Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Concurrent Validity of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire Across Development, Psychopathology, and Culture

Assessment ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107319112199322
Author(s):  
Kevin Liu ◽  
Joseph S. Nijmeh ◽  
Stacie L. Warren

The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) is a widely used assessment of excessive worry. American undergraduate samples have predominately been used to evaluate its factor structure, which may not generalize to other developmental, cultural, and psychopathology populations. The present study tested the PSWQ’s factor structure across three diverse samples: American undergraduate students ( n = 3,243), Dutch high school students ( n = 3,906), and American adults with psychopathology ( n = 384). Exploratory, confirmatory, and multigroup confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Measurement invariance and concurrent validity were also tested. Method-factor and two-factor models were largely equivalent and superior to a one-factor model. Invariance tests supported configural and metric invariance but only partial scalar invariance. Positively worded items but not negatively worded items demonstrated concurrent validity with anxiety and depression symptom measures and diagnoses. Overall, the PSWQ appears to measure a unitary construct. Present results warrant further testing of the PSWQ across diverse samples.

2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
STALE PALLESEN ◽  
INGER HILDE NORDHUS ◽  
BERIT CARLSTEDT ◽  
JULIAN F. THAYER ◽  
TOM BACKER JOHNSEN

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Nuevo ◽  
Margaret-Anne Mackintosh ◽  
Margaret Gatz ◽  
Ignacio Montorio ◽  
Julie Loebach Wetherell

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin van der Heiden ◽  
Peter Muris ◽  
Arjan E.R. Bos ◽  
Henk T. van der Molen

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Péter Pajkossy ◽  
Péter Simor ◽  
István Szendi ◽  
Mihály Racsmány

Abstract. The Hungarian version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) was validated in two studies, using five different samples. Study 1 tested the factor structure and internal consistency of the PSWQ in two undergraduate student samples, comparing the psychometric properties of the paper-pencil and the online versions of the scale. Study 2 assessed construct validity in two undergraduate student samples and in a sample of patients diagnosed with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and matched control participants. Our results suggest that the Hungarian PSWQ demonstrates good psychometric properties. We found no difference between the online and the paper-pencil versions of the scale. A factor structure with one general worry factor and two method factors representing wording effects showed the best fit to the data.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Chau Leung ◽  
Herbert W. Marsh ◽  
Rhonda G. Craven ◽  
Adel S. Abduljabbar

Abstract. Studies on the construct validity of the Self-Description Questionnaire II (SDQII) have not compared the factor structure between the English and Chinese versions of the SDQII. By using rigorous multiple group comparison procedures based upon confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of measurement invariance, the present study examined the responses of Australian high school students (N = 302) and Chinese high school students (N = 322) using the English and Chinese versions of the SDQII, respectively. CFA provided strong evidence that the factor structure (factor loading and item intercept) of the Chinese version of the SDQII in comparison to responses to the English version of the SDQII is invariant, therefore it allows researchers to confidently utilize both the English and Chinese versions of the SDQII with Chinese and Australian samples separately and cross-culturally.


Assessment ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly Hazlett-Stevens ◽  
Jodie B. Ullman ◽  
Michelle G. Craske

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document