scholarly journals Impact of Health Insurance Expansion on the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (34) ◽  
pp. 4110-4115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Loehrer ◽  
Zirui Song ◽  
Alex B. Haynes ◽  
David C. Chang ◽  
Matthew M. Hutter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Reform ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Third ◽  
Insured Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Privately Insured

Purpose Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. Lack of insurance coverage has been associated with more advanced disease at presentation, more emergent admissions at time of colectomy, and lower survival relative to privately insured patients. The 2006 Massachusetts health care reform serves as a unique natural experiment to assess the impact of insurance expansion on colorectal cancer care. Methods We used the Hospital Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases to identify patients with colorectal cancer with government-subsidized or self-pay (GSSP) or private insurance admitted to a hospital between 2001 and 2011 in Massachusetts (n = 17,499) and three control states (n = 144,253). Difference-in-differences models assessed the impact of the 2006 Massachusetts coverage expansion on resection of colorectal cancer, controlling for confounding factors and secular trends. Results Before the 2006 Massachusetts reform, government-subsidized or self-pay patients had significantly lower rates of resection for colorectal cancer compared with privately insured patients in both Massachusetts and the control states. The Massachusetts insurance expansion was associated with a 44% increased rate of resection (rate ratio = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.68; P < .001), a 6.21 percentage point decreased probability of emergent admission (95% CI, −11.88 to −0.54; P = .032), and an 8.13 percentage point increased probability of an elective admission (95% CI, 1.34 to 14.91; P = .019) compared with the control states. Conclusion The 2006 Massachusetts health care reform, a model for the Affordable Care Act, was associated with increased rates of resection and decreased probability of emergent resection for colorectal cancer. Our findings suggest that insurance expansion may help improve access to care for patients with colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals The impact of the 2006 Massachusetts health care reform law on spine surgery patient payer-mix status and age

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 694-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas W. Villelli ◽  
Hong Yan ◽  
Jian Zou ◽  
Nicholas M. Barbaro
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
New York ◽  
Health Care Reform ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
New York State ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Care System

OBJECTIVESeveral similarities exist between the Massachusetts health care reform law of 2006 and the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The authors’ prior neurosurgical research showed a decrease in uninsured surgeries without a significant change in surgical volume after the Massachusetts reform. An analysis of the payer-mix status and the age of spine surgery patients, before and after the policy, should provide insight into the future impact of the ACA on spine surgery in the US.METHODSUsing the Massachusetts State Inpatient Database and spine ICD-9-CM procedure codes, the authors obtained demographic information on patients undergoing spine surgery between 2001 and 2012. Payer-mix status was assigned as Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, uninsured, or other, which included government-funded programs and workers’ compensation. A comparison of the payer-mix status and patient age, both before and after the policy, was performed. The New York State data were used as a control.RESULTSThe authors analyzed 81,821 spine surgeries performed in Massachusetts and 248,757 in New York. After 2008, there was a decrease in uninsured and private insurance spine surgeries, with a subsequent increase in the Medicare and “other” categories for Massachusetts. Medicaid case numbers did not change. This correlated to an increase in surgeries performed in the age group of patients 65–84 years old, with a decrease in surgeries for those 18–44 years old. New York showed an increase in all insurance categories and all adult age groups.CONCLUSIONSAfter the Massachusetts reform, spine surgery decreased in private insurance and uninsured categories, with the majority of these surgeries transitioning to Medicare. Moreover, individuals who were younger than 65 years did not show an increase in spine surgeries, despite having greater access to health insurance. In a health care system that requires insurance, the decrease in private insurance is primarily due to an increasing elderly population. The Massachusetts model continues to show that this type of policy is not causing extreme shifts in the payer mix, and suggests that spine surgery will continue to thrive in the current US health care system.

Insurance type impacts the economic burden and survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-99
Author(s):  
Ankush Chandra ◽  
Jacob S. Young ◽  
Cecilia Dalle Ore ◽  
Fara Dayani ◽  
Darryl Lau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Burden ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Inpatient Hospital ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Insured Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Privately Insured

OBJECTIVEGlioblastoma (GBM) carries a high economic burden for patients and caregivers, much of which is associated with initial surgery. The authors investigated the impact of insurance status on the inpatient hospital costs of surgery for patients with GBM.METHODSThe authors conducted a retrospective review of patients with GBM (2010–2015) undergoing their first resection at the University of California, San Francisco, and corresponding inpatient hospital costs.RESULTSOf 227 patients with GBM (median age 62 years, 37.9% females), 31 (13.7%) had Medicaid, 94 (41.4%) had Medicare, and 102 (44.9%) had private insurance. Medicaid patients had 30% higher overall hospital costs for surgery compared to non-Medicaid patients ($50,285 vs $38,779, p = 0.01). Medicaid patients had higher intensive care unit (ICU; p < 0.01), operating room (p < 0.03), imaging (p < 0.001), room and board (p < 0001), and pharmacy (p < 0.02) costs versus non-Medicaid patients. Medicaid patients had significantly longer overall and ICU lengths of stay (6.9 and 2.6 days) versus Medicare (4.0 and 1.5 days) and privately insured patients (3.9 and 1.8 days, p < 0.01). Medicaid patients had similar comorbidity rates to Medicare patients (67.8% vs 68.1%), and both groups had higher comorbidity rates than privately insured patients (37.3%, p < 0.0001). Only 67.7% of Medicaid patients had primary care providers (PCPs) versus 91.5% of Medicare and 86.3% of privately insured patients (p = 0.009) at the time of presentation. Tumor diameter at diagnosis was largest for Medicaid (4.7 cm) versus Medicare (4.1 cm) and privately insured patients (4.2 cm, p = 0.03). Preoperative (70 vs 90, p = 0.02) and postoperative (80 vs 90, p = 0.03) Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores were lowest for Medicaid versus non-Medicaid patients, while in subgroup analysis, postoperative KPS score was lowest for Medicaid patients (80, vs 90 for Medicare and 90 for private insurance; p = 0.03). Medicaid patients had significantly shorter median overall survival (10.7 months vs 12.8 months for Medicare and 15.8 months for private insurance; p = 0.02). Quality-adjusted life year (QALY) scores were 0.66 and 1.05 for Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients, respectively (p = 0.036). The incremental cost per QALY was $29,963 lower for the non-Medicaid cohort.CONCLUSIONSPatients with GBMs and Medicaid have higher surgical costs, longer lengths of stay, poorer survival, and lower QALY scores. This study indicates that these patients lack PCPs, have more comorbidities, and present later in the disease course with larger tumors; these factors may drive the poorer postoperative function and greater consumption of hospital resources that were identified. Given limited resources and rising healthcare costs, factors such as access to PCPs, equitable adjuvant therapy, and early screening/diagnosis of disease need to be improved in order to improve prognosis and reduce hospital costs for patients with GBM.

Crisis in U.S. Health Care: Corporate Power Still Blocks Reform

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Geyman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Insurance Industry ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Public Support ◽  
Universal Coverage ◽  
The United States ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Current Crisis ◽  
The Government

The corporate, largely privatized market-based U.S. health care system is deteriorating in terms of increasing costs, decreasing access, unacceptable quality of care, inequities, and disparities. Reform efforts to establish universal insurance coverage have failed on six occasions over the last century, largely through opposition of corporate stakeholders in the medical-industrial complex. This article provides historical perspective to previous reform attempts, updates the current battle between Republicans and Democrats over repeal of the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA), and compares three financing alternatives—continuation of the ACA; its replacement by a Republican plan (the House’s American Health Care Act or its Senate counterpart, the Better Care Reconciliation Act); and single-payer national health insurance (NHI or Medicare for All). Markers are described that reveal the extent of the current crisis in U.S. health care. Evidence is presented that the private insurance industry, increasingly dependent on bailout by the government, is in a “death spiral.” NHI is gaining increasing public support as the only financing alternative to provide universal coverage. Nine lessons that are still unlearned in the United States concerning health care are discussed, together with future prospects to establish universal coverage in this embattled and changing political environment.

scholarly journals Problems of health insurance coverage and health care in the United States: public and private solution strategies

1992 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-286
Author(s):  
E. Richard Brown
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Health Care Financing ◽  
Health Insurance Coverage ◽  
The United States ◽  
Political Debate ◽  
Financing System

A nearly universal consensus has developed in the United States that the current health care financing system is a failure. The system has been unable to control the continuing rapid rise in health care costs (by far, the highest in the world), and it has been unable to stem the growing population that has no health insurance coverage (at least 36 million people). There is nearly universal political agreement that government must provide health insurance to a far greater share of the population than ever before. The political debate now focuses on whether this expanded government role should supplement the private insurance system with an enlarged public program covering those left out of private insurance coverage, or replace private insurance with a universal government health insurance program covering the entire population.

scholarly journals Medicaid Patients Have Greater Difficulty Scheduling Health Care Appointments Compared With Private Insurance Patients: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 004695801983811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter R. Hsiang ◽  
Adam Lukasiewicz ◽  
Mark Gentry ◽  
Chang-Yeon Kim ◽  
Michael P. Leslie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Physician Practices ◽  
Lower Likelihood ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Appointment Availability ◽  
Insured Patients ◽  
Privately Insured

Medicaid patients are known to have reduced access to care compared with privately insured patients; however, quantifying this disparity with large controlled studies remains a challenge. This meta-analysis evaluates the disparity in health services accessibility of appointments between Medicaid and privately insured patients through audit studies of health care appointments and schedules. Audit studies evaluating different types of outpatient physician practices were selected. Studies were categorized based on the characteristics of the simulated patient scenario. The relative risk of appointment availability was calculated for all different types of audit scenario characteristics. As a secondary analysis, appointment availability was compared pre- versus post-Medicaid expansion. Overall, 34 audit studies were identified, which demonstrated that Medicaid insurance is associated with a 1.6-fold lower likelihood in successfully scheduling a primary care appointment and a 3.3-fold lower likelihood in successfully scheduling a specialty appointment when compared with private insurance. In this first meta-analysis comparing appointment availability between Medicaid and privately insured patients, we demonstrate Medicaid patients have greater difficulty obtaining appointments compared with privately insured patients across a variety of medical scenarios.

Impact of insurance status on survival in neuroendocrine tumors: A multi-institutional Study from the U.S. Neuroendocrine Study Group.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 371-371
Author(s):  
Paula Marincola Smith ◽  
Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar ◽  
Mary Dillhoff ◽  
Eliza W Beal ◽  
George A. Poultsides ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
The United States ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Insured Patients ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The U.S

371 Background: Insurance status predicts access to medical care in the United States. Previous studies show uninsured and government insured patients have worse outcomes than those with private insurance. However, the impact of insurance status on survival in patients with Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors (GI-NETs) is unclear. We evaluate the association between insurance status and survival in patients with GI-NETs. Methods: Our analysis includes 2022 patients who had surgical resection of GI-NETs at 8 institutions in the U.S. Neuroendocrine Study Group. Patients were categorized based on insurance as private (PI), government (GovI) or uninsured (UI). Factors associated with insurance status were assessed by uni- and multi-variate analysis. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: Patient demographics between the insurance categories were similar in ECOG performance status and tumor size at presentation. GovI patients had a higher median age than PI or UI (66 vs. 54 vs. 56 years respectively; p<0.01). Uninsured patients were more likely African American (21.5%) or Latino (5%) compared to PI (11.5%, 2%) or GovI (15%, 2%) (p<0.01). The UI group had a higher proportion of patients who underwent no surveillance imaging post-operatively (39%) compared to PI (26%) and GovI patients (26%) but this was not statistically significant (p=0.15). There was no difference in operative intent (curative vs. palliative) between groups (p=0.2). Five-year overall survival was 86% for PI, 82% for GovI, and 73% for UI patients (p<0.01). On multivariate regression analysis, being uninsured was independently associated with reduced survival when controlling for ASA Class, ECOG, race, tumor location, neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, Somatostatin analog, or radiation therapy (HR 1.39, p = 0.012). Conclusions: This is the first systematic analysis of insurance status’s association with overall survival in GI-NET patients. Our analysis shows uninsured or government insured patients have shortened survival compared to the privately insured. The disparity is likely underrepresented in this study, as we examined only patients who underwent surgical resection.

scholarly journals Medicaid Health Insurance Status Limits Patient Accessibility to Rehabilitation Services Following ACL Reconstruction Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596711876335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda J. Rogers ◽  
Ian Penvose ◽  
Emily J. Curry ◽  
Anthony DeGiacomo ◽  
Xinning Li
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Metropolitan Area ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
The United States ◽  
The State ◽  
Median Income ◽  
Insurance Type ◽  
Insured Patients ◽  
Privately Insured

Background: In the senior author’s (X.L.) orthopaedic sports medicine clinic in the United States (US), patients appear to have difficulty finding physical therapy (PT) practices that accept Medicaid insurance for postoperative rehabilitation. Purpose: To determine access to PT services for privately insured patients versus those with Medicaid who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the largest metropolitan area in the state of Massachusetts, which underwent Medicaid expansion as part of the Affordable Care Act. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Locations offering PT services were identified through Google, Yelp, and Yellow Pages internet searches. Each practice was contacted and queried about health insurance type accepted (Medicaid [public] vs Blue Cross Blue Shield [private]) for postoperative ACL reconstruction rehabilitation. Additional data collection points included time to first appointment, reason for not accepting insurance, and ability to refer to a location accepting insurance type. Median income and percentage of households living in poverty were also noted through US Census data for the town in which the practice was located. Results: Of the 157 PT locations identified, contact was made with 139 to achieve a response rate of 88.5%. Overall, 96.4% of practices took private insurance, while 51.8% accepted Medicaid. Among those locations that did not accept Medicaid, only 29% were able to refer to a clinic that would accept it. “No contract” was the most common reason why Medicaid was not accepted (39.4%). Average time to first appointment was 5.8 days for privately insured patients versus 8.4 days for Medicaid patients ( P = .0001). There was no significant difference between clinic location (town median income or poverty level) and insurance type accepted. Conclusion: The study results reveal that 43% fewer PT clinics accept Medicaid as compared with private insurance for postoperative ACL reconstruction rehabilitation in a large metropolitan area. Furthermore, Medicaid patients must wait significantly longer for an initial appointment. Access to PT care is still limited despite the expansion of Medicaid insurance coverage to all patients in the state.

Insurance Status and the Use of Guideline Therapy in the Treatment of Selected Cancers

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (36) ◽  
pp. 9079-9088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda C. Harlan ◽  
Amanda L. Greene ◽  
Limin X. Clegg ◽  
Margaret Mooney ◽  
Jennifer L. Stevens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Black Patients ◽  
Rectal Cancers ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Insured Patients ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This study estimates the impact of type of insurance coverage on the receipt of guideline therapy in a population-based sample of cancer patients treated in the community. Patients and Methods Patients (n = 7,134) from the National Cancer Institute's Patterns of Care studies who were newly diagnosed with 11 different types of cancer were analyzed. The definition of guideline therapy was based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment recommendations. Insurance status was categorized as a mutually exclusive hierarchical variable (no insurance, any private insurance, any Medicaid, Medicare only, and all other). Multivariate analyses were used to examine the association between insurance and receipt of guideline therapy. Results Adjusting for clinical and nonclinical variables, insurance status was a modest, although statistically significant, determinant of receipt of guideline therapy, with 65% of the privately insured patients receiving recommended therapy compared with 60% of patients with Medicaid. Seventy percent of the uninsured patients received guideline therapy, which was nonsignificantly different compared with private insurance. When stratified by race, insurance was a statistically significant predictor of the receipt of guideline therapy only for non-Hispanic blacks. Conclusion Overall, levels of guideline treatment were lower than expected and particularly low for patients with Medicaid or Medicare only. The use of guideline therapy for ovarian and cervical cancer patients and for patients with rectal cancers was unrelated to type of insurance. Of particular concern is the significantly lower use of guideline therapy for non-Hispanic black patients with Medicaid. After adjusting for other factors, only half of these patients received guideline therapy.

scholarly journals Disparities in Emergent Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer Contribute to Inequalities in Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality in The US Health Care System

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Schlottmann ◽  
P. D. Strassle ◽  
A. L. Cairns ◽  
F. A. M. Herbella ◽  
A. Fichera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
The United States ◽  
Socioeconomic Disparities ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Surgery ◽  
The Us ◽  
Care System

Background and Aims: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer among both men and women in the United States. We aimed to determine racial and socioeconomic disparities in emergent colectomy rates for colorectal cancer in the US Health Care system. Material and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample including adult patients (⩾18 years) diagnosed with colorectal cancer, and who underwent colorectal resection while admitted between 2008 and 2015. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were used to assess the association between emergent admissions, compared to elective admissions, and postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 141,641 hospitalizations were included: 93,775 (66%) were elective admissions and 47,866 (34%) were emergent admissions. Black patients were more likely to undergo emergent colectomy, compared to white patients (42% vs 32%, p < 0.0001). Medicaid and Medicare patients were also more likely to have an emergent colectomy, compared to private insurance (47% and 36% vs 25%, respectively, p < 0.0001), as were patients with low household income, compared to highest (38% vs 31%, p < 0.0001). Emergent procedures were less likely to be laparoscopic (19% vs 38%, p < 0.0001). Patients undergoing emergent colectomy were significantly more likely to have postoperative venous thromboembolism, wound complications, infection, bleeding, cardiac failure, renal failure, respiratory failure, shock, and inpatient mortality. Conclusion: There are significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in emergent colectomy rates for colorectal cancer. Efforts to reduce this disparity in colorectal cancer surgery patients should be prioritized to improve outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document