The Third Way in Health Care Reform: Does the Emperor have Any Clothes?

1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Ham
1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Edmonstone ◽  
Maggie Havergal

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (34) ◽  
pp. 4110-4115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Loehrer ◽  
Zirui Song ◽  
Alex B. Haynes ◽  
David C. Chang ◽  
Matthew M. Hutter ◽  
...  

Purpose Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. Lack of insurance coverage has been associated with more advanced disease at presentation, more emergent admissions at time of colectomy, and lower survival relative to privately insured patients. The 2006 Massachusetts health care reform serves as a unique natural experiment to assess the impact of insurance expansion on colorectal cancer care. Methods We used the Hospital Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases to identify patients with colorectal cancer with government-subsidized or self-pay (GSSP) or private insurance admitted to a hospital between 2001 and 2011 in Massachusetts (n = 17,499) and three control states (n = 144,253). Difference-in-differences models assessed the impact of the 2006 Massachusetts coverage expansion on resection of colorectal cancer, controlling for confounding factors and secular trends. Results Before the 2006 Massachusetts reform, government-subsidized or self-pay patients had significantly lower rates of resection for colorectal cancer compared with privately insured patients in both Massachusetts and the control states. The Massachusetts insurance expansion was associated with a 44% increased rate of resection (rate ratio = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.68; P < .001), a 6.21 percentage point decreased probability of emergent admission (95% CI, −11.88 to −0.54; P = .032), and an 8.13 percentage point increased probability of an elective admission (95% CI, 1.34 to 14.91; P = .019) compared with the control states. Conclusion The 2006 Massachusetts health care reform, a model for the Affordable Care Act, was associated with increased rates of resection and decreased probability of emergent resection for colorectal cancer. Our findings suggest that insurance expansion may help improve access to care for patients with colorectal cancer.


Author(s):  
Тетяна Семигіна ◽  
Вікторія Тимошевська ◽  
Тетяна Степурко

This paper is aimed to present how people respond to some innovationsintroduced within the Ukrainian health care system by legislation adopted in2017. It is focused on issues of choosing family doctors and on perception ofe-health by population.The survey “Health Index. Ukraine” has been launched in 2015 by theInternational Renaissance Foundation, School of Public Health of NationalUniversity of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy and Kyiv International Institute ofSociology. In 2018, the questions on primary health care reform (choosingthe primary health care provider, perception of e-health) were added tothe research instrument of “Health index. Ukraine”. This paper analysesdata collected in 2018 only, because the users’ experience of choosing familydoctor and perception of e-health variables are available for 2018 datasolely. The third wave of the survey took place in June - July 2018 and overall10219 respondents were interviewed in Ukraine.At the moment of the third wave of survey, 42% of respondents reportedthat all their household members including themselves had their declarationssigned with family doctors, 5.8% reported that some of their householdmembers had their declarations signed, and 52.2% more informed that noneof their household members had his/her declaration signed. Households withchildren were more active: 52% of them had their declarations signed withdoctors. 12.4% of household representatives reported that do not plan tochoose a family doctor. 59.5% of respondents reported that they did notexperience problems in the process of choosing a family doctor.There is no significant difference in rates of declarations signing betweendifferent type of areas, education levels, and health self-assessment status.Regional difference in signing declarations (self-reported) by all householdmembers reaches up to 52.4%.The survey results demonstrate that patients want their medical recordsto be visible by different doctors (29.9%) and by patients themselves (28.9%),and only 19.8% believe the e-health instrument is not necessary at all. Thoseself-assessing their health as very bad or bad are three times more criticalabout the electronic system as those self-assessing their health as very good.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document