Clinical Outcomes in Distal Radius Fractures Accompanied by Volar Lunate Facet Fragments: A Comparison between Dorsal and Volar Displaced Fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 417-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Obata ◽  
Kiyohito Naito ◽  
Ayaka Kaneko ◽  
Keniji Goto ◽  
Yoichi Sugiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Fragment Size ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Bone Fragment ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The treatment strategy for distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment is controversial. In most cases, only the bone fragment size was discussed and a plate for distal placement is selected due to the accompanying volar lunate facet fragment regardless of the direction of bone fragment displacement. In this study, we divided distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment into dorsal and volar displaced fractures, and treated these surgically based on different treatment strategies. Methods: The subjects were 25 patients with distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment treated by reduction and fixation using a volar locking plate (VLP) (male: 14, female: 11, mean age: 57.8 years old). A proximal VLP (PVLP) was selected for 13 dorsal displaced fractures and a distal VLP (DVLP) was selected for 12 volar displaced fractures. The range of motion, VAS, Q-DASH, and Mayo score were evaluated at 12 months after surgery, and compared. Results: No significant difference due to the difference in the direction of displacement was noted in the range of motion, VAS, Q-DASH, or Mayo score at 12 months after surgery and there were no perioperative complications. In addition, no re-displacement of volar lunate facet fragment was noted after surgery in any patient and bone fusion was observed. Conclusions: Reduction and fixation with a PVLP are possible even for dorsal displaced distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment. For the volar displaced distal radius fractures, a favorable postoperative outcome is possible by applying a DVLP to the distal ulnar.

Mid-Term Functional Outcome after Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 238-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruhiko Shimura ◽  
Akimoto Nimura ◽  
Koji Fujita ◽  
Takashi Miyamoto
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Locking Plate ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The volar locking plate is frequently used in the fixation of unstable distal radius fractures, but despite this there is a paucity of mid to long term outcome studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term functional outcomes of elderly patients treated with a volar locking plate for unstable distal radius fractures. Methods: Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 74.1 (range, 65–85) years were followed for a mean of 39.1 (range, 30–81) months. Patients with follow-up periods of < 24 months were excluded from this study to investigate the mid-term clinical outcomes. The Mayo wrist score (MWS), grip strength and wrist range of motion were retrospectively reviewed at 12 months, 24 months and the latest follow-up (mean 39.1 months). Osteoarthritis status according to the system of Knirk and Jupiter was assessed at 24 months. Results: Significant improvements in MWS and grip strength were observed between 12 and 24 months but not between 24 months and the final follow-up. There was no significant difference in wrist range of motion between 12 and 24 months. The MWS of 14 patients with radiographic signs of osteoarthritis was not significantly different from that of 18 patients without radiographic signs of osteoarthritis. Conclusions: Elderly patients treated with the volar locking plate showed improved MWS and grip strength postoperatively after 12 months. Improvement in grip strength was slower than range of motion.

scholarly journals Immobilization following Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 07 (05) ◽  
pp. 409-414
Author(s):  
J. Hill ◽  
Gabriel Bouz ◽  
Ali Azad ◽  
William Pannell ◽  
R. Alluri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate Fixation

Background No consensus exists regarding postoperative splinting position following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine whether immobilization in supination would result in superior outcomes compared with no restriction of forearm range of motion. Patients and Methods All patients >18 years of age with distal radius fractures indicated for volar plate fixation were eligible. Exclusion criteria were open fracture and concomitant injury to, or functional deficit of, either upper extremity. Patients were randomized to immobilization in (1) maximal supination with a sugar-tong splint or (2) no restriction of supination with a volar splint. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score; wrist range of motion; and grip strength were recorded at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. A Student's t-test was used to compare mean values of all outcome measures at each time point. Results A total of 46 patients enrolled in the study; 28 were immobilized with a volar splint and 18 were immobilized with a sugar-tong splint. Six-week follow-up data were obtained for 32 patients. There was no significant difference in PRWE, DASH, and VAS scores; or range of motion; or grip strength between the two groups postoperatively. Conclusion Range of motion, grip strength, and patient-rated outcome measures were similar regardless of postoperative immobilization technique in patients with a distal radius fractures stabilized with a volar plate. Surgeons can elect to use the standard-of-care postoperative immobilization modality of their preference following volar plate fixation without compromising short-term return to function. Level of Evidence This is a Level II, therapeutic study.

scholarly journals Hematoma block for distal radius fractures – prospective, randomized comparison of two different volumes of lidocaine

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 4535-4538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagay Orbach ◽  
Nimrod Rozen ◽  
Barak Rinat ◽  
Guy Rubin
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Fracture Site ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Group B

Objective This study aimed to compare analgesic efficacy and safety of different volumes of lidocaine injected into a fracture hematoma (hematoma block [HB]) for reducing distal radius fractures. Methods Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A included patients in whom 10 mL of 2% lidocaine was injected into the fracture site and group B included patients in whom 20 mL of 1% lidocaine was injected. The fracture was manipulated after 15 minutes and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was recorded during manipulation. Patients were followed up for approximately 1 hour and complications were recorded. Results Twenty patients were enrolled in the study (12 women and eight men), with a mean age of 57 years (range, 32–87 years). Demographic findings were similar between the groups. The mean VAS score of group A was 5.50 ± 3.57 and that in group B was 3.09 ± 2.33, with no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion VAS scores between HB with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine and HB with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine are not significantly different. However, our study suggests that HB with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine has a better analgesic effect than HB with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine.

scholarly journals 1224 Effect of Distal Brachioradialis Release During Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Hafez ◽  
A Shaat ◽  
M Zain ◽  
M A Sajid ◽  
A Butt
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Approach ◽  
Normal Ranges ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aim The study aim is to determine the impact of the brachioradialis release during the open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures using a volar approach Method Total of 40 patients was treated with Open reduction and internal fixation of intra articular distal radius fractures. Distal release of Brachioradialis was performed to 19 patients, while 21 patients had no release of BR during surgery. Radiological parameters including Radial height, Inclination and volar tilt were measured 1 month post-operatively, while functional outcomes assessed with modified mayo wrist scores and Quick-dash scores Results There is no significant difference between age, gender and pre-operative conditions indicating that both the groups (BR release and without BR release) have similar demographic characteristics. Pre-operatively both groups had disturbed values for radial height, inclination, and volar tilt. Postoperatively, the mean of both groups was closer to normal ranges for radial inclination and volar tilt; however, radial height was the least adequately restored radiological parameter for both study group (11.54 ± 1.35 for BR group versus 10.21 ± 2.29 for Non-BR group). Pain, functional status, and grip strength had similar values in both groups whereas BR group showed higher ROM and DASH scores with P values of 0.048 and 0.025 respectively. Conclusions Brachioradialis release enhances the reduction and operative fixation, restoring the necessary radiological and subsequent functional parameters in distal radius fractures with reported no complications.

scholarly journals Local injection of leukocyte rich platelet rich plasma produced higher radius union scoring system than local injection of pure platelet rich plasma in conservative therapy of intra-articular closed distal radius fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1878
Author(s):  
I. Made Sunaria ◽  
I Wayan Suryanto Dusak ◽  
I. Gede Eka Wiratnaya
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Conservative Therapy ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Local Injection ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Distal radius fracture often occurs both extra-articular and intra-articular, covering all ages. The use of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) consisting of leucocytes rich-PRP (L-PRP) and pure-PRP (P-PRP) thought can help in bone healing process. This study aimed to determine that the administration of L-PRP provides a better healing rate than P-PRP in intra-articular closed distal radius fractures after conservative treatment.Methods: This was a single-blinded experimental study with stratified randomized post-test only group design involving 51 patients with closed distal fractures undergoing closed reduction, consisting of 17 patients per study group. Group 1 received placebo, group 2 received P-PRP, and group 3 with L-PRP. Each group was then re-evaluated using x-ray at week 2, 3, and 6. RUSS score was then measured. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics and normality test, homogeneity test and inferential test were performed to determine the effect of L-PRP, P-PRP on the union rate of fracture distal radius. All obtained data was analysed using SPSS statistics 22 software.Results: Between control and P-PRP group, there was significant difference in mean RUSS with p value of 0.012. Between control and L-PRP injection group, there was a significant difference in mean RUSS with p value of 0.000. Between P-PRP and L-PRP group, there was also significant mean RUSS difference with p value of 0.003.Conclusions: There was a significant difference between the control group given placebo and the group P-PRP and L-PRP in closed fractures of the intraarticular radius after conservative therapy.

Immediate mobilization of distal radius fractures stabilized by volar locking plate results in a better short-term outcome than a five week immobilization: A prospective randomized trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921552110366
Author(s):  
Stefan Quadlbauer ◽  
Christoph Pezzei ◽  
Josef Jurkowitsch ◽  
Brigitta Kolmayr ◽  
Daniel Simon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Cast Immobilization ◽  
One Year ◽  
Immediate Mobilization

Objective: To evaluate the impact of immediate (first day after surgery) mobilization compared to standard five weeks cast immobilization on the functional outcome after volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Design: Prospective randomized parallel group comparative trial. Setting: Trauma Hospital, Austria. Participants: Patients with isolated unstable distal radius fractures, stabilized with volar angular stable locking plate. Interventions: The immediate mobilization group received a removable forearm splint for one week and active supervised group physiotherapy and home exercises for the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and fingers from the first postoperative day. The cast immobilization group received a non-removable cast for five weeks. In the first five weeks supervised group physiotherapy and home exercises were performed for shoulder, elbow, and fingers. Thereafter additional supervised and home exercises for the wrist were started. Main measures: At regular intervals of six and nine weeks, three and six months, and one year post surgery range of motion, grip strength, and x-rays were evaluated. Additionally, the shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand ( QuickDASH) score, Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation, Mayo Wrist score, and pain according to the Visual Analog Scale score were analyzed. Results: One hundred and sixteen patients were prospectively randomized into two study groups. At the one-year follow-up, patients in the immediate mobilization group showed a significantly higher range of motion in extension/flexion (mean difference 10.2°, 99% confidence interval 0.6–19.8), grip strength (mean difference 5.1 kg, 99% confidence interval −0.5 to 10.7), and Mayo Wrist score (mean difference 7.9 points, 99% confidence interval 2.3–13.5) than the cast immobilization group. Range of motion in supination/pronation (mean difference 13.4°, 99% confidence interval 1.5–25.3) and in radial/ulnar deviation (mean difference 6.3°, 99% confidence interval 0.9–11.7) differed significantly up to nine weeks favoring the immediate mobilization group. The Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation revealed significantly better scores after three months (mean difference 9.3 points, 99% confidence interval 0.5–18.1) and QuickDASH after six months (mean difference 7.3 points, 99% confidence interval 0.3–14.3) in the immediate mobilization group. All other subsequent follow-up examinations indicated no significant differences in respect of pain, range of motion, and patient-reported outcome measurements between the study groups. There were no significant differences in respect of radiological loss of reduction and complications between the groups. Conclusions: Immediate mobilization in combination with supervised physiotherapy of the wrist after volar locking plate fixation of unstable distal radius fractures results in a significantly improved range of motion and grip strength after one year compared to cast immobilization. No increased risk for loss of reduction and other complications was observed.

scholarly journals Preexisting Carpal and Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis Has No Impact on Function after Distal Radius Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 301-306
Author(s):  
Jonah Davies ◽  
Hugo Centomo ◽  
Stéphane Leduc ◽  
Pierre Beaumont ◽  
G.-Yves Laflamme ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Functional outcomes of distal radius fractures vary widely regardless of treatment methods. Purpose This study aims to verify whether preexisting carpal and carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) will negatively impact wrist functional outcome in patients with distal radius fractures. Patients and Methods A retrospective case–control study was done using a prospective trauma database. Patients were matched 1:1 in two groups based on the presence of wrist or carpal arthritis (OA). The groups were matched for sex, follow-up, and treatment type. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year and functional outcomes were assessed using validated scores. Results A total of 61 patients were included. Mean age was 63 years (range: 20–85) and average follow-up was 26 months. There were 31 patients in the OA+ group and 30 in the OA− group. Forty-one patients were treated surgically and 20 nonoperatively. None of the patients in the OA− developed OA during follow-up. Both groups were comparable for sex, residual deformity, and follow-up. There was no significant difference for the visual analog scale, Short Form-12, Quick Disability Arm Shoulder Hand, and Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation, or for radiographic outcomes. Conclusion Preexisting OA in the wrist or CMC does not seem to impact outcomes of distal radius fractures, regardless of treatment, age, or sex. Although this is a negative study, the results are important to help counsel patients with distal radius fractures. Further work must be done to identify other potential causes for negative outcomes. Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study.

Three-dimensional deformity analysis of malunited distal radius fractures and their influence on wrist and forearm motion

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 506-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Miyake ◽  
T. Murase ◽  
Y. Yamanaka ◽  
H. Moritomo ◽  
K. Sugamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Computer Models ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Ct Data ◽  
Flexion And Extension

Little information exists about three-dimensional (3-D) deformity patterns of malunited distal radius fractures including axial deformity. The current study aimed to clarify the 3-D deformity pattern of malunited distal radius fractures and reveal the influence of osseous deformities, including axial rotation deformity, on wrist and forearm motion. The deformity of 20 dorsally tilted malunions were evaluated using 3-D computer models created from CT data, and correlations between deformity components and range of motion were assessed. The 3-D deformity analysis showed that axial malalignment in pronation, which showed a correlation with the degree of radial tilt deformity, was very common. A radial tilt deformity of > 5° was observed in only 45% of cases. Although the range of wrist flexion and extension showed a correlation with dorsal tilt deformity, the range of forearm pronation and supination did not correlate with distal radius deformities.

scholarly journals Dorsal Bridge Plating versus External Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 177-184
Author(s):  
William L. Wang ◽  
Asif M. Ilyas
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Hardware Failure ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bridge Plating

Abstract Background External fixation and dorsal bridge plating are wrist spanning fixation options for distal radius fractures; however, their comparative effectiveness is not well understood. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes between these two techniques. Materials and Methods A PubMed database query of all distal radius fracture cases managed with spanning external fixation or dorsal bridge plating was performed. A total of 28 articles met inclusion criteria, yielding 895 patients for data extraction and comparative analysis. Results Dorsal bridge plating demonstrated lower rates of infection (2 vs. 10%, p = 0.05) and complex regional pain syndrome (1 vs. 4%, p = 0.04) but higher rates of hardware failure (4 vs. 1%, p = 0.026). Bridge plating also demonstrated higher rates of excellent/good ratings under the Gartland and Werley outcome score (91 vs. 83%, p = 0.016). There was no significant difference in DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Wrist) scores, radiographic parameters, or unplanned reoperations between the two spanning fixation options. Conclusion Bridge plating and external fixation both appear to be comparable for spanning fixation constructs for distal radius fractures, but with bridge plating having a potentially lower complication profile.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document