The Development of a Preference-Setting Model for the Return of Individual Genomic Research Results

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phoebe L. Bacon ◽  
Erin D. Harris ◽  
Sonja I. Ziniel ◽  
Sarah K. Savage ◽  
Elissa R. Weitzman ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 827-842
Author(s):  
Anya E.R. Prince ◽  
John M. Conley ◽  
Arlene M. Davis ◽  
Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz ◽  
R. Jean Cadigan

The growing practice of returning individual results to research participants has revealed a variety of interpretations of the multiple and sometimes conflicting duties that researchers may owe to participants. One particularly difficult question is the nature and extent of a researcher’s duty to facilitate a participant’s follow-up clinical care by placing research results in the participant’s medical record. The question is especially difficult in the context of genomic research. Some recent genomic research studies — enrolling patients as participants — boldly address the question with protocols dictating that researchers place research results directly into study participants’ existing medical records, without participant consent. Such privileging of researcher judgment over participant choice may be motivated by a desire to discharge a duty that researchers perceive themselves as owing to participants. However, the underlying ethical, professional, legal, and regulatory duties that would compel or justify this action have not been fully explored.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10066-10066
Author(s):  
Conrad Vincent Fernandez ◽  
Nada Jabado ◽  
Kym Boycott ◽  
David Malkin ◽  
Eric Bouffet ◽  
...  

10066 Background: The disclosure of clinically significant, validated incidental and target findings to participants in genomic research is often recommended. There have been no reports on whether attitudes of parents differ if these findings emerge from an acquired pediatric cancer versus an inherited genetic condition setting. Methods: Parents in 3 large-scale projects [Canadian Pediatric Cancer Genome Consortium (CPCGC), the Finding of Rare Genes Canada Consortium (FORGE) and the Orphan Diseases: identifying Genes and Novel Therapeutics to Enhance Treatment Project (IGNITE)] were surveyed using a mailed, validated 29-item questionnaire. Two reminders were sent. Analysis was by descriptive and Chi-square statistics. Results: Response rate: 64% (n=307/480). 40% were > 50 yrs age; more than half had a grade 12 education. 86 were parents of poor risk pediatric cancer patients and 221 were parents or individuals with rare inherited conditions. Most stated a very strong or strong right to genomic research results, irrespective if from the target condition (97%) or incidental (86%). 70% wish genetic counselling pre- and post-research testing; an additional 20% were uncertain what this entails. Almost all indicated that genomic research for childhood onset conditions should occur, regardless of whether therapy existed (99%) or not (91%). A few indicated that they would not want incidental results showing an untreatable fatal condition (17%). Most want results, even if these suggest susceptibility to multiple conditions (87%) or are of uncertain health impact (84%). Most felt a right to genomic research that showed a serious condition in siblings, whether treatable (94%) or not (89%). 74% strongly support that results discovered after death of the proband be shared with family. Conclusions: Parents of children in both cancer and inherited rare conditions genomic research do not differ in indicating a strong right and desire to receive research results, even if they are of uncertain impact, of childhood onset, or after death of the proband. Clear delineation of what will or will not be offered from genomic research should be established at the time of consent.


2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 280-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mildred K. Cho

Human genetic and genomic research can yield information that may be of clinical relevance to the individuals who participate as subjects of the research. However, no consensus exists as yet on the responsibilities of researchers to disclose individual research results to participants in human subjects research. “Genetic and genomic research” on humans varies widely, including association studies, examination of allele frequencies, and studies of natural selection, human migration, and genetic variation. For the purposes of this article, it is defined broadly to include analysis of DNA collected from humans that has implications for human health (even if the purpose of the study is not medical). This paper addresses both research results of individual research participants that may be an intended product of the research, as well as unanticipated, “incidental” findings.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 414-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid A. Holm ◽  
Brittany R. Iles ◽  
Sonja I. Ziniel ◽  
Phoebe L. Bacon ◽  
Sarah K. Savage ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Amanda M. Willis ◽  
Bronwyn Terrill ◽  
Angela Pearce ◽  
Alison McEwen ◽  
Mandy L. Ballinger ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document