Online wavelet least-squares support vector machine fuzzy predictive control for engine lambda regulation

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 866-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pak Kin Wong ◽  
Hang Cheong Wong ◽  
Chi Man Vong ◽  
Ka In Wong
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Predictive Control ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Fuzzy Predictive Control

scholarly journals Least Squares Support Vector Machine-Based Multivariate Generalized Predictive Control for Parabolic Distributed Parameter Systems with Control Constraints

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 453
Author(s):  
Ling Ai ◽  
Yang Xu ◽  
Liwei Deng ◽  
Kok Lay Teo
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Predictive Control ◽  
Control Strategy ◽  
Distributed Parameter Systems ◽  
Diffusion Reaction ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Distributed Parameter ◽  
Generalized Predictive Control ◽  
Parabolic Distributed Parameter Systems

This manuscript addresses a new multivariate generalized predictive control strategy using the least squares support vector machine for parabolic distributed parameter systems. First, a set of proper orthogonal decomposition-based spatial basis functions constructed from a carefully selected set of data is used in a Galerkin projection for the building of an approximate low-dimensional lumped parameter systems. Then, the temporal autoregressive exogenous model obtained by the least squares support vector machine is applied in the design of a multivariate generalized predictive control strategy. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed multivariate generalized predictive control strategy is verified through a numerical simulation study on a typical diffusion-reaction process in radical symmetry.

A New Control Method for Fermenter Temperature

2012 ◽  
Vol 236-237 ◽  
pp. 385-389
Author(s):  
Guang Hui Zeng ◽  
Yan Gan
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Predictive Control ◽  
Pid Control ◽  
Control Method ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Control Performance ◽  
Simulation Results ◽  
Controlled Object

A new control method based on least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) and model predictive control (MPC) is proposed for the control of fermenter temperature. Existing PID control doesn’t consider the model of controlled object, so it tends to bring steady-state error. The proposed method utilizes LSSVM to obtain fermenter temperature’s model and then uses it to implement MPC. The simulation results show that our method has better control performance than traditional PID control

Q-learning System Based on Cooperative Least Squares Support Vector Machine

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue-Song WANG ◽  
Xi-Lan TIAN ◽  
Yu-Hu CHENG ◽  
Jian-Qiang YI
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Learning System ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Q Learning

scholarly journals Predicting Ink Transfer Rate of 3D Additive Printing Using EGBO Optimized Least Squares Support Vector Machine Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Shengpu Li ◽  
Yize Sun
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Transfer Rate ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Experimental Sample ◽  
Machine Model ◽  
Ink Transfer

Ink transfer rate (ITR) is a reference index to measure the quality of 3D additive printing. In this study, an ink transfer rate prediction model is proposed by applying the least squares support vector machine (LSSVM). In addition, enhanced garden balsam optimization (EGBO) is used for selection and optimization of hyperparameters that are embedded in the LSSVM model. 102 sets of experimental sample data have been collected from the production line to train and test the hybrid prediction model. Experimental results show that the coefficient of determination (R2) for the introduced model is equal to 0.8476, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) is 6.6 × 10 (−3), and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) is 1.6502 × 10 (−3) for the ink transfer rate of 3D additive printing.

scholarly journals Regional Zenith Tropospheric Delay Modeling Based on Least Squares Support Vector Machine Using GNSS and ERA5 Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1004
Author(s):  
Song Li ◽  
Tianhe Xu ◽  
Nan Jiang ◽  
Honglei Yang ◽  
Shuaimin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Improvement Rate ◽  
Zenith Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Background Data ◽  
Mean Square Errors

The meteorological reanalysis data has been widely applied to derive zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) with a high spatial and temporal resolution. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, machine learning also begins as a high-efficiency tool to be employed in modeling and predicting ZTD. In this paper, we develop three new regional ZTD models based on the least squares support vector machine (LSSVM), using both the International GNSS Service (IGS)-ZTD products and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis 5 (ERA5) data over Europe throughout 2018. Among them, the ERA5 data is extended to ERA5S-ZTD and ERA5P-ZTD as the background data by the model method and integral method, respectively. Depending on different background data, three schemes are designed to construct ZTD models based on the LSSVM algorithm, including the without background data, with the ERA5S-ZTD, and with the ERA5P-ZTD. To investigate the advantage and feasibility of the proposed ZTD models, we evaluate the accuracy of two background data and three schemes by segmental comparison with the IGS-ZTD of 85 IGS stations in Europe. The results show that the overall average Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) value of all sites is 30.1 mm for the ERA5S-ZTD, and 10.7 mm for the ERA5P-ZTD. The overall average RMSE is 25.8 mm, 22.9 mm, and 9 mm for the three schemes, respectively. Moreover, the overall improvement rate is 19.1% and 1.6% for the ZTD model with ERA5S-ZTD and ERA5P-ZTD, respectively. In order to explore the reason of the lower improvement for the ZTD model with ERA5P-ZTD, the loop verification is performed by estimating the ZTD values of each available IGS station. In actuality, the monthly improvement rate of estimated ZTD is positive for most stations, and the biggest improvement rate can even reach about 40%. The negative rate mainly comes from specific stations, these stations are located on the edge of the region, near the coast, as well as the lower similarity between the individual verified station and training stations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document