Michael Stauffacher

By looking at deep geothermal energy in Switzerland, this article illustrates how innovation pathways in federal countries take entangled forms between top-down and bottom-up. The Swiss federal government presents deep geothermal energy as an important technology to decarbonize electricity production. Setbacks in early projects have slowed these efforts. Despite strong policy incentives from the federal government, no electricity is being produced from geothermal projects in Switzerland in 2019. Based on four case studies, we analyze how some cantons and cities have taken different pathways: Rather than implementing federal objectives, they favor heat production instead of electricity generation. The relative success of these initiatives led federal authorities to modify their approach to promoting geothermal energy. This study shows that federal mechanisms and instruments alone are not enough to make energy infrastructures acceptable locally. To learn from bottom-up experiences and adapt federal policies to local reality, better coordination between the federal and subnational levels is needed.

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 5502
Author(s):  
Dominic Samoita ◽  
Charles Nzila ◽  
Poul Alberg Østergaard ◽  
Arne Remmen

Currently, Kenya depends mainly on oil, geothermal energy and hydro resources for electricity production, however all three have associated issues. Oil-based electricity generation is environmentally harmful, expensive and a burden to the national trade balance. The rivers for hydropower and their tributaries are found in arid and semi-arid areas with erratic rainfall leading to problems of supply security, and geothermal exploitation has cost and risk issues amongst others. Given these problems and the fact that Kenya has a significant yet underexploited potential for photo voltaic (PV)-based power generation, the limited—although growing—exploitation of solar PV in Kenya is explored in this paper as a means of diversifying and stabilising electricity supply. The potential for integration of PV into the Kenyan electricity generation mix is analysed together with the sociotechnical, economic, political, and institutional and policy barriers, which limit PV integration. We argue that these barriers can be overcome with improved and more robust policy regulations, additional investments in research and development, and improved coordination of the use of different renewable energy sources. Most noticeably, storage solutions and other elements of flexibility need to be incorporated to balance the intermittent character of electricity generation based on solar PV.


Author(s):  
Gianfranco Guidati ◽  
Domenico Giardini

Near-to-surface geothermal energy with heat pumps is state of the art and is already widespread in Switzerland. In the future energy system, medium-deep to deep geothermal energy (1 to 6 kilometres) will, in addition, play an important role. To the forefront is the supply of heat for buildings and industrial processes. This form of geothermal energy utilisation requires a highly permeable underground area that allows a fluid – usually water – to absorb the naturally existing rock heat and then transport it to the surface. Sedimentary rocks are usually permeable by nature, whereas for granites and gneisses permeability must be artificially induced by injecting water. The heat gained in this way increases in line with the drilling depth: at a depth of 1 kilometre, the underground temperature is approximately 40°C, while at a depth of 3 kilometres it is around 100°C. To drive a steam turbine for the production of electricity, temperatures of over 100°C are required. As this requires greater depths of 3 to 6 kilometres, the risk of seismicity induced by the drilling also increases. Underground zones are also suitable for storing heat and gases, such as hydrogen or methane, and for the definitive storage of CO2. For this purpose, such zones need to fulfil similar requirements to those applicable to heat generation. In addition, however, a dense top layer is required above the reservoir so that the gas cannot escape. The joint project “Hydropower and geo-energy” of the NRP “Energy” focused on the question of where suitable ground layers can be found in Switzerland that optimally meet the requirements for the various uses. A second research priority concerned measures to reduce seismicity induced by deep drilling and the resulting damage to buildings. Models and simulations were also developed which contribute to a better understanding of the underground processes involved in the development and use of geothermal resources. In summary, the research results show that there are good conditions in Switzerland for the use of medium-deep geothermal energy (1 to 3 kilometres) – both for the building stock and for industrial processes. There are also grounds for optimism concerning the seasonal storage of heat and gases. In contrast, the potential for the definitive storage of CO2 in relevant quantities is rather limited. With respect to electricity production using deep geothermal energy (> 3 kilometres), the extent to which there is potential to exploit the underground economically is still not absolutely certain. In this regard, industrially operated demonstration plants are urgently needed in order to boost acceptance among the population and investors.


Author(s):  
Corrie Clark ◽  
Christopher Harto

Previous assessments of the sustainability of geothermal energy have focused on resource management and associated environmental impacts during plant operations. Within these constraints, studies have shown that overall emissions, water consumption, and land use for geothermal electricity production have a smaller impact than traditional base-load electricity generation technologies. According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), geothermal energy generation in the United States is projected to increase nearly threefold, from 2.37 GW to 6.30 GW, by 2035 (EIA 2012). With this potential for significant growth in geothermal electricity production, there is a need to improve understanding of the environmental impacts across the life cycle of geothermal energy production systems. This paper assesses the use of freshwater in construction, drilling, and production activities of various geothermal power plants. Four geothermal technologies were evaluated: air-cooled enhanced geothermal systems (EGSs), air-cooled hydrothermal binary systems, evaporative-cooled hydrothermal flash systems, and air-cooled geopressured systems that coproduce natural gas. The impacts associated with these power plant scenarios are compared to those from other electricity generating technologies as part of a larger effort to compare the lifecycle impacts of geothermal electricity generation to other power generation technologies.


Author(s):  
Christopher Dalby ◽  
Robin Shail ◽  
Tony Batchelor ◽  
Lucy Cotton ◽  
Jon Gutmanis ◽  
...  

<p>SW England is the most prospective region in the UK for the development of deep geothermal energy as it has highest heat flow values (c. 120 mW m<sup>-2</sup>) and predicted temperatures greater than 190 <sup>o</sup>C at 5 km depth. The United Downs Deep Geothermal Project (UDDGP), situated near Redruth in Cornwall, is the first deep geothermal power project to commence in the UK. Two deviated geothermal wells, UD-1 (5058 m TVD) and UD-2 (2214 m TVD), were completed in 2019 and intersect the NNW-SSE-trending Porthtowan Fault Zone (PTFZ) within the Early Permian Cornubian Batholith.</p><p>The Cornubian Batholith is composite and can be divided into five granite types that were formed by variable source melting and fractionation [1]. These processes were the primary control on the heterogeneous distribution of U, Th and K that underpins heat production in the granite. Previous high resolution airborne gamma-ray data has demonstrated the spatial variation of near-surface granite heat production [2], and the CSM Hot Dry Rock Project (1977-1991) provided U, Th and K distributions to depths of 2600 m in the Carnmenellis Granite [3]. However, uncertainties in: (i) U, Th and K content in the deeper batholith, (ii) thermal conductivity are still challenges to modelling the high heat flow.</p><p>Preliminary evaluation of UD-1 downhole spectral gamma data (900-5057 m) indicates the presence of three major granite types on the basis of contrasting U and Th characteristics. QEMSCAN mineralogical analysis of cuttings (720 – 5057 m) demonstrates the overwhelming dominance of two mica (G1) and muscovite (G2) granites and little expression of biotite (G3) granites. U- and Th- bearing accessory minerals include monazite, zircon and apatite, with the appearance of allanite and titanite in the deeper granites. Representivity analysis between various cutting fractions show no systematic bias in the major mineral components.</p><p>There is a substantial increase in Th below 3000 m that indicates the deeper parts of the batholith are likely to contribute substantially to overall heat production. Monazite is the primary source for Th and has a close association with micas. Mineralogical, mineral chemical, whole-rock geochemical and coupled thermal conductivity analysis is ongoing to improve understanding of the construction of this part of the Cornubian Batholith and its implications for the regional thermal resource and sub-surface temperature evaluation.</p><p>References:<br>[1]Simons B et al. (2016) Lithos, 260: 76-94<br>[2]Beamish D and Busby J (2016) Geothermal Energy, 4.1:4<br>[3]Parker R (1989) Pergamon, 621.44</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 25-35
Author(s):  
Iwona Kargulewicz ◽  
Damian Zasina

Abstract The structure of fuels consumed for energy production and the amount of CO2 emissions associated with that production in Poland in 1990–2017 and in other selected European countries were presented. The countries to be compared were selected so that the analysed group was diverse in terms of electricity generation conditions. CO2 emission intensity from electricity production for Poland were estimated and compared with the average intensity for the EU and for the other selected European countries. Additionally, CO2 emission in the electricity and commercial heat production sector projected until 2040 was included to present the impact of the fuel mix on the emission results.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Cole
Keyword(s):  
Top Down ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document