scholarly journals Distal Radius Fractures: Does Obesity Affect Fracture Pattern, Treatment, and Functional Outcomes?

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Montague ◽  
Jesse T. Lewis ◽  
Obadah Moushmoush ◽  
Jaiyoung Ryu
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Complex Part ◽  
Point Increase ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are 16% of fractures treated by orthopedic surgeons. Obesity’s influence on DRF complexity has not been studied. This study was undertaken to determine if body mass index (BMI) affects DRF pattern, treatment, and functional outcomes. Methods: Part 1 was a retrospective review of patients who sustained a DRF after a fall from standing height with no prior reduction or treatment. Radiographs were classified as “simple” or “complex.” Part 2 consisted of contacting patients from Part 1 and obtaining a Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score. Retrospective review also identified patients who failed initial nonoperative treatment. Fracture pattern, failure of nonoperative treatment, and QuickDASH scores were compared with BMI at the time of injury. Results: For Part 1, 130 patients (132 wrists) were identified. Average age was 57 years, 77% were female, and average BMI was 28.2 kg/m2. Each point increase in BMI increased the chance of having a complex DRF (odds ratio = 1.07). Part 2 identified 50 patients who completed a QuickDASH at an average of 4.6 years after injury. Those with a BMI <25 kg/m2 (n = 15) had an average QuickDASH score of 37; patients with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (n = 35) had an average QuickDASH score of 18. Increasing BMI was suggestive of a lower QuickDASH score ( P = .08). No significant difference was found with respect to BMI and failure of nonoperative treatment. Conclusions: A higher BMI increases the odds of a complex DRF. Despite more complex fractures, overweight patients may experience less disability after sustaining a DRF.

scholarly journals Wrist function in malunion: Is the distal radius designed to retain function in the face of fracture?

2016 ◽  
Vol 98 (7) ◽  
pp. 442-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Uzoigwe ◽  
N Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Human Species ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
The Face ◽  
Preserve Function ◽  
Wrist Function

Introduction Fractures of the distal radius are the most common fracture in humans and are the sempiternal hazard of 3.5 million years of bipedalism. Despite the antiquity of the injury, one of the most controversial topics in current orthopaedics is the management of distal radius fractures. It has been suggested that radiographic appearances rarely correlate with functional outcomes. As the success of the human species is predicated almost exclusively on its dexterity and intelligence, it is conceivable that the distal radius has evolved to preserve function even in the face of injury. We therefore hypothesise that the distal radius is designed to accommodate the possibility of fracture. Methods We conducted a review of studies comparing fracture pattern and form with function. We also explore the paleoanthropological evidence and comparative studies with other primates. Findings The evidence points to the human distal radius being highly tolerant of post-fracture deformity in terms of preservation of function. In addition, the distal radius appears to have apparently anatomically ‘redundant’ features that confer this capability. We believe these phenomena to be an evolved trait that developed with bipedalism, increasing the chances of survival for a species whose success depends upon its dexterity.

scholarly journals Preexisting Carpal and Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Has No Impact on Function after Distal Radius Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 301-306
Author(s):  
Jonah Davies ◽  
Hugo Centomo ◽  
Stéphane Leduc ◽  
Pierre Beaumont ◽  
G.-Yves Laflamme ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Functional outcomes of distal radius fractures vary widely regardless of treatment methods. Purpose This study aims to verify whether preexisting carpal and carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) will negatively impact wrist functional outcome in patients with distal radius fractures. Patients and Methods A retrospective case–control study was done using a prospective trauma database. Patients were matched 1:1 in two groups based on the presence of wrist or carpal arthritis (OA). The groups were matched for sex, follow-up, and treatment type. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year and functional outcomes were assessed using validated scores. Results A total of 61 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years (range: 20–85) and average follow-up was 26 months. There were 31 patients in the OA+ group and 30 in the OA− group. Forty-one patients were treated surgically and 20 nonoperatively. None of the patients in the OA− developed OA during follow-up. Both groups were comparable for sex, residual deformity, and follow-up. There was no significant difference for the visual analog scale, Short Form-12, Quick Disability Arm Shoulder Hand, and Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation, or for radiographic outcomes. Conclusion Preexisting OA in the wrist or CMC does not seem to impact outcomes of distal radius fractures, regardless of treatment, age, or sex. Although this is a negative study, the results are important to help counsel patients with distal radius fractures. Further work must be done to identify other potential causes for negative outcomes. Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study.

Predictors of Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged >65 Years

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110172
Author(s):  
Amanda Walsh ◽  
Nelson Merchan ◽  
David N. Bernstein ◽  
Bailey Ingalls ◽  
Carl M. Harper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Total N ◽  
Fracture Characteristics ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Comorbidity Index

Background Treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in patients aged >65 years is controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify what patient and fracture characteristics may influence the decision to pursue surgical versus nonsurgical treatment in patients aged >65 years sustaining a DRF. Methods We queried our institutional DRF database for patients aged >65 years who presented to a single academic, tertiary center hand clinic over a 5-year period. In all, 164 patients treated operatively were identified, and 162 patients treated nonoperatively during the same time period were selected for comparison (total N = 326). Demographic variables and fracture-specific variables were recorded. Patient and fracture characteristics between the groups were compared to determine which variables were associated with each treatment modality (operative or nonoperative). Results The average age in our cohort was 72 (SD: 11) years, and 274 patients (67%) were women. The average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 4.1 (SD: 2.1). The CCI is a validated tool that predicts 1-year mortality based on patient age and a list of 22 weighted comorbidities. Factors associated with operative treatment in our population were largely related to the severity of the injury and included increasing dorsal tilt (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.12; P < .001) and AO Classification type C fractures (OR, 5.42; 95% CI, 2.35-11.61; P < .001). Increasing CCI was the only factor independently associated with nonoperative management (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.997; P = .046). Conclusion Fracture severity is a strong driver in the decision to pursue operative management in patients aged >65 years, whereas increasing CCI predicts nonoperative treatment.

Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Women Older than 80 Years: A Preliminary Report of Functional and Radiographic Outcomes after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili E. Schindelar ◽  
Richard M. McEntee ◽  
Robert E. Gallivan ◽  
Brian Katt ◽  
Pedro K. Beredjiklian
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Hardware Failures

Abstract Background Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures seen in the elderly. The management of distal radius fractures in the elderly, especially patients older than 80 years, has not been well defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate operative treatment of distal radius fractures in patients older than 80 years to determine functional outcomes and complication rates. Materials and Methods A retrospective review was performed to identify patients 80 years or older who were treated for a distal radius fracture with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Medical records were reviewed for demographics, medical history, functional outcomes including quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH), radiographs, and postoperative complications. Results There were 40 patients included for review. Average age was 84 years. The preoperative qDASH score was 69. At 6 months follow-up, the postoperative qDASH score was 13 (p < 0.001). There were five (12.5%) complications reported postoperatively. All fractures healed with adequate radiographic alignment and there were no hardware failures. Conclusion Distal radius fractures in patients older than 80 years treated with ORIF have good functional outcomes and low complication rates. Increased functionality and independence of the elderly, as well as updated implant design can lead to the effective surgical management of these patients. When indicated from a clinical perspective, operative fixation of distal radius fractures should be considered in patients older than 80 years.

Functional Outcomes of Percutaneous K-Wire Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures with or without Osteoporosis

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 248
Author(s):  
Ki-Chan An ◽  
Gyu-Min Kong ◽  
Jang-Seok Choi ◽  
Hi-Chul Gwak ◽  
Joo-Yong Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Wire Fixation

scholarly journals Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 1027-1034
Author(s):  
Sondre Hassellund ◽  
Zinajda Zolic-Karlsson ◽  
John Håkon Williksen ◽  
Torstein Husby ◽  
Jan Erik Madsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Life Years

Aims The purpose was to compare operative treatment with a volar plate and nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and over in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods A cost-utility analysis was performed alongside a randomized controlled trial. A total of 50 patients were randomized to each group. We prospectively collected data on resource use during the first year post-fracture, and estimated costs of initial treatment, further operations, physiotherapy, home nursing, and production loss. Health-related quality of life was based on the Euro-QoL five-dimension, five-level (EQ-5D-5L) utility index, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated. Results The mean QALYs were 0.05 higher in the operative group during the first 12 months (p = 0.260). The healthcare provider costs were €1,533 higher per patient in the operative group: €3,589 in the operative group and 2,056 in the nonoperative group. With a suggested willingness to pay of €27,500 per QALY there was a 45% chance for operative treatment to be cost-effective. For both groups, the main costs were related to the primary treatment. The primary surgery was the main driver of the difference between the groups. The costs related to loss of production were high in both groups, despite high rates of retirement. Retirement rate was unevenly distributed between the groups and was not included in the analysis. Conclusion Surgical treatment was not cost-effective in patients aged 65 years and older compared to nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in a healthcare perspective. Costs related to loss of production might change this in the future if the retirement age increases. Level of evidence: II Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1027–1034.

Distal radius fractures – A volar plate is not just a volar plate

Trauma ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-207
Author(s):  
Richard Knight ◽  
Lucy Elliott ◽  
Mark Brewster ◽  
Michelle Spiteri ◽  
Dominic Power
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Potential Cost ◽  
Plate Design ◽  
Column Variable

Introduction Increasingly complex distal radius plate designs are available for treating distal radius fractures. As a result, many fractures are being ‘over-treated’ with more complex volar plate designs than necessary. We hypothesise that significant cost savings could be made by rationalising the use of complex locking plate designs. Methods Over a two-year period, radiographs of 250 consecutive distal radius fractures fixed with volar locking plates were reviewed and the type of plate, and type and number of screws used for fixation were noted. Preoperative radiographs were independently reviewed to ascertain if it would have been possible to stabilise the fracture with a simpler, extra-articular plate design. Potential cost savings were then calculated. Results It was deemed that 89 (36.5%) of the 250 cases originally treated with a more complex 2 column variable angle plate could have been treated with an extra-articular construct, leading to potential savings of £19,224. Conclusion It is clear from our data that many distal radius fracture patterns are being ‘over-treated’ with complex locking plate designs with multiple rows of screws and that substantial cost savings could be made by selecting an appropriate construct to suit the fracture pattern.

Clinical Outcomes in Distal Radius Fractures Accompanied by Volar Lunate Facet Fragments: A Comparison between Dorsal and Volar Displaced Fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 417-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Obata ◽  
Kiyohito Naito ◽  
Ayaka Kaneko ◽  
Keniji Goto ◽  
Yoichi Sugiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Fragment Size ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Bone Fragment ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The treatment strategy for distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment is controversial. In most cases, only the bone fragment size was discussed and a plate for distal placement is selected due to the accompanying volar lunate facet fragment regardless of the direction of bone fragment displacement. In this study, we divided distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment into dorsal and volar displaced fractures, and treated these surgically based on different treatment strategies. Methods: The subjects were 25 patients with distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment treated by reduction and fixation using a volar locking plate (VLP) (male: 14, female: 11, mean age: 57.8 years old). A proximal VLP (PVLP) was selected for 13 dorsal displaced fractures and a distal VLP (DVLP) was selected for 12 volar displaced fractures. The range of motion, VAS, Q-DASH, and Mayo score were evaluated at 12 months after surgery, and compared. Results: No significant difference due to the difference in the direction of displacement was noted in the range of motion, VAS, Q-DASH, or Mayo score at 12 months after surgery and there were no perioperative complications. In addition, no re-displacement of volar lunate facet fragment was noted after surgery in any patient and bone fusion was observed. Conclusions: Reduction and fixation with a PVLP are possible even for dorsal displaced distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment. For the volar displaced distal radius fractures, a favorable postoperative outcome is possible by applying a DVLP to the distal ulnar.

scholarly journals Hematoma block for distal radius fractures – prospective, randomized comparison of two different volumes of lidocaine

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 4535-4538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagay Orbach ◽  
Nimrod Rozen ◽  
Barak Rinat ◽  
Guy Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Fracture Site ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Group B

Objective This study aimed to compare analgesic efficacy and safety of different volumes of lidocaine injected into a fracture hematoma (hematoma block [HB]) for reducing distal radius fractures. Methods Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A included patients in whom 10 mL of 2% lidocaine was injected into the fracture site and group B included patients in whom 20 mL of 1% lidocaine was injected. The fracture was manipulated after 15 minutes and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was recorded during manipulation. Patients were followed up for approximately 1 hour and complications were recorded. Results Twenty patients were enrolled in the study (12 women and eight men), with a mean age of 57 years (range, 32–87 years). Demographic findings were similar between the groups. The mean VAS score of group A was 5.50 ± 3.57 and that in group B was 3.09 ± 2.33, with no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion VAS scores between HB with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine and HB with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine are not significantly different. However, our study suggests that HB with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine has a better analgesic effect than HB with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document