Surgical Care of the Child: A New Challenge for the Operating Room Nurse

AORN Journal ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 37-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerelynn S. Bittner ◽  
Eleanor L. Freeman ◽  
James L. Talbert
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062110035
Author(s):  
Justin J. Turcotte ◽  
Jeffrey M. Gelfand ◽  
Christopher M. Jones ◽  
Rubie S. Jackson

Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant medication, supply and equipment, and provider shortages, limiting the resources available for provision of surgical care. In response to mandates restricting surgery to high-acuity procedures during this period, our institution developed a multidisciplinary Low-Resource Operating Room (LROR) Taskforce in April 2020. This study describes our institutional experience developing an LROR to maintain access to urgent surgical procedures during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. A delineation of available resources and resource replacement strategies was conducted, and a final institution-wide plan for operationalizing the LROR was formed. Specialty-specific subgroups then convened to determine best practices and opportunities for LROR utilization. Orthopedic surgery performed in the LROR using wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is presented as a use case. Results. Overall, 19 limited resources were identified, spanning across the domains of physical space, drugs, devices and equipment, and personnel. Based on the assessment, the decision to proceed with creation of an LROR was made. Sixteen urgent orthopedic surgeries were successfully performed using WALANT without conversion to general anesthesia. Conclusion. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a LROR was successfully designed and operationalized. The process for development of a LROR and recommended strategies for operating in a resource-constrained environment may serve as a model for other institutions and facilitate rapid implementation of this care model should the need arise in future pandemic or disaster situations.


Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Zarei ◽  
Sara Bagheri ◽  
Amin Sedigh ◽  
Mohammad Ghasembandi

Background & Aim: A wide range of clinical education of operating room students is done in the operating room. One of the problems in students' clinical education is the lack of appropriate learning tools in the operating room. The use of educational tools that improve students' performance affects students' self-efficacy in the operating room. So, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the surgical preference card as an educational aid tool on the self-efficacy of the operating room students. Methods & Materials: This quasi-experimental study was carried out on 64 operating room students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences at AL-Zahra Hospital in the year 2018. Participates were selected through convenience sampling and were divided into experimental (n=32) and control (n=32) groups. The students in the intervention group performed surgical care with using the surgical preference card. The data collection tool was a clinical self-efficacy questionnaire. Data were analyzed with SPSS-21 software using the independent-t, paired t-test, and chi-square test. Results: The findings of this study showed that there was no significant difference between the average self-efficacy score of the control group before and after the intervention (p>0.05). while the average self-efficacy score of the experimental group increased significantly after the intervention as compared with before the intervention (p <0.001). Conclusion: The surgical preference card as an educational aid tool improved the students' selfefficacy. Therefore, it is recommended to use this tool for the clinical education of other operating room students.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yejian Zhou ◽  
Huidong Zhang ◽  
Songyang Yu ◽  
Diana Patterson

BACKGROUND Background: It is necessary to develop a flexible and automated intelligent surgical anaesthesia management system since all major hospitals have a good network environment and provide basic hardware support for the operation of surgical anaesthesia information systems. OBJECTIVE Objectives: Based on the actual needs of surgical anaesthesia information system, this paper establishes a surgical anaesthesia information system based on BS three-layer architecture data structure, describes the system development environment, the use of technical methods, and the functions realized by the surgical anaesthesia information system. METHODS Methods: The system clarifies object-oriented (anaesthetist, operating room nurse and system administrator), access rights of different roles, three-layer BS structural features and other related points, and divides it into user management module and anaesthesia management module according to different system functions. And three parts of the surgical management module. RESULTS Results: Through the surgical anaesthesia information management system, the anaesthesiologist can complete the entire anaesthesia procedure including preoperative anaesthesia preparation, anaesthesia scheduling, intraoperative recording, and the like. The operating room nurse can conveniently arrange the operation, record the surgical care record, cost entry, surgical execution and postoperative registration. CONCLUSIONS Conclusion: The system realized the standardized management of the surgical anaesthesia process, improved the anaesthesia efficiency, realized the electronic storage of surgical anaesthesia information, shared the surgical anaesthesia information, and recorded and tracked the management of high plant consumables, which enhanced the hospital information construction. CLINICALTRIAL


BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Stöß ◽  
Marcella Steffani ◽  
Kay Kohlhaw ◽  
Claudia Rudroff ◽  
Ludger Staib ◽  
...  

Abstract Background During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, German health care centres were restructured for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. This was accompanied by the suspension of the surgical programme. The aim of the survey was to determine the effects of COVID-19 on surgical care in non-university hospitals in Germany. Methods This cross-sectional study was based on an anonymous online survey, which was accessible from April 24th to May 10th, 2020 for surgeons of the Konvent der leitenden Krankenhauschirurgen (Convention of leading Hospital Surgeons) in Germany. The analysis comprised of 22.8% (n = 148/649) completed surveys. Results Communication and cooperation with authorities, hospital administration and other departments were largely considered sufficient. In the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, 28.4% (n = 42/148) of the respondents complained about a short supply of protective equipment available for the hospital staff. 7.4% (n = 11/148) of the participants stated that emergency operations had to be postponed or rescheduled. A decreased quantity of emergency surgical procedures and a decreased number of surgical emergency patients treated in the emergency room was reported in 43.9% (n = 65/148) and 63.5% (n = 94/148), respectively. Consultation and treatment of oncological patients in the outpatient clinic was decreased in 54.1% (n = 80/148) of the surveyed hospitals. To increase the capacity for COVID-19 patients, a reduction of bed and operating room occupancy of 50.8 ± 19.3% and 54.2 ± 19.1% were reported, respectively. Therefore, 90.5% (n = 134/148) of all participants expected a loss of revenue of 28.2 ± 12.9% in 2020. Conclusion The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on surgical care in Germany. The reduction in the bed and the operating room capacity may have lead to considerable delays in urgent and semi-elective surgical interventions. In addition to the risk of worsening patient care, we anticipate severe financial damage to the clinics in 2020 and beyond. National and supranational planning is urgently needed to ensure the surgical care of patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renaldo C. Blocker ◽  
Ashley Eggman ◽  
Robert Zemple ◽  
Elise Wu Chi-Tao ◽  
Douglas A. Wiegmann

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Cristiny Teodoro Couto Ribeiro ◽  
Thatiane Marcélia Rodrigues ◽  
Sara Araújo Ferreira Teles ◽  
Rafaela Carvalho Pereira ◽  
Liliane de Lourdes Teixeira Silva ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To understand the perception of nursing staff about intraoperative distractions and interruptions. Methods: An exploratory qualitative study was performed with 16 nursing professionals of a surgical center in Minas Gerais. The data were collected through a semi-structured interview and thematic content analysis was performed. Results: When reflecting on the occurrence of distractions and interruptions of intraoperative activities, nursing professionals define, identify and value events in a heterogeneous way, but believe that distractions and interruptions negatively affect both the quality of the work environment and the safety of care provided to the surgical patient. Factors contributing to the occurrence of distractions and interruptions are related to aspects inside the operating room such as equipment failure and use of cell phones and to external factors such as verbal messages given at the operating room door. Incidents have been reported due to distractions, but there are no established actions to minimize these events. Conclusion: This study indicates the importance of implementing strategies that minimize the occurrence of distractions and interruptions of intraoperative activities in order to plan surgical care better, and prevent and mitigate harm to patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Marilyn Lynn ◽  
Douglas Bronson ◽  
William Gunnar

Purpose: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) provides surgical care and services through a network of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Surgical Programs. This study examined the impact of benchmarking on improvements in VHA surgery program operating room efficiency.Methods: The VA National Surgery Office (NSO) developed the operating room (OR) Efficiency Matrix with four common metrics that characterize OR processes. The OR Efficiency Matrix assigned a performance level to each VHA Surgery Program identified in the NSO Quarterly Report. The NSO Quarterly Report provided ongoing and regular feedback allowing VHA Surgery Programs to develop action plans and improve performance.Results: Beginning with the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Quarter (Q) 2 NSO Quarterly Report, the NSO has been reporting to VHA Surgery Programs on the OR Efficiency Matrix through several tables and figures in the NSO Quarterly Report. Overall, raw metric rates have improved nationally, with most improvements coming in the metrics of OR first time starts and surgical case cancellation.Conclusions: The NSO developed and implemented the OR Efficiency Matrix, representing four well recognized metrics, to assess, track, and report OR efficiency at 137 VHA Surgery Programs. This internal benchmarking process and data reporting was associated with sustainable improvements in OR efficiency over time.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s239-s240
Author(s):  
Matthew Magyar ◽  
Allyson Shephard ◽  
Pat Bedard ◽  
Ken Tang ◽  
Gyaandeo Maharajh ◽  
...  

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) following open heart surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) among pediatric patients are healthcare-associated infections associated with significant morbidity and mortality. At a pediatric acute-care facility, an increase in SSI incidence prompted an epidemiologic review. We describe the incidence of cardiac SSIs at our hospital; we identified risk factors and areas of practice variation to inform improvement initiatives. Methods: SSI cases following CPB at our hospital have been identified through routine surveillance using NHSN definitions since January 2016. An increase in cases was noted in mid-2018, prompting a common cause analysis with stakeholders across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care continuum. Areas of practice variability were identified, and an epidemiologic review was performed to determine risk factors among cases compared to noncases between January 2016 and August 2018. The rate of SSIs and 95% confidence intervals were estimated, and univariate logistic regressions were fitted to estimate unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) for the association between each of the predetermined preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors and developing an SSI. Results: Overall, 139 patients underwent surgery involving CPB between January 1, 2016, and August 31, 2018. Preoperative bathing was infrequently documented (9% among cases vs 5% among noncases; P = .56). Operating room observations identified frequent door openings and equipment crowding. Moreover, 11 patients (7.9%) developed a cardiac SSI, with 6 (14.3%) occurring in the first 8 months of 2018 (P = .067). There were no predominant pathogens; 3 of 11 cases were associated with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Also, 9 cases were classified as deep incisional or organ-space SSI. Each hour increase in total CPB duration was associated with a 63% increase in odds of developing an SSI (OR, 1.626; 95% CI, 1.041–2.539). Each additional day of intubation (OR, 2.400; 95% CI, 1.203–4.788) and peritoneal dialysis (OR, 1.767; 95% CI, 1.070–2.919) during the first 3 days postoperatively were also associated with increased SSI risk. Postoperative documentation of wound assessment occurred in 60% of patients, with no difference between cases and noncases (55% vs 67%; P = .42). Conclusions: Using a mixed-methods approach, preoperative bathing, increased operating room traffic, and postoperative care around wounds and invasive devices were identified as areas of improvement toward safer surgical care. Although no unique organism or process explained the increased rate, determining risk factors and areas of practice variability through stakeholder engagement provided insight into opportunities to prevent SSIs.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulus Mikael Torkki ◽  
Antti Ilmari Alho ◽  
Antti Veikko Peltokorpi ◽  
Markus Ilmari Torkki ◽  
Pentti Ensio Kallio

Objectives:Industrial management principles could be used to improve the quality and efficiency of health care. In this study, we have evaluated the effects of a process management approach to trauma patient care. The major objective was to reduce the waiting times and increase the efficiency of the hospital.Methods:Urgent surgery care was analyzed as an overall process. The process development followed the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and was based on statistical analysis of certain performance metrics. Data were collected from hospital databases and by personnel interviews. To develop the process, the anesthesia induction was performed outside the operating room, better process guidance was developed, and patient flow was reorganized. The transition time for these changes was 1 year (2002 to 2003).Results:Waiting times decreased by 20.5 percent (p<.05), nonoperative times in the operating room were reduced by 23.1 percent (p<.001), and efficiency was increased by 9.7 percent (p<.001) after reengineering of the care process. Overtime hours decreased by 30.9 percent.Conclusions:Managing urgent surgical care as a process can improve the productivity and quality of care without a need to increase personnel resources. The focus should be on reducing waiting times and waste times.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document