Gul Ozyegin, New Desires, New Selves: Sex, Love and Piety among Turkish Youth,

Sexualities ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 736-737
Author(s):  
Tanfer Emin Tunc
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-502
Author(s):  
Aynur Yumurtaci ◽  
Bilal Bagis

AbstractThis paper aims to capture the favored both national and individual saving and investment perceptions of the Turkish youth. Also, the research contributes to the understanding of the common preferences of the youth and focuses on perceptions over their home country’s saving-investment decisions. We reason, it is important to evaluate views of the youth on national savings and investments as they will be both the decision-makers determining the economic and social policies of the near future and the ones that are directly impacted by these policies implemented today. For this purpose, a questionnaire is applied to randomly selected 550 university students in Turkey and the results are analyzed by the chi-square test. Accordingly, students have mostly preferred that investments should be primarily made to the education sector at national level while investment made for the social security system is placed on the last rank. In addition, education is the most important individual investment choice of participants. On the other hand, information technologies, energy, and agriculture are identified as the most significant investment areas, which could be potentially increased the global competitiveness of their home country. Another important outcome of this research is that students prefer to invest their individual savings in gold and real estate investments, respectively.


2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seydi Ahmet Satici ◽  
Recep Uysal ◽  
M. Fatih Yilmaz ◽  
M. Engin Deniz

Author(s):  
Murat KORKMAZ ◽  
Ali Serdar YÜCEL ◽  
Ercan ŞAHBUDAK ◽  
Hatice Nur GERMİR ◽  
Erdal ŞEN ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (S1) ◽  
pp. s36-s42 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Penka ◽  
H. Heimann ◽  
A. Heinz ◽  
M. Schouler-Ocak

AbstractIn Germany, the public system of addiction treatment is used less by migrants with addictive disorders than by their non-migrant counterparts. To date, the literature has focused primarily on language, sociocultural factors, and residence status when discussing access barriers to this part of the health care system. However, little attention has been paid to cultural differences in explanatory models of addictive behaviour. This is surprising when we consider the important role played by popular knowledge in a population's perceptions of and responses to illnesses, including their causes, symptoms, and treatment.In the present study, we examined explanatory models of addictive behaviour and of mental disorders in 124 native German und Russian-German youth and compared these models to those observed in an earlier study of 144 German and Turkish youth. We employed the free listing technique German and to compile the terms that participating subjects used to describe addictive behaviour. Subsequently, we examined how a subset of our study population assigned these terms to the respective disorders by means of the pile sort method.Although the explanatory models used by the German and Russian-German youth in our study were surprisingly similar, those employed by Turkish youth did not make any fundamental distinction between illegal and legal drugs (e.g. alcohol and nicotine). German and Russian-German youth regarded eating disorders as “embarrassing” or “disgraceful”, but Turkish youth did not. Unlike our German and Russian-German subjects, the Turkish youth did not classify eating disorders as being addictive in nature. Moreover, medical concepts crucial to a proper understanding of dependence disorders (e.g. the term “physical dependence”) were characterised by almost half of our Turkish subjects as useless in describing addictions.These findings show that it is impossible to translate medical or everyday concepts of disease and treatment properly into a different language without considering the connotations and implications of each term as it relates to the respective culture. Terms that are central to Western medical models of disease may otherwise be misunderstood, misinterpreted, or simply rejected.


2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bengü Börkan ◽  
Fatoş Erkman ◽  
Pınar Keskiner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document