Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair With Single/Double Chimney Technique for Aortic Arch Pathologies

Purpose: To summarize a single-center experience using the single/double chimney technique in association with thoracic endovascular aortic repairs (TEVAR) for aortic arch pathologies. Methods: From November 2007 to March 2016, 122 patients (mean age 50.4±12.7 years, range 29–80; 92 men) with aortic arch pathologies underwent TEVAR combined with single (n=101) or double (n=21) chimney grafts to reconstruct the supra-aortic branches: 21 innominate arteries, 114 left common carotid arteries, and 8 left subclavian arteries (LSA). Pathologies included type B aortic dissection (n=47), aortic arch dissection (n=49), retrograde type A aortic dissection (n=8), thoracic aortic aneurysm (n=7), penetrating aortic arch ulcer (n=9), and post-TEVAR type I endoleak (n=2). Follow-up examinations included computed tomography at 0.5, 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Results: The aortic stent-grafts were deployed in zone 0 (n=21), zone 1 (n=93), and zone 2 (n=8). One (0.8%) of the 122 patients died at 4 days due to a perforated peptic ulcer. Type Ia endoleaks were found intraoperatively in 13 (10.7%) patients, including 3 with the double chimney technique. Type II endoleaks occurred in 6 (4.9%) patients; 3 were treated with duct occluders in the LSA. Postoperative chimney graft migration occurred in 1 (0.8%) patient with double chimneys; additional stent-grafts were deployed in both chimneys. Median follow-up was 32.3 months, during which 1 (0.8%) patient died after a stroke at 3 months. Chimney stent-graft patency was observed in the remaining 120 patients. Two (1.7%) secondary TEVARs were performed for distal aortic dissection. Nine asymptomatic type Ia endoleaks and 1 type II endoleak persisted in follow-up; a type II endoleak in 1 patient with Marfan syndrome sealed in 52 months. Conclusion: TEVAR with the chimney technique provides a safe, minimally invasive alternative with good chimney graft patency and low postoperative mortality during midterm follow-up. The double chimney technique should be used judiciously owing to its potential complications.

Download Full-text

Homemade Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Complete Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Dissections

Journal of Endovascular Therapy ◽

10.1177/1526602819858578 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 26 (5) ◽

pp. 645-651 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Ludovic Canaud ◽

Baris Ata Ozdemir ◽

Lucien Chassin-Trubert ◽

Julien Sfeir ◽

Pierre Alric ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Aortic Arch ◽

Stent Graft ◽

Endovascular Repair ◽

Covered Stent ◽

Type I ◽

Type Ii ◽

Stent Grafts ◽

Fenestrated Stent Graft ◽

Type I Endoleak

Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for complete endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch dissections. Materials and Methods: From July 2014 through September 2018, 35 patients (mean age 66±11 years; 25 men) underwent homemade fenestrated stent-graft repair of acute (n=16) or chronic (n=10) complicated type B aortic dissections (n=16) and dissecting aortic arch aneurysms subsequent to surgical treatment of acute type A dissections (n=9). Nineteen (54%) procedures were emergent. Results: Zone 2 single-fenestrated stent-grafts were used in 25 cases; the remaining 10 were double-fenestrated stent-grafts deployed in zone 0. Median time for stent-graft modification was 18 minutes (range 16–20). Technical success was achieved in all cases. An immediate distal type I endoleak was treated intraoperatively. Among the double-fenestrated stent-graft cases, the left subclavian artery fenestration could not be cannulated in 2 patients and revascularization was required. Partial coverage of the left common carotid artery necessitated placement of a covered stent in 3 cases. One (3%) patient had a stroke without permanent sequelae. Two type II endoleaks required additional covered stent placement at 5 and 7 days postoperatively, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 6% (2 patients with ruptured aortic arch aneurysm). During a mean follow-up of 17.6±13 months, there was no aortic rupture or retrograde dissection. One late type I endoleak was treated with additional proximal fenestrated stent-graft placement. One type II endoleak is currently under observation. One additional patient died (unrelated to the aorta); overall mortality was 9%. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. Conclusion: The use of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for endovascular repair of aortic arch dissections is feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up.

Download Full-text

Collected Transatlantic Experience From the PERICLES Registry: Use of Chimney Grafts to Treat Post-EVAR Type Ia Endoleaks Shows Good Midterm Results

Journal of Endovascular Therapy ◽

10.1177/1526602818782941 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 25 (4) ◽

pp. 492-498 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Sonia Ronchey ◽

Stefano Fazzini ◽

Salvatore Scali ◽

Giovanni Torsello ◽

Paul Kubilis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽

Primary Patency ◽

Graft Occlusion ◽

Technical Success ◽

Stent Grafts ◽

Midterm Results ◽

Type Ia ◽

Aneurysm Repair ◽

Chimney Graft

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the performance of the chimney (ch) technique in the treatment of type Ia endoleaks after standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2014, 517 chEVAR procedures were performed in 13 US and European vascular centers (PERICLES registry). Thirty-nine patients (mean age 76.9±7.1 years; 33 men) were treated for persistent type Ia endoleak and had computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography follow-up at >1 month. Endurant abdominal stent-grafts were used in the 20 cases. Single chimney graft placement was performed in 18 (46%) patients and multiple in 21 (54%). Overall, 70 visceral vessels were targeted for revascularization. Results: Technical success was achieved in 35 (89.7%) cases; 3 persistent type Ia endoleaks and 1 chimney graft occlusion were detected within the first 30 days. Thirty-day mortality was 2.6%. Two other deaths (not aneurysm related) occurred during a mean follow-up of 21.9 months (0.23–71.3). Primary patency of the chimney grafts was 94.3% at 36 months. In a subgroup analysis comparing Endurant to other stent-grafts, no significant differences were observed regarding persistent endoleak [1/20 (5%) vs 2/19 (11%), p=0.6] or reintervention [1/20 (5%) vs 0/19 (0%)]. Conclusion: The present series demonstrates that chEVAR in the treatment of post-EVAR type Ia endoleaks has satisfactory results independent of the abdominal and chimney graft combinations. Midterm results show that chEVAR is an effective method for treating type Ia endoleaks.

Download Full-text

P5609Outcomes of chimney technique for aortic arch diseases: a single-center experience with 226 cases

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehz746.0553 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

H Y Ding ◽

Y Zhu ◽

S Y Luo ◽

E M Xie ◽

Y Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Carotid Artery ◽

Aortic Arch ◽

Common Carotid Artery ◽

Aortic Rupture ◽

Spinal Cord Ischemia ◽

Single Center ◽

Chimney Technique ◽

Single Center Experience ◽

Type Ia

Abstract Objective The aim of the present study is to report our single-center experience with chimney technique for aortic arch diseases and the early- and mid-term outcomes in these patients. Methods From August 2012 to October 2017, 226 patients (mean age 54±12 years; 197 men) with aortic arch diseases underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with chimney stents. Pathologies included type B aortic dissection (n=185), aortic arch aneurysm/descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (n=13), aortic arch pseudoaneurysm (n=10), penetrating aortic ulcer (n=7), intramural hematoma (n=7), and aortic rupture (n=4). Results The aortic stent-grafts were deployed in zone 0 (n=22), zone 1 (n=13), and zone 2 (n=191). A total of 230 chimney stents were deployed (innominate artery, n=21; right common carotid artery, n=1; left common carotid artery, n=13; left subclavian artery, n=195). The technical success rate was 84% (189/226) and immediate type Ia endoleak occurred in 37 (16%) patients. In the early-term, four patients died, of which from aortic rupture (n=1), ventricular fibrillation (n=1) or major stroke (n=2). Four major strokes occurred (two patients died and two recovered), but no reintervention was recorded. Spinal cord ischemia developed in three patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 22±16 months. Late type Ia endoleaks were recorded in two patients. Chimney stent occlusions were recorded in six patients. During follow-up, five patients died, of which from aortic rupture (n=3), cerebral hemorrhage (n=1) or rectal cancer (n=1). Two major strokes occurred (one patient died and one recovered) and reintervention performed in one case. Conclusion The chimney technique for aortic arch diseases is safe and feasible. And long-term follow-up observation is needed.

Download Full-text

Image-guided translumbar type II endoleak repair: A novel approach

American Journal of Interventional Radiology ◽

10.25259/ajir_6_2019 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 ◽

pp. 9

Author(s):

Salman Mirza ◽

Shahnawaz Ansari

Keyword(s):

Mesenteric Artery ◽

Inferior Mesenteric Artery ◽

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽

Type Ii ◽

Type Ii Endoleak ◽

Image Guided ◽

Novel Approach ◽

Abdominal Aortic ◽

Aneurysm Repair

We present a case of a 72-year-old male with an abdominal aortic aneurysm status post-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Follow-up imaging demonstrated an enlarging type II endoleak and attempts at transarterial coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery were unsuccessful. The patient underwent image-guided percutaneous translumbar type II endoleak repair using XperGuide (Philips, Andover, MA USA).

Download Full-text

Successful Type II Endoleak Closure by Subclavian-to-Carotid Artery Transposition After Stent-Graft Placement of a Distal Aortic Arch Aneurysm

The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon ◽

10.1055/s-2005-865630 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 53 (5) ◽

pp. 322-324 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

D. Zimpfer ◽

M. Schoder ◽

T. Fleck ◽

T. Holzenbein ◽

M. Cejna ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Carotid Artery ◽

Aortic Arch ◽

Stent Graft ◽

Aortic Arch Aneurysm ◽

Type Ii ◽

Type Ii Endoleak ◽

Graft Placement ◽

Distal Aortic Arch Aneurysm ◽

Arch Aneurysm

Download Full-text

Comparing polymer-filled versus self-expanding endografts in Chinese patients

Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals ◽

10.1177/0218492318810108 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 26 (9) ◽

pp. 667-676

Author(s):

Yuk Law ◽

Yiu Che Chan ◽

Stephen Wing-Keung Cheng

Keyword(s):

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽

Aortic Aneurysms ◽

The Self ◽

Chinese Patients ◽

Type Ii ◽

Mortality And Morbidity ◽

Type Ia ◽

One Year ◽

Aneurysm Repair

Introduction We performed a single-center nonrandomized study on patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair using polymer-filled or other self-expanding endografts. Methods Consecutive patients with asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms who underwent endovascular repair were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into a polymer-filled ( n = 20) or self-expanding group ( n = 42). Baseline characteristics, operative mortality and morbidity, and follow-up data were compared. Results Aneurysm diameter, neck and iliac morphologies did not differ between the two groups. Technical success was 100%. The 30-day mortality was 0% and 2.4% in the polymer-filled and self-expanding group, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 17 months, the changes in sac size were −2.1 mm and −5.1 mm ( p = 0.144) at one year, and −3.5 mm and −7.7 mm ( p = 0.287) at 2 years in the polymer-filled and self-expanding group, respectively. The polymer-filled group had 7 (35%) type II endoleaks, and the self-expanding group had 1 (2.4%) type Ia and 13 (31%) type II endoleaks. Neck diameter remained stable in the polymer-filled stent-grafts whereas there was progressive neck degeneration in the self-expanding group. The rates of reintervention and overall survival were similar in both groups. The presence of an endoleak was the only predictor of non-regression of the aneurysm (odds ratio = 17.00, 95% confidence interval: 4.46–64.88, p < 0.001). Conclusion Polymer-filled endografts had similar safety, effectiveness, and durability to other self-expanding endografts. The major advantage is the small iliofemoral access. They also have the potential long-term benefit of a more stable neck.

Download Full-text

Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) and Chimney EVAS in the Treatment of Failed Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs

Journal of Endovascular Therapy ◽

10.1177/1526602816675622 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 24 (1) ◽

pp. 115-120 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

Marwan Youssef ◽

Sebastian Zerwes ◽

Rudolf Jakob ◽

Oroa Salem ◽

Fritz Dünschede ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽

Multiple Organ ◽

Aortic Aneurysms ◽

Technical Success ◽

Graft Thrombosis ◽

Type Ia ◽

Aneurysm Repair ◽

Chimney Graft ◽

Bifurcated Graft

Purpose: To assess the technical success and clinical outcome of reinterventions using the Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System to treat complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: Fifteen consecutive patients (mean age 79 years; 14 men) with prior EVAR were treated with EVAS between March 2014 and December 2015 at 2 institutions. The failed prior EVARs included 13 bifurcated endografts, 1 bifurcated graft plus fenestrated cuff, and 1 tube endograft. Endoleaks were the predominant indications: type Ia in 10 and type III in 5 (3 type IIIa and 2 type IIIb). All patients presented with progressive aortic aneurysms (median 7.85-cm diameter; range 6.5–11). Eight patients were treated on an urgent or emergency basis (6 symptomatic aneurysms and 2 contained ruptures). All patients underwent Nellix relining of the failed stent-graft; 10 had chimney (Ch) procedures in combination with EVAS (chEVAS) because the proximal landing zones were inadequate. Results: Technical success was 100%. All endoleaks were successfully sealed, and no additional intervention was required. No further endoleak after EVAS or chEVAS was recorded. Endobag protrusion occurred in 1 case without sequelae. One elderly patient with ruptured aneurysm died from multiple organ failure 2 months postoperatively. One renal artery guidewire injury led to nephrectomy because of active bleeding. No reinterventions, aneurysm-related mortalities, graft thrombosis, endoleaks, or chimney graft occlusions were observed during a median follow-up of 8 months (range 3–24). Conclusion: The present preliminary experience demonstrates that the use of EVAS/chEVAS is feasible for treatment of failed EVAR. This technique may be used as bailout or an alternative treatment when other established methods are infeasible or not available.

Download Full-text

Chimney technique with endoanchors in treatment of late type 1a endoleak after endovascular aortic repair

SAGE Open Medical Case Reports ◽

10.1177/2050313x20953011 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

pp. 2050313X2095301

Author(s):

Emanuele Gatta ◽

Gabriele Pagliariccio ◽

Sara Schiavon ◽

Carlo Grilli Cicilioni ◽

Luciano Carbonari

Keyword(s):

Open Repair ◽

Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽

Late Type ◽

Stent Grafts ◽

Computed Tomographic ◽

Chimney Technique ◽

Aortic Repair ◽

Computed Tomographic Scan ◽

Type Ia ◽

Long Time

The late type Ia endoleak after endovascular aortic repair could be a challenging issue. Over the last years, in case of short or enlarged neck, fenestrated and branched stent grafts have been increasingly employed with improving results. However, these devices have limited use in urgent/emergent cases as custom graft manufacturing takes long time, and may not be fit in patients with particular anatomic features. In this setting, chimney and relining remain an alternative but sometimes may not be adequate. According to literature, the use of the endoanchors associated to chimney technique can improve the procedure results in primary endovascular aortic repair. We treated two patients with a late type Ia endoleak after endovascular aortic repair with a simultaneous relining, single renal chimney, and endoanchors implant. These patients were valuated unfit for open repair with neck configuration unadapt for a simple relining, ballooning, or stenting. The patient conditions were unfavorable for an endovascular repair with branched endovascular aortic repair–fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. The same procedure was performed in both patients. Postoperative angio-computed tomographic scan demonstrated the resolution of the endoleak with patency of renal graft. Our preliminary experience, in these selected cases, demonstrate the feasibility of the technique in late type Ia endoleak.

Download Full-text

Delayed Aortic Stent Collapse in Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury Repair

Aorta ◽

10.1055/s-0039-3401022 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 07 (05) ◽

pp. 129-136

Author(s):

Abdullah Alhaizaey ◽

Badr Aljabri ◽

Musaad Alghamdi ◽

Ali AlAhmari ◽

Ahmed Abulyazied ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Aortic Arch ◽

Age Groups ◽

Young Patients ◽

Aortic Injury ◽

Stent Grafts ◽

Mortality And Morbidity ◽

Technical Success Rate ◽

Stent Grafting ◽

Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury

Abstract Background Endovascular stent grafting has emerged as an option to treat traumatic aorta injuries with reported significantly low mortality and morbidity. Stent collapse is one of the complications that can occur in this type of treatment. The aim of this article is to analyze the expected cause of stent collapse and to draw attention to the importance of the surveillance follow-up, as this phenomenon may occur late postdeployment. Methods A retrospectively collected dataset from the two highest volume trauma centers in Saudi Arabia was analyzed between April 2007 and October 2012. A total of 66 patients received stent grafts for traumatic aortic injury and were included in the study. We apply Ishimaru's anatomical aortic arch zones and Benjamin's aortic injury grading systems. There were 35 patients with aortic injury at zone 2, 26 patients in zone 3, and 5 patients in zone 4. About 96% (63) of the injuries were grades 2 and 3, including large intimal flap or aortic wall pseudoaneurysm with change in wall contour. The technical success rate, as defined by complete exclusion of lesions without leaks, stroke, arm ischemia or stent-related complications, was 90%. Results Proximal stent collapse occurred in 4.5% of patients (3 of 66 inserted stents) during follow-up of 4 to 8 years (mean, 6 years). Patients with stent collapse tended to have an acute aortic arch angle with long-intraluminal stent lip, when compared with patients with noncollapsed stents. Intraluminal lip protrusion more than 10-mm increased collapse (p < 0.001). Stent-grafts sizes larger than 28 mm also demonstrated a higher collapse rate (p < 0.001). Conclusions The risk of stent collapse appears related to poor apposition of the stent due to severe aortic arch angulation in young patients and to large stent sizes (>28 mm). Such age groups may have more anatomical and aortic size changes during the growth. Clinical and radiological surveillance is essential in follow-up after stent-graft treatment for traumatic aortic injury.

Download Full-text