Clothing Demand in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Frederick W. Derrick ◽  
Rachel Dardis
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cross Sectional Analysis ◽  
Sectional Analysis

scholarly journals Health profile of adult special immigrant visa holders arriving from Iraq and Afghanistan to the United States, 2009–2017: A cross-sectional analysis

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. e1003118
Author(s):  
Gayathri S. Kumar ◽  
Simone S. Wien ◽  
Christina R. Phares ◽  
Walid Slim ◽  
Heather M. Burke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Profile ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cross Sectional Analysis ◽  
Sectional Analysis

Trends in Academic Achievement Within Otolaryngology: Does Fellowship Training Impact Research Productivity?

2021 ◽  
pp. 194589242110547
Author(s):  
David C. Moffatt ◽  
Andrew M. Ferry ◽  
Jared M. Stuart ◽  
Jesse D. Supernaw ◽  
Alex E. Wright ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Research Output ◽  
The United States ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
H Index ◽  
Cross Sectional Analysis ◽  
Scholarly Impact ◽  
Sectional Analysis

Background Scholarly productivity and research output vary among different subspecialties. The h-index was developed as a more wholesome metric that measures an author's contribution to literature. Objective Through a web-based cross-sectional analysis, we investigated the differences in scholarly impact and influence of both fellowship and nonfellowship-trained academic otolaryngologists in the United States. A secondary objective was to further understand the output among the larger fellowship fields. Methods A cross-sectional analysis was performed for active faculty otolaryngologists. A total of 1704 otolaryngologists were identified as faculty in residency training programs across the United States. Their h-index and publication data were gathered using the Scopus database. The data were obtained in August 2019 and analysis occurred in January 2020. Results Head and neck surgical faculty (25.5%) had the highest representation with fellowship experience. Among all faculty, there was no statistical difference in the overall average h-index scores when comparing faculty that had fellowship training with those who did not (12.6 and 12.1, respectively, P = .498). Rhinologists had the highest publication output per year at 3.90. Among fellowship-trained faculty, the highest average h-index and total publications were seen in head & neck surgery, while facial plastics had the lowest averages ( P < .001). Conclusions In this study, fellowship-trained faculty had a greater but not significant scholarly impact than nonfellowship faculty. Furthermore, there were significant variations in output among the various subspecialties of otolaryngology. Growing fields, as academic rhinology, are continuing to flourish in robust research productivity and output. This study further demonstrates the potential, growing influence of fellowship training on research involvement and academic advancement within the otolaryngology subspecialties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document