Efficacy of Maggot Debridement Therapy on Refractory Atypical Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Open-Label Study

Author(s):  
Mansour Siavash ◽  
Ali Najjarnezhad ◽  
Nader Mohseni ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Abtahi ◽  
Azadeh Karimy ◽  
...  

Atypical or refractory diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are still a major health problem. Maggot debridement therapy (MDT) by larva of Lucilia sericata is an ancient and a modern option for wound healing. It works by debridement, stimulation of wound healing, and disinfection. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MDT for healing atypical and refractory DFUs. Patients with atypical DFUs were selected and further evaluated for some predefined differential diagnoses like atypical fungal, parasitic, or bacterial infections, malignancy, trauma, and so on. Multiple MDT sessions were carried out. Ulcer size was measured before every MDT session. Complete wound healing, time to heal, and adverse effects were recorded as well. Forty-two DFU patients (26 men, 16 women) with 42 nonhealing atypical ulcers participated in this study. Complete wound healing was achieved in 35 patients (83.3%) by MDT. Complete debridement and then healing of the wounds happened in less than 1.79 ± 0.8 months. Four ulcers persisted, and 3 (7.1%) were eventually amputated. MDT may be considered as an effective treatment for atypical DFUs, which are unresponsive to conventional therapies.

Author(s):  
GF PEREIRA ◽  
M BALMITH ◽  
M NELL

Objective: A chronic wound fails to progress through the phases of wound healing in an orderly and appropriate process, and poses a major challenge to wound care professionals. Pressure ulcers (PUs) and diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are classified as chronic wounds. Antiseptics, such as povidone-iodine (PVP-I), are often used to treat bacterial infections in chronic wounds; however, their efficacy and ability to accelerate wound healing has come into question. As a result, current medical research is now focusing on alternative and natural antiseptic agents, such as honey, for the treatment of chronic wounds. The aim of this study was to analyze the wound healing effects of honey in PU and DFU treatment in comparison to standard antiseptic care. Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalKey was conducted to identify all published data of clinical trials and narrative reviews that investigated or reported the use of honey and standard antiseptics in the treatment of PUs and DFUs in adults. A keyword search was then performed using the following keywords: “PUs”, “DFUs”, “antiseptics”, “PVP-I”, “honey”, “Manuka honey (MH)”, and “wound healing”. Database restrictions were implemented based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, notably the report’s availability, completion status and language, the sample populations’ age, as well as, the date of publication. A preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes) diagram was constructed illustrating the study selection process. The eligibility of articles was assessed by the screening of titles, abstracts and full texts. A total of 12 articles were included in this study comprising of 775 patients with PUs, DFUs or a combination of PUs and DFUs. Results: Results indicated that honey reduced bacterial infection, reduced pain and edema experienced by patients, reduced the odor of the wound and promoted wound healing in the treatment of chronic ulcers. Honey was also found to be effective in the process of debridement and exudate removal. Conclusion: Honey was found to be highly effective in the treatment of PUs and DFUs and should be considered as an alternative to standard antiseptic care in the treatment of chronic wounds. However, the literature in this study is limited and so further research into honey and its antiseptic-promoting activity in wound healing is recommended.


2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1066-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janelle Yu ◽  
Suzanne Lu ◽  
Ann-Marie McLaren ◽  
Julie A. Perry ◽  
Karen M. Cross

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 1536
Author(s):  
Janelle Yu ◽  
Suzanne Lu ◽  
Ann-Marie McLaren ◽  
Elisa Greco ◽  
Karen Cross

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurens Manning ◽  
Emma J. Hamilton ◽  
Edward Raby ◽  
Paul E. Norman ◽  
Wendy Davis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background One Australian loses a limb every 3 h as a result of infected diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). This common condition accounts for substantial morbidity and mortality for affected individuals and heavy economic costs for the health sector and the community. There is an urgent need to test interventions that improve wound healing time, prevent amputations and recurrent ulceration in patients presenting with DFU whilst improving quality of life and reducing health care costs. Methods One hundred and fifty eligible participants will be randomised to receive an autologous skin cell suspension, also termed ‘spray-on’ skin (ReCell®) or standard care interventions for their DFU. The primary outcome is complete wound healing at 6 months, but participants will be followed up for a total of 12 months to enable secondary outcomes including total overall costs, ulcer free days at 12 months and quality of life to be assessed. Discussion Outpatient costs for dressings, home nursing visits and outpatient appointments are key cost drivers for DFU. If spray-on skin is effective, large cost savings to WA Health will be realised immediately through a shortened time to healing, and through a higher proportion of patients achieving complete healing. Shortened healing times may enable participants to return to work earlier. Any economic benefits are likely to be amplified across Australia and other similar demographic settings where aging populations with increased diabetes rates are considered major future challenges. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618000511235. Registered on 9 April 2018.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Louise Buhl Sørensen ◽  
Rasmus Bo Jansen ◽  
Therese Wilbek Fabricius ◽  
Bo Jørgensen ◽  
Ole Lander Svendsen

Aim. To describe differences in healing time of diabetic foot ulcers for patients treated at the Copenhagen Wound Healing Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, between the years 1999/2000 and 2011/2012. The Center is highly specialized and receives diabetes patients with hard-to-heal foot ulcers. A further aim is to attempt to find predictors of healing time of diabetic foot ulcers. Methods. A retrospective descriptive study of records from patients with diabetic foot ulcer treated at the Copenhagen Wound Healing Center in 1999, 2000, 2011, or 2012. Follow-up data was collected until the 3rd of August 2018. Results. Median time (range) to healing was 6 (61.3) months in 1999/2000 and 6.6 (67.8) in 2011/2012 (p=0.2). About 33% of ulcers were healed, 17% were minor or major amputated, and 1.5% were dead within one year in 1999/2000, whereas 30% of ulcers were healed (p=0.6), 14% were amputated (p=0.2), and 12.8% were dead within one year in 2011/2012 (p<0.001). The single factor found significantly associated with longer ulcer duration was infection. Related to shorter ulcer duration were toe localization of the ulcer and good glycemic control. Conclusion. The median time to healing of a diabetic foot ulcer was long, around 6 months and with a high recurrence rate in 1999/2000 as well as in 2011/2012. Some factors were found to be significantly related to healing time, and intervention addressing these may improve the time to heal, although such interpretations must be taken with precaution from the present study and should be proven in randomized prospective intervention trials.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e031896
Author(s):  
Fredirick Mashili ◽  
Agricola Joachim ◽  
Said Aboud ◽  
Mabulla Mchembe ◽  
Faraja Chiwanga ◽  
...  

BackgroundDiabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are associated with high morbidity and mortality in low-income countries. This coexists with an increasing prevalence of obesity which has been reported to alter antimicrobial susceptibility and potentially affect the outcome of infected foot ulcers. This study aims to determine whether adiposity and local microbial factors affect the progression and healing of foot ulcers in people with type 2 diabetes in hospital settings in Tanzania.Methods and analysisA prospective cohort of 300 individuals with type 2 diabetes presenting with DFUs at an outpatient clinic will be enrolled into the study. At baseline, participants will be stratified into normal and high adiposity groups (150 per group) as measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Both groups will receive DFU management according to locally appropriate standards of care and will be followed up for 24 weeks or until complete wound healing, whichever occurs first. The primary end point is complete wound healing at 24 weeks while secondary end points are ulcer progression (worsening or improving), amputation and death. Enrolling 150 participants per group will have a minimum power of 80% to detect a 20% difference in cumulative incidence of complete ulcer healing (at the 5% level of statistical significance) between the normal and high adiposity groups.Ethical considerations and dissemination of resultsThis study will be conducted in compliance with the independent institutional review boards (IRBs), informed consent guidelines, the declaration of Helsinki and International Conference on Harmonisation, Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ethical clearance has been granted by the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences ethical review board (MUHAS Ref. No. DA.282/298/01 .C/). Permissions to conduct the study have been granted by the Abbas Medical Centre and the Muhimbili Academic Medical Centre (MAMC).Progress and results emanating from this work will be communicated to the scientific community through conference presentations, short communications (using journal letters and interesting case reports) and peer-reviewed publications. When necessary, through proper channels, popular means of communication (newspapers, magazines and online communications) will be used to inform policy and the public.Trial registration numberNCT03960255; Pre-results.


Author(s):  
Marta García-Madrid ◽  
Irene Sanz-Corbalán ◽  
Aroa Tardáguila-García ◽  
Raúl J. Molines-Barroso ◽  
Mateo López-Moral ◽  
...  

Punch grafting is an alternative treatment to enhance wound healing which has been associated with promising clinical outcomes in various leg and foot wound types. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of punch grafting as a treatment for hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Six patients with chronic neuropathic or neuroischemic DFUs with more than 6 months of evolution not responding to conventional treatment were included in a prospective case series between May 2017 and December 2020. All patients were previously debrided using an ultrasound-assisted wound debridement and then, grafted with 4 to 6 mm punch from the donor site that was in all cases the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. All patients were followed up weekly until wound healing. Four (66.7%) DFUs were located in the heel, 1 (16.7%) in the dorsal aspect of the foot and 1 (16.7%) in the Achilles tendon. The median evolution time was 172 (interquartile range [IQR], 25th-75th; 44-276) weeks with a median area of 5.9 (IQR; 1.87-37.12) cm2 before grafting. Complete epithelization was achieved in 3 (50%) patients at 12 weeks follow-up period with a mean time of 5.67 ± 2.88 weeks. Two of the remaining patients achieved wound healing at 32 and 24 weeks, respectively, and 1 patient showed punch graft unsuccessful in adhering. The median time of wound healing of all patients included in the study was 9.00 (IQR; 4.00-28.00) weeks. The wound area reduction (WAR) at 4 weeks was 38.66% and WAR at 12 weeks was 88.56%. No adverse effects related to the ulcer were registered through the follow-up period. Autologous punch graft is an easy procedure that promotes healing, achieving wound closure in chronic DFUs representing an alternative of treatment for hard-to-heal DFUs in which conservative treatment has been unsuccessful.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document