Effect of β-blocker Therapy on Hospital Readmission and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients With Concurrent Cocaine Use

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 518-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Obiora Egbuche ◽  
Ifunanya Ekechukwu ◽  
Valery Effoe ◽  
Nnamdi Maduabum ◽  
Heather R. Millard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Blocker Therapy ◽  
Cocaine Use ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Β Blocker

Background: β-Blockers are first-line agents for reduction in symptoms, hospitalization, and mortality in patients with heart failure having reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the safety and efficacy of continuous β-blocker therapy (BBT) in patients who actively use cocaine remain controversial, and available literature is limited. We aimed to evaluate the effect of BBT on hospital readmission and mortality in patients having HFrEF with concurrent cocaine use. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with a diagnosis of HFrEF between 2011 and 2014 based on International Classification of Diseases 9-Clinical Modification codes. We included patients aged 18 and older who tested positive for cocaine on a urine toxicology test obtained at the time of index admission. Patients were followed for 1 year. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the effect of BBT on the 30-day, all-cause and heart failure–related readmissions. Results: The 30-day readmission rates for BBT versus no BBT groups were 20% versus 41% (odds ratio [OR]: 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05-0.56, P = .004) for heart failure-related readmissions and 25% versus 46% (OR: 0.19, 95% CI = 0.06-0.64, P = .007) for all-cause readmissions. Conclusion: The BBT reduced 30-day, all-cause and heart failure–related readmission rate but not 1-year mortality in patients having HFrEF with concurrent cocaine use.

scholarly journals Improvement in clinical outcomes of patients with heart failure and active cocaine use after β-blocker therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Persio D. Lopez ◽  
Adedoyin Akinlonu ◽  
Tuoyo O. Mene-Afejuku ◽  
Carissa Dumancas ◽  
Mohammed Saeed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Blocker Therapy ◽  
Cocaine Use ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Β Blocker

Concomitant use of a positive inotropic agent to create a bridge to the successful initiation of β-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure: A proposal for a trial

2003 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. S62-S66
Author(s):  
Manuela Zampino ◽  
Christopher M. O'Connor ◽  
Wendy A. Gattis ◽  
Kirkwood F. Adams ◽  
Mihai Gheorghiade
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Inotropic Agent ◽  
Blocker Therapy ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Β Blocker

β-Blockade in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Does Heart Rate Control Influence Readmissions?

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-45
Author(s):  
Ryan E. Owens ◽  
Jennifer D. Twilla ◽  
Timothy H. Self ◽  
Abdulrahman I. Alshaya ◽  
Carlvin J. Metra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Target Dose ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Β Blocker ◽  
The Impact

Background: Raised resting heart rate (HR), >70 beats per minute (bpm), has been shown to be a risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes and hospital readmissions, specifically in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF rEF). Given their mortality benefit, β-blockers are recommended in HF rEF, with a goal to titrate to a maximum tolerated dose rather than a specific HR target. Objective: To determine the impact of optimal HR control achievement prior to hospital discharge on hospital readmissions in patients with HF rEF receiving β-blockade. Methods: A retrospective study of patients admitted to 5 adult hospitals within a large urban health-care system, between 2013 and 2015, was conducted. Patients were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision ( ICD-9) coding for acute on chronic HF rEF. Results: Of the 225 patients included, 20% achieved optimal HR control (n = 46, HR <70 bpm; n = 179, HR ≥70 bpm) and only 15% received β-blocker titration during hospital admission. Of note, 25% of patients receiving ≥50% target dose (n = 79) and 28% receiving 100% target dose (n = 39) achieved optimal HR control. At 30 days, patients with an HR <70 bpm versus HR ≥70 bpm exhibited similar readmission rates (9% vs 11%, respectively; P > .99) and ED visits (11% vs 8%, respectively; P = .57). Conclusions: Readmission rates were similar among patients with HF rEF despite the majority failing to achieve optimal HR control from β-blockade. However, β-blocker dosing remains suboptimal relative to guideline-recommended target doses. Opportunities exist for inpatient clinicians to optimize β-blockade in an attempt to achieve HR control.

scholarly journals The impact of the coronavirus disease and Tele-Heart Failure Clinic on cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization in ambulatory patients with heart failure

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0249043
Author(s):  
Sarinya Puwanant ◽  
Supanee Sinphurmsukskul ◽  
Laddawan Krailak ◽  
Pavinee Nakaviroj ◽  
Noppawan Boonbumrong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Heart Failure Clinic ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
The Impact

Background We sought to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Tele-HF Clinic (Tele-HFC) program on cardiovascular death, heart failure (HF) rehospitalization, and heart transplantation rates in a cohort of ambulatory HF patients during and after the peak of the pandemic. Methods Using the HF clinic database, we compared data of patients with HF before, during, and after the peak of the pandemic (January 1 to March 17 [pre-COVID], March 17 to May 31 [peak-COVID], and June 1 to October 1 [post-COVID]). During peak-COVID, all patients were managed by Tele-HFC or hospitalization. After June 1, patients chose either a face-to-face clinic visit or a continuous tele-clinic visit. Results Cardiovascular death and medical titration rates were similar in peak-COVID compared with all other periods. HF readmission rates were significantly lower in peak-COVID (8.7% vs. 2.5%, p<0.001) and slightly increased (3.5%) post-COVID. Heart transplant rates were substantially increased in post-COVID (4.5% vs. peak-COVID [0%], p = 0.002). After June 1, 38% of patients continued with the Tele-HFC program. Patients managed by the Tele-HFC program for <6 months were less likely to have HF with reduced ejection fraction (73% vs. 54%, p = 0.005) and stage-D HF (33% vs. 14%, p = 0.001), and more likely to achieve the target neurohormonal blockade dose (p<0.01), compared with the ≥6-month Tele-HFC group. Conclusions HF rehospitalization and transplant rates significantly declined during the pandemic in ambulatory care of HF. However, reduction in these rates did not affect subsequent 5-month hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in the setting of Tele-HFC program and continuum of advanced HF therapies.

Implementation of Guideline-Recommended Therapies for Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Regional Arab Middle East Experience

Angiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 431-437
Author(s):  
Mohammad Zubaid ◽  
Wafa Rashed ◽  
Mustafa Ridha ◽  
Nooshin Bazargani ◽  
Adel Hamad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Β Blocker ◽  
Β Blockers

We describe the characteristics of ambulatory patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the Gulf region (Middle East) and the implementation of guideline-recommended treatments. We included 2427 HFrEF outpatients (mean age 59 ± 13 years, 75% males and median left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] of 30%). A high proportion of patients received guideline-recommended medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEI]/angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI] 87%, β-blocker 91%, mineralocorticoid antagonist [MRA] 64%). However, only a minority of patients received guideline-recommended target doses (ACEI/ARB/ARNI 13%, β-blocker 27%, and MRA 4.4%). Old age was a significant independent predictor for not prescribing treatment ( P < .001 for ACEI/ARB/ARNI and MRA; and P = .002 for β-blockers). Other independent predictors were chronic kidney disease (for both ACEI/ARB/ARNI and MRA, P < .001) and higher LVEF ( P = .014 for β-blockers and P < .001 for MRA). Patients with HFrEF managed by heart failure specialists more often received recommended target doses of ACEI/ARB/ARNI (40% vs 11%, P < .001) and β-blockers (56% vs 26%, P < .001) compared to those treated by general cardiologists. Although the majority of our patients with HFrEF received guideline-recommended medications, the doses they were prescribed were suboptimal. Understanding the reasons behind this is important for improved practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document