Effect of Ankle Position on Tibiotalar Motion With Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis in a Fracture Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 746-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark P. Pallis ◽  
David N. Pressman ◽  
Kenneth Heida ◽  
Tyler Nicholson ◽  
Susan Ishikawa
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Fracture Model ◽  
Tibiofibular Syndesmosis ◽  
Traumatic Injuries ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Syndesmotic Screw ◽  
Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Pronation External Rotation

Background: Anatomic reduction and fixation of the syndesmosis in traumatic injuries is paramount in restoring function of the tibiotalar joint. While overcompression is a potential error, recent work has called into question whether ankle position during fixation really matters in this regard. Our study aimed to corroborate more recent findings using a fracture model that, to our knowledge, has not been previously tested. Methods: Twenty cadaver leg specimens were obtained and prepared. Each was tested for tibiotalar motion under various conditions: intact syndesmosis, intact syndesmosis with lag screw compression, pronation external rotation type 4 (PER-4) ankle fracture with syndesmotic disruption, and single-screw syndesmotic fixation followed by plate and screw fracture and syndesmotic screw fixation. In each situation, the ankle was held in alternating plantarflexion and dorsiflexion when inserting the syndesmotic screw with the subsequent amount of maximal dorsiflexion being recorded following hand-tight lag screw fixation. Results: While ankle range of motion increased significantly with creation of the PER-4 injury, under no condition was there a statistically significant change in maximal dorsiflexion angle. Conclusion: Ankle position during distal tibiofibular syndesmosis fixation did not limit dorsiflexion of the ankle joint. Clinical Relevance: Our findings suggest that maximal dorsiflexion during syndesmotic screw fixation may not be necessary.

Ankle Fractures Involving the Fibula Proximal to the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 513-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabil A. Ebraheim ◽  
Anis O. Mekhail ◽  
Scott S. Gargasz
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
The Other ◽  
Tibiofibular Syndesmosis ◽  
Fair Result ◽  
Syndesmotic Screw ◽  
Stage 4 ◽  
Tibiofibular Joint ◽  
Supination External Rotation ◽  
Pronation External Rotation

Thirty-two cases of ankle fractures associated with fibular fractures above the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis were studied. All were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. The average follow-up was 25 months. The results of the postoperative evaluation were rated, based on subjective clinical criteria, as good, fair, and poor. According to the Lauge-Hansen classification, there were 17 (53%) cases of supination-external rotation injury (2 stage 2 and 15 stage 4), 9 (28%) cases of stage 3 pronation-abduction injury, and 6 (19%) cases of pronation-external rotation injury (3 stage 3 and 3 stage 4). All cases could be classified as Weber type C or as suprasyndesmotic, fibular diaphyseal fracture (44-C) according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification. In 18 (56%) cases, the fracture was associated with ankle dislocation. There were seven (22%) open fractures (two grade I, four grade II, and one grade IIIA). Syndesmotic screws were used in 23 (72%) cases (12 supination-external rotation injury, 6 pronation-external rotation injury, and 5 pronation-abduction injury). The syndesmotic screw was removed after an average of 9 weeks. Four (13%) nonunions and two (6%) delayed unions of the fibula were treated with bone grafting and/or hardware revision and eventually healed. Three of the nonunions had poor clinical results because of degenerative ankle joint arthritis in two (one of them ended in arthrodesis) and deep infection, which was eventually cured, in the third. The fourth nonunion had a fair result. One of the delayed unions had a fair result (an obese patient) and the other had a good result. Two patients developed deep infections; one ended in gangrene and amputation in a diabetic patient, and the other was a patient with fibular nonunion that eventually healed. Three patients had superficial infections that were treated successfully. Of the 32 cases, 23 (72%) showed good results, 4 (13%) showed fair results, and 5 (16%) showed poor results. The cases with poor results included three fibular nonunions, one deep infection, and one recurrent superficial infection and wound dehiscence after hardware removal. A syndesmotic screw is usually needed in cases of fracture-dislocations. Two patients with occult fibular nonunions developed diastasis of the syndesmosis after removal of the syndesmotic screw. It was found that reduction and temporary pinning of the distal tibiofibular joint helps achieve fibular length, which is crucial to restoring the biomechanics of the ankle joint. It seems advisable not to remove the syndesmotic screw until there are signs of healing of fibular fracture to avoid diastasis of the distal tibiofibular joint. Bone grafting should be considered in high energy fractures with comminution. These complex injuries are associated with higher rates of complications. Poor results can be attributed to fracture factors, e.g., open fractures, infections; patient factors, e.g., obesity, lowered immunity as in diabetes, and noncompliance; and iatrogenic factors, e.g., early removal of syndesmotic screws.

scholarly journals Biomechanics of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 247301142110127
Author(s):  
Pranav Khambete ◽  
Ethan Harlow ◽  
Jason Ina ◽  
Shana Miskovsky
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Tibiofibular Syndesmosis ◽  
Interosseous Ligament ◽  
Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Ankle Biomechanics

Background: This investigation’s purpose was to perform a systematic review of the literature examining the biomechanics of the ligaments comprising the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis with specific attention to their resistance to translational and rotational forces. Although current syndesmosis repair techniques can achieve an anatomic reduction, they may not reapproximate native ankle biomechanics, resulting in loss of reduction, joint overconstraint, or lack of external rotation resistance. Armed with a contemporary understanding of individual ligament biomechanics, future operative strategies can target key stabilizing structure(s), translating to a repair better equipped to resist anatomic displacing forces. Study design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using a PRISMA checklist. Biomechanical studies testing cadaveric lower limb specimens in the intact and injured state measuring the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis resistance to translational and rotational forces were included in this review. Only studies that included numerical data were included in this review; studies that only reported figures and graphs were excluded. Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two studies determined the mechanical properties of syndesmotic ligaments, finding superior strength and stiffness of the interosseous ligament (IOL), as compared to the anterior (AITFL) or posteroinferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL). Four studies examined native ankle biomechanics establishing physiologic range of motion of the fibula relative to the tibia. Fibular range of motion was found to be up to 2.53 mm of posterior translation (Markolf et al), 1.00 mm lateral translation (Xenos et al), 3.6 degrees of external rotation (Burssens et al), and 1.4 degrees of internal rotation (Clanton et al). Four studies evaluated syndesmotic biomechanics under physiological loading and found that the AITFL, IOL, and PITFL provide the majority of resistance to external rotation, diastasis, and internal rotation, respectively. Two studies investigated the biomechanics of clinically and intraoperatively used tests for syndesmotic injuries and found increased sensitivity of sagittal plane posterior fibular translation, as opposed to coronal plane lateral fibular translation for unstable injuries. Conclusions: Study findings suggest that although the IOL is the strongest syndesmotic ligament, the AITFL has a dominant role stabilizing the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis to external rotation force. Because of these characteristics, operative repair of the AITFL along its native vector may provide a more biomechanically advantageous construct and should be investigated clinically. Additionally, evaluation of clinical stress tests revealed that the external rotation stress test is the most sensitive test to recognize an AITFL tear, and that a 3-ligament disruption is needed to cause diastasis greater than 2 mm.

scholarly journals Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
Markus Regauer ◽  
Gordon Mackay ◽  
Owen Nelson ◽  
Wolfgang Böcker ◽  
Christian Ehrnthaller
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Posterior Malleolus ◽  
Anatomic Reduction

Background: Surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries is not trivial, and there are no generally accepted treatment guidelines. The most common controversies regarding surgical treatment are related to screw fixation versus dynamic fixation, the use of reduction clamps, open versus closed reduction, and the role of the posterior malleolus and of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL). Our aim was to draw important conclusions from the pertinent literature concerning surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries, to transform these conclusions into surgical principles supported by the literature, and finally to fuse these principles into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the reference lists of systematic reviews of relevant studies dealing with the surgical treatment of unstable syndesmotic injuries were searched independently by two reviewers using specific terms and limits. Surgical principles supported by the literature were fused into an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm. Results: A total of 171 articles were included for further considerations. Among them, 47 articles concerned syndesmotic screw fixation and 41 flexible dynamic fixations of the syndesmosis. Twenty-five studies compared screw fixation with dynamic fixations, and seven out of these comparisons were randomized controlled trials. Nineteen articles addressed the posterior malleolus, 14 the role of the AITFL, and eight the use of reduction clamps. Anatomic reduction is crucial to prevent posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Therefore, flexible dynamic stabilization techniques should be preferred whenever possible. An unstable AITFL should be repaired and augmented, as it represents an important stabilizer of external rotation of the distal fibula. Conclusions: The current literature provides sufficient arguments for the development of an evidence-based surgical treatment algorithm for unstable syndesmotic injuries.

Impact of Torque on Assessment of Syndesmotic Injuries Using Weightbearing Computed Tomography Scans

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 710-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Krähenbühl ◽  
Travis L. Bailey ◽  
Maxwell W. Weinberg ◽  
Nathan P. Davidson ◽  
Beat Hintermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Axial Load ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Deltoid Ligament ◽  
Tibiofibular Syndesmosis ◽  
Tibiofibular Ligament ◽  
Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis ◽  
Axial Ct ◽  
The Impact

Background: The diagnosis of subtle injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis remains elusive. Conventional radiographs miss a large subset of injuries that present without frank diastasis. This study evaluated the impact of torque application on the assessment of syndesmotic injuries when using weightbearing computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: Seven pairs of male cadavers (tibia plateau to toe-tip) were included. CT scans with axial load application (85 kg) and with (10 Nm) or without torque to the tibia (corresponding to external rotation of the foot and ankle) were taken during 4 test conditions. First, intact ankles (native) were scanned. Second, 1 specimen from each pair underwent anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) transection (condition 1A), while the contralateral underwent deltoid transection (condition 1B). Third, the lesions were reversed on the same specimens and the remaining intact deltoid or AITFL was transected (condition 2). Finally, the distal tibiofibular interosseous membrane (IOM) was transected in all ankles (condition 3). Measurements were performed to assess the integrity of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis on digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) and on axial CT scans. Results: Torque impacted DRR and axial CT scan measurements in almost all conditions. The ability to diagnose syndesmotic injuries using axial CT measurements improved when torque was applied. No significant syndesmotic morphological change was observed with or without torque for either isolated AITFL or deltoid ligament transection. Discussion: Torque application had a notable impact on two-dimensional (2-D) measurements used to diagnose syndesmotic injuries for both DRRs and axial CT scans. Because weightbearing conditions allow for standardized positioning of the foot while radiographs or CT scans are taken, the combination of axial load and torque application may be desirable. Clinical Relevance: Application of torque to the tibia impacts 2-D measurements and may be useful when diagnosing syndesmotic injuries by DRRs or axial CT images.

scholarly journals Technical aspects of the syndesmotic screw and their effect on functional outcome following acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury

Injury ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 775-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Schepers ◽  
Hans van der Linden ◽  
Esther M.M. van Lieshout ◽  
Dieu-Donné Niesten ◽  
Maarten van der Elst
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Tibiofibular Syndesmosis ◽  
Technical Aspects ◽  
Syndesmotic Screw ◽  
Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis ◽  
Syndesmosis Injury

scholarly journals Overtightening of the Syndesmosis Revisited and the Effect of Syndesmotic Malreduction on Ankle Dorsiflexion

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ghorbanhoseini ◽  
John Y. Kwon ◽  
Tyler Gonzalez ◽  
Brian Velasco ◽  
Aron Lechtig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
P Value ◽  
Posterior Displacement ◽  
Syndesmotic Screw ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Micro Sensor ◽  
Ankle Trauma ◽  
One Way Anova

Category: Ankle, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Ankle syndesmotic injuries are a significant source of morbidity and require anatomic reduction to optimize outcomes. Although a previous study concluded that maximal dorsiflexion during syndesmotic fixation was not required, methodologic weaknesses existed and several studies have demonstrated improved ankle dorsiflexion after removal of syndesmotic screws. The purposes of the current investigation are: To assess the effect of syndesmotic screw fixation on ankle dorsiflexion utilizing a controlled load and instrumentation allowing for precise measurement of ankle dorsiflexion. To assess the effect of anterior & posterior syndesmotic malreduction after syndesmotic screw fixation on ankle dorsiflexion. Methods: Fifteen cadaveric leg specimens were utilized for the study. Ankle dorsiflexion was measured utilizing a precise micro- sensor system after application of a consistent load in the intact state, after compression fixation with a syndesmotic screw and after anterior & posterior malreduction of the syndesmosis. Results: Following screw compression of the nondisplaced syndesmosis, dorsiflexion ROM was 99.7±0.87% (mean ± standard error) of baseline ankle ROM. Anterior and posterior displacement of the syndesmosis resulted in dorsiflexion ROM that was 99.1±1.75% and 98.6±1.56% of baseline ankle ROM, respectively. One-way ANOVA was performed showing no statistical significance between groups (p-value =0.88). Two-way ANOVA comparing the groups with respect to both the reduction condition (intact, anatomic reduction, anterior displacement, posterior displacement) and the displacement order (anterior first, posterior first) did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect (p-value= 0.99). Conclusion: Maximal dorsiflexion of the ankle is not required prior to syndesmotic fixation. Anterior or posterior syndesmotic malreduction following syndesmotic screw fixation has no effect on ankle dorsiflexion thus poor patient outcomes after syndesmotic malreduction does not appear to be the result of loss of dorsiflexion due to mechanical block.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document